BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   ASA (https://www.boatbanter.com/asa/)
-   -   Who are you gonna listen to? (https://www.boatbanter.com/asa/78106-who-you-gonna-listen.html)

Ellen MacArthur February 6th 07 03:23 AM

Who are you gonna listen to?
 
Are you gonna listen to LSD 10X popping flashback people like Capt. JG or scientests with real
credentials? Like this guy?

Global Warming: The Cold, Hard Facts?

By Timothy Ball
Monday, February 5, 2007

Global Warming, as we think we know it, doesn't exist. And I am not the only one trying to
make people open up their eyes and see the truth. But few listen, despite the fact that I was
the first Canadian Ph.D. in Climatology and I have an extensive background in climatology,
especially the reconstruction of past climates and the impact of climate change on human
history and the human condition."Few listen, even though I have a Ph.D, (Doctor of Science)
from the University of London, England and was a climatology professor at the University of
Winnipeg." . For some reason (actually for many), the World is not listening. Here is why.

What would happen if tomorrow we were told that, after all, the Earth is flat? It would
probably be the most important piece of news in the media and would generate a lot of debate.
So why is it that when scientists who have studied the Global Warming phenomenon for years
say that humans are not the cause nobody listens? Why does no one acknowledge that the
Emperor has no clothes on?

Believe it or not, Global Warming is not due to human contribution of Carbon Dioxide (CO2).
This in fact is the greatest deception in the history of science. We are wasting time, energy
and trillions of dollars while creating unnecessary fear and consternation over an issue with
no scientific justification. For example, Environment Canada brags about spending $3.7 billion
in the last five years dealing with climate change almost all on propaganda trying to defend an
indefensible scientific position while at the same time closing weather stations and failing to
meet legislated pollution targets.

No sensible person seeks conflict, especially with governments, but if we don't pursue the
truth, we are lost as individuals and as a society. That is why I insist on saying that there is no
evidence that we are, or could ever cause global climate change. And, recently, Yuri A. Izrael,
Vice President of the United Nations sponsored Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
(IPCC) confirmed this statement. So how has the world come to believe that something is wrong?

Maybe for the same reason we believed, 30 years ago, that global cooling was the biggest threat:
a matter of faith. "It is a cold fact: the Global Cooling presents humankind with the most important
social, political, and adaptive challenge we have had to deal with for ten thousand years. Your
stake in the decisions we make concerning it is of ultimate importance; the survival of ourselves,
our children, our species," wrote Lowell Ponte in 1976.

I was as opposed to the threats of impending doom global cooling engendered as I am to the threats
made about Global Warming. Let me stress I am not denying the phenomenon has occurred. The
world has warmed since 1680, the nadir of a cool period called the Little Ice Age (LIA) that has
generally continued to the present. These climate changes are well within natural variability and
explained quite easily by changes in the sun. But there is nothing unusual going on.

Since I obtained my doctorate in climatology from the University of London, Queen Mary College,
England my career has spanned two climate cycles. Temperatures declined from 1940 to 1980 and
in the early 1970's global cooling became the consensus. This proves that consensus is not a scientific
fact. By the 1990's temperatures appeared to have reversed and Global Warming became the consensus.
It appears I'll witness another cycle before retiring, as the major mechanisms and the global
temperature trends now indicate a cooling.

No doubt passive acceptance yields less stress, fewer personal attacks and makes career progress
easier. What I have experienced in my personal life during the last years makes me understand why
most people choose not to speak out; job security and fear of reprisals. Even in University, where
free speech and challenge to prevailing wisdoms are supposedly encouraged, academics remain silent.

I once received a three page letter that my lawyer defined as libellous, from an academic colleague,
saying I had no right to say what I was saying, especially in public lectures. Sadly, my experience is
that universities are the most dogmatic and oppressive places in our society. This becomes progressively
worse as they receive more and more funding from governments that demand a particular viewpoint.

In another instance, I was accused by Canadian environmentalist David Suzuki of being paid by oil
companies. That is a lie. Apparently he thinks if the fossil fuel companies pay you have an agenda.
So if Greenpeace, Sierra Club or governments pay there is no agenda and only truth and enlightenment?
Personal attacks are difficult and shouldn't occur in a debate in a civilized society. I can only consider
them from what they imply. They usually indicate a person or group is losing the debate. In this case,
they also indicate how political the entire Global Warming debate has become. Both underline the lack
of or even contradictory nature of the evidence.

I am not alone in this journey against the prevalent myth. Several well-known names have also raised
their voices. Michael Crichton, the scientist, writer and filmmaker is one of them. In his latest book,
"State of Fear" he takes time to explain, often in surprising detail, the flawed science behind Global
Warming and other imagined environmental crises. Another cry in the wildenerness is Richard Lindzen's.
He is an atmospheric physicist and a professor of meteorology at MIT, renowned for his research in
dynamic meteorology - especially atmospheric waves. He is also a member of the National Academy of
Sciences and has held positions at the University of Chicago, Harvard University and MIT. Linzen
frequently speaks out against the notion that significant Global Warming is caused by humans. Yet
nobody seems to listen.

I think it may be because most people don't understand the scientific method which Thomas Kuhn so
skilfully and briefly set out in his book "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions." A scientist makes
certain assumptions and then produces a theory which is only as valid as the assumptions. The theory
of Global Warming assumes that CO2 is an atmospheric greenhouse gas and as it increases temperatures
rise. It was then theorized that since humans were producing more CO2 than before, the temperature
would inevitably rise. The theory was accepted before testing had started, and effectively became a law.

As Lindzen said many years ago: "the consensus was reached before the research had even begun."
Now, any scientist who dares to question the prevailing wisdom is marginalized and called a sceptic,
when in fact they are simply being good scientists. This has reached frightening levels with these
scientists now being called climate change denier with all the holocaust connotations of that word.
The normal scientific method is effectively being thwarted.

Meanwhile, politicians are being listened to, even though most of them have no knowledge or
understanding of science, especially the science of climate and climate change. Hence, they are
in no position to question a policy on climate change when it threatens the entire planet. Moreover,
using fear and creating hysteria makes it very difficult to make calm rational decisions about issues
needing attention.

Until you have challenged the prevailing wisdom you have no idea how nasty people can be. Until
you have re-examined any issue in an attempt to find out all the information, you cannot know how
much misinformation exists in the supposed age of information. I was greatly influenced several
years ago by Aaron Wildavsky's book "Yes, but is it true?" The author taught political science at a
New York University and realized how science was being influenced by and apparently misused by
politics. He gave his graduate students an assignment to pursue the science behind a policy generated
by a highly publicised environmental concern. To his and their surprise they found there was little
scientific evidence, consensus and justification for the policy. You only realize the extent to which
Wildavsky's findings occur when you ask the question he posed. Wildavsky's students did it in the
safety of academia and with the excuse that it was an assignment. I have learned it is a difficult
question to ask in the real world, however I firmly believe it is the most important question to ask
if we are to advance in the right direction.

_________________________________________________

Dr. Tim Ball, Chairman of the Natural Resources Stewardship Project (www.nrsp.com), is a
Victoria-based environmental consultant and former climatology professor at the University of
Winnipeg. He can be reached at



Maxprop February 6th 07 05:00 AM

Who are you gonna listen to?
 

"Ellen MacArthur" wrote in message
reenews.net...
Are you gonna listen to LSD 10X popping flashback people like Capt. JG
or scientests with real
credentials? Like this guy?

Global Warming: The Cold, Hard Facts?

By Timothy Ball
Monday, February 5, 2007

Global Warming, as we think we know it, doesn't exist. And I am not the
only one trying to


monster clip

question to ask in the real world, however I firmly believe it is the most
important question to ask
if we are to advance in the right direction.

_________________________________________________

Dr. Tim Ball, Chairman of the Natural Resources Stewardship Project
(www.nrsp.com), is a
Victoria-based environmental consultant and former climatology professor
at the University of
Winnipeg. He can be reached at


The only thing that is absolute about global warming is that it is making
some folks rich. The leaders of anti-greenhouse gas organizations, the
scientists gobbling up federal grant money for research on gw, guys like Al
Gore, who write and publish books on the subject and get movies made based
upon their books, etc., are making money way faster than the Earth's
temperature is rising.

Global warming = big bucks.

Max



katy February 6th 07 05:11 AM

Who are you gonna listen to?
 
Maxprop wrote:
"Ellen MacArthur" wrote in message
reenews.net...

Are you gonna listen to LSD 10X popping flashback people like Capt. JG
or scientests with real
credentials? Like this guy?

Global Warming: The Cold, Hard Facts?

By Timothy Ball
Monday, February 5, 2007

Global Warming, as we think we know it, doesn't exist. And I am not the
only one trying to



monster clip

question to ask in the real world, however I firmly believe it is the most
important question to ask
if we are to advance in the right direction.

