Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 20, 5:32 pm, OzOne wrote:
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 06:55:58 -0700, Joe scribbled thusly: Would it not have been smarter to cut the sail where it clears the rails? I see this all the time, sail all crunched up on the rails. IIRC even Robs head sail is cut this way. http://i196.photobucket.com/albums/a...35s5/Week1.jpg Even looks bad. Somethings got to go.. Joe And sacrifice sail when close hauled? I would think a properly shaped sail on all points would be the best all around. I can see the chaffing taking place clearly. Is that wrong OZ? Joe |
#2
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
OzOne wrote:
And sacrifice sail when close hauled? Everything's a compromise. Joe wrote: I would think a properly shaped sail on all points would be the best all around. Depends on what you mean by "best." A genoa with a high-cut foot to clear the bow pulpit & lifelines will be slower on alll points, less sail area and poor flow around the foot. Better visibility & less chafe, though. You have to make up your mind what you want. I can see the chaffing taking place clearly. Well, you can avoid that by keeping the sail nice & safe in it's bag. Is that wrong OZ? It's only WRONG to think that the loss of speed isn't much (it is) or that anybody who doesn't have the same priorities as yourself is a fool. Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
#3
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 21, 8:32 am, wrote:
OzOne wrote: And sacrifice sail when close hauled? Everything's a compromise. Joe wrote: I would think a properly shaped sail on all points would be the best all around. Depends on what you mean by "best." Best all around Doug. Is that too hard a concept for you to envision? Best means the best shape, and best care, and best preformance. Are you telling me a crunched up sail dragging the lifelines has good flow around the foot? A genoa with a high-cut foot to clear the bow pulpit & lifelines will be slower on alll points, less sail area and poor flow around the foot. Better visibility & less chafe, though. You have to make up your mind what you want. I can see the chaffing taking place clearly. Well, you can avoid that by keeping the sail nice & safe in it's bag. Hey.... for all I care about your sails, you can drag them across a parking lot, use 40 grit sandpaper to clean them, and fly them where they always rub everything and are out of the proper shape. Is that wrong OZ? It's only WRONG to think that the loss of speed isn't much (it is) or that anybody who doesn't have the same priorities as yourself is a fool. If you are happy with a sail crunched up over a hand rail and or lifelines feel free to partake. Oh I forgot...you do not have a sailboat do you? Joe |
#4
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Joe wrote:
On Aug 21, 8:32 am, wrote: OzOne wrote: And sacrifice sail when close hauled? Everything's a compromise. Joe wrote: I would think a properly shaped sail on all points would be the best all around. Depends on what you mean by "best." Best all around Doug. Is that too hard a concept for you to envision? Best means the best shape, and best care, and best preformance. Are you telling me a crunched up sail dragging the lifelines has good flow around the foot? A genoa with a high-cut foot to clear the bow pulpit & lifelines will be slower on alll points, less sail area and poor flow around the foot. Better visibility & less chafe, though. You have to make up your mind what you want. I can see the chaffing taking place clearly. Well, you can avoid that by keeping the sail nice & safe in it's bag. Hey.... for all I care about your sails, you can drag them across a parking lot, use 40 grit sandpaper to clean them, and fly them where they always rub everything and are out of the proper shape. Is that wrong OZ? It's only WRONG to think that the loss of speed isn't much (it is) or that anybody who doesn't have the same priorities as yourself is a fool. If you are happy with a sail crunched up over a hand rail and or lifelines feel free to partake. Oh I forgot...you do not have a sailboat do you? Joe For Pete's sake, if it bothers you so much you can always drop the lifelines down to the base of the bow pulpit..many people do that...we have chafe guards on our lines..little round whellie things that the sail rides over to keep it from chafing...our sail is a deck sweeper...having it cut up over the top of the lifelines would mean an incredible loss of sail area...so it's a tad unsightly, so what? Beats losing speed... |
#5
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 21, 9:48 am, katy wrote:
