Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:35:15 +0700, Bruce
wrote: The first problem comes when you attempt to locate proper heavy duty thimbles for the eyes. Damned hard to find. Next comes splicing the eyes in the cables. Again, if you can do it yourself and have the tools then go for it but if you are paying rigger's rates then get your wallet ready. Don't they have fittings that avoid the eyesplice, for stainless, but not for galvanized? That would do it even if stainless is six times as costly. I don't know about those compression sleeves. I remember in the fifties when Lands End sold nothing but sailboat stuff. They had sleeves and a tool that looked like a boltcutter. You can get 3/8 galv. for less than a buck a foot, breaking strength 14 000 lbs. My original reference was to anchor rode, and you can bet the ranch it wasn't stainless. You can brush grease over a wire filled winch drum and not get it on the rest of the boat. People who aren't useing it say it rusts. How come the zinc does not afford anodic protection to the steel. I drive by the neighors steel roof that has a third of the zinc gone, and no rust. No salt of course. My dad built the Iowa schooner [only been the one] and used galvanized. Whatever the local hardware store had. Casady Casady |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Richard Casady" wrote in message ... On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:35:15 +0700, Bruce wrote: The first problem comes when you attempt to locate proper heavy duty thimbles for the eyes. Damned hard to find. Next comes splicing the eyes in the cables. Again, if you can do it yourself and have the tools then go for it but if you are paying rigger's rates then get your wallet ready. Don't they have fittings that avoid the eyesplice, for stainless, but not for galvanized? That would do it even if stainless is six times as costly. I don't know about those compression sleeves. I remember in the fifties when Lands End sold nothing but sailboat stuff. They had sleeves and a tool that looked like a boltcutter. Yes, you can get compression fittings for galvanised wire as well as stainless. I have the gear to do my own splices by the Talurit system, which makes a very neat job with a 20 ton hydraulic press. The only difference is that you use aluminium ferrules for galvd. and copper ones for stainless. You can use these copper ferrules also for 1 x 19 wire if you don't want to go for swaging. In that case you use the next larger ferrule because 1 x 19 is much more resistant to compression than stranded. I have no experience of the systems worked by a sort of bolt cutter but would not be certain that the average person could produce enough force to compress a copper ferrule. I am about to fit new steering wires to my boat if it ever stops snowing. The old ones are terminated with Nico-press fittings but I have made Talurit splices on the new ones. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Edgar wrote:
I have no experience of the systems worked by a sort of bolt cutter but would not be certain that the average person could produce enough force to compress a copper ferrule. I am about to fit new steering wires to my boat if it ever stops snowing. The old ones are terminated with Nico-press fittings but I have made Talurit splices on the new ones. The Nicopress sleeves used to terminate galvanized aircraft control cables are made of copper, and the aircraft supply companies suggest zinc coated copper sleeves for stainless wire cable. Aluminum sleeves are often stocked in hardware stores - they do well with galvanized cable in the smaller diameters to 3/16 inch certainly. A sleeve set by a reworked bolt cutter needs a little care, because as you can easily imagine, it is quite possible to squeeze the diameter over the two cables far too skinny with this tool. That's what a gage is for. Grinding a bolt cutter's blades into two semicircles of the appropriate size works well. A sleeve (or ferrule) is squeezed three times, but NEVER at different angles, or at right angles to and over an existing squeeze. That about guarantees a slip, in a joint which will otherwise hold up over 90% of the rated breaking strain of the cable, often over 100%. Brian W |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Casady wrote:
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:35:15 +0700, Bruce wrote: The first problem comes when you attempt to locate proper heavy duty thimbles for the eyes. Damned hard to find. Next comes splicing the eyes in the cables. Again, if you can do it yourself and have the tools then go for it but if you are paying rigger's rates then get your wallet ready. Don't they have fittings that avoid the eyesplice, for stainless, but not for galvanized? That would do it even if stainless is six times as costly. I don't know about those compression sleeves. I remember in the fifties when Lands End sold nothing but sailboat stuff. They had sleeves and a tool that looked like a boltcutter. Poured socket terminals were the 'gold standard' for wire rope terminals for the greater part of the last century. The end of the rope is splayed in a