_________________________________________________

Dr. Tim Ball, Chairman of the Natural Resources Stewardship Project
(www.nrsp.com), is a
Victoria-based environmental consultant and former climatology professor
at the University of
Winnipeg. He can be reached at



The only thing that is absolute about global warming is that it is making
some folks rich. The leaders of anti-greenhouse gas organizations, the
scientists gobbling up federal grant money for research on gw, guys like Al
Gore, who write and publish books on the subject and get movies made based
upon their books, etc., are making money way faster than the Earth's
temperature is rising.

Global warming = big bucks.

Max


All boils down to politics is big bucks...akin to what's going on in
Texas with the mandatory inoculation of little girls with an agent that
is just recently on the market and hasn't been tested by time yet. ANd
then we find that the press secretary or whatever of the governor of TX
is a former lobbyist for Merck Labs, which produces the vaccine a the
cost of hundreds per girl....politicians and science are like oil and
water...they should be kept in separate containers...

Capt. JG February 6th 07 06:24 AM

Who are you gonna listen to?
 
"Maxprop" wrote in message
hlink.net...

"Ellen MacArthur" wrote in message
reenews.net...
Are you gonna listen to LSD 10X popping flashback people like Capt.
JG or scientests with real
credentials? Like this guy?

Global Warming: The Cold, Hard Facts?

By Timothy Ball
Monday, February 5, 2007

Global Warming, as we think we know it, doesn't exist. And I am not the
only one trying to


monster clip

question to ask in the real world, however I firmly believe it is the
most important question to ask
if we are to advance in the right direction.

_________________________________________________

Dr. Tim Ball, Chairman of the Natural Resources Stewardship Project
(www.nrsp.com), is a
Victoria-based environmental consultant and former climatology professor
at the University of
Winnipeg. He can be reached at


The only thing that is absolute about global warming is that it is making
some folks rich. The leaders of anti-greenhouse gas organizations, the
scientists gobbling up federal grant money for research on gw, guys like
Al Gore, who write and publish books on the subject and get movies made
based upon their books, etc., are making money way faster than the Earth's
temperature is rising.

Global warming = big bucks.

Max



Global environmental change for the worse is happening because human beings
are so shortsighted as to ignore their own long-term best interests.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com




Capt. JG February 6th 07 06:26 AM

Who are you gonna listen to?
 
"katy" wrote in message
...
Maxprop wrote:
"Ellen MacArthur" wrote in message
reenews.net...

Are you gonna listen to LSD 10X popping flashback people like Capt.
JG or scientests with real
credentials? Like this guy?

Global Warming: The Cold, Hard Facts?

By Timothy Ball
Monday, February 5, 2007

Global Warming, as we think we know it, doesn't exist. And I am not the
only one trying to



monster clip

question to ask in the real world, however I firmly believe it is the
most important question to ask
if we are to advance in the right direction.

_________________________________________________

Dr. Tim Ball, Chairman of the Natural Resources Stewardship Project
(www.nrsp.com), is a
Victoria-based environmental consultant and former climatology professor
at the University of
Winnipeg. He can be reached at



The only thing that is absolute about global warming is that it is making
some folks rich. The leaders of anti-greenhouse gas organizations, the
scientists gobbling up federal grant money for research on gw, guys like
Al Gore, who write and publish books on the subject and get movies made
based upon their books, etc., are making money way faster than the
Earth's temperature is rising.

Global warming = big bucks.

Max

All boils down to politics is big bucks...akin to what's going on in Texas
with the mandatory inoculation of little girls with an agent that is just
recently on the market and hasn't been tested by time yet. ANd then we
find that the press secretary or whatever of the governor of TX is a
former lobbyist for Merck Labs, which produces the vaccine a the cost of
hundreds per girl....politicians and science are like oil and water...they
should be kept in separate containers...



My understanding is that parents can opt their daughters out if they decide
it is either morally objectionable or against their religion. So, what's
wrong with the requirement to have young girls vaccinated against a deadly
disease?

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com




Captain Hook February 6th 07 08:13 AM

Who are you gonna listen to?
 
On Mon, 5 Feb 2007 22:23:14 -0500, "Ellen MacArthur"
wrote:

Are you gonna listen to LSD 10X popping flashback people like Capt. JG or scientests with real
credentials? Like this guy?


http://www.desmogblog.com/tiim-ball-...johnson-update

50. The Defendants (the Calgary Herald) state that the Plaintiff
(Ball) never held a reputation in the scientific community as a noted
climatologist and authority on global warming. The particulars of the
Plaintiff's reputation are as follows:

(a) The Plaintiff has never published any research in any
peer-reviewed scientific journal which addressed the topic of human
contributions to greenhouse gas emissions and global warming;

(b) The Plaintiff has published no papers on climatology in
academically recognized peer-reviewed scientific journals since his
retirement as a Professor in 1996;

(c) The Plaintiff's credentials and credibility as an expert on the
issue of global warming have been repeatedly disparaged in the media;
and

(d) The Plaintiff is viewed as a paid promoter of the agenda of the
oil and gas industry rather than as a practicing scientist.



Timothy F. Ball (Tim Ball)
Inflates credentials
http://www.desmogblog.com/timothy-f-ball-tim-ball

Ball and the oil industry

Ball is listed as a "consultant" of a Calgary-based global warming
skeptic organization called the "Friends of Science" (FOS). In a
January 28, 2007 article in the Toronto Star, the President of the FOS
admitted that about one-third of the funding for the FOS is provided
by the oil industry. In an August, '06 Globe and Mail feature, the FOS
was exposed as being funded in part by the oil and gas sector and
hiding the fact that they were. According to the Globe and Mail, the
oil industry money was funneled through the Calgary Foundation
charity, to the University of Calgary and then put into an education
trust for the FOS.

Ball inflates credentials

Ball and organizations he is affiliated with have repeatedly made the
claim that he is the "first Canadian PhD in climatology." Even
further, Ball once claimed he was "one of the first climatology PhD's
in the world." As many people have pointed out, there have been many
PhD's in the field prior to Ball.

Ball and the NRSP
Ball is listed as an "Executive" for a Canadian group called the
"Natural Resource Stewardship Project," (NRSP) a lobby organization
that refuses to disclose it's funding sources. The NRSP is led by
executive director Tom Harris and Dr. Tim Ball. An Oct. 16, 2006
CanWest Global news article on who funds the NRSP, it states that "a
confidentiality agreement doesn't allow him [Tom Harris] to say
whether energy companies are funding his group."

Ball's research history

Ball retired from the University of Winnipeg in 1996 and a search of
22,000 academic journals shows that, over the course of his career,
Ball has published 4 pieces of original research in a peer-reviewed
journal on the subject of climate change Ball has not published any
new research in the last 11 years.


Global Warming: The Cold, Hard Facts?

By Timothy Ball
Monday, February 5, 2007

Global Warming, as we think we know it, doesn't exist. And I am not the only one trying to
make people open up their eyes and see the truth. But few listen, despite the fact that I was
the first Canadian Ph.D. in Climatology and I have an extensive background in climatology,
especially the reconstruction of past climates and the impact of climate change on human
history and the human condition."Few listen, even though I have a Ph.D, (Doctor of Science)
from the University of London, England and was a climatology professor at the University of
Winnipeg." . For some reason (actually for many), the World is not listening.


Here is why.


Dr. Tim Ball: The Lie that Just Won't Die
5 Feb 07

The deathless and - in many specific respects - completely fictional
meanderings of Dr. Tim Ball have begun appearing again on right-wing
blogs all over the net. At City Troll, at Convenient Untruth and at
New Orleans Lady, the same tired and retreaded old climate rant paints
Dr. Ball as the courageous victim of a plot to silence a well-meaning
skeptic.

But Ball can't even tell the truth about his own resume. His claim to
be the first Climatology Ph.D. in Canada is a total falsehood; his
degree was in historical geography - not climatology - and it was
nowhere near the first ever granted to someone writing vaguely in the
field.

katy February 6th 07 01:30 PM

Who are you gonna listen to?
 
Capt. JG wrote:
"Maxprop" wrote in message
hlink.net...

"Ellen MacArthur" wrote in message
dfreenews.net...

Are you gonna listen to LSD 10X popping flashback people like Capt.
JG or scientests with real
credentials? Like this guy?

Global Warming: The Cold, Hard Facts?

By Timothy Ball
Monday, February 5, 2007

Global Warming, as we think we know it, doesn't exist. And I am not the
only one trying to


monster clip

question to ask in the real world, however I firmly believe it is the
most important question to ask
if we are to advance in the right direction.

_________________________________________________

Dr. Tim Ball, Chairman of the Natural Resources Stewardship Project
(www.nrsp.com), is a
Victoria-based environmental consultant and former climatology professor
at the University of
Winnipeg. He can be reached at


The only thing that is absolute about global warming is that it is making
some folks rich. The leaders of anti-greenhouse gas organizations, the
scientists gobbling up federal grant money for research on gw, guys like
Al Gore, who write and publish books on the subject and get movies made
based upon their books, etc., are making money way faster than the Earth's
temperature is rising.

Global warming = big bucks.

Max




Global environmental change for the worse is happening because human beings
are so shortsighted as to ignore their own long-term best interests.


