Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm going to re-power soon and am also going to get new shaft and prop.
It seems that in my boat class (Westsail 32), some people are going to folding props to help speed under sail. I'm for increased speed, but also want reliability. My current bronze propeller is pitted and old. Every time I turn around and look at it, it is full of sea growth. That makes me think I'm getting poor performance. So, I'm for an improvement, but I am unsure of what kind. Any opinions from boaters that have encountered this situation would be appreciated. Thanks, Mark , "Belle" Westsail 32 |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
You will definitely will see a decent speed improvement under sail with a
folding prop. Depending on the prop you buy, you should see better power/control in reverse too. They are very reliable now, so I don't think that is a down side. The biggest downside is their cost. I have a Max prop and think it great. Paul www.jcruiser.org "MLapla4120" wrote in message ... I'm going to re-power soon and am also going to get new shaft and prop. It seems that in my boat class (Westsail 32), some people are going to folding props to help speed under sail. I'm for increased speed, but also want reliability. My current bronze propeller is pitted and old. Every time I turn around and look at it, it is full of sea growth. That makes me think I'm getting poor performance. So, I'm for an improvement, but I am unsure of what kind. Any opinions from boaters that have encountered this situation would be appreciated. Thanks, Mark , "Belle" Westsail 32 |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
You will definitely will see a decent speed improvement under sail with a
folding prop no, you won't. folding props only hve value for racing boats, where 2 seconds a mile means the difference between 2nd place and 6th. According to MIT tests, a folding prop means a savings of a mere 170 pounds drag at 5 knots (or 40 pounds drag at 2-1/2 knots, or 10 pounds drag at 1-1/4 knots) over a --------- three ------------ blade prop. ***Much*** less with compared to a two-blade, and even less compared to a two-blade rotated verticle behind the keel. Wanna guess just how much powered is required to pull 170# at 5 knots? |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Its real easy to test, as I can get my folding 3 blade to stay open. I can
see the boat speed, then have it fold and measure the speed. It is significant. If the MIT tests say otherwise then they are not testing reality - wanna guess what errors they made in the test or you in the interpretation??. Paul www.jcruiser.org "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... You will definitely will see a decent speed improvement under sail with a folding prop no, you won't. folding props only hve value for racing boats, where 2 seconds a mile means the difference between 2nd place and 6th. According to MIT tests, a folding prop means a savings of a mere 170 pounds drag at 5 knots (or 40 pounds drag at 2-1/2 knots, or 10 pounds drag at 1-1/4 knots) over a --------- three ------------ blade prop. ***Much*** less with compared to a two-blade, and even less compared to a two-blade rotated verticle behind the keel. Wanna guess just how much powered is required to pull 170# at 5 knots? |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Assuming you're talking about a sailboat, then I'm currently taking a
look at www.kiwiprops.co.nz which look neat, and the testimonials read well. But I've no personal experience. I'd like to hear from anyone who has |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Its real easy to test, as I can get my folding 3 blade to stay open. I can
see the boat speed, then have it fold and measure the speed. It is significant. If the MIT tests say otherwise then they are not testing reality - wanna guess what errors they made in the test or you in the interpretation??. sure, paul lever knows more testing props than MIT. good on ya, paul. Paul www.jcruiser.org "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... You will definitely will see a decent speed improvement under sail with a folding prop no, you won't. folding props only hve value for racing boats, where 2 seconds a mile means the difference between 2nd place and 6th. According to MIT tests, a folding prop means a savings of a mere 170 pounds drag at 5 knots (or 40 pounds drag at 2-1/2 knots, or 10 pounds drag at 1-1/4 knots) over a --------- three ------------ blade prop. ***Much*** less with compared to a two-blade, and even less compared to a two-blade rotated verticle behind the keel. Wanna guess just how much powered is required to pull 170# at 5 knots? |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
bite me.
