He says he wants to put a windfall profit tax on oil companies (he's taxing
your pension) and yet he says he'll cut taxes on business. He's full of
crap!

He wants to pull out of Iraq but says he'll invade Pakistan.

He wants to reduce dependence on foriegn oil but wants no more pumping of
American oil.

He wants to negotiate with terrorists but now his spokeswoman says they will
kill Bin Laden.

He wants the prisoners in Guantanemo to come under the rights of the
Constitution, but wants to suspends those rights for innocent American
citizens!

What a bag of ****!

God damn America!

On Jun 18, 6:08*am, "Kapt Krunch" wrote:
He says he wants to put a windfall profit tax on oil companies (he's taxing
your pension) and yet he says he'll cut taxes on business. He's full of
crap!

He wants to pull out of Iraq but says he'll invade Pakistan.

He wants to reduce dependence on foriegn oil but wants no more pumping of
American oil.

He wants to negotiate with terrorists but now his spokeswoman says they will
kill Bin Laden.

He wants the prisoners in Guantanemo to come under the rights of the
Constitution, but wants to suspends those rights for innocent American
citizens!

What a bag of ****!

God damn America!



And 8 years of bush administration did what for us??????
Even the mouths on the business shows (CNBC etc) say he has ****ed the
economy up. THe guy on the stock pick program Mad Money says bush is
bad for the economy.

When you hear stock brokers saying the economy is **** and blamming
bush somthing is very wrong.
Bob

"Bob" wrote in message
...
On Jun 18, 6:08 am, "Kapt Krunch" wrote:
bs removed

And 8 years of bush administration did what for us??????

Well, we've got a lovely war that's making us "safer" isn't it? Went after
Saddam while bin laden played with the taliban, currently in Pakistan, our
wonderful ally who allowed the proliferation of nukes to N. Korean and
Syria. Hey, and don't forget all the goodwill Bush ****ed away after the
Sept. attack. He's unrepentant, and who cares (according to Cheney) if 70%
of the voters think we're going in the wrong direction and the war was a
sack-o-**** lying misadventure.

Even the mouths on the business shows (CNBC etc) say he has ****ed the
economy up. THe guy on the stock pick program Mad Money says bush is
bad for the economy.

When you hear stock brokers saying the economy is **** and blamming
bush somthing is very wrong.
Bob

Now, the rightwing-nuts are going to go after "speculators" in the oil
commodities market. Why? Well, Congress (Democrats therein being complicit
I'm ashamed to admit) decided to de-regulate them in 2007, so even if they
are to blame (which is doubtful, since they generally smooth out
fluctuations), we have no way of knowing (something like 30% of commoditiy
trading is "regulated" by foreign exchanges). Of course, McCain, honorable
and reasonably intelligent, originally thought the obscene oil-co profits
should be taxed, but now has decided that Bushco's oil buddies will need to
help him win this coming November, so he's gone back on what he said.

I'm hoping that the two candidates will avoid the personal attacks (although
going after Michelle seems to be the ticket right now), actually talk about
the vast differences, avoid mis-quoting each other, and treat each other
with the respect each certainly deserve.

Rant on -
Kucinich, despite him being (tongue in cheek) a bit left of center, should
have his 35 articles of impeachment of Bush heard on the House floor, but
Pelosi said it's "off the table." Why? I recently asked Feinstein (one of
our Senators), and the response was "it wouldn't be good for the country."
Why? It's no wonder that people are moving toward independent status. It was
"good" for the country to impeach Clinton but not "good" for the country to
impeach Bush.
- Rant off

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Bob" wrote in message
...

And 8 years of bush administration did what for us??????
Even the mouths on the business shows (CNBC etc) say he has ****ed the
economy up. THe guy on the stock pick program Mad Money says bush is
bad for the economy.

When you hear stock brokers saying the economy is **** and blamming
bush somthing is very wrong.
Bob

Under the Bush administration America was only attacked for one day by Al
Qeada. It was repeatedly attacked under Clinton.

Under Bush, children in religious compounds in Texas were given back to
their parents rather than incinerated by flame throwing tanks under Clinton.

Laura Bush will not be launching her own presidential campaign or run for
senator in a state she never lived in.

Bush is not bad for the economy, the Congress is. How has the economy been
doing since we have a the Democrat majority in Congress?

If Bush is so bad why hasn't the Democrat Congress opposed him?

Do you believe the Democrats will tax us into prosperity?