No...humans are so short sighted that they ignore the fact that they
cannot control Mother nature and that the earth is not static and
changes constatly...the next "theiry" will be that we are somehow
responsible for the cooling of the sun.

katy February 6th 07 01:34 PM

Who are you gonna listen to?
 
Capt. JG wrote:
"katy" wrote in message
...

Maxprop wrote:

"Ellen MacArthur" wrote in message
adfreenews.net...


Are you gonna listen to LSD 10X popping flashback people like Capt.
JG or scientests with real
credentials? Like this guy?

Global Warming: The Cold, Hard Facts?

By Timothy Ball
Monday, February 5, 2007

Global Warming, as we think we know it, doesn't exist. And I am not the
only one trying to


monster clip

question to ask in the real world, however I firmly believe it is the
most important question to ask
if we are to advance in the right direction.

_________________________________________________

Dr. Tim Ball, Chairman of the Natural Resources Stewardship Project
(www.nrsp.com), is a
Victoria-based environmental consultant and former climatology professor
at the University of
Winnipeg. He can be reached at


The only thing that is absolute about global warming is that it is making
some folks rich. The leaders of anti-greenhouse gas organizations, the
scientists gobbling up federal grant money for research on gw, guys like
Al Gore, who write and publish books on the subject and get movies made
based upon their books, etc., are making money way faster than the
Earth's temperature is rising.

Global warming = big bucks.

Max


All boils down to politics is big bucks...akin to what's going on in Texas
with the mandatory inoculation of little girls with an agent that is just
recently on the market and hasn't been tested by time yet. ANd then we
find that the press secretary or whatever of the governor of TX is a
former lobbyist for Merck Labs, which produces the vaccine a the cost of
hundreds per girl....politicians and science are like oil and water...they
should be kept in separate containers...




My understanding is that parents can opt their daughters out if they decide
it is either morally objectionable or against their religion. So, what's
wrong with the requirement to have young girls vaccinated against a deadly
disease?

The vaccine is unproven. You don't remember thalidomide? We are still
investigating the possibilities that MMR vaccines are respinsible for
the rise in autism. And once again, we're talking about legislation
about a sexualy transmitted condition. No sex...no cancer. Ny the time
the current crop of 11-15 year old are 18, there will be some time to
sit back and see what the actual results are from those who vilunteer to
take the risk.

Scotty February 6th 07 01:46 PM

Who are you gonna listen to?
 

"katy" wrote in message
...


No...humans are so short sighted that they ignore the fact

that they
cannot control Mother nature and that the earth is not

static and
changes constatly...the next "theiry" will be that we are

somehow
responsible for the cooling of the sun.



We are, it's all those solar panels using up the sun.

Scotty



katy February 6th 07 01:53 PM

Who are you gonna listen to?
 
Scotty wrote:
"katy" wrote in message
...

No...humans are so short sighted that they ignore the fact


that they

cannot control Mother nature and that the earth is not


static and

changes constatly...the next "theiry" will be that we are


somehow

responsible for the cooling of the sun.




We are, it's all those solar panels using up the sun.

Scotty


And here I thought it was mirror windowed buildings reflecting it backa
nd burning it out...

Joe February 6th 07 02:11 PM

Who are you gonna listen to?
 
On Feb 6, 12:26 am, "Capt. JG" wrote:
"katy" wrote in message

...





Maxprop wrote:
"Ellen MacArthur" wrote in message
dfreenews.net...


Are you gonna listen to LSD 10X popping flashback people like Capt.
JG or scientests with real
credentials? Like this guy?


Global Warming: The Cold, Hard Facts?


By Timothy Ball
Monday, February 5, 2007


Global Warming, as we think we know it, doesn't exist. And I am not the
only one trying to


monster clip


question to ask in the real world, however I firmly believe it is the
most important question to ask
if we are to advance in the right direction.


_________________________________________________


Dr. Tim Ball, Chairman of the Natural Resources Stewardship Project
(www.nrsp.com), is a
Victoria-based environmental consultant and former climatology professor
at the University of
Winnipeg. He can be reached at


The only thing that is absolute about global warming is that it is making
some folks rich. The leaders of anti-greenhouse gas organizations, the
scientists gobbling up federal grant money for research on gw, guys like
Al Gore, who write and publish books on the subject and get movies made
based upon their books, etc., are making money way faster than the
Earth's temperature is rising.


Global warming = big bucks.


Max

All boils down to politics is big bucks...akin to what's going on in Texas
with the mandatory inoculation of little girls with an agent that is just
recently on the market and hasn't been tested by time yet. ANd then we
find that the press secretary or whatever of the governor of TX is a
former lobbyist for Merck Labs, which produces the vaccine a the cost of
hundreds per girl....politicians and science are like oil and water...they
should be kept in separate containers...


My understanding is that parents can opt their daughters out if they decide
it is either morally objectionable or against their religion. So, what's
wrong with the requirement to have young girls vaccinated against a deadly
disease?

--
"j" ganz - Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -



Nothing's wrong if it's a proven drug, whats wrong is our gov is going
to get rich with kickbacks.
Remeber that gov vaccination that cause all the kids with little arms
and legs?

Joe


katy February 6th 07 02:42 PM

Who are you gonna listen to?
 
Joe wrote:
On Feb 6, 12:26 am, "Capt. JG" wrote:

"katy" wrote in message

...






Maxprop wrote:

"Ellen MacArthur" wrote in message
eadfreenews.net...


Are you gonna listen to LSD 10X popping flashback people like Capt.
JG or scientests with real
credentials? Like this guy?


Global Warming: The Cold, Hard Facts?


By Timothy Ball
Monday, February 5, 2007


Global Warming, as we think we know it, doesn't exist. And I am not the
only one trying to


monster clip


question to ask in the real world, however I firmly believe it is the
most important question to ask
if we are to advance in the right direction.


_________________________________________________


Dr. Tim Ball, Chairman of the Natural Resources Stewardship Project
(www.nrsp.com), is a
Victoria-based environmental consultant and former climatology professor
at the University of
Winnipeg. He can be reached at


The only thing that is absolute about global warming is that it is making
some folks rich. The leaders of anti-greenhouse gas organizations, the
scientists gobbling up federal grant money for research on gw, guys like
Al Gore, who write and publish books on the subject and get movies made
based upon their books, etc., are making money way faster than the
Earth's temperature is rising.


Global warming = big bucks.


Max

All boils down to politics is big bucks...akin to what's going on in Texas
with the mandatory inoculation of little girls with an agent that is just
recently on the market and hasn't been tested by time yet. ANd then we
find that the press secretary or whatever of the governor of TX is a
former lobbyist for Merck Labs, which produces the vaccine a the cost of
hundreds per girl....politicians and science are like oil and water...they
should be kept in separate containers...


My understanding is that parents can opt their daughters out if they decide
it is either morally objectionable or against their religion. So, what's
wrong with the requirement to have young girls vaccinated against a deadly
disease?

--
"j" ganz - Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -




Nothing's wrong if it's a proven drug, whats wrong is our gov is going
to get rich with kickbacks.
Remeber that gov vaccination that cause all the kids with little arms
and legs?

Joe

\im...Joe...that was thalidomide....already been metioned...twice, I
believe...drug was supposed to stop miscarriage...sure did...

Martin Baxter February 6th 07 05:47 PM

Who are you gonna listen to?
 
Dave wrote:


Max, it's an article of faith with these folks. Challenging their gospel is
like urging that the Bible is not divinely inspired--you'll never get that
concession from the ultra-devout.



Hmmm..... pot ..... kettle ???


Cheers
Marty

Capt. JG February 6th 07 05:56 PM

Who are you gonna listen to?
 
"katy" wrote in message
...
Capt. JG wrote:
"katy" wrote in message
...

Maxprop wrote:

"Ellen MacArthur" wrote in message
eadfreenews.net...


Are you gonna listen to LSD 10X popping flashback people like Capt.
JG or scientests with real
credentials? Like this guy?

Global Warming: The Cold, Hard Facts?

By Timothy Ball
Monday, February 5, 2007

Global Warming, as we think we know it, doesn't exist. And I am not the
only one trying to


monster clip

question to ask in the real world, however I firmly believe it is the
most important question to ask
if we are to advance in the right direction.

_________________________________________________

Dr. Tim Ball, Chairman of the Natural Resources Stewardship Project
(www.nrsp.com), is a
Victoria-based environmental consultant and former climatology
professor at the University of
Winnipeg. He can be reached at


The only thing that is absolute about global warming is that it is
making some folks rich. The leaders of anti-greenhouse gas
organizations, the scientists gobbling up federal grant money for
research on gw, guys like Al Gore, who write and publish books on the
subject and get movies made based upon their books, etc., are making
money way faster than the Earth's temperature is rising.

Global warming = big bucks.

Max

All boils down to politics is big bucks...akin to what's going on in
Texas with the mandatory inoculation of little girls with an agent that
is just recently on the market and hasn't been tested by time yet. ANd
then we find that the press secretary or whatever of the governor of TX
is a former lobbyist for Merck Labs, which produces the vaccine a the
cost of hundreds per girl....politicians and science are like oil and
water...they should be kept in separate containers...




