Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
KLC Lewis wrote:
"Bruce in Bangkok" wrote in message ... On Sun, 31 May 2009 19:54:24 -0700, "Capt. JG" wrote: "Larry" wrote in message ... http://www.kitco.com/charts/popup/au0060lnb_.html This week, we'll probably pass the $1000/oz magic mark......again. Printing fake money has come home to roost and we're all going to get screwed for what the bankers have done to save their own asses.... Watch this chart very carefully: http://www.kitco.com/images/live/gold.gif Scary stuff.....for a bankrupt country. One can easily argue that gold is more fake than currency. Currency is a reflection of relative value and highly liquid, has relatively predictable purchasing power even in times of moderate inflation or deflation, and is ubiquitous and well-understood; whereas, gold is just a shiny metal that hardly anyone uses to acquire anything any more. You can make stuff out of gold, but you can also make stuff out of wood, which for survivalists would be a whole lot more practical. On the other hand we have the old folks adage "don't take any wooden nickels". Cheers, Bruce in Bangkok (bruceinbangkokatgmaildotcom) And "Not worth a Continental." Fiat currency always becomes worthless over time, unless it is revalued, which is the issuing bank's version of a reverse split. "You used to have $1,000.000 which was able to be traded for one loaf of bread. We have exchanged that $1,000.000 for 50 cents, which will still buy the same loaf of bread. Have a nice day." Examples throughout history are too numerous to mention, but include Germany, Yugoslavia, and even the United States of America. I used to have a collection of one hundred dollar bills. You know the type... Picture of Ben Franklin on the front... Guaranteed to make friends anywhere on the planet! I was trying to collect the whole set (save the $100 bills). I had a collection almost an inch thick! They were sorta fun to play with. Then I bought a boat. Now I have a boat. And I don't have to worry about what $100 bills are worth any more. A boat is supposed to be a depreciating asset. But I'm not so sure at the moment. If the value of money craters, the boat will be worth a lot more that the stack of $100 bills it took to buy it. If the price of new boats causes new boat sales to sink, the companies that make boats could fail. That also would drive up the value of used (experienced?) boats. All in all, I'm enjoying the boat a lot more than the little stack of $100 bills. Richard |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 00:16:06 -0500, cavelamb
wrote: KLC Lewis wrote: "Bruce in Bangkok" wrote in message ... On Sun, 31 May 2009 19:54:24 -0700, "Capt. JG" wrote: "Larry" wrote in message ... http://www.kitco.com/charts/popup/au0060lnb_.html This week, we'll probably pass the $1000/oz magic mark......again. Printing fake money has come home to roost and we're all going to get screwed for what the bankers have done to save their own asses.... Watch this chart very carefully: http://www.kitco.com/images/live/gold.gif Scary stuff.....for a bankrupt country. One can easily argue that gold is more fake than currency. Currency is a reflection of relative value and highly liquid, has relatively predictable purchasing power even in times of moderate inflation or deflation, and is ubiquitous and well-understood; whereas, gold is just a shiny metal that hardly anyone uses to acquire anything any more. You can make stuff out of gold, but you can also make stuff out of wood, which for survivalists would be a whole lot more practical. On the other hand we have the old folks adage "don't take any wooden nickels". Cheers, Bruce in Bangkok (bruceinbangkokatgmaildotcom) And "Not worth a Continental." Fiat currency always becomes worthless over time, unless it is revalued, which is the issuing bank's version of a reverse split. "You used to have $1,000.000 which was able to be traded for one loaf of bread. We have exchanged that $1,000.000 for 50 cents, which will still buy the same loaf of bread. Have a nice day." Examples throughout history are too numerous to mention, but include Germany, Yugoslavia, and even the United States of America. I used to have a collection of one hundred dollar bills. You know the type... Picture of Ben Franklin on the front... Guaranteed to make friends anywhere on the planet! I was trying to collect the whole set (save the $100 bills). I had a collection almost an inch thick! They were sorta fun to play with. Then I bought a boat. Now I have a boat. And I don't have to worry about what $100 bills are worth any more. A boat is supposed to be a depreciating asset. But I'm not so sure at the moment. If the value of money craters, the boat will be worth a lot more that the stack of $100 