"Ken Marino" wrote in message
m...
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:02:11 -0500, Dave wrote:

On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:39:33 -0500, Ken Marino
said:

I guess libs don't know the meaning of illegal or fraud when it applies
to their warped idea of equality.

That does call to mind a question I've been meaning to ask of those who
live in states with early voting, since I have no experience with such a
system. Is that early voting done by going to a polling place and
casting a vote, or is it like the Dems' proposed abolition of union
elections, where Cornelius the Acorn volunteer can come round to the
nursing home and "help" the voter fill out the ballot and make sure it
gets delivered?

Your close to right. The other reason is the main democratic voting
motto-- vote early and often.


I believe it was Jeb Bush who attempted to make a joke out of for his
Republican friends. So, basically, you're wrong again.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:47:49 -0700, "Capt. JG"
said:

Do you really expect
Mickey Mouse to show up and try to vote?

In Chicago? Of course. And I expect his ballot would be counted.


I think Bush voted absentee in Crawford, which fits on several levels.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:48:46 -0700, "Capt. JG"
said:

Try and keep up. We're talking about supposed registration fraud by acorn
vs. voter fraud by some republicans.

Correction: you were talking about registration fraud by Acorn until I
raised a separate question about the potential for early voting to be the
subject of similar fraud. You responded to my question with a pointer to
some web site having nothing to do with early voting. I take it that's a
subject you don't want to talk about. That's ok. But I do wish that if you
have nothing to add that's responsive to the question you'd simply refrain
from responding to the question.


Not my fault if you're having trouble keeping up.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Gregory Hall" wrote in message
...

"Ken Marino" wrote in message
m...
To a liberal/dem it doesn't matter

Isn't it interesting. The dem's want to give free healthcare and
education
to illegal immigrants. Is there no meaning in a libs mind to the word
illegal. And now the dems/libs say voter registration fraud (acorn) is
not
voter fraud. I guess libs don't know the meaning of illegal or fraud when
it applies to their warped idea of equality.


Liberals are proud of the fact that they have no moral standards. They say
that since conservatives claim to have moral standards then they need to
be held to a higher standard and should they fail to live up to those high
standards then they deserve to be persecuted. Bill Clinton never claimed
to be a faithful husband so having oral sex with Monica Lewinski in the
Oval office could be excused. Since he didn't believe oral sex with a
young intern was immoral he could even justify lying under oath at his
impeachment trial because it depended upon what the meaning of "is" is.
Barney Frank can run a prostitute ring out of his house and remain in good
standing in Congress but Mark Foley's emails to a former intern forced him
to resign. Wm. Jefferson, Democrat La was indicted on bribery charges yet
still serves in congress. And the list goes on.

This shows how liberals, since they don't claim to have any moral
standards, don't need to act morally. They don't even have to obey the law
because they don't claim to be law-abiding citizens. Hence, any immoral
behavior by liberals is to be accepted as par for the course.

People who vote for these criminals are themselves criminals, for the most
part, so they condone such behavior because they partake in such
activities themselves. This is your Democrat party.

--
Gregory Hall


Brilliant!

http://www.whitepages.com/search/Fin...ltime=s urvey

On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:47:49 -0700, Capt. JG wrote:

"Ken Marino" wrote in message
m...
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:09:39 -0700, Capt. JG wrote:

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:39:33 -0500, Ken Marino
said:

I guess libs don't know the meaning of illegal or fraud when it
applies to their warped idea of equality.

That does call to mind a question I've been meaning to ask of those
who live
in states with early voting, since I have no experience with such a
system.
Is that early voting done by going to a polling place and casting a
vote, or
is it like the Dems' proposed abolition of union elections, where
Cornelius
the Acorn volunteer can come round to the nursing home and "help" the
voter
fill out the ballot and make sure it gets delivered?


No, it's more like this...
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/...in649380.shtml

prosecute them and throw them in jail. But don't forget that the same
people saying that this is going on will tell you there is no reason to
investigate acorn.


It's been investigated and will continue to be investigated, but there's
a big difference in voter fraud and registration fraud. Do you really
expect Mickey Mouse to show up and try to vote?

No I don't, but I wouldn't put it past the dem's to try. The problem is,
voter fraud will not occur without voter registration fraud happening
first. Once registered, one only needs a phony I.D. to go in and vote.
When you know who the phony registration people are it doesn't take much
effort to get a phony I.D. You have to have the phony registration to get
it all started.

On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 20:56:49 -0600, Charles Momsen wrote:

http://www.whitepages.com/search/FindPerson?
extra_listing=mixed&form_mode=opt_b&post_back=1&fi rstname_begins_with=1&firstname=Mickey&name=Mouse& street=&city_zip=&state_id=&localtime=survey

And am I surprised? Only that there were so few.

On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 20:14:01 -0500, Dave wrote:

On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:48:46 -0700, "Capt. JG"
said:

Try and keep up. We're talking about supposed registration fraud by
acorn vs. voter fraud by some republicans.

Correction: you were talking about registration fraud by Acorn until I
raised a separate question about the potential for early voting to be
the subject of similar fraud. You responded to my question with a
pointer to some web site having nothing to do with early voting. I take
it that's a subject you don't want to talk about. That's ok. But I do
wish that if you have nothing to add that's responsive to the question
you'd simply refrain from responding to the question.

C'mon Dave. You know the best defense when you don't have one is to
change the subject. That tactic, and vulgarities are the #1 and #2 ways
libs get their points across.

"Ken Marino" wrote in message
m...
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:47:49 -0700, Capt. JG wrote:

"Ken Marino" wrote in message
m...
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:09:39 -0700, Capt. JG wrote:

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:39:33 -0500, Ken Marino
said:

I guess libs don't know the meaning of illegal or fraud when it
applies to their warped idea of equality.

That does call to mind a question I've been meaning to ask of those
who live
in states with early voting, since I have no experience with such a
system.
Is that early voting done by going to a polling place and casting a
vote, or
is it like the Dems' proposed abolition of union elections, where
Cornelius
the Acorn volunteer can come round to the nursing home and "help" the
voter
fill out the ballot and make sure it gets delivered?


No, it's more like this...
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/...in649380.shtml

prosecute them and throw them in jail. But don't forget that the same
people saying that this is going on will tell you there is no reason to
investigate acorn.


It's been investigated and will continue to be investigated, but there's
a big difference in voter fraud and registration fraud. Do you really
expect Mickey Mouse to show up and try to vote?

No I don't, but I wouldn't put it past the dem's to try. The problem is,
voter fraud will not occur without voter registration fraud happening
first. Once registered, one only needs a phony I.D. to go in and vote.
When you know who the phony registration people are it doesn't take much
effort to get a phony I.D. You have to have the phony registration to get
it all started.


Ah... so you think someone is going to risk 5 years in jail and a $10K fine
for one vote.... are you really this stupid or are you just pretending.
You've got to be pretending.

Read this stuff and get back to us when you've got something serious to
say...

http://truthaboutfraud.org/index.html


--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

On 29 Oct 2008 20:14:01 -0500, Dave wrote:

But I do wish that if you
have nothing to add that's responsive to the question you'd simply refrain
from responding to the question.

I take it from this advice to Jon, that you are announcing that you
have taken a vow to never post here again, for the same reason.