So what did you do, jaxie? Did you call the Corps of Eng and ask them if a facility
that the did not build nor do they maintain is a tidegate or a lock? (Actually, it
is both.)



"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
yeah, me and the CG and Corps of Eng.

Are you still claiming the CG and Corps support your nonsense?


no. I got that nonsense from them, not them from me.


JAX finally admits his post are nonsense!

Hey jaxie. I just called the lock tender on the Shinnecock Canal. I asked him if the
locks were a tidegate or locks. He said "We have both." I asked again, are the
locks regular locks like on the Erie Canal, with a gate at both ends, that raises and
lowers the boats? And he said "Absolutely."

I guess that settles it. You were probably never there, and probably don't know the
difference between a gate and a lock. You never talked to the CG, or the Corps. In
fact, you just made this all up, didn't you?

BTW, anyone who wants to verify this could track down the phone number - I won't
publish it here, but he's a Suffolk County employee.




"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
Are you still claiming the CG and Corps support your nonsense?

no. I got that nonsense from them, not them from me.

Is there a way I could subscribe to this news net without JACKASS (excuse
me, I meant JAXAshby)-- It would cut down on the amount of time required to
download an update by 50%, and cut down on the bullcrap by 90%.
"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
shen finally says he is wrong, but he chews on his words doing it thusly:

right, yo-yo. whatever was either -- let alone both -- the Coast Guard
or
the
Army Corps of Engineers thinking? obviously you need to inform each and
both
that they are to never again make any statements without first getting
your
express permission.

Now Doodles, if "you" wish to believe that the CG or Corp is the final
"word"
in all things waterborne, please feel free to do so.
All you have to do, is realize that not all of us are so limited in our
thinking, as yourself.

Shen

Sorry. You have to make a contribution to a newsgroup before you have the right to
complain. If this is all you have to offer, you're no better than jaxie.

On the other hand, if you have some interesting experience to talk about, or even some
questions to ask, please feel free to post.


"Pete Tatro" wrote in message
...
Is there a way I could subscribe to this news net without JACKASS (excuse
me, I meant JAXAshby)-- It would cut down on the amount of time required to
download an update by 50%, and cut down on the bullcrap by 90%.

nah, no need to call them. they have an informative website.

From: "Jeff Morris"
Date: 10/20/2004 9:38 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

So what did you do, jaxie? Did you call the Corps of Eng and ask them if a
facility
that the did not build nor do they maintain is a tidegate or a lock?
(Actually, it
is both.)



"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
yeah, me and the CG and Corps of Eng.

Are you still claiming the CG and Corps support your nonsense?


no. I got that nonsense from them, not them from me.


JAX finally admits his post are nonsense!

there you have it, folks. jeffies *claims* to have called some toothless,
bottom of the economic scrap heap civil servant in the employ of Essex County
NY for **THE** answer as to what constitutes a lock.

From: "Jeff Morris"
Date: 10/20/2004 3:36 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

Hey jaxie. I just called the lock tender on the Shinnecock Canal. I asked
him if the
locks were a tidegate or locks. He said "We have both." I asked again,
are the
locks regular locks like on the Erie Canal, with a gate at both ends, that
raises and
lowers the boats? And he said "Absolutely."

I guess that settles it. You were probably never there, and probably don't
know the
difference between a gate and a lock. You never talked to the CG, or the
Corps. In
fact, you just made this all up, didn't you?

BTW, anyone who wants to verify this could track down the phone number - I
won't
publish it here, but he's a Suffolk County employee.




"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
Are you still claiming the CG and Corps support your nonsense?

no. I got that nonsense from them, not them from me.

peetro, try this instead for all your information on everything in the world:

www.yoyo.com

From: "Pete Tatro"
Date: 10/20/2004 5:04 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

Is there a way I could subscribe to this news net without JACKASS (excuse
me, I meant JAXAshby)-- It would cut down on the amount of time required to
download an update by 50%, and cut down on the bullcrap by 90%.
"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
shen finally says he is wrong, but he chews on his words doing it thusly:

right, yo-yo. whatever was either -- let alone both -- the Coast Guard
or
the
Army Corps of Engineers thinking? obviously you need to inform each and
both
that they are to never again make any statements without first getting
your
express permission.

Now Doodles, if "you" wish to believe that the CG or Corp is the final
"word"
in all things waterborne, please feel free to do so.
All you have to do, is realize that not all of us are so limited in our
thinking, as yourself.

Shen

jeffies, *you* don't qualify by *your* definition, unless of course you define
"contribution" such that is includes utter bullsquat.

[did you pass this squat below by your wife _before_ you posted it, or did she
clout you about the ears once again?]

From: "Jeff Morris"
Date: 10/20/2004 5:34 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

Sorry. You have to make a contribution to a newsgroup before you have the
right to
complain. If this is all you have to offer, you're no better than jaxie.

On the other hand, if you have some interesting experience to talk about, or
even some
questions to ask, please feel free to post.


"Pete Tatro" wrote in message
...
Is there a way I could subscribe to this news net without JACKASS (excuse
me, I meant JAXAshby)-- It would cut down on the amount of time required to
download an update by 50%, and cut down on the bullcrap by 90%.

JAXAshby wrote:
because, I wish to show just how stew ped *you* [and, jeffies] are, hoary. you
have no value in any discussion nautical.
..

Why are you still raving about this, jaxass?

All you ever show, fellow, is that you are an argumentative ass. You've
been pushing this nonsense about Shinnecock for a year. You started some
nonsense about anchor rodes in rec.boats and got your butt handed to you
on a plastic platter. You've got a crappy little clapped-out sailbote
that I wouldn't take offshore, and you act as if you were a world-class
sailor. And, of course, there's always that photo of yourself you posted
on a webpage to attract trans-sexuals.



--

hoary, don't argue with me. a.) argue with the CG and/or the Corps of Eng
about what a lock is, and b.) argue with the physicists about anchors rodes.

what a fumb duck you are, hoary.

From: Harry Krause
Date: 10/20/2004 9:51 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

JAXAshby wrote:
because, I wish to show just how stew ped *you* [and, jeffies] are, hoary.
you
have no value in any discussion nautical.
.

Why are you still raving about this, jaxass?

All you ever show, fellow, is that you are an argumentative ass. You've
been pushing this nonsense about Shinnecock for a year. You started some
nonsense about anchor rodes in rec.boats and got your butt handed to you
on a plastic platter. You've got a crappy little clapped-out sailbote
that I wouldn't take offshore, and you act as if you were a world-class
sailor. And, of course, there's always that photo of yourself you posted
on a webpage to attract trans-sexuals.



--