controlled fashion and spelter (usually zinc alloy) is poured in to the terminal to form a solid wedge retaining the rope. Used to be the Navy standard for all wire terminals used for safety critical lifting. Works for galvanized and bare steel wire but I believe its not so good for stainless as the spelter doesn't wet the strands properly. Check out chapter 10 of: http://www.fastlift.co.za/pdf/CASAR%20-%20Wire%20rope%20end%20connections.pdf for instructions. It should be noted that unlike most other terminal systems, it does not de-rate the wire strength from 100% The tools and materials to do it are affordable and can be carried on board nearly any boat, the terminals are generally reusable and the galvanic compatibility is good, but you do need to be ashore or in a very sheltered location to work with molten spelter so some screw down compression fittings of any of the types suitable for galvanised wire would need to be stocked for any repairs under way. You can get 3/8 galv. for less than a buck a foot, breaking strength 14 000 lbs. My original reference was to anchor rode, and you can bet the ranch it wasn't stainless. You can brush grease over a wire filled winch drum and not get it on the rest of the boat. People who aren't useing it say it rusts. How come the zinc does not afford anodic protection to the steel. I drive by the neighors steel roof that has a third of the zinc gone, and no rust. No salt of course. My dad built the Iowa schooner [only been the one] and used galvanized. Whatever the local hardware store had. Casady Casady -- Ian Malcolm. London, ENGLAND. (NEWSGROUP REPLY PREFERRED) ianm[at]the[dash]malcolms[dot]freeserve[dot]co[dot]uk [at]=@, [dash]=- & [dot]=. *Warning* HTML & 32K emails -- NUL: |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:39:58 +0000, IanM
wrote: Richard Casady wrote: On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:35:15 +0700, Bruce wrote: The first problem comes when you attempt to locate proper heavy duty thimbles for the eyes. Damned hard to find. Next comes splicing the eyes in the cables. Again, if you can do it yourself and have the tools then go for it but if you are paying rigger's rates then get your wallet ready. Don't they have fittings that avoid the eyesplice, for stainless, but not for galvanized? That would do it even if stainless is six times as costly. I don't know about those compression sleeves. I remember in the fifties when Lands End sold nothing but sailboat stuff. They had sleeves and a tool that looked like a boltcutter. No, I was referring specifically to thimbles used in eye splices as I assumed that if one were complaining about costs one wouldn't want to buy swedge fittings as a non-stainless swedge fitting any where that it gets salt water on it probably has a shorter life then a properly made and served eye splice. Poured socket terminals were the 'gold standard' for wire rope terminals for the greater part of the last century. The end of the rope is splayed in a controlled fashion and spelter (usually zinc alloy) is poured in to the terminal to form a solid wedge retaining the rope. Used to be the Navy standard for all wire terminals used for safety critical lifting. Works for galvanized and bare steel wire but I believe its not so good for stainless as the spelter doesn't wet the strands properly. Check out chapter 10 of: http://www.fastlift.co.za/pdf/CASAR%20-%20Wire%20rope%20end%20connections.pdf Called "spelter sockets". There is a boat builder in Phuket that has proper bronze fittings cast and uses them from time to time. They used to be common around cranes but have largely been replaced by wedge sockets as the poured sockets take a bit of skill to make. Or perhaps more accurately, a bit of attention paid to the proper technique. for instructions. It should be noted that unlike most other terminal systems, it does not de-rate the wire strength from 100% I think you'll find that sta-lock type of fitting will test stronger then the cable. One test was 107% of rated cable strength. The tools and materials to do it are affordable and can be carried on board nearly any boat, the terminals are generally reusable and the galvanic compatibility is good, but you do need to be ashore or in a very sheltered location to work with molten spelter so some screw down compression fittings of any of the types suitable for galvanised wire would need to be stocked for any repairs under way. The spelter is just zinc in most cases. You can get 3/8 galv. for less than a buck a foot, breaking strength 14 000 lbs. My original reference was to anchor rode, and you can bet the ranch it wasn't stainless. You can brush grease over a wire filled winch drum and not get it on the rest of the boat. People who aren't useing it say it rusts. How come the zinc does not afford anodic protection to the steel. I drive by the neighors steel roof that has a third of the zinc gone, and no rust. No salt of course. My dad built the Iowa schooner [only been the one] and used galvanized. Whatever the local hardware store had. Your neighbor's roof wasn't immersed in salt water very often either. I doubt very much if galvanized wire will make