Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stephen Trapani wrote:
wrote: One of the scariest, and most depressing things I've witnessed in this country was not long after 9/11, while working to build a facility to manufacture a new stockpile of smallpox vaccine for the government, was a news program where 2 liberal and 2 conservative national journalists were asked if it was OK to torture suspects *if* it *might* save American lives. All 4 said the equivalent of "hell yes!". I was sickened, saddened, and ashamed that we could, as a nation, be such gutless wimps that any action against the *other* (however defined) person is justifiable if there's even the slightest chance that it *might* save our butts. Pitiful. Yeah, who are we anyway? We claim to be a nation of laws, and we claim the moral high ground on these issues in our dealings with the rest of the world. Our lives are pitiful and worth nothing! Not even remotely implied by *any* argument presented here. Feel free to associate yourself with that remark if you like. How dare we threaten, scare or hurt someone who is trying to hurt and kill us?? We're not worth it!!!! We should protect murderous criminals instead of trying to save our butts!!! Murderous criminals who have not been even charged with a crime because of lack of evidence? Face it Stephen, no matter how enamored or torture you may be, it is illegal. Write your representatives and ask them to introduce legislation legalizing torture because it's the only way to keep you safe - see how successful you are. Keith |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Stephen Trapani" wrote in message news ![]() I believe in the moral high ground of doing what is right over and above any conflicting laws. Stephen So we should be "A Nation of Laws," unless those laws get in our way. Gotcha. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stephen Trapani wrote:
Then why don't we take reasonable measures to find out what we need to find out to stop these mass murderers! Sure... I got nothing against that. ..... The moral high ground includes and excludes many things, but one thing it includes is putting the well being of innocents ahead of the rights of mass murderers! Does this have anything to do with the issue at hand (tortureof prisoners)? The main point that you (and Dave, and other pro-torture people) have failed to make is that using torture actually accomplishes anything at all to prevent terrorists. Instead, you blame -us- for failing to use torture.... sorry, but terrorism is not my fault. You can take responsibility yourself if you like. But you can't just change the laws of our nation to suit your own moral perceptions (just like I can't). Furthermore, a group of people who -were- in a position to change the laws of our nation (or, more accurately, temporarily change a few and ignore a lot of others) agree with your moral perceptions.... specifically, that torturing prisoners is OK... and they don't really seem to have gotten such great results. DSK |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Way OT, but a "cold war" question. who were the "Pinkos?" | General | |||
"Jeffrey Boyd" is an anagram of "Midget Runt" in Japanese | ASA | |||
Battery with "Double the Power" or that takes up "Half the Space" | ASA | |||
Marinco 15 Amp "Marine Grade" 120VAC Receptical v. Leviton "terrestrial grade" | Boat Building |