Note that Ozzy had no interest in seeing the orginal shot. "Spare me
the proof, here's what I think!"
His is a fragile little world!

Ahh well...


RB
35s5
NY

Go on Bob....post the original.
I won't laugh at it.



I can't post a 5 meg image... I can send it to you and I CLEARLY said
that. Even so, the crops from the original already proved you were 100%
wrong and then you further exposed yourself by claiming tweaking an
image is not part of shooting with a DSLR. Golly, I wonder what
workflow tools like Capture and PS are for!!!? Could it be because
DSLRs are not designed for out-of-camera results? Uh...Ozzy didn't
know! He probably connects the Canon directly to his printer.
Hey, guess what, folks! Scientific American, American History Magazine
and Sports Illustrated don't edit pics in post!!!
Yeah, right!

Ozzy, you didn't just step in it...you fell face first and inhaled
about a gallon!


RB
35s5
NY

"Capt. Rob" wrote in message
oups.com...
Go on Bob....post the original.
I won't laugh at it.



I can't post a 5 meg image... I can send it to you and I CLEARLY said
that. Even so, the crops from the original already proved you were 100%
wrong and then you further exposed yourself by claiming tweaking an
image is not part of shooting with a DSLR. Golly, I wonder what
workflow tools like Capture and PS are for!!!? Could it be because
DSLRs are not designed for out-of-camera results? Uh...Ozzy didn't
know! He probably connects the Canon directly to his printer.
Hey, guess what, folks! Scientific American, American History Magazine
and Sports Illustrated don't edit pics in post!!!
Yeah, right!

Ozzy, you didn't just step in it...you fell face first and inhaled
about a gallon!

Dunno, Bubbles. He's been posting two- to four-line responses, and you've
been posting megaparagraphic explanations of myriad pseudotechnical details
and semiexplanatory drivel . . . yada, yada . . .

I think he's got your number, and you don't like it. Truth hurts, dunnit?

And where's the photo of you in your STI??? Okay, I'll accept a photo of
Thomas sitting in the driver's seat, or even Suzy reclining on the hood.
Your choice.

Max

OzOne wrote:


Go on Bob....post the original.
I won't laugh at it.

But please no editing to prove some point you need to make ;-)

Hey OZ here is an un-doctored well shot photograph of a spider.
No photoshop needed if you have the proper equipment.

http://www.ski.org/Vision/Eyepage/Im...etcastingB.jpg

Joe


Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.

Dunno, Bubbles. He's been posting two- to four-line responses,


LOL, Maxi....look at the title of the thread. It's posted in a sailing
group, just like my Kia, telescope and home theatre threads. I've got
Ozzy yammering about a spider shot. I was hoping for Mooron, but Ozzy
is a close second.
What do you suppose motivates me to post them? I'll give you an example
later today! Gee, have I gone on too long with this response? Who knew
that meant something!?

RB
35s5
NY

Well done Ozone..... finding a nerve under that thick skin and cellulite
was quite an accomplishment!

CM

OzOne wrote in message ...


Hey Bob, no need to get upset....THREE posts.....calm down already!

Sheesh...we all know you're not perfect...no need to get upset about
it.


On 6 Jun 2006 04:13:25 -0700, "Capt. Rob"
scribbled thusly:


Bet you're glad digital came along....you'd be totally stuffed with
film eh!?



Uh, yeah...cuz Ansel Adams never edited, cropped or dodged images or
even curled negatives to get his results!
Bwahahahahahahaha!
Ozzy, you're really grasping, dude. EVERY pro edits their images. With
DSLRs you have no choice because out of auto mode, key components are
designed to be worked in post.
I have a pretty good feeling you don't even own a DSLR and if you do,
quite clearly you don't know hot to use it. Your comments prove that
beyond all doubt.
Know what the native contrast settings are for your Canon? Not likely!
Now I know why you've never posted more tha few pics and why they're
all P&S quality. Get back to me with a shot like this and we can talk.

http://members.aol.com/bobsprit/images/spider2.jpg


RB
35s5
NY



Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.

That's from the eye page and it has indeed be doctored. All shots are
doctored.



RB
35s5
NY

Capt. Rob wrote:
That's from the eye page and it has indeed be doctored. All shots are
doctored.



My EFIX data on the pictures says it's un-altered

Joe




RB
35s5
NY

My EFIX data on the pictures says it's un-altered



No such thing, Joe. EXIF data does not show post work and none is
attached to the pic anyway.
Another desperate try from Joe!



RB
35s5
NY

Neat Picture Nutsy!!

http://community.webtv.net/tassail/ThomPage