On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 20:14:01 -0500, Dave wrote:

On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:48:46 -0700, "Capt. JG"
said:

Try and keep up. We're talking about supposed registration fraud by
acorn vs. voter fraud by some republicans.

Correction: you were talking about registration fraud by Acorn until I
raised a separate question about the potential for early voting to be
the subject of similar fraud. You responded to my question with a
pointer to some web site having nothing to do with early voting. I take
it that's a subject you don't want to talk about. That's ok. But I do
wish that if you have nothing to add that's responsive to the question
you'd simply refrain from responding to the question.

C'mon Dave. You know the best defense when you don't have one is to
change the subject. That tactic, and vulgarities are the #1 and #2 ways
libs get their points across.

On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 22:21:45 -0500, Ken Marino
wrote:

On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 20:14:01 -0500, Dave wrote:

On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:48:46 -0700, "Capt. JG"
said:

Try and keep up. We're talking about supposed registration fraud by
acorn vs. voter fraud by some republicans.

Correction: you were talking about registration fraud by Acorn until I
raised a separate question about the potential for early voting to be
the subject of similar fraud. You responded to my question with a
pointer to some web site having nothing to do with early voting. I take
it that's a subject you don't want to talk about. That's ok. But I do
wish that if you have nothing to add that's responsive to the question
you'd simply refrain from responding to the question.

C'mon Dave. You know the best defense when you don't have one is to
change the subject. That tactic, and vulgarities are the #1 and #2 ways
libs get their points across.

Are you serious? Dave has a custom made pair of gloves he uses to hold
the goal posts as he runs around with them.

On 29 Oct 2008 20:14:01 -0500, Dave wrote:

But I do wish that if you
have nothing to add that's responsive to the question you'd simply refrain
from responding to the question.

I take it from this advice to Jon, that you are announcing that you
have taken a vow to never post here again, for the same reason.

On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:02:11 -0500, Dave wrote:

On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:39:33 -0500, Ken Marino
said:

I guess libs don't know the meaning of illegal or fraud when it applies
to their warped idea of equality.

That does call to mind a question I've been meaning to ask of those who
live in states with early voting, since I have no experience with such a
system. Is that early voting done by going to a polling place and
casting a vote, or is it like the Dems' proposed abolition of union
elections, where Cornelius the Acorn volunteer can come round to the
nursing home and "help" the voter fill out the ballot and make sure it
gets delivered?

Your close to right. The other reason is the main democratic voting
motto-- vote early and often.

"Ken Marino" wrote in message
m...
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:02:11 -0500, Dave wrote:

On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:39:33 -0500, Ken Marino
said:

I guess libs don't know the meaning of illegal or fraud when it applies
to their warped idea of equality.

That does call to mind a question I've been meaning to ask of those who
live in states with early voting, since I have no experience with such a
system. Is that early voting done by going to a polling place and
casting a vote, or is it like the Dems' proposed abolition of union
elections, where Cornelius the Acorn volunteer can come round to the
nursing home and "help" the voter fill out the ballot and make sure it
gets delivered?

Your close to right. The other reason is the main democratic voting
motto-- vote early and often.


I believe it was Jeb Bush who attempted to make a joke out of for his
Republican friends. So, basically, you're wrong again.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com