Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Doug Dotson" wrote in message
... I have to agree that the CQR is more difficult to set and there is definitely a technique to setting it. I saw far more CQRs in the Bahamas than any other anchor. Our 45 poundes saved our cookies when the Spade wouldn;t set. You can;t just drop it and back down on is though. Our Spade just flopped over on its side and dragged and wasn;t heavy enough to get a bite. One lesson learned in our Nonsuch, which refused to back in a straight line anyways, was to just wait for a few minutes, and then very gradually add backing power. This certainly works for the Delta which almost always sets within a few feet of where it lands; I've heard that CQR owners use the same tecnique and I'd guess it also works for the Spade. A Fortress (or Danforth) however, shouldn't need this as long as there is enough scope - 2:1 is too little, 3:1 is better - its very satisfying to feel it dig in. Of course, more scope should be let out in most situations. I'm planning on getting a 45 lb Fortress as a sand/grass anchor and also to use as a storm anchor. 45 pounds? Do you mean the FX85 which is 47 pounds? This a monster (the shank is 51"), which I wouldn't mind having as a storm anchor, but it seems a bit large to keep on deck. How big is your boat? BTW, I've had Danforth style anchors tear out some weeds, then flop over and refuse to reset because the weed is holding the flukes up. THis is why I wouldn't use a Fortress as the only anchor overnight, except possibly in soft mud. Perhaps the FX85 is big enough to avoid this problem, but how can you really be sure? DOug s/v Callista |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Another Anchor Question.... | ASA | |||
Fisherman's anchor | General | |||
land anchor vs fluke anchor for anchors set directly on beach | Cruising | |||
Anchor rollers | General | |||
Anchor lights | Cruising |