My understanding is that parents can opt their daughters out if they
decide it is either morally objectionable or against their religion. So,
what's wrong with the requirement to have young girls vaccinated against
a deadly disease?

The vaccine is unproven. You don't remember thalidomide? We are still
investigating the possibilities that MMR vaccines are respinsible for the
rise in autism. And once again, we're talking about legislation about a
sexualy transmitted condition. No sex...no cancer. Ny the time the
current crop of 11-15 year old are 18, there will be some time to sit back
and see what the actual results are from those who vilunteer to take the
risk.



Actually, the vaccine is well-proven from what I've read, and it will save
lives. The argument that it'll promote underage sexual behavior is a scare
tactic used by the religious right.


--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com




Capt. JG February 6th 07 05:57 PM

Who are you gonna listen to?
 
"Joe" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Feb 6, 12:26 am, "Capt. JG" wrote:
"katy" wrote in message

...





Maxprop wrote:
"Ellen MacArthur" wrote in message
dfreenews.net...


Are you gonna listen to LSD 10X popping flashback people like
Capt.
JG or scientests with real
credentials? Like this guy?


Global Warming: The Cold, Hard Facts?


By Timothy Ball
Monday, February 5, 2007


Global Warming, as we think we know it, doesn't exist. And I am not
the
only one trying to


monster clip


question to ask in the real world, however I firmly believe it is the
most important question to ask
if we are to advance in the right direction.


_________________________________________________


Dr. Tim Ball, Chairman of the Natural Resources Stewardship Project
(www.nrsp.com), is a
Victoria-based environmental consultant and former climatology
professor
at the University of
Winnipeg. He can be reached at


The only thing that is absolute about global warming is that it is
making
some folks rich. The leaders of anti-greenhouse gas organizations,
the
scientists gobbling up federal grant money for research on gw, guys
like
Al Gore, who write and publish books on the subject and get movies
made
based upon their books, etc., are making money way faster than the
Earth's temperature is rising.


Global warming = big bucks.


Max
All boils down to politics is big bucks...akin to what's going on in
Texas
with the mandatory inoculation of little girls with an agent that is
just
recently on the market and hasn't been tested by time yet. ANd then we
find that the press secretary or whatever of the governor of TX is a
former lobbyist for Merck Labs, which produces the vaccine a the cost
of
hundreds per girl....politicians and science are like oil and
water...they
should be kept in separate containers...


My understanding is that parents can opt their daughters out if they
decide
it is either morally objectionable or against their religion. So, what's
wrong with the requirement to have young girls vaccinated against a
deadly
disease?

--
"j" ganz - Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -



Nothing's wrong if it's a proven drug, whats wrong is our gov is going
to get rich with kickbacks.
Remeber that gov vaccination that cause all the kids with little arms
and legs?

Joe



I don't think anyone except the usual suspects are going to get rich. It's
the right thing to do, and parents have a way to avoid it if they truly want
to.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com




Capt. JG February 6th 07 05:58 PM

Who are you gonna listen to?
 
"katy" wrote in message
...
Joe wrote:
On Feb 6, 12:26 am, "Capt. JG" wrote:

"katy" wrote in message

...






Maxprop wrote:

"Ellen MacArthur" wrote in message
. readfreenews.net...

Are you gonna listen to LSD 10X popping flashback people like Capt.
JG or scientests with real
credentials? Like this guy?

Global Warming: The Cold, Hard Facts?

By Timothy Ball
Monday, February 5, 2007

Global Warming, as we think we know it, doesn't exist. And I am not
the
only one trying to

monster clip

question to ask in the real world, however I firmly believe it is the
most important question to ask
if we are to advance in the right direction.

_________________________________________________

Dr. Tim Ball, Chairman of the Natural Resources Stewardship Project
(www.nrsp.com), is a
Victoria-based environmental consultant and former climatology
professor
at the University of
Winnipeg. He can be reached at

The only thing that is absolute about global warming is that it is
making
some folks rich. The leaders of anti-greenhouse gas organizations, the
scientists gobbling up federal grant money for research on gw, guys
like
Al Gore, who write and publish books on the subject and get movies made
based upon their books, etc., are making money way faster than the
Earth's temperature is rising.

Global warming = big bucks.

Max

All boils down to politics is big bucks...akin to what's going on in
Texas
with the mandatory inoculation of little girls with an agent that is
just
recently on the market and hasn't been tested by time yet. ANd then we
find that the press secretary or whatever of the governor of TX is a
former lobbyist for Merck Labs, which produces the vaccine a the cost of
hundreds per girl....politicians and science are like oil and
water...they
should be kept in separate containers...

My understanding is that parents can opt their daughters out if they
decide
it is either morally objectionable or against their religion. So, what's
wrong with the requirement to have young girls vaccinated against a
deadly
disease?

--
"j" ganz - Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -




Nothing's wrong if it's a proven drug, whats wrong is our gov is going
to get rich with kickbacks.
Remeber that gov vaccination that cause all the kids with little arms
and legs?

Joe

\im...Joe...that was thalidomide....already been metioned...twice, I
believe...drug was supposed to stop miscarriage...sure did...



Note... read about it here... the vaccine to prevent cancer is in a
completely different league of drugs.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thalidomide


--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com




Capt. JG February 6th 07 05:59 PM

Who are you gonna listen to?
 
"katy" wrote in message
...
Capt. JG wrote:
"Maxprop" wrote in message
hlink.net...

"Ellen MacArthur" wrote in message
adfreenews.net...

Are you gonna listen to LSD 10X popping flashback people like Capt.
JG or scientests with real
credentials? Like this guy?

Global Warming: The Cold, Hard Facts?

By Timothy Ball
Monday, February 5, 2007

Global Warming, as we think we know it, doesn't exist. And I am not the
only one trying to

monster clip

question to ask in the real world, however I firmly believe it is the
most important question to ask
if we are to advance in the right direction.

_________________________________________________

Dr. Tim Ball, Chairman of the Natural Resources Stewardship Project
(www.nrsp.com), is a
Victoria-based environmental consultant and former climatology professor
at the University of
Winnipeg. He can be reached at

The only thing that is absolute about global warming is that it is making
some folks rich. The leaders of anti-greenhouse gas organizations, the
scientists gobbling up federal grant money for research on gw, guys like
Al Gore, who write and publish books on the subject and get movies made
based upon their books, etc., are making money way faster than the
Earth's temperature is rising.

Global warming = big bucks.

Max




Global environmental change for the worse is happening because human
beings are so shortsighted as to ignore their own long-term best
interests.


No...humans are so short sighted that they ignore the fact that they
cannot control Mother nature and that the earth is not static and changes
constatly...the next "theiry" will be that we are somehow responsible for
the cooling of the sun.



We absolutely can affect Mother Nature. We're doing it right now with air
and water pollution.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com




Capt. JG February 6th 07 06:00 PM

Who are you gonna listen to?
 
"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 5 Feb 2007 22:24:24 -0800, "Capt. JG"
said:

Global environmental change for the worse is happening because human
beings
are so shortsighted as to ignore their own long-term best interests.


Thus endeth the reading of the gospel according to Jon.

Max, it's an article of faith with these folks. Challenging their gospel
is
like urging that the Bible is not divinely inspired--you'll never get that
concession from the ultra-devout.



No. It's an article of faith in science. Rightwing nuts have no interest in
facts.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com




Capt. JG February 6th 07 06:10 PM

Who are you gonna listen to?
 
"Martin Baxter" wrote in message
...
Dave wrote:


Max, it's an article of faith with these folks. Challenging their gospel
is
like urging that the Bible is not divinely inspired--you'll never get
that
concession from the ultra-devout.



Hmmm..... pot ..... kettle ???


Cheers
Marty



You're more articulate than I. Oops... sorry Mundo.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com




katy February 6th 07 06:32 PM

Who are you gonna listen to?
 
Capt. JG wrote:
"katy" wrote in message
...

Capt. JG wrote:

"katy" wrote in message
...


Maxprop wrote:


"Ellen MacArthur" wrote in message
. readfreenews.net...



Are you gonna listen to LSD 10X popping flashback people like Capt.
JG or scientests with real
credentials? Like this guy?

Global Warming: The Cold, Hard Facts?

By Timothy Ball
Monday, February 5, 2007

Global Warming, as we think we know it, doesn't exist. And I am not the
only one trying to


monster clip

question to ask in the real world, however I firmly believe it is the
most important question to ask
if we are to advance in the right direction.

_________________________________________________

Dr. Tim Ball, Chairman of the Natural Resources Stewardship Project
(www.nrsp.com), is a
Victoria-based environmental consultant and former climatology
professor at the University of
Winnipeg. He can be reached at


The only thing that is absolute about global warming is that it is
making some folks rich. The leaders of anti-greenhouse gas
organizations, the scientists gobbling up federal grant money for
research on gw, guys like Al Gore, who write and publish books on the
subject and get movies made based upon their books, etc., are making
money way faster than the Earth's temperature is rising.