"JAXAshby" wrote in message ... Its real easy to test, as I can get my folding 3 blade to stay open. I can see the boat speed, then have it fold and measure the speed. It is significant. If the MIT tests say otherwise then they are not testing reality - wanna guess what errors they made in the test or you in the interpretation??. sure, paul lever knows more testing props than MIT. good on ya, paul. Paul www.jcruiser.org "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... You will definitely will see a decent speed improvement under sail with a folding prop no, you won't. folding props only hve value for racing boats, where 2 seconds a mile means the difference between 2nd place and 6th. According to MIT tests, a folding prop means a savings of a mere 170 pounds drag at 5 knots (or 40 pounds drag at 2-1/2 knots, or 10 pounds drag at 1-1/4 knots) over a --------- three ------------ blade prop. ***Much*** less with compared to a two-blade, and even less compared to a two-blade rotated verticle behind the keel. Wanna guess just how much powered is required to pull 170# at 5 knots? |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
As usual, Jax has taken some good data and come up with a completely
erroneous conclusion. The drag from the prop increases as the square of the speed. Using the MIT figures, at 8 knots you are looking at something over 430 pounds of drag. For a medium displacement boat that can add up to 15% or more in improved performance. For a 40' LWL cruiser that means an extra 20 to 25 miles a day. Paul L wrote: Its real easy to test, as I can get my folding 3 blade to stay open. I can see the boat speed, then have it fold and measure the speed. It is significant. If the MIT tests say otherwise then they are not testing reality - wanna guess what errors they made in the test or you in the interpretation??. Paul www.jcruiser.org "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... You will definitely will see a decent speed improvement under sail with a folding prop no, you won't. folding props only hve value for racing boats, where 2 seconds a mile means the difference between 2nd place and 6th. According to MIT tests, a folding prop means a savings of a mere 170 pounds drag at 5 knots (or 40 pounds drag at 2-1/2 knots, or 10 pounds drag at 1-1/4 knots) over a --------- three ------------ blade prop. ***Much*** less with compared to a two-blade, and even less compared to a two-blade rotated verticle behind the keel. Wanna guess just how much powered is required to pull 170# at 5 knots? -- Glenn Ashmore I'm building a 45' cutter in strip/composite. Watch my progress (or lack there of) at: http://www.rutuonline.com Shameless Commercial Division: http://www.spade-anchor-us.com |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
glenn, just where is it you found you "facts" that "a medium displacement boat"
has 2,866.66666666 pounds of drag? btw, "a medium displacement boat" that does 8 knots continuous is rare indeed. btw-2: that 15% that is so often bandied about comes from a marketing department at a folding prop company. btw-3: ------ folding -------- three blade props are rare indeed. btw-4: the subject of this thread is folding, not feathering (a hugely more expensive breed of cat) btw-5, the 170# figures from MIT were for --------- three --------- bladed props. Two bladed props have much less drag, and two bladed props aligned behind the keel have even less. btw-6, when the winds are sufficient to drive ""a medium displacement boat" at 8 knots, you have more than enough wind to drive the boat at 8 knots with a bucket dragging behind just by putting up anothe 20 square feet of sail. btw-7: most folding/feathering props are promoted by their marketers as an improvement in **LITE** airs, not heavy. As usual, Jax has taken some good data and come up with a completely erroneous conclusion. The drag from the prop increases as the square of the speed. Using the MIT figures, at 8 knots you are looking at something over 430 pounds of drag. For a medium displacement boat that can add up to 15% or more in improved performance. For a 40' LWL cruiser that means an extra 20 to 25 miles a day. Paul L wrote: Its real easy to test, as I can get my folding 3 blade to stay open. I can see the boat speed, then have it fold and measure the speed. It is significant. If the MIT tests say otherwise then they are not testing reality - wanna guess what errors they made in the test or you in the interpretation??. Paul www.jcruiser.org "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... You will definitely will see a decent speed improvement under sail with a folding prop no, you won't. folding props only hve value for racing boats, where 2 seconds a mile means the difference between 2nd place and 6th. According to MIT tests, a folding prop means a savings of a mere 170 pounds drag at 5 knots (or 40 pounds drag at 2-1/2 knots, or 10 pounds drag at 1-1/4 knots) over a --------- three ------------ blade prop. ***Much*** less with compared to a two-blade, and even less compared to a two-blade rotated verticle behind the keel. Wanna guess just how much powered is required to pull 170# at 5 knots? -- Glenn Ashmore I'm building a 45' cutter in strip/composite. Watch my progress (or lack there of) at: http://www.rutuonline.com Shameless Commercial Division: http://www.spade-anchor-us.com |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
There is another J36 at our marina, which has a fixed prop. It is
astonishingly slower than our boat. I know the sails aren't identical, but we have caught them going to windward when we didn't even have a jib hoisted. Their bottom is cleaner or as clean.On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 05:02:39 GMT, "Paul L" wrote: Its real easy to test, as I can get my folding 3 blade to stay open. I can see the boat speed, then have it fold and measure the speed. It is significant. If the MIT tests say otherwise then they are not testing reality - wanna guess what errors they made in the test or you in the interpretation??. Paul www.jcruiser.org "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... You will definitely will see a decent speed improvement under sail with a folding prop no, you won't. folding props only hve value for racing boats, where 2 seconds a mile means the difference between 2nd place and 6th. According to MIT tests, a folding prop means a savings of a mere 170 pounds drag at 5 knots (or 40 pounds drag at 2-1/2 knots, or 10 pounds drag at 1-1/4 knots) over a --------- three ------------ blade prop. ***Much*** less with compared to a two-blade, and even less compared to a two-blade rotated verticle behind the keel. Wanna guess just how much powered is required to pull 170# at 5 knots? Rodney Myrvaagnes NYC We have achieved faith-based science, faith-based economics, faith-based law enforcement, and faith-based missile defense. What's next? Faith-based air traffic control? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Rigid vang...pros & cons? | General |