"katy" wrote in message
...
Charlie Morgan wrote:
On Wed, 07 Feb 2007 14:50:05 -0500, katy
wrote:


Charlie Morgan wrote:

On Wed, 07 Feb 2007 13:08:11 -0500, katy
wrote:



Charlie Morgan wrote:


On Wed, 07 Feb 2007 11:18:36 -0500, katy
wrote:




Mundo wrote:



On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 09:12:45 -0500, katy wrote
(in article ):





Charlie Morgan wrote:




On Wed, 07 Feb 2007 08:09:33 -0500, katy
wrote:






I do know about tropical rainforests and it is a much simpler
task to fix



This is unequivocal proof that you haven't a clue about tropical
rainforests.

CWM

In regards to growing new rainforests? Yes..in respect to keeping
the ones that exist...no....and you have no clue as to what I do or
do not know...


Chiming in from a timber farming area... New will never replace old
growth in our lifetimes. Here they get a marketable product about
every 25-30 years. These trees are a 1/5 of the size of "Old
Growth". In the Rain forests the indigenous tribes are split up and
given christianity for hope... Unbelievable. The animals are forced
into ever confining spaces etc. No we must just go ahead and enjoy
what is left. I plan on using plenty of fossil fuel and tossing my
soda cans overboard (torn open of course). All is lost. To late.
Nothing left but discussion.


Animals adapt or disappear...natural selection...


You mean like passenger pigeons?

CWM


"The Passenger Pigeon is now extinct.


Yeah, the damned things couldn't adapt to being shot full of holes.
Adapt or disappear... natural selection.
You are living proof that evolution doesn't always work that well.

CWM

Humanity is proof of that...we keep finding more and more artificial ways
to keep ourselves going when we should just let oursleves go naturally...


Well, I agree you have "let yourself go".

CWM

You don't know me....


You're a very lucky woman!


--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com