Global warming = big bucks.

Max

All boils down to politics is big bucks...akin to what's going on in
Texas with the mandatory inoculation of little girls with an agent that
is just recently on the market and hasn't been tested by time yet. ANd
then we find that the press secretary or whatever of the governor of TX
is a former lobbyist for Merck Labs, which produces the vaccine a the
cost of hundreds per girl....politicians and science are like oil and
water...they should be kept in separate containers...



My understanding is that parents can opt their daughters out if they
decide it is either morally objectionable or against their religion. So,
what's wrong with the requirement to have young girls vaccinated against
a deadly disease?


The vaccine is unproven. You don't remember thalidomide? We are still
investigating the possibilities that MMR vaccines are respinsible for the
rise in autism. And once again, we're talking about legislation about a
sexualy transmitted condition. No sex...no cancer. Ny the time the
current crop of 11-15 year old are 18, there will be some time to sit back
and see what the actual results are from those who vilunteer to take the
risk.




Actually, the vaccine is well-proven from what I've read, and it will save
lives. The argument that it'll promote underage sexual behavior is a scare
tactic used by the religious right.


Actually it has not been in existance long enough to have withstood any
test of time...are their women out their who have been vaccinated who
have reached menarche yet? How many have had children? Have those
children had children yet to see if there is any residual genetic
effect? ANd I said nothing about sexual activity other than the comment
that if you don't have sex, you won't get papiloma virus...which is true...

katy February 6th 07 06:35 PM

Who are you gonna listen to?
 
Capt. JG wrote:
"katy" wrote in message
...

Capt. JG wrote:

"Maxprop" wrote in message
arthlink.net...


"Ellen MacArthur" wrote in message
eadfreenews.net...


Are you gonna listen to LSD 10X popping flashback people like Capt.
JG or scientests with real
credentials? Like this guy?

Global Warming: The Cold, Hard Facts?

By Timothy Ball
Monday, February 5, 2007

Global Warming, as we think we know it, doesn't exist. And I am not the
only one trying to

monster clip

question to ask in the real world, however I firmly believe it is the
most important question to ask
if we are to advance in the right direction.

_________________________________________________

Dr. Tim Ball, Chairman of the Natural Resources Stewardship Project
(www.nrsp.com), is a
Victoria-based environmental consultant and former climatology professor
at the University of
Winnipeg. He can be reached at

The only thing that is absolute about global warming is that it is making
some folks rich. The leaders of anti-greenhouse gas organizations, the
scientists gobbling up federal grant money for research on gw, guys like
Al Gore, who write and publish books on the subject and get movies made
based upon their books, etc., are making money way faster than the
Earth's temperature is rising.

Global warming = big bucks.

Max



Global environmental change for the worse is happening because human
beings are so shortsighted as to ignore their own long-term best
interests.


No...humans are so short sighted that they ignore the fact that they
cannot control Mother nature and that the earth is not static and changes
constatly...the next "theiry" will be that we are somehow responsible for
the cooling of the sun.




We absolutely can affect Mother Nature. We're doing it right now with air
and water pollution.

And Mother Nature, as she always does, will take over in the end and we
will either adapt to her or we'll go the way of the dinosaurs...keep
being a sheep, Jon...air and water pollution hurt humanity...humanity
must choose to do something about that in regards to the effects it has
on health, but it hasn't much to do with historical and cyclical global
warming or cooling...

katy February 6th 07 06:36 PM

Who are you gonna listen to?
 
Capt. JG wrote:
"Dave" wrote in message
...

On Mon, 5 Feb 2007 22:24:24 -0800, "Capt. JG"
said:


Global environmental change for the worse is happening because human
beings
are so shortsighted as to ignore their own long-term best interests.


Thus endeth the reading of the gospel according to Jon.

Max, it's an article of faith with these folks. Challenging their gospel
is
like urging that the Bible is not divinely inspired--you'll never get that
concession from the ultra-devout.




No. It's an article of faith in science. Rightwing nuts have no interest in
facts.


And liveral create facts out of whole cloth becasue that's the way they
want it to be...and if they lie long enough and persistently enough,
enough people believe them and make it so...

Capt. JG February 6th 07 06:44 PM

Who are you gonna listen to?
 
"katy" wrote in message
...
Capt. JG wrote:
"katy" wrote in message
...

Capt. JG wrote:

"katy" wrote in message
...


Maxprop wrote:


"Ellen MacArthur" wrote in message
.readfreenews.net...



Are you gonna listen to LSD 10X popping flashback people like Capt.
JG or scientests with real
credentials? Like this guy?

Global Warming: The Cold, Hard Facts?

By Timothy Ball
Monday, February 5, 2007

Global Warming, as we think we know it, doesn't exist. And I am not
the only one trying to


monster clip

question to ask in the real world, however I firmly believe it is the
most important question to ask
if we are to advance in the right direction.

_________________________________________________

Dr. Tim Ball, Chairman of the Natural Resources Stewardship Project
(www.nrsp.com), is a
Victoria-based environmental consultant and former climatology
professor at the University of
Winnipeg. He can be reached at


The only thing that is absolute about global warming is that it is
making some folks rich. The leaders of anti-greenhouse gas
organizations, the scientists gobbling up federal grant money for
research on gw, guys like Al Gore, who write and publish books on the
subject and get movies made based upon their books, etc., are making
money way faster than the Earth's temperature is rising.

Global warming = big bucks.

Max

All boils down to politics is big bucks...akin to what's going on in
Texas with the mandatory inoculation of little girls with an agent that
is just recently on the market and hasn't been tested by time yet. ANd
then we find that the press secretary or whatever of the governor of TX
is a former lobbyist for Merck Labs, which produces the vaccine a the
cost of hundreds per girl....politicians and science are like oil and
water...they should be kept in separate containers...



My understanding is that parents can opt their daughters out if they
decide it is either morally objectionable or against their religion. So,
what's wrong with the requirement to have young girls vaccinated against
a deadly disease?


The vaccine is unproven. You don't remember thalidomide? We are still
investigating the possibilities that MMR vaccines are respinsible for the
rise in autism. And once again, we're talking about legislation about a
sexualy transmitted condition. No sex...no cancer. Ny the time the
current crop of 11-15 year old are 18, there will be some time to sit
back and see what the actual results are from those who vilunteer to take
the risk.




Actually, the vaccine is well-proven from what I've read, and it will
save lives. The argument that it'll promote underage sexual behavior is a
scare tactic used by the religious right.


Actually it has not been in existance long enough to have withstood any
test of time...are their women out their who have been vaccinated who have
reached menarche yet? How many have had children? Have those children had
children yet to see if there is any residual genetic effect? ANd I said
nothing about sexual activity other than the comment that if you don't
have sex, you won't get papiloma virus...which is true...



Neither was the polio vaccine, but it saved countless lives. The fact is
that there exists things like rape and incest, which has nothing to do with
abstinence:

http://www.paralumun.com/issuesrapestats.htm

In part...

Somewhere in America, a woman is raped every 2 minutes, according to the
U.S. Department of Justice.
In 1995, 354,670 women were the victims of a rape or sexual assault.
(NationalCrime Victimization Survey. Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S.
Department of Justice, 1996.)
Over the last two years, more than 787,000 women were the victim of a rape
or sexual assault. (National Crime Victimization Survey. Bureau of Justice
Statistics, U.S.Department of Justice, 1996.)
The FBI estimates that 72 of every 100,000 females in the United States
wereraped last year. (Federal Bureau of Investigation, Uniform Crime
Statistics, 1996.)


--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com




katy February 6th 07 06:45 PM

Who are you gonna listen to?
 
Charlie Morgan wrote:
On Tue, 06 Feb 2007 13:32:25 -0500, katy
wrote:


ANd I said nothing about sexual activity other than the comment
that if you don't have sex, you won't get papiloma virus...which is true...



I guess you missed the part where they said they were giving this to
Texan girls. They can't even pronounce the word "abstinence"

CWM


Oh..I thought that was becasue they are Baptist and Nazarene, not Texans..

Capt. JG February 6th 07 06:48 PM

Who are you gonna listen to?
 
"katy" wrote in message
...
Capt. JG wrote:
"katy" wrote in message
...

Capt. JG wrote:

"Maxprop" wrote in message
. earthlink.net...


"Ellen MacArthur" wrote in message
. readfreenews.net...


Are you gonna listen to LSD 10X popping flashback people like Capt.
JG or scientests with real
credentials? Like this guy?

Global Warming: The Cold, Hard Facts?

By Timothy Ball
Monday, February 5, 2007

Global Warming, as we think we know it, doesn't exist. And I am not
the only one trying to

monster clip

question to ask in the real world, however I firmly believe it is the
most important question to ask
if we are to advance in the right direction.

_________________________________________________

Dr. Tim Ball, Chairman of the Natural Resources Stewardship Project
(www.nrsp.com), is a
Victoria-based environmental consultant and former climatology
professor at the University of
Winnipeg. He can be reached at

The only thing that is absolute about global warming is that it is
making some folks rich. The leaders of anti-greenhouse gas
organizations, the scientists gobbling up federal grant money for
research on gw, guys like Al Gore, who write and publish books on the
subject and get movies made based upon their books, etc., are making
money way faster than the Earth's temperature is rising.

