Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.building,uk.rec.waterways,uk.rec.waterways.fens
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I posted this to a number of groups as I'm sure it's of interest to all.
I'm looking to purchase a CV coupling to go between the engine and the prop shaft. The two contenders seem to be either an Aquadrive or a PythonDrive. The PythonDrive is cheaper. Has anyone any experience with the PythonDrive. Will it handle movement from a soft mounted engine in up/ down, side/ side and fore/ aft directions. My engine is currently coupled to the prop shaft with a R&D flexible shaft coupling, this is basically a plastic plate that can flex slightly. Although the setup works, it's a bit primitive. At certain throttle settings the engine bounces about a bit and vibrations can be felt. Any info will be appreciated. Adrian Smith |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats.building,uk.rec.waterways,uk.rec.waterways.fens
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Adrian Smith wrote:
I posted this to a number of groups as I'm sure it's of interest to all. I'm looking to purchase a CV coupling to go between the engine and the prop shaft. The two contenders seem to be either an Aquadrive or a PythonDrive. snip Been there, done that. The AquaDrive works. Lew |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats.building,uk.rec.waterways,uk.rec.waterways.fens
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Lew Hodgett" wrote in message
ink.net... Adrian Smith wrote: I posted this to a number of groups as I'm sure it's of interest to all. I'm looking to purchase a CV coupling to go between the engine and the prop shaft. The two contenders seem to be either an Aquadrive or a PythonDrive. snip Been there, done that. The AquaDrive works. Lew Why did you choose the Aquadrive over the cheaper PythonDrive? Did you notice a big before/ after difference in both noise and vibration? Adrian Smith |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats.building,uk.rec.waterways,uk.rec.waterways.fens
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Adrian Smith wrote: I posted this to a number of groups as I'm sure it's of interest to all. I'm looking to purchase a CV coupling to go between the engine and the prop shaft. The two contenders seem to be either an Aquadrive or a PythonDrive. The PythonDrive is cheaper. Has anyone any experience with the PythonDrive. Will it handle movement from a soft mounted engine in up/ down, side/ side and fore/ aft directions. My engine is currently coupled to the prop shaft with a R&D flexible shaft coupling, this is basically a plastic plate that can flex slightly. Although the setup works, it's a bit primitive. At certain throttle settings the engine bounces about a bit and vibrations can be felt. Any info will be appreciated. Adrian Smith An alternative (cheaper) is the Centaflex coupling. I have had one of these for 15 years now and it has proven very effective in reducing both vibration and shaft wear. it allows much more misalignment (especially laterally) than the R&D disc. It is also much easier to fit than an Aquadrive. I could not fit an Aquadrive in my boat as there was insufficient space between gearbox and stern tube. The Centaflex coupling simply replaces the R&D with no modifications to shaft or hull. See http://www.centa.info/download/centaflex-m/de-en.pdf or try Google for a supplier. I think the starting price is around £100, depending on shaft size/engine HP. Good luck. Martyn Wills |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats.building,uk.rec.waterways,uk.rec.waterways.fens
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Adrian Smith wrote:
Why did you choose the Aquadrive over the cheaper PythonDrive? Did you notice a big before/ after difference in both noise and vibration? At the time AquaDrive was the only product available. There was a MAJOR reduction in both sound and vibration levels, at least 20dB each, and quit snapping mounting bolts like they were pretzels. Unless Python is at least 40% lower in cost, my choice is AquaDrive. Even then, doubt I'd by it. Lew |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats.building,uk.rec.waterways,uk.rec.waterways.fens
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Adrian Smith wrote:
Why did you choose the Aquadrive over the cheaper PythonDrive? Did you notice a big before/ after difference in both noise and vibration? Just noticed that you are probably in UK which may impact pricing. Here in US, a complete AquaDrive package, including engine mounts and adapters is probably less than $1,500 USD for most sail boat engines. Lew |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats.building,uk.rec.waterways,uk.rec.waterways.fens
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Lew Hodgett" wrote in message link.net... Adrian Smith wrote: Why did you choose the Aquadrive over the cheaper PythonDrive? Did you notice a big before/ after difference in both noise and vibration? At the time AquaDrive was the only product available. There was a MAJOR reduction in both sound and vibration levels, at least 20dB each, and quit snapping mounting bolts like they were pretzels. Unless Python is at least 40% lower in cost, my choice is AquaDrive. Even then, doubt I'd by it. Lew Is that because you have heard bad things about the PythonDrive? or that the AquaDrive is somehow superior? Adrian Smith |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats.building,uk.rec.waterways,uk.rec.waterways.fens
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I fitted a Centaflex AGM coupling - 2 rubber couplings and a 2.4mtr 5
inch diameter hollow shaft in between and it was considerably cheaper than Aquadrive - but not sure about Python drive. Are not Aqua and Python the same thing but Python is the US version?? |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats.building,uk.rec.waterways,uk.rec.waterways.fens
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Lew Hodgett" wrote in message
link.net... Adrian Smith wrote: Why did you choose the Aquadrive over the cheaper PythonDrive? Did you notice a big before/ after difference in both noise and vibration? Just noticed that you are probably in UK which may impact pricing. Here in US, a complete AquaDrive package, including engine mounts and adapters is probably less than $1,500 USD for most sail boat engines. Lew Don't suppose you can remember what model/size AquaDrive you have? PythonDrive for my engine (2.25litre 48BHP@2800) is approx 600USD (converted from GBP) Probably get one cheaper over there. For complete unit/ adapters but not engine mounts. From what I can see in the specs there is not much difference between an AquaDrive and a PythonDrive. Adrian Smith |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats.building,uk.rec.waterways,uk.rec.waterways.fens
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Adrian Smith wrote:
Is that because you have heard bad things about the PythonDrive? or that the AquaDrive is somehow superior? I know the AquaDrive works. I have no interest in trying to reinvent the wheel, especially for a one time purchase. Lew |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
SKF OK 90 coupling | Cruising | |||
Drive Saver/Spacer users sought | Cruising | |||
engine alignment | Cruising | |||
Coupling for split Rudder Post | Boat Building | |||
"get home" electric motor coupling to prop shaft? | Electronics |