Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to alt.sailing,alt.sailing.asa,aus.sport.sailing,uk.rec.sailing
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
![]()
posted to alt.sailing,alt.sailing.asa,aus.sport.sailing,uk.rec.sailing
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Wilbur Hubbard" wrote...
If some people don't know the correct terminology then they should be taught the correct terminology immediately, if not before and sooner than that if possible. Because of one person who spelled a word incorrectly in the subject line we have hundreds of subscribers seeing that incorrect spelling over and over and thinking that's the way it should be. Shame on anybody who allows something like that to slide. What's more important, sparing the feelings of a numbskull or demonstrating correct terminology to the maundering masses? Why is it, then, that you failed to follow your own stated philosophy? You offered NO correction, but only propagated the error. BTW, why do you choose to propagate a misspelling of "invalid"? |
#3
![]()
posted to alt.sailing,alt.sailing.asa,aus.sport.sailing,uk.rec.sailing
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Weiss" jrweiss98155nospamatnospamcomcastdotnospamnet wrote in message . .. "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote... If some people don't know the correct terminology then they should be taught the correct terminology immediately, if not before and sooner than that if possible. Because of one person who spelled a word incorrectly in the subject line we have hundreds of subscribers seeing that incorrect spelling over and over and thinking that's the way it should be. Shame on anybody who allows something like that to slide. What's more important, sparing the feelings of a numbskull or demonstrating correct terminology to the maundering masses? Why is it, then, that you failed to follow your own stated philosophy? You offered NO correction, but only propagated the error. I am capable of following my own stated philosophy via any means I choose. I offered no immediate correction because it is ofttimes more effective to allow somebody who makes a mistake to figure it out for himself. It's like the old saying, “Give a man a fish; you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish; and you have fed him for a lifetime." My method was to correct his spelling for a lifetime by letting him figure out his error. Am I not entitled to teach in the manner of my own choosing? Am I to be second-guessed by those too tardy or too slothful to catch the error themselves? BTW, why do you choose to propagate a misspelling of "invalid"? I choose to do so in order to make the word invalid even more invalid and to disassociate myself as much as possible from the copy cat crowd. Monkey see - monkey do is not for me. Wilbur Hubbard |
#4
![]()
posted to alt.sailing,alt.sailing.asa,uk.rec.sailing
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Since we're being pedantic...
The question was about tacking not spelling "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in message ... "John Weiss" jrweiss98155nospamatnospamcomcastdotnospamnet wrote in message . .. "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote... If some people don't know the correct terminology then they should be taught the correct terminology immediately, if not before and sooner than that if possible. Because of one person who spelled a word incorrectly in the subject line we have hundreds of subscribers seeing that incorrect spelling over and over and thinking that's the way it should be. Shame on anybody who allows something like that to slide. What's more important, sparing the feelings of a numbskull or demonstrating correct terminology to the maundering masses? Why is it, then, that you failed to follow your own stated philosophy? You offered NO correction, but only propagated the error. I am capable of following my own stated philosophy via any means I choose. I offered no immediate correction because it is ofttimes more effective to allow somebody who makes a mistake to figure it out for himself. It's like the old saying, “Give a man a fish; you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish; and you have fed him for a lifetime." My method was to correct his spelling for a lifetime by letting him figure out his error. Am I not entitled to teach in the manner of my own choosing? Am I to be second-guessed by those too tardy or too slothful to catch the error themselves? BTW, why do you choose to propagate a misspelling of "invalid"? I choose to do so in order to make the word invalid even more invalid and to disassociate myself as much as possible from the copy cat crowd. Monkey see - monkey do is not for me. Wilbur Hubbard |
#5
![]()
posted to alt.sailing,alt.sailing.asa,uk.rec.sailing
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard wrote:
Since we're being pedantic... The question was about tacking not spelling He only knows how to spell; can't tack worth 2 cents... |
#6
![]()
posted to alt.sailing,alt.sailing.asa,aus.sport.sailing,uk.rec.sailing
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in message ... "John Weiss" jrweiss98155nospamatnospamcomcastdotnospamnet wrote in BTW, why do you choose to propagate a misspelling of "invalid"? I choose to do so in order to make the word invalid even more invalid and to disassociate myself as much as possible from the copy cat crowd. Monkey see - monkey do is not for me. Nice explanation, Neal. Think anyone will buy it? Max |
#7
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wilbur Hubbard wrote:
It's like the old saying, “Give a man a fish; you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish; ..... and he'll sit in a boat all day drinking beer!" Cheers Marty |
#8
![]()
posted to alt.sailing,alt.sailing.asa,aus.sport.sailing,uk.rec.sailing
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in message ... "Floatything" dont wrote in message ... Honestly, some people just don't know the correct terminology. Now we have the pedantry over, can we get back to sailing? If some people don't know the correct terminology then they should be taught the correct terminology immediately, if not before and sooner than that if possible. Then why didn't you? Why did you find it necessary to be obtuse? Because of one person who spelled a word incorrectly in the subject line we have hundreds of subscribers seeing that incorrect spelling over and over and thinking that's the way it should be. Shame on anybody who allows something like that to slide. What's more important, sparing the feelings of a numbskull or demonstrating correct terminology to the maundering masses? What's more important is being civil. Usenet is chock full of gold-plated assholes. No point in adding yourself to the list. Max |
#9
![]()
posted to alt.sailing,alt.sailing.asa,aus.sport.sailing,uk.rec.sailing
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Maxprop wrote:
What's more important is being civil. Usenet is chock full of gold-plated assholes. No point in adding yourself to the list. Max He's been on that list for quite some time... |
#10
![]()
posted to alt.sailing,alt.sailing.asa,aus.sport.sailing,uk.rec.sailing
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "katy" wrote in message ... Maxprop wrote: What's more important is being civil. Usenet is chock full of gold-plated assholes. No point in adding yourself to the list. Max He's been on that list for quite some time... I know, but I was giving him a chance to repent. (or take the hook which. to his credit, he assiduously avoided) Max |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
lanteen sails | General | |||
Buying Used Sails | ASA | |||
Our New Sails....on the way! | ASA | |||
Evaluating old sails | Cruising | |||
The Compleat FAQ for alt.sailing.asa | ASA |