The stock bubble occured on Clinton's watch.

The greed of the 80's was only exceeded by the greed of the 90's.

Obama is an empty suit. If you think Carters was bad, you ain't seen nothing
yet.

Elian Gonzalez is now a brainwashed commie bootlicker thanks to Clinton.

Stock brokers are salesmen. They are not economists. In fact, they sell
products that have a pretty good record of not satifying their customers.
Are the brokers going to blame themselvesor their product?

Under Bush:

Individual American's gas consumption has been reduced.
Eating of unhealthy food has been reduced.
Frivolous spending by individuals has been reduced.
More people own more houses under Bush than Clinton.
The tide is turning on obesity under Bush.

1/2 a billion dollars was donated to Democratic presidential candidates this
cycle. The money could have been used directly to help those without food,
housing or medical care. The 100 million $ Clintons donate only to their own
charity.

Bush is perhaps the worst Republican president ever. That still makes him
better than 80% of the Democrat presidents.

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 10:55:05 -0700, "Capt. JG"
said:

although
going after Michelle seems to be the ticket right now

What a joke. Obama puts his wife out front as his spokesperson, and then
screams "no fair" when people criticize what she's said. The edition of
the
Times I got this morning headlined its front page article something like
"Michelle Obama, under attack, looks for a new introduction" It should
have
said "Michelle Obama, foot in mouth, requests do-over."


So you think the left-wingnuts should attack Cindy McCain who has also been
"put out there"?

Is that the most important thing in this campaign... no, don't answer. It's
clear.

Vote McCain! Four more years for change!

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

What a bag of ****!

He has no experience. Sadly this glaring fact is escaping the hordes
enamored of the idea of voting a black man into office. Or, worse yet,
anything but a republican. Idiots, do they no remember the TRAIN WRECK
of Jimmy Carter's term in office? No experience, no infrastructure,
handed a precarious economy, oil woes. Unfortunately if they elect this
inexperienced candidate they'll doom us at to repeat that miserable time.

"Bill Kearney" wrote in message
t...

What a bag of ****!

He has no experience. Sadly this glaring fact is escaping the hordes
enamored of the idea of voting a black man into office. Or, worse yet,
anything but a republican. Idiots, do they no remember the TRAIN WRECK of
Jimmy Carter's term in office? No experience, no infrastructure, handed a
precarious economy, oil woes. Unfortunately if they elect this
inexperienced candidate they'll doom us at to repeat that miserable time.


He is only 1/2 black so the premise of voting a black man into office is
false.

He is a good man, too good to be a politician. He will be eaten alive in
office and America will suffer.

He is a good man, too good to be a politician. He will be eaten alive in
office and America will suffer.

Good, at what? Besides being a talking head? He's done nothing, run
nothing, sponsored no legislation, nadda, zip, zilch.

America will suffer if he's elected, whether or not he's 'eaten alive' isn't
the problem.

On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 08:08:28 -0600, "Kapt Krunch"
wrote:

He says he wants to put a windfall profit tax on oil companies (he's taxing
your pension) and yet he says he'll cut taxes on business. He's full of
crap!

No he's taxing the companies additional profits because they are
charging infllated prices based upon Saudi prices.
He's taxing their profiteering.

He wants to pull out of Iraq but says he'll invade Pakistan.

At least he's not lying about why...

He wants to reduce dependence on foriegn oil but wants no more pumping of
American oil.

He wants to reduce dependance by reducing comsumption of a finite
resource.

He wants to negotiate with terrorists but now his spokeswoman says they will
kill Bin Laden.

Ahhh now we get into gross distrortions..

He wants the prisoners in Guantanemo to come under the rights of the
Constitution, but wants to suspends those rights for innocent American
citizens!

More distortion

What a bag of ****!

You are indeed

God damn America!

It's your country.....If you don't like it leave!





OzOne of the three twins

I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace.

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 13:34:37 -0700, "Capt. JG"
said:

So you think the left-wingnuts should attack Cindy McCain who has also
been
"put out there"?

Seems to me that if Cindy McCain is put forward as John McCain's
spokesperson, then what she says is fair game for criticism. Sauce for the
goose, etc. I gather you reject such an even-handed approach.

Is that the most important thing in this campaign...

It wasn't I who raised the issue. It was you who was whining about
so-called
"attacks" on Michelle Obama.


Ah, so it's whining when I ask whether or not it's appropriate. Sounds like
you're taking the high road on this one!

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com