Global warming = big bucks.

Max



Global environmental change for the worse is happening because human
beings are so shortsighted as to ignore their own long-term best
interests.


No...humans are so short sighted that they ignore the fact that they
cannot control Mother nature and that the earth is not static and changes
constatly...the next "theiry" will be that we are somehow responsible for
the cooling of the sun.




We absolutely can affect Mother Nature. We're doing it right now with air
and water pollution.

And Mother Nature, as she always does, will take over in the end and we
will either adapt to her or we'll go the way of the dinosaurs...keep being
a sheep, Jon...air and water pollution hurt humanity...humanity must
choose to do something about that in regards to the effects it has on
health, but it hasn't much to do with historical and cyclical global
warming or cooling...



Being a sheep means knowing what's coming and doing nothing. It has
everything to do with historical and cyclical global warming or cooling. The
fact is that we're changing the climate and we need to do something or it
will get out of control and millions will suffer and/or die. I guess it's
easy to be a sheep and follow whatever Dick Cheney and big oil tells you,
but I'm willing to put more stock in what just about every climatologist is
telling us. Those with an agenda of big money and big oil are not interested
in anyone except themselves.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com




katy February 6th 07 06:49 PM

Who are you gonna listen to?
 
Capt. JG wrote:
"katy" wrote in message
...

Capt. JG wrote:

"katy" wrote in message
...


Capt. JG wrote:


"katy" wrote in message
...



Maxprop wrote:



"Ellen MacArthur" wrote in message
w.readfreenews.net...




Are you gonna listen to LSD 10X popping flashback people like Capt.
JG or scientests with real
credentials? Like this guy?

Global Warming: The Cold, Hard Facts?

By Timothy Ball
Monday, February 5, 2007

Global Warming, as we think we know it, doesn't exist. And I am not
the only one trying to


monster clip

question to ask in the real world, however I firmly believe it is the
most important question to ask
if we are to advance in the right direction.

_________________________________________________

Dr. Tim Ball, Chairman of the Natural Resources Stewardship Project
(www.nrsp.com), is a
Victoria-based environmental consultant and former climatology
professor at the University of
Winnipeg. He can be reached at


The only thing that is absolute about global warming is that it is
making some folks rich. The leaders of anti-greenhouse gas
organizations, the scientists gobbling up federal grant money for
research on gw, guys like Al Gore, who write and publish books on the
subject and get movies made based upon their books, etc., are making
money way faster than the Earth's temperature is rising.

Global warming = big bucks.

Max

All boils down to politics is big bucks...akin to what's going on in
Texas with the mandatory inoculation of little girls with an agent that
is just recently on the market and hasn't been tested by time yet. ANd
then we find that the press secretary or whatever of the governor of TX
is a former lobbyist for Merck Labs, which produces the vaccine a the
cost of hundreds per girl....politicians and science are like oil and
water...they should be kept in separate containers...



My understanding is that parents can opt their daughters out if they
decide it is either morally objectionable or against their religion. So,
what's wrong with the requirement to have young girls vaccinated against
a deadly disease?


The vaccine is unproven. You don't remember thalidomide? We are still
investigating the possibilities that MMR vaccines are respinsible for the
rise in autism. And once again, we're talking about legislation about a
sexualy transmitted condition. No sex...no cancer. Ny the time the
current crop of 11-15 year old are 18, there will be some time to sit
back and see what the actual results are from those who vilunteer to take
the risk.



Actually, the vaccine is well-proven from what I've read, and it will
save lives. The argument that it'll promote underage sexual behavior is a
scare tactic used by the religious right.



Actually it has not been in existance long enough to have withstood any
test of time...are their women out their who have been vaccinated who have
reached menarche yet? How many have had children? Have those children had
children yet to see if there is any residual genetic effect? ANd I said
nothing about sexual activity other than the comment that if you don't
have sex, you won't get papiloma virus...which is true...




Neither was the polio vaccine, but it saved countless lives. The fact is
that there exists things like rape and incest, which has nothing to do with
abstinence:

http://www.paralumun.com/issuesrapestats.htm

In part...

Somewhere in America, a woman is raped every 2 minutes, according to the
U.S. Department of Justice.
In 1995, 354,670 women were the victims of a rape or sexual assault.
(NationalCrime Victimization Survey. Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S.
Department of Justice, 1996.)
Over the last two years, more than 787,000 women were the victim of a rape
or sexual assault. (National Crime Victimization Survey. Bureau of Justice
Statistics, U.S.Department of Justice, 1996.)
The FBI estimates that 72 of every 100,000 females in the United States
wereraped last year. (Federal Bureau of Investigation, Uniform Crime
Statistics, 1996.)


That's a weak argument to convinve anyone they should vaccinate
themselves with something that hasn't withstood the test of time...like
I said, we still haven't figured out the possible causation of autism
from the MMR vaccine yet and that's been well over 20 years...it's also
a well known medical fact that people who live negative paranoid lives,
worrying and stress filled, are candidates for cancer...so let's make
some more paranoia for tjem so they contract it for sure...let's tell
them all they'll get cancer if they are raped! Let's hav ewomen worry
more that they may be raped...God, this world is really becoming a very
pathetic depressing place...I prefer to live my life thinking positive
thank you...

Capt. JG February 6th 07 06:49 PM

Who are you gonna listen to?
 
"katy" wrote in message
...
Capt. JG wrote:
"Dave" wrote in message
...

On Mon, 5 Feb 2007 22:24:24 -0800, "Capt. JG"
said:


Global environmental change for the worse is happening because human
beings
are so shortsighted as to ignore their own long-term best interests.

Thus endeth the reading of the gospel according to Jon.

Max, it's an article of faith with these folks. Challenging their gospel
is
like urging that the Bible is not divinely inspired--you'll never get
that
concession from the ultra-devout.




No. It's an article of faith in science. Rightwing nuts have no interest
in facts.


And liveral create facts out of whole cloth becasue that's the way they
want it to be...and if they lie long enough and persistently enough,
enough people believe them and make it so...



I'm assuming you mean liberals. Which facts are those? Human caused global
environmental change for the worse is happening. If we don't do something
soon, it will spiral out of control.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com




Capt. JG February 6th 07 06:53 PM

Who are you gonna listen to?
 
"katy" wrote in message
...

Neither was the polio vaccine, but it saved countless lives. The fact is
that there exists things like rape and incest, which has nothing to do
with abstinence:

http://www.paralumun.com/issuesrapestats.htm

In part...

Somewhere in America, a woman is raped every 2 minutes, according to the
U.S. Department of Justice.
In 1995, 354,670 women were the victims of a rape or sexual assault.
(NationalCrime Victimization Survey. Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S.
Department of Justice, 1996.)
Over the last two years, more than 787,000 women were the victim of a
rape or sexual assault. (National Crime Victimization Survey. Bureau of
Justice Statistics, U.S.Department of Justice, 1996.)
The FBI estimates that 72 of every 100,000 females in the United States
wereraped last year. (Federal Bureau of Investigation, Uniform Crime
Statistics, 1996.)


That's a weak argument to convinve anyone they should vaccinate themselves
with something that hasn't withstood the test of time...like I said, we
still haven't figured out the possible causation of autism from the MMR
vaccine yet and that's been well over 20 years...it's also a well known
medical fact that people who live negative paranoid lives, worrying and
stress filled, are candidates for cancer...so let's make some more
paranoia for tjem so they contract it for sure...let's tell them all
they'll get cancer if they are raped! Let's hav ewomen worry more that
they may be raped...God, this world is really becoming a very pathetic
depressing place...I prefer to live my life thinking positive thank you...



The polio vaccine is a weak argument? Rape stats are a week argument?

As far as MMR goes, there is absolutely no evidence that it causes autism.
This has been looked at over and over.

You still haven't said why it's a problem if there's an opt out for parents
who don't agree morally or on religious grounds.


--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com




katy February 6th 07 06:53 PM

Who are you gonna listen to?
 
Capt. JG wrote:
"katy" wrote in message
...

Capt. JG wrote:

"katy" wrote in message
...


Capt. JG wrote:


"Maxprop" wrote in message
.earthlink.net...



"Ellen MacArthur" wrote in message
.readfreenews.net...



Are you gonna listen to LSD 10X popping flashback people like Capt.
JG or scientests with real
credentials? Like this guy?

Global Warming: The Cold, Hard Facts?

By Timothy Ball
Monday, February 5, 2007

Global Warming, as we think we know it, doesn't exist. And I am not
the only one trying to

monster clip

question to ask in the real world, however I firmly believe it is the
most important question to ask
if we are to advance in the right direction.

_________________________________________________

Dr. Tim Ball, Chairman of the Natural Resources Stewardship Project
(www.nrsp.com), is a
Victoria-based environmental consultant and former climatology
professor at the University of
Winnipeg. He can be reached at

The only thing that is absolute about global warming is that it is
making some folks rich. The leaders of anti-greenhouse gas
organizations, the scientists gobbling up federal grant money for
research on gw, guys like Al Gore, who write and publish books on the
subject and get movies made based upon their books, etc., are making
money way faster than the Earth's temperature is rising.

