Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Maxprop wrote:
There are more, but this is a start. I'm sure others have good suggestions as well. How can you mention Ericsons and Irwins in the same post?? But it's just a damned shame that the 35s5--best boat ever created--doesn't meet your needs. Think of it: fast as an offshore powerboat, better looking than Brittney Spears, PHRF of -4000, accommodations for dozens, including a toddler, fine French joinerwork, and did I mention better looking than Brittney Spears? OH, and it has a by-God swim platform. Please reconsider . . . I've been curious... how does one swim on a platform? I've always thought you had to be in the water. DSK |
#2
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How can you mention Ericsons and Irwins in the same post??
I wonder if Doug has ever seen a good Irwin. RB 35s5 NY |
#3
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Capt. Rob" wrote in message oups.com... How can you mention Ericsons and Irwins in the same post?? I wonder if Doug has ever seen a *good Irwin.* I believe that is an oxymoron. Max |
#4
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Capt. Rob wrote:
How can you mention Ericsons and Irwins in the same post?? I wonder if Doug has ever seen a good Irwin. RB 35s5 NY There is no such thing as a good Irwin... |
#5
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
NY
There is no such thing as a good Irwin... You're education on boats is based on heresay. Some Irwins held up nicely, while others are plagued by soft decks and worse. Ive brokered two Irwins (one 31 was very nice) and seen five more at least. On the other hand every older Ericson I've ever seen had deck issues. I would't buy either unless I was in Scotty's sad shoes...and even then I'd still wait and buy a Pearson The current Irwin I'm selling is a disaster. RB 35s5 NY |
#6
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Capt. Rob wrote:
NY There is no such thing as a good Irwin... You're education on boats is based on heresay. Some Irwins held up nicely, while others are plagued by soft decks and worse. Ive brokered two Irwins (one 31 was very nice) and seen five more at least. On the other hand every older Ericson I've ever seen had deck issues. I would't buy either unless I was in Scotty's sad shoes...and even then I'd still wait and buy a Pearson The current Irwin I'm selling is a disaster. RB 35s5 NY My education on Irwin's is based on knowinf several people who have/had the,....and on the opinion, albeit hearsay, of boat specialists.... |
#7
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "DSK" wrote in message ... Maxprop wrote: There are more, but this is a start. I'm sure others have good suggestions as well. How can you mention Ericsons and Irwins in the same post?? I know it's a stretch of the imagination, but they are in the same resale price range. While the Ericsons are well-built, performance-type cruisers, the Irwins are big-ass bathtub-like cruisers with lots of interior space and substandard construction. Amazingly they resell very well. People seem to be unable to look beyond the voluminous interior. A friend owned a 37' Irwin up until this past fall--we tried repeatedly to bury the rail on the damn thing, but never could--not even in 30+kts. That sort of stiffness tends to instill confidence in those who are too ignorant to realize just how poorly constructed they are. But it's just a damned shame that the 35s5--best boat ever created--doesn't meet your needs. Think of it: fast as an offshore powerboat, better looking than Brittney Spears, PHRF of -4000, accommodations for dozens, including a toddler, fine French joinerwork, and did I mention better looking than Brittney Spears? OH, and it has a by-God swim platform. Please reconsider . . . I've been curious... how does one swim on a platform? I've always thought you had to be in the water. Ask Bubbles. My boat ain't got one. Max |
#8
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I wonder if Doug has ever seen a *good Irwin.*
I believe that is an oxymoron. FYI, there are some BAD Irwins out there and some very good ones. I've brokered both. Both ericson and Irwin are known for bad decks. In fact I've never seen an older Ericson with dry decks. RB 35s5 NY |
#9
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Capt. Rob" wrote in message ps.com... I wonder if Doug has ever seen a *good Irwin.* I believe that is an oxymoron. FYI, there are some BAD Irwins out there and some very good ones. I've brokered both. Even the larger Irwins--those in the 50'+ range--have serious construction issues. Ted Irwin didn't build these boats with the same philosophy as the higher-end builders, and it shows. If you've brokered "good" Irwins, I'd suggest you were looking more at condition than quality of construction. Both ericson and Irwin are known for bad decks. So are C&C, Tartan, Catalina, Hunter, and myriad others. Any boat with a wood core of any type in the deck layup faces that problem. Irwins, unlike Ericsons, made some things horribly cheaply, such as locker access covers on the side decks. Some are so thin that just stepping on them makes them crack, and a heavy individual will go right through them. You won't find that on an Ericson. In fact I've never seen an older Ericson with dry decks. I've never seen any older boat with a wood core in the deck remain dry; not even the end-grain balsa cores. A friend's Tartan 34 is so wet over the forepeak that it squishes when walked upon. Irwins are no worse than others in this regard, but the glasswork and layup quality just isn't in the same league as more expensive boats. Max |
#10
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 04:43:31 GMT, "Maxprop"
wrote: "Capt. Rob" wrote in message ups.com... I wonder if Doug has ever seen a *good Irwin.* I've never seen any older boat with a wood core in the deck remain dry; not even the end-grain balsa cores. A friend's Tartan 34 is so wet over the forepeak that it squishes when walked upon. Irwins are no worse than others in this regard, but the glasswork and layup quality just isn't in the same league as more expensive boats. Max As a sample of one, my experience has been that if a manufacturer puts fasteners into the core without going all the way through, you are much more likely to get core rot. I repaired quite a bit of it and found it all related to that practice. I had a hatch cowl, head ventilator, several escutcheon plates, and some others which were all caulk and screw into the core. All eventually resulted in core rot. When I repaired it I converted all of those to through bolt. I never had to repair any more core rot. Sure did slice a lot of balsa on my band saw to make the repairs. Kind of like slicing loaves of bread on the end grain. I wont even put a canvas snap into the core since that experience. If I want a cover, I'll make a decorative teak backer, through bolt it and then put the snaps into it. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
So where is...................... | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General |