Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wally wrote:
Soque (Enjoque) Pupette wrote: I exercise my responsibility by staying withing the bounds of my provider's AUP/TOS and the law; however, I refuse to be constrained by some nutcase on a power trip. What if you were to transgress your provider's TOS, and some nutcase on a power trip got you booted? Would you accept responsibility for your transgression, or would you assert that the power-tripping nutcase is the only person to blame? If I travel outside the bounds of my provider's TOS I *should* get booted -- regardless who reports me or if my provider notices it himself. But, *I* don't have to worry about it as *I* won't go there. What if you transgressed the TOS of a series of providers, there being a series because you were regularly booted? What if this happened for five years, and you then deliberately transgressed your provider's TOS, knowing that the power-tripping nutcase would again get you booted? Someone that gets booted from a series of providers for deliberate abuse and/or TOS violations over the course of a five year flameware is a nutcase, too. Net-abuse and/or TOS violations are *not* justified by being on the right side of an argument. Do you think it's right that an online community, which essentially has no active part in this on-going feud, should get trashed as a way of attempting to coerce the power tripper to accept the blame? This is a fair question. I'm glad you brought it up. I think such a community should be self policing. Meaning: They should take a stand against the injustices by a rogue netkkkop in their midst, thereby quelling the need for a loud and boisterous protest of those injustices. If they don't, they're complicit in the injustice by allowing it to fester. It may look like a thrashing, it may be called a thrashing, it's actually a protest by folks that oppose rogue netkkkoping. Frankly, I've never been fond of the "We'll turn your group into a smoking crater" troll. But, I realize it's a troll. It's designed to provoke an emotional reaction by kicking the natural (and powerful) instinct of self-preservation. -- ,,, ..oo c - Soque |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Neal; "Neal the destroyer!" | ASA | |||
Capt. Neal vs Lady Pilot. | ASA | |||
Bobsprit Vs. Neal | ASA | |||
Neal is NO sailor! | ASA | |||
Pity for Neal, Please | ASA |