Joe wrote: On Aug 21, 8:32 am, wrote: OzOne wrote: And sacrifice sail when close hauled? Everything's a compromise. Joe wrote: I would think a properly shaped sail on all points would be the best all around. Depends on what you mean by "best." Best all around Doug. Is that too hard a concept for you to envision? Best means the best shape, and best care, and best preformance. Are you telling me a crunched up sail dragging the lifelines has good flow around the foot? A genoa with a high-cut foot to clear the bow pulpit & lifelines will be slower on alll points, less sail area and poor flow around the foot. Better visibility & less chafe, though. You have to make up your mind what you want. I can see the chaffing taking place clearly. Well, you can avoid that by keeping the sail nice & safe in it's bag. Hey.... for all I care about your sails, you can drag them across a parking lot, use 40 grit sandpaper to clean them, and fly them where they always rub everything and are out of the proper shape. Is that wrong OZ? It's only WRONG to think that the loss of speed isn't much (it is) or that anybody who doesn't have the same priorities as yourself is a fool. If you are happy with a sail crunched up over a hand rail and or lifelines feel free to partake. Oh I forgot...you do not have a sailboat do you? Joe For Pete's sake, if it bothers you so much you can always drop the lifelines down to the base of the bow pulpit..many people do that...we have chafe guards on our lines..little round whellie things that the sail rides over to keep it from chafing...our sail is a deck sweeper...having it cut up over the top of the lifelines would mean an incredible loss of sail area...so it's a tad unsightly, so what? Beats losing speed...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Drop the life lines forward? Do they toss the lifejackets and liferaft over too? Why not go with a bigger % forward sail to make up for the loss. Tad unsightly, so what? What is that the crunched up sail is not going to have a good flow at the foot as Doug claims. Joe |
#6
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Joe" wrote in message
ups.com... On Aug 21, 9:48 am, katy wrote: Joe wrote: On Aug 21, 8:32 am, wrote: OzOne wrote: And sacrifice sail when close hauled? Everything's a compromise. Joe wrote: I would think a properly shaped sail on all points would be the best all around. Depends on what you mean by "best." Best all around Doug. Is that too hard a concept for you to envision? Best means the best shape, and best care, and best preformance. Are you telling me a crunched up sail dragging the lifelines has good flow around the foot? A genoa with a high-cut foot to clear the bow pulpit & lifelines will be slower on alll points, less sail area and poor flow around the foot. Better visibility & less chafe, though. You have to make up your mind what you want. I can see the chaffing taking place clearly. Well, you can avoid that by keeping the sail nice & safe in it's bag. Hey.... for all I care about your sails, you can drag them across a parking lot, use 40 grit sandpaper to clean them, and fly them where they always rub everything and are out of the proper shape. Is that wrong OZ? It's only WRONG to think that the loss of speed isn't much (it is) or that anybody who doesn't have the same priorities as yourself is a fool. If you are happy with a sail crunched up over a hand rail and or lifelines feel free to partake. Oh I forgot...you do not have a sailboat do you? Joe For Pete's sake, if it bothers you so much you can always drop the lifelines down to the base of the bow pulpit..many people do that...we have chafe guards on our lines..little round whellie things that the sail rides over to keep it from chafing...our sail is a deck sweeper...having it cut up over the top of the lifelines would mean an incredible loss of sail area...so it's a tad unsightly, so what? Beats losing speed...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Drop the life lines forward? Do they toss the lifejackets and liferaft over too? Why not go with a bigger % forward sail to make up for the loss. Tad unsightly, so what? What is that the crunched up sail is not going to have a good flow at the foot as Doug claims. Joe We had a Catalina 27 a few years ago that had the lifelines dropped at the pulpit. Dumb idea. That's one of the places where they can help you. We had them re-run. You don't have to worry about lifejackets on Bob's boat though... he and his guests don't use them... -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
#7
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Joe" wrote in message ups.com... On Aug 21, 9:48 am, katy wrote: Joe wrote: On Aug 21, 8:32 am, wrote: OzOne wrote: And sacrifice sail when close hauled? Everything's a compromise. Joe wrote: I would think a properly shaped sail on all points would be the best all around. Depends on what you mean by "best." Best all around Doug. Is that too hard a concept for you to envision? Best means the best shape, and best care, and best preformance. Are you telling me a crunched up sail dragging the lifelines has good flow around the foot? A genoa with a high-cut foot to clear the bow pulpit & lifelines will be slower on alll points, less sail area and poor flow around the foot. Better visibility & less chafe, though. You have to make up your mind what you want. I can see the chaffing taking place clearly. Well, you can avoid that by keeping the sail nice & safe in it's bag. Hey.... for all I care about your sails, you can drag them across a parking lot, use 40 grit sandpaper to clean them, and fly them where they always rub everything and are out of the proper shape. Is that wrong OZ? It's only WRONG to think that the loss of speed isn't much (it is) or that anybody who doesn't have the same priorities as yourself is a fool. If you are happy with a sail crunched up over a hand rail and or lifelines feel free to partake. Oh I forgot...you do not have a sailboat do you? Joe For Pete's sake, if it bothers you so much you can always drop the lifelines down to the base of the bow pulpit..many people do that...we have chafe guards on our lines..little round whellie things that the sail rides over to keep it from chafing...our sail is a deck sweeper...having it cut up over the top of the lifelines would mean an incredible loss of sail area...so it's a tad unsightly, so what? Beats losing speed...