"JG" wrote:
Donal,

Of course it's "possible." However, I will neither confirm nor deny it.

You don't need to "confirm nor deny" it Ganzy! I've seen proof!
Why do you add your home and cell numbers to the abuse reports, loser?

I'm truly sorry for you.

Too bad most in this newsgroup, except Scotty and Katywails of course, can
sympathize with your abhorrent behavior!

LP

"JG" wrote in message
...
Neal is so totally full of it, he's leaking from the years.

He claims that I've been netcoping him for years, and that I've bragged
about it. However, he's unable to show a single post with me doing that.
He's a liar. Nothing new.

Would you *really* like the netkkkoping **** you wrote posted in asa?
You've lost it, boi friend.

I can't speak to what Katy has or hasn't done.

You didn't share your "newgroup netkkkop" forms with katy? They sound so
familar...are you two sleeping together also?

Certainly, if she did rat him out to his ISP, he deserved it. I have no
problem with that.

Only you and the whore katysails deserve what you are getting from the
usenet admins. nothing more, nothing less

LP

"Fred Hall" wrote:
On Sat, 2 Apr 2005 23:13:52 -0800, "JG" wrote:

I never said I reported him. He's delusional or lying, but what you wrote
is
about right.

Did you or didn't your report him? What's the truth, Ganz?

Very cute, sweetie. Ganz will never confess, no matter how many times you
ask him to be an honorable man. It's not in his bi-sexual genes. I truly
believe he can't help hisself.

LP

"Scotty" wrote:
"Lady Pilot" wrote

Shame on you CM.

Shame on you, Scotty.

That was a dig at Mooron. He still has a sense of humour.

And you lost your sense of humor when?

So you take the side of snitches like Ganz

better to be aside of , rather than in front of JG.

Agreed!


and katysails?


Well, IF I have to choose sides, as one does in a playground brawl,
yes, Katy's been a friend for a long time.

Who would ask you to chose sides, unless it was from a homely bitch named
katysails?

I actually thought you had more honor.

Nope, not me.

Well, katy scum attracts katy scum...a law of physics I presume?

My mistake! I guess you
would turn in your neighbor or fellow sailor for smoking a doobie?

Only if they bogarted me.

So you would just sit there and go to jail for a katykook? I don't know
whether to call you lazy or stupid. Enjoy the katysex!!!!

LP

"Donal" wrote in message


If you want to know how a real homosexual man deals with
accusations of
homosexuality then why don't you accuse me of being a Homo? I'll
be
quite
happy to give you a demonstration


Donal came out?

"Lady Pilot" wrote in message
news:YG54e.16933$TZ.1636@okepread06...

So you would just sit there and go to jail for a katykook? I don't
know
whether to call you lazy or stupid.

call me 'gone'.


PLONK

"Scotty" wrote in message
...

"Donal" wrote in message


If you want to know how a real homosexual man deals with
accusations of
homosexuality then why don't you accuse me of being a Homo? I'll
be
quite
happy to give you a demonstration


Donal came out?

Of course I did. Haven't you heard that women think of gay men as a
challenge?

I'm as bent as a nine bob note!

Regards


Donal
--

"JG" wrote in message
...
Donal,

Of course it's "possible." However, I will neither confirm nor deny it.

OK, so you don't care what we think.


So,
you're left with either believing Neal,

I read his posts in the spirit that he intended them.

who is a known liar

Is he?

or with
accepting the fact that you'll never know for sure. Assuming for a moment
that I did actually contact his ISP (and we're not talking recently here),
then is it possible for you to imagine a situation that would make it ok
to
do so... I mean beyond reacting to his foul language and odd views of the
world? What would be an acceptable reason in your view for protesting to
an
ISP? Neal seems to have no problem supposedly bragging about reporting me
to
supernews.

Quite honestly, ..... I didn't believe him for a second. You were busy on
a job that prevented you from accessing the newsgroup at the time.

I don't see you decrying that. Why the double standard,
especially w.r.t. Neal?

Neal didn't report you.




I will say this about that... :-) For someone to call me a homo is not an
issue that would cause me to "report someone to his ISP." I'm sure it
would
be viewed as a stupid complaint with no merit, since filtering is
available.
And, in fact, I have filtered Neal pretty effectively. The only time I see
his posts are when someone copies them in theirs.

You've claimed in the past that I had no sense of humor and yet it seems
you
don't. Wally's post was right on. You said it was a good post and a chided
you by saying that it was a great post. Obviously, you're humor impaired
not
to see the humor in that.

Very funny!


I'm truly sorry for you.

Thanks. I appreciate your sympathy. It helps me to get through the day.


BTW, Do you think that Neal has violated his TOS. If so, what did he do
that breached the rules?

Regards


Donal
--

"Scotty" wrote in message
...