bills it took to buy it. If the price of new boats causes new boat sales to sink, the companies that make boats could fail. That also would drive up the value of used (experienced?) boats. All in all, I'm enjoying the boat a lot more than the little stack of $100 bills. Richard I've got my sail boat for sale and have asked the broker, who is one of the larger ones in Asia, how boats are selling. He tells me that over all sales haven't fallen much although some sellers have dropped prices. So, for the moment , probably, boats are worth about what they were a year or so ago. and, boating costs here, yard costs, marina costs, etc., haven't dropped any. With all the complaining - vehicle sales off 47%, exports dropping, etc., you'd think somebody would be lowering prices but they don't seem to be coming down at all, in fact, living costs, food, etc., have gone up. Even dunkin donuts just raised their prices :-( Was it you that was asking about the small diesel a while ago? How did that work out? Cheers, Bruce in Bangkok (bruceinbangkokatgmaildotcom) |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bruce in Bangkok wrote:
On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 00:16:06 -0500, cavelamb wrote: KLC Lewis wrote: "Bruce in Bangkok" wrote in message ... On Sun, 31 May 2009 19:54:24 -0700, "Capt. JG" wrote: "Larry" wrote in message ... http://www.kitco.com/charts/popup/au0060lnb_.html This week, we'll probably pass the $1000/oz magic mark......again. Printing fake money has come home to roost and we're all going to get screwed for what the bankers have done to save their own asses.... Watch this chart very carefully: http://www.kitco.com/images/live/gold.gif Scary stuff.....for a bankrupt country. One can easily argue that gold is more fake than currency. Currency is a reflection of relative value and highly liquid, has relatively predictable purchasing power even in times of moderate inflation or deflation, and is ubiquitous and well-understood; whereas, gold is just a shiny metal that hardly anyone uses to acquire anything any more. You can make stuff out of gold, but you can also make stuff out of wood, which for survivalists would be a whole lot more practical. On the other hand we have the old folks adage "don't take any wooden nickels". Cheers, Bruce in Bangkok (bruceinbangkokatgmaildotcom) And "Not worth a Continental." Fiat currency always becomes worthless over time, unless it is revalued, which is the issuing bank's version of a reverse split. "You used to have $1,000.000 which was able to be traded for one loaf of bread. We have exchanged that $1,000.000 for 50 cents, which will still buy the same loaf of bread. Have a nice day." Examples throughout history are too numerous to mention, but include Germany, Yugoslavia, and even the United States of America. I used to have a collection of one hundred dollar bills. You know the type... Picture of Ben Franklin on the front... Guaranteed to make friends anywhere on the planet! I was trying to collect the whole set (save the $100 bills). I had a collection almost an inch thick! They were sorta fun to play with. Then I bought a boat. Now I have a boat. And I don't have to worry about what $100 bills are worth any more. A boat is supposed to be a depreciating asset. But I'm not so sure at the moment. If the value of money craters, the boat will be worth a lot more that the stack of $100 bills it took to buy it. If the price of new boats causes new boat sales to sink, the companies that make boats could fail. That also would drive up the value of used (experienced?) boats. All in all, I'm enjoying the boat a lot more than the little stack of $100 bills. Richard I've got my sail boat for sale and have asked the broker, who is one of the larger ones in Asia, how boats are selling. He tells me that over all sales haven't fallen much although some sellers have dropped prices. So, for the moment , probably, boats are worth about what they were a year or so ago. and, boating costs here, yard costs, marina costs, etc., haven't dropped any. With all the complaining - vehicle sales off 47%, exports dropping, etc., you'd think somebody would be lowering prices but they don't seem to be coming down at all, in fact, living costs, food, etc., have gone up. Even dunkin donuts just raised their prices :-( Was it you that was asking about the small diesel a while ago? How did that work out? Cheers, Bruce in Bangkok (bruceinbangkokatgmaildotcom) For what it's worth, I'd rather live in my boat than in my car... Yes, I was curious about installing a diesel. It may make an interesting winter project some time, but I'm not in a big hurry. Once I get the boat down to the coast it will be more do-able. Up here it's all long distance. I've always had outboards (part of being too poor for really expensive toys) and I'm comfortable with that - as long as I can make the boat do what I want it to do. But to me that means being able to vector the thrust of the motor for directional control below steerage speeds. So while the most common advice was "keep 1 to 2 knots for steering" (which is not always possible - like when backing out of the slip?), my personal solution is to steer the motor. I've not attacked that in detail yet (need to find or make a tiller for it), but it turns out it's only a single bolt that locks the motor in place. Pulling that bolt frees the motor, bit THEN you need a way to lock it down again! (It just goes to show Rozann Rozadanna, if it's not one thing, it's always something else). http://www.home.earthlink.net/~capri26/index.htm |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 03:19:32 -0500, cavelamb
wrote: For what it's worth, I'd rather live in my boat than in my car... Unless you've got a BIG car :-) Yes, I was curious about installing a diesel. It may make an interesting winter project some time, but I'm not in a big hurry. Once I get the boat down to the coast it will be more do-able. Up here it's all long distance. I've always had outboards (part of being too poor for really expensive toys) and I'm comfortable with that - as long as I can make the boat do what I want it to do. But to me that means being able to vector the thrust of the motor for directional control below steerage speeds. So while the most common advice was "keep 1 to 2 knots for steering" (which is not always possible - like when backing out of the slip?), my personal solution is to steer the motor. A mate has a cat with a inboard engine with steerable leg (not sure what it is called) but you can apply thrust at 90 degrees to the hull while it is stationary. He really likes it for going in and out of marinas. If you do much cruising I suspect that you will wish you had an inboard though. Or a bigger fuel tank. An outboard surely burns a lot of fuel.. I hear people talking about being "sailors" and sailing, but most times you do have a schedule. Your wife is going to have a baby, the Boss expects you back, you want to see your sweety, something! So you make your plans and you are right on schedule and the last morning you wake up and..... No Wind.. and it's fifty miles to get home. I've not attacked that in detail yet (need to find or make a tiller for it), but it turns out it's only a single bolt that locks the motor in place. Pulling that bolt frees the motor, bit THEN you need a way to lock it down again! (It just goes to show Rozann Rozadanna, if it's not one thing, it's always something else). The real conniptions I have watched are the guys with the outboard that they can't reach easily trying to get in or out of a marina when the current is running strong, trying to juggle throttle, rudder, engine tiller, shift......... I've never tried it but I'd guess that with a few bits and pieces one could put a long tiller, with a shift and throttle, on an outboard that would reach the cockpit. If everything could be where you can lay your hand on it when you need to it would be much handier. Cheers, Bruce in Bangkok (bruceinbangkokatgmaildotcom) |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 19:13:35 +0700, Bruce in Bangkok
wrote: If you do much cruising I suspect that you will wish you had an inboard though. Or a bigger fuel tank. An outboard surely burns a lot of fuel.. Four cycle spark ignition specific consumption is the same inboard, sterndrive, outboard, long tail motor, sail drive, and airboat. Half a pound pre hour per horsepower. As much as double for fuel cooled racing mills. Getting the oxygen into the motor is the problem, not fuel. A lean mixture uses all the fuel. A rich mixture uses all the oxygen and gives maximum power and a wasteful fuel rich exhaust. Flames at the end of the exhaust system. With fewer than one set of jets per cylinder, carburators are inefficient, the reason why they have disappeared from autos. Two four barrels or four two barrels for a eight, a common arrangement for muscle cars. As it is wilth EFI, you get enough fuel in the exhaust to require a catalytic [spell checkers are grand] converter. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Casady wrote in