a satisfactory anchor rode as I can't see how you can wash all the salt out of the stands so it will be rusting quietly away while on the drum. Casady Cheers, Bruce |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Your neighbor's roof wasn't immersed in salt water very often either. I doubt very much if galvanized wire will make a *satisfactory anchor rode as I can't see how you can wash all the salt out *of the stands so it will be rusting quietly away while on the drum. Casady Cheers, It makes a fine rode. jiminy what do folks think work boats carry? we dont have ss anchor's or rodes. the cost is prohibitive and the life span is not as good. SS does not like to work. the only advantage SS has over good galv is that it is not supposed to rust Ever (if you get the wrong formulation it sure will). that still does not off set the cost diffrance. SS is mostly Cash flash there are other things that work as well or better and are cheaper to boot. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Two meter troll wrote:
.... It makes a fine rode. jiminy what do folks think work boats carry? we don't have ss anchors or rodes. the cost is prohibitive and the life span is not as good. SS does not like to work. the only advantage SS has over good galv is that it is not supposed to rust Ever (if you get the wrong formulation it sure will). that still does not off set the cost difference. A useful little test for the stainless believers goes like this. Buy a bright shiny stainless bowl - like a surgical bowl or whatever. Put a cup of salt water in it, and leave it outside. Make sure it doesn't dry up. Check how long it takes to get a pinhole in the bowl. Try again with tap water - you should get the same result..... Brian W |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Brian Whatcott" wrote in message ... Two meter troll wrote: ... It makes a fine rode. jiminy what do folks think work boats carry? we don't have ss anchors or rodes. the cost is prohibitive and the life span is not as good. SS does not like to work. the only advantage SS has over good galv is that it is not supposed to rust Ever (if you get the wrong formulation it sure will). that still does not off set the cost difference. A useful little test for the stainless believers goes like this. Buy a bright shiny stainless bowl - like a surgical bowl or whatever. Put a cup of salt water in it, and leave it outside. Make sure it doesn't dry up. Check how long it takes to get a pinhole in the bowl. Try again with tap water - you should get the same result..... Brian W There are various grades of 'stainless' steel. The lower grades will be attracted by a magnet and will be likely to behave as you describe. The better grades are totally non-magnetic and are the only kind that should be on boat fittings. Take a small powerful magnet when you go to buy marine fittings as there is a lot of low-grade stuff on offer even if it is being sold for marine use. |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:26:40 +0100, "Edgar"
wrote: There are various grades of 'stainless' steel. The lower grades will be attracted by a magnet and will be likely to behave as you describe. The better grades are totally non-magnetic and are the only kind that should be on boat fittings. Take a small powerful magnet when you go to buy marine fittings as there is a lot of low-grade stuff on offer even if it is being sold for marine use. My refrigerator is all nonmagnetic stainless, cost three grand more than one with paint. Casady |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 18:50:35 -0600, Brian Whatcott
wrote: Two meter troll wrote: ... It makes a fine rode. jiminy what do folks think work boats carry? we don't have ss anchors or rodes. the cost is prohibitive and the life span is not as good. SS does not like to work. the only advantage SS has over good galv is that it is not supposed to rust Ever (if you get the wrong formulation it sure will). that still does not off set the cost difference. A useful little test for the stainless believers goes like this. Buy a bright shiny stainless bowl - like a surgical bowl or whatever. Put a cup of salt water in it, and leave it outside. Make sure it doesn't dry up. Check how long it takes to get a pinhole in the bowl. Try again with tap water - you should get the same result..... In that case, oxygen in the air can get at it to maintain the thin layer of chromium oxide that protects it in the manner aluminum oxide protecs aluminum. In the presence of salt and absence of oxygen, the chloride attacks it. It can also rust. I had a stainless bowl develop a pinhole in ordinary kitchen use. In the case of the so called stainless hose clamps, check them with a magnet at the store. The *******s often use plain carbon steel for the worm. Casady |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
stainless rigging wire - nick in wire | Cruising | |||
Wire Rigging for Ships | ASA | |||
Day Sailer One Mainsheet rigging, Halyards and Vang rigging | ASA | |||
Johnson 3 wire trim motor.. Red, Blue, green.. How to wire up? | General | |||
Reusable rigging wire terminals besides Stalok, Norseman? | Cruising |