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Drop the life lines forward? Do they toss the lifejackets and liferaft over too? Why not go with a bigger % forward sail to make up for the loss. Tad unsightly, so what? What is that the crunched up sail is not going to have a good flow at the foot as Doug claims. Joe You are correct Joe. For best performance you need a deck-sweeping genny. The vortex along the foot is controlled so drag is lessened. Put a clear vinyl window in the foot of the sail if you're concerned about seeing where you're going. But don't have your genny draped over the life lines. Get them out of the way. Neglecting to do this is typical of sailors who don't have a clue. Bobsprit hasn't learned a thing about sailing. He's too busy playing day-care center administrator. Wilbur Hubbard |
#8
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Joe wrote:
For Pete's sake, if it bothers you so much you can always drop the lifelines down to the base of the bow pulpit..many people do that...we have chafe guards on our lines..little round whellie things that the sail rides over to keep it from chafing...our sail is a deck sweeper...having it cut up over the top of the lifelines would mean an incredible loss of sail area...so it's a tad unsightly, so what? Beats losing speed...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Drop the life lines forward? They're still there.. they just run at a slant from the first set of stanchions to the bottom of the bow pulpit...they are still functional... Do they toss the lifejackets and liferaft over too? You got the wrong picture in your mind... Why not go with a bigger % forward sail to make up for the loss. We have a 140....don't have any use for anything larger than that...we have a light displacement boat and do not sail on head sail alone..that's not the way our boat is balanced... Tad unsightly, so what? What is that the crunched up sail is not going to have a good flow at the foot as Doug claims. It's not crunched up...it's just a bit crooked.... Joe |
#9
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "katy" wrote in message ... Joe wrote: For Pete's sake, if it bothers you so much you can always drop the lifelines down to the base of the bow pulpit..many people do that...we have chafe guards on our lines..little round whellie things that the sail rides over to keep it from chafing...our sail is a deck sweeper...having it cut up over the top of the lifelines would mean an incredible loss of sail area...so it's a tad unsightly, so what? Beats losing speed...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Drop the life lines forward? They're still there.. they just run at a slant from the first set of stanchions to the bottom of the bow pulpit...they are still functional... Do they toss the lifejackets and liferaft over too? You got the wrong picture in your mind... Why not go with a bigger % forward sail to make up for the loss. We have a 140....don't have any use for anything larger than that...we have a light displacement boat and do not sail on head sail alone..that's not the way our boat is balanced... Tad unsightly, so what? What is that the crunched up sail is not going to have a good flow at the foot as Doug claims. It's not crunched up...it's just a bit crooked.... It should never be crunched up or crooked. The foot should run fair. Have a look at how a real sailor does it. http://captneal.homestead.com/Thumbsup.html Pay particular attention to the "close-hauled" picture. Note how the sail sweeps the foredeck and how the lifelines angle down to the base of the pulpit so there is no interaction with the sail. I hope this helps. Wilbur Hubbard |
#10
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "katy" wrote in message ... Joe wrote: On Aug 21, 8:32 am, wrote: For Pete's sake, if it bothers you so much you can always drop the lifelines down to the base of the bow pulpit..many people do that...we have chafe guards on our lines..little round whellie things that the sail rides over to keep it from chafing...our sail is a deck sweeper...having it cut up over the top of the lifelines would mean an incredible loss of sail area...so it's a tad unsightly, so what? Beats losing speed... speed? what would you lose, 1/8 kt? Maybe get to the anchorage 6 minutes later? Scotty |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Rob's Real Fun Run | ASA | |||
Rob's life in pictures | ASA | |||
Capt Rob's Quandry | ASA | |||
Rob's Zombies | ASA |