: On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 19:13:35 +0700, Bruce in Bangkok wrote: If you do much cruising I suspect that you will wish you had an inboard though. Or a bigger fuel tank. An outboard surely burns a lot of fuel.. Four cycle spark ignition specific consumption is the same inboard, sterndrive, outboard, long tail motor, sail drive, and airboat. Half a pound pre hour per horsepower. As much as double for fuel cooled racing mills. Getting the oxygen into the motor is the problem, not fuel. A lean mixture uses all the fuel. A rich mixture uses all the oxygen and gives maximum power and a wasteful fuel rich exhaust. Flames at the end of the exhaust system. With fewer than one set of jets per cylinder, carburators are inefficient, the reason why they have disappeared from autos. Two four barrels or four two barrels for a eight, a common arrangement for muscle cars. As it is wilth EFI, you get enough fuel in the exhaust to require a catalytic [spell checkers are grand] converter. My 250cc Honda Reflex scooter, water cooled, 4 cycle, 1 cyl, float carb, electronic ignition with electronic enrichment instead of choke/accelerator pump, variable V-belt drive (no transmission just one reduction gear in wheel) gets nearly 75 mpg if I stop driving it like I stole it. Its top speed is near 80 mph on level ground. Sustaining 75 mph on the interstate doesn't seem to bother it. Starting, even in winter at 25F, is instantaneous. Power is smooth, except for a little lag as the centrifugal weights, built inside the engine-mounted pulley, fly out around 40 MPH into medium ratio. Low ratio weights fly out at about 55 MPH. Engine speed is lower at 70 than it is at 60 because of the crazy variable V-belt drive. There is no "shifting". The centrifugal clutch is inside the engine and engages the V-belt pulley at 2200 RPM so you can idle disconnected (1400 rpm). 60 mph is about 7000 RPM. My old '60-something Honda 90cc bike ran 12,000 RPM for years. It's an amazing technology and dirt simple. A counter rotating weighted shaft in the engine makes it have zero vibration...very smooth/quiet. "How fast will it go?", is always their first question. I tell them, then follow up with, "It would go faster, but it's only running on one cylinder.", trying not to laugh. -- ----- Larry "You meet the nicest people on a Honda." - Honda ads, 1960s |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
rOn Mon, 01 Jun 2009 09:11:44 -0500, Richard Casady
wrote: On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 19:13:35 +0700, Bruce in Bangkok wrote: If you do much cruising I suspect that you will wish you had an inboard though. Or a bigger fuel tank. An outboard surely burns a lot of fuel.. Four cycle spark ignition specific consumption is the same inboard, sterndrive, outboard, long tail motor, sail drive, and airboat. Half a pound pre hour per horsepower. As much as double for fuel cooled racing mills. Getting the oxygen into the motor is the problem, not fuel. A lean mixture uses all the fuel. A rich mixture uses all the oxygen and gives maximum power and a wasteful fuel rich exhaust. Flames at the end of the exhaust system. With fewer than one set of jets per cylinder, carburators are inefficient, the reason why they have disappeared from autos. Two four barrels or four two barrels for a eight, a common arrangement for muscle cars. As it is wilth EFI, you get enough fuel in the exhaust to require a catalytic [spell checkers are grand] converter. Try running the usual small outboard in a barrel of clean water and see whether there isn't a bit of "slick" that forms on the surface of the water. Remember the big hurrah about not allowing 2 stroke outboards in lakes any more? Apparently 2 stroke outboards pass a bit of their fuel straight out the exhaust. Perhaps I should have specified 2-stroke outboard so I'll change that to "the two-stroke out board motors that I usually see on small sailboats as auxiliary power". Cheers, Bruce in Bangkok (bruceinbangkokatgmaildotcom) |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 07:13:40 +0700, Bruce in Bangkok
wrote: Perhaps I should have specified 2-stroke outboard so I'll change that to "the two-stroke out board motors that I usually see on small sailboats as auxiliary power". The Iowa schooner had a half horse Evinrude. Casady |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bruce in Bangkok wrote in
: Bruce in Bangkok (bruceinbangkokatgmaildotcom) Bruce, how much are Yanmar diesel outboards, 27 and 36hp, in Thailand? They had the prices jacked up so high in the USA they couldn't sell them. -- ----- Larry If a man goes way out into the woods all alone and says something, is it still wrong, even though no woman hears him? |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 01 Jun 09, Bruce in Bangkok wrote:
If everything could be where you can lay your hand on it when you need to it would be much handier. And a 30" - 35" shaft would be nice. Rick |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Lower Price Omega Constellation Diamond 18kt Rose Gold And Steel MiniLadies Watch 1368.71 | General | |||
Fuel Prices: Energy Use Rose 2.4 Percent in 2006 | General | |||
strains on catenaries | General |