shen finally says he is wrong, but he chews on his words doing it thusly:

right, yo-yo. whatever was either -- let alone both -- the Coast Guard or
the
Army Corps of Engineers thinking? obviously you need to inform each and
both
that they are to never again make any statements without first getting your
express permission.

Now Doodles, if "you" wish to believe that the CG or Corp is the final "word"
in all things waterborne, please feel free to do so.
All you have to do, is realize that not all of us are so limited in our
thinking, as yourself.

Shen

shen shows just how miserable is his understanding of tidal flows thusly:

okay squathead, you call 'em the way you see 'em and I will call them the
way
both the CG and Corps of Engineers see them.

but what do they know?


Exactly. What "DO" they know?
BTW, let's assume that the canal/lock in question runs N-S. Now, if the tidal
current is flowing at a good rate through the canal/lock from N-S, could we
assume that the water to the South is at a lower level than the water to the
North?
If you should answer this in the affirmative, then we can say that the lock
is
used to raise or lower (even if only inches) vessels, though the main reason
may have more to do with overcoming the dangers of a strong current, and get
vessels, safely through the area........ just a thought.

Shen

Subject: Shinnecock Inlet
From: (JAXAshby)


shen finally says he is wrong, but he chews on his words doing it thusly:


LOL How you come up with that conclusion is beyond me...... course, it helps
explain......nah, your conclusions are beyond explanation.
Toodles Doodles.

ubject: Shinnecock Inlet
From: (JAXAshby)


shen shows just how miserable is his understanding of tidal flows thusly:

Thought that would be too complicated for your limited reasoning abilities.

Toodles, again, Doodles.

Shen

From: (Shen44)
Date: 10/19/2004 10:26 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

LOL How you come up with any conclusion is beyond me......

we know that, there is no reason to tell us a frickin' gin.

of course. Me and the USCG and the USA C of Eng.

From: (Shen44)
Date: 10/19/2004 10:31 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

ubject: Shinnecock Inlet
From: (JAXAshby)


shen shows just how miserable is his understanding of tidal flows thusly:

Thought that would be too complicated for your limited reasoning abilities.

Toodles, again, Doodles.

Shen

Are you still claiming the CG and Corps support your nonsense? Why haven't you been
able to provide a link? Is it because you made it up?


"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
of course. Me and the USCG and the USA C of Eng.

From: (Shen44)
Date: 10/19/2004 10:31 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

ubject: Shinnecock Inlet
From: (JAXAshby)


shen shows just how miserable is his understanding of tidal flows thusly:

Thought that would be too complicated for your limited reasoning abilities.

Toodles, again, Doodles.

Shen

Are you still claiming the CG and Corps support your nonsense?

no. I got that nonsense from them, not them from me.

JAXAshby wrote:
Are you still claiming the CG and Corps support your nonsense?


no. I got that nonsense from them, not them from me.


JAX finally admits his post are nonsense!

yeah, me and the CG and Corps of Eng.

Are you still claiming the CG and Corps support your nonsense?


no. I got that nonsense from them, not them from me.


JAX finally admits his post are nonsense!