Global warming = big bucks.

Max



Global environmental change for the worse is happening because human
beings are so shortsighted as to ignore their own long-term best
interests.


No...humans are so short sighted that they ignore the fact that they
cannot control Mother nature and that the earth is not static and changes
constatly...the next "theiry" will be that we are somehow responsible for
the cooling of the sun.



We absolutely can affect Mother Nature. We're doing it right now with air
and water pollution.


And Mother Nature, as she always does, will take over in the end and we
will either adapt to her or we'll go the way of the dinosaurs...keep being
a sheep, Jon...air and water pollution hurt humanity...humanity must
choose to do something about that in regards to the effects it has on
health, but it hasn't much to do with historical and cyclical global
warming or cooling...




Being a sheep means knowing what's coming and doing nothing.


Well, that explains it...you know nothing about sheep or their
behavior...sheep know little and runi in blind fear...they also follow
willingly for no reason other than they're sheep and that's what sheep do..
It has
everything to do with historical and cyclical global warming or cooling. The
fact is that we're changing the climate


We are not changing the climate...my God, you do think humans are
omnipotent, don't you? We are not capable of sich feats...ya
know...watching sci fi channel is fun but when you start believing some
of that crap you're in trouble...

and we need to do something or it
will get out of control and millions will suffer and/or die. I guess it's
easy to be a sheep and follow whatever Dick Cheney and big oil tells you,
but I'm willing to put more stock in what just about every climatologist is
telling us. Those with an agenda of big money and big oil are not interested
in anyone except themselves.


So move to Cuba..they'll love you there...



Martin Baxter February 6th 07 06:56 PM

Who are you gonna listen to?
 
"Capt. JG" wrote:

"Martin Baxter" wrote in message
...
Dave wrote:


Max, it's an article of faith with these folks. Challenging their gospel
is
like urging that the Bible is not divinely inspired--you'll never get
that
concession from the ultra-devout.



Hmmm..... pot ..... kettle ???


Cheers
Marty


You're more articulate than I. Oops... sorry Mundo.


It's Ok for us articulates to call each other articulate, but those
inarticulates better not!

Cheers
Marty


katy February 6th 07 06:56 PM

Who are you gonna listen to?
 
Capt. JG wrote:
"katy" wrote in message
...

Capt. JG wrote:

"Dave" wrote in message
...


On Mon, 5 Feb 2007 22:24:24 -0800, "Capt. JG"
said:



Global environmental change for the worse is happening because human
beings
are so shortsighted as to ignore their own long-term best interests.

Thus endeth the reading of the gospel according to Jon.

Max, it's an article of faith with these folks. Challenging their gospel
is
like urging that the Bible is not divinely inspired--you'll never get
that
concession from the ultra-devout.



No. It's an article of faith in science. Rightwing nuts have no interest
in facts.


And liveral create facts out of whole cloth becasue that's the way they
want it to be...and if they lie long enough and persistently enough,
enough people believe them and make it so...




I'm assuming you mean liberals. Which facts are those? Human caused global
environmental change for the worse is happening.


Nope..it's not...

If we don't do something
soon, it will spiral out of control.


And then we, like the dinosaurs, will be no more except fossils in the
ground and the earth will keep spinning, the sun will keeo shining (for
a while) and the universe will go on until the next Big Bang...all
things end...accept that...we are not infite beings..


katy February 6th 07 07:01 PM

Who are you gonna listen to?
 
Capt. JG wrote:
"katy" wrote in message
...


Neither was the polio vaccine, but it saved countless lives. The fact is
that there exists things like rape and incest, which has nothing to do
with abstinence:

http://www.paralumun.com/issuesrapestats.htm

In part...

Somewhere in America, a woman is raped every 2 minutes, according to the
U.S. Department of Justice.
In 1995, 354,670 women were the victims of a rape or sexual assault.
(NationalCrime Victimization Survey. Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S.
Department of Justice, 1996.)
Over the last two years, more than 787,000 women were the victim of a
rape or sexual assault. (National Crime Victimization Survey. Bureau of
Justice Statistics, U.S.Department of Justice, 1996.)
The FBI estimates that 72 of every 100,000 females in the United States
wereraped last year. (Federal Bureau of Investigation, Uniform Crime
Statistics, 1996.)



That's a weak argument to convinve anyone they should vaccinate themselves
with something that hasn't withstood the test of time...like I said, we
still haven't figured out the possible causation of autism from the MMR
vaccine yet and that's been well over 20 years...it's also a well known
medical fact that people who live negative paranoid lives, worrying and
stress filled, are candidates for cancer...so let's make some more
paranoia for tjem so they contract it for sure...let's tell them all
they'll get cancer if they are raped! Let's hav ewomen worry more that
they may be raped...God, this world is really becoming a very pathetic
depressing place...I prefer to live my life thinking positive thank you...




The polio vaccine is a weak argument? Rape stats are a week argument?

As far as MMR goes, there is absolutely no evidence that it causes autism.
This has been looked at over and over.


And hasn't been decided conclusively...my sister inlaw teaches autitic
kids...we have two autistic kids in the fa,ily and my other sister is a
foster care mother with 2 auristic kids...believe me, they all know what
the research going on is... that book is by no means closed...

You still haven't said why it's a problem if there's an opt out for parents
who don't agree morally or on religious grounds.


Becasuse a person as a parent shouldn't have to use religion or their
morality to make health decisions of that sort for their children. This
is not a disease that is spread in the schoolyard like mimps or measles
or even chicken pox...it is not polio which is transmissable in the
environment or like TB...this is a cancer that invades the body from a
specific activity, sex...the vector for it is very limited...your
average child is not going to contract it on the playfround (one would
hope)...



Capt. JG February 6th 07 07:15 PM

Who are you gonna listen to?
 
"katy" wrote in message
...
Capt. JG wrote:
"katy" wrote in message
...


Neither was the polio vaccine, but it saved countless lives. The fact is
that there exists things like rape and incest, which has nothing to do
with abstinence:

http://www.paralumun.com/issuesrapestats.htm

In part...

Somewhere in America, a woman is raped every 2 minutes, according to the
U.S. Department of Justice.
In 1995, 354,670 women were the victims of a rape or sexual assault.
(NationalCrime Victimization Survey. Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S.
Department of Justice, 1996.)
Over the last two years, more than 787,000 women were the victim of a
rape or sexual assault. (National Crime Victimization Survey. Bureau of
Justice Statistics, U.S.Department of Justice, 1996.)
The FBI estimates that 72 of every 100,000 females in the United States
wereraped last year. (Federal Bureau of Investigation, Uniform Crime
Statistics, 1996.)



That's a weak argument to convinve anyone they should vaccinate
themselves with something that hasn't withstood the test of time...like I
said, we still haven't figured out the possible causation of autism from
the MMR vaccine yet and that's been well over 20 years...it's also a well
known medical fact that people who live negative paranoid lives, worrying
and stress filled, are candidates for cancer...so let's make some more
paranoia for tjem so they contract it for sure...let's tell them all
they'll get cancer if they are raped! Let's hav ewomen worry more that
they may be raped...God, this world is really becoming a very pathetic
depressing place...I prefer to live my life thinking positive thank
you...




The polio vaccine is a weak argument? Rape stats are a week argument?

As far as MMR goes, there is absolutely no evidence that it causes
autism. This has been looked at over and over.


And hasn't been decided conclusively...my sister inlaw teaches autitic
kids...we have two autistic kids in the fa,ily and my other sister is a
foster care mother with 2 auristic kids...believe me, they all know what
the research going on is... that book is by no means closed...


There is no such thing as "conclusively" when it comes to anything. The
tobaco companies are still using that argument.
Your sister is, I'm sure, a fine person, but anecdotal evidence isn't worth
much.


You still haven't said why it's a problem if there's an opt out for
parents who don't agree morally or on religious grounds.


Becasuse a person as a parent shouldn't have to use religion or their
morality to make health decisions of that sort for their children. This
is not a disease that is spread in the schoolyard like mimps or measles or
even chicken pox...it is not polio which is transmissable in the
environment or like TB...this is a cancer that invades the body from a
specific activity, sex...the vector for it is very limited...your average
child is not going to contract it on the playfround (one would hope)...


Why not? People use that for lots and lots of things. Christian Scientists
try to use it for preventing life-saving intervention.

I think the key phrase is "one would hope." Why hope when you can prevent
it? Sounds awfully like faith-based pseudo-medicine to me.


--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com




Capt. JG February 6th 07 07:19 PM

Who are you gonna listen to?
 
"katy" wrote in message
...
And Mother Nature, as she always does, will take over in the end and we
will either adapt to her or we'll go the way of the dinosaurs...keep
being a sheep, Jon...air and water pollution hurt humanity...humanity
must choose to do something about that in regards to the effects it has
on health, but it hasn't much to do with historical and cyclical global
warming or cooling...




Being a sheep means knowing what's coming and doing nothing.


Well, that explains it...you know nothing about sheep or their
behavior...sheep know little and runi in blind fear...they also follow
willingly for no reason other than they're sheep and that's what sheep
do..
It has
everything to do with historical and cyclical global warming or cooling.
The fact is that we're changing the climate


You're acting like a sheep if you follow the rest of the crowd into danger
without questioning what you're doing. I don't have to be familiar with the
behavior of farm animals, but feel free to use that spurious argument when
you have no other available.


We are not changing the climate...my God, you do think humans are
omnipotent, don't you? We are not capable of sich feats...ya
know...watching sci fi channel is fun but when you start believing some of
that crap you're in trouble...


We absolutely are. We're increasing the temperature and we're increasing the
pollutants in the atmosphere, which will result in highly variable weather.
This will cause untold millions to suffer and die.

and we need to do something or it
will get out of control and millions will suffer and/or die. I guess it's
easy to be a sheep and follow whatever Dick Cheney and big oil tells you,
but I'm willing to put more stock in what just about every climatologist
is telling us. Those with an agenda of big money and big oil are not
interested in anyone except themselves.


So move to Cuba..they'll love you there...


So, that's all you can do... don't like what the gov't is doing, so I should
leave? Ad hominem attacks are next I'm sure.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com




Capt. JG February 6th 07 07:21 PM

Who are you gonna listen to?
 
"katy" wrote in message
...
I'm assuming you mean liberals. Which facts are those? Human caused
global environmental change for the worse is happening.


Nope..it's not...


So, what you're saying is that you know more that every one of the respected
and knowledgeable scientists around the globe.

Got it.


If we don't do something
soon, it will spiral out of control.


And then we, like the dinosaurs, will be no more except fossils in the
ground and the earth will keep spinning, the sun will keeo shining (for a
while) and the universe will go on until the next Big Bang...all things
end...accept that...we are not infite beings..


No, humans will generally survive. We just won't be very comfortable.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com




Martin Baxter February 6th 07 07:24 PM

Who are you gonna listen to?
 
katy wrote:


Nope..it's not...

If we don't do something
soon, it will spiral out of control.


And then we, like the dinosaurs, will be no more except fossils in the
ground and the earth will keep spinning, the sun will keeo shining (for
a while) and the universe will go on until the next Big Bang...all
things end...accept that...we are not infite beings..


That may just be the strangest non-argument I've read, it basically says
that because the dinosaurs became extinct, it's perfectly fine for
mankind to hasten his extinction and we should do nothing to prevent it.
It amounts to propounding mass suicide.

Cheers
Marty

katy February 6th 07 07:28 PM

Who are you gonna listen to?
 
Capt. JG wrote:
"katy" wrote in message
...

Capt. JG wrote:

"katy" wrote in message
...



Neither was the polio vaccine, but it saved countless lives. The fact is
that there exists things like rape and incest, which has nothing to do
with abstinence:

http://www.paralumun.com/issuesrapestats.htm

In part...

Somewhere in America, a woman is raped every 2 minutes, according to the
U.S. Department of Justice.
In 1995, 354,670 women were the victims of a rape or sexual assault.
(NationalCrime Victimization Survey. Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S.
Department of Justice, 1996.)
Over the last two years, more than 787,000 women were the victim of a
rape or sexual assault. (National Crime Victimization Survey. Bureau of
Justice Statistics, U.S.Department of Justice, 1996.)
The FBI estimates that 72 of every 100,000 females in the United States
wereraped last year. (Federal Bureau of Investigation, Uniform Crime
Statistics, 1996.)



That's a weak argument to convinve anyone they should vaccinate
themselves with something that hasn't withstood the test of time...like I
said, we still haven't figured out the possible causation of autism from
the MMR vaccine yet and that's been well over 20 years...it's also a well
known medical fact that people who live negative paranoid lives, worrying
and stress filled, are candidates for cancer...so let's make some more
paranoia for tjem so they contract it for sure...let's tell them all
they'll get cancer if they are raped! Let's hav ewomen worry more that
they may be raped...God, this world is really becoming a very pathetic
depressing place...I prefer to live my life thinking positive thank
you...



The polio vaccine is a weak argument? Rape stats are a week argument?

As far as MMR goes, there is absolutely no evidence that it causes
autism. This has been looked at over and over.


And hasn't been decided conclusively...my sister inlaw teaches autitic
kids...we have two autistic kids in the fa,ily and my other sister is a
foster care mother with 2 auristic kids...believe me, they all know what
the research going on is... that book is by no means closed...



There is no such thing as "conclusively" when it comes to anything. The
tobaco companies are still using that argument.
Your sister is, I'm sure, a fine person, but anecdotal evidence isn't worth
much.


Not anecdotal at all...she is a specially trained advocate...and has
researched the issues herself as has my SIL who holds a Master's Degree
in Education specifically of the Autistic...or are you saying that
someone with an MA isn't capable of reading research, looking at their
own personal experiences in the field and fa,ily and drawing conclusions?
http://www.vaccineinfo.net/immunizat...ismstudy.shtml

katy February 6th 07 07:32 PM

Who are you gonna listen to?
 
Capt. JG wrote:
"katy" wrote in message
...

And Mother Nature, as she always does, will take over in the end and we
will either adapt to her or we'll go the way of the dinosaurs...keep
being a sheep, Jon...air and water pollution hurt humanity...humanity
must choose to do something about that in regards to the effects it has
on health, but it hasn't much to do with historical and cyclical global
warming or cooling...



Being a sheep means knowing what's coming and doing nothing.


Well, that explains it...you know nothing about sheep or their
behavior...sheep know little and runi in blind fear...they also follow
willingly for no reason other than they're sheep and that's what sheep
do..
It has

everything to do with historical and cyclical global warming or cooling.
The fact is that we're changing the climate



You're acting like a sheep if you follow the rest of the crowd into danger
without questioning what you're doing. I don't have to be familiar with the
behavior of farm animals, but feel free to use that spurious argument when
you have no other available.


We are not changing the climate...my God, you do think humans are
omnipotent, don't you? We are not capable of sich feats...ya
know...watching sci fi channel is fun but when you start believing some of
that crap you're in trouble...



We absolutely are. We're increasing the temperature and we're increasing the
pollutants in the atmosphere, which will result in highly variable weather.
This will cause untold millions to suffer and die.


and we need to do something or it

will get out of control and millions will suffer and/or die. I guess it's
easy to be a sheep and follow whatever Dick Cheney and big oil tells you,
but I'm willing to put more stock in what just about every climatologist
is telling us. Those with an agenda of big money and big oil are not
interested in anyone except themselves.


So move to Cuba..they'll love you there...



So, that's all you can do... don't like what the gov't is doing, so I should
leave? Ad hominem attacks are next I'm sure.


Keep believing all this crap that's spoon fed to you on the liveral
plate, Jon...they need velievers...they can't exist without them...I
hope when they award you with thelittle bell on a tribbon that you like
the tinkly sound it makes...

katy February 6th 07 07:35 PM

Who are you gonna listen to?
 
Capt. JG wrote:
"katy" wrote in message
...

I'm assuming you mean liberals. Which facts are those? Human caused
global environmental change for the worse is happening.


Nope..it's not...



So, what you're saying is that you know more that every one of the respected
and knowledgeable scientists around the globe.

Got it.


Nope...ny husband teaches envitonmental science...has Master;'s courses
to support it...my dad is a meteorologist, my uncle was an entymologist,
another was a botanist, and another a chemist...I come from a fam,ily
that lived and lives in the scietific community...and I draw my
conclusions from what I've read, what I've heard, and what I've
observed. Many of the scientists you refer to are just as agendized to
your postion as mine are to mine. And most likely, never the twain
shall meet...so you and I will never agree on this but, in the end, we
will all be gone and it won't matter anymore..


If we don't do something

soon, it will spiral out of control.


And then we, like the dinosaurs, will be no more except fossils in the
ground and the earth will keep spinning, the sun will keeo shining (for a
while) and the universe will go on until the next Big Bang...all things
end...accept that...we are not infite beings..


No, humans will generally survive. We just won't be very comfortable.


katy February 6th 07 07:39 PM

Who are you gonna listen to?
 
Martin Baxter wrote:
katy wrote:


Nope..it's not...

If we don't do something

soon, it will spiral out of control.


And then we, like the dinosaurs, will be no more except fossils in the
ground and the earth will keep spinning, the sun will keeo shining (for
a while) and the universe will go on until the next Big Bang...all
things end...accept that...we are not infite beings..


That may just be the strangest non-argument I've read, it basically says
that because the dinosaurs became extinct, it's perfectly fine for
mankind to hasten his extinction and we should do nothing to prevent it.
It amounts to propounding mass suicide.

Cheers
Marty


The earth has been happy without us in the past...why wouldn't she be
happy without us in the future? Mankind will survive only of it
deserves to survive...sometimes U don't think our survival in the
unicerse is a very umportant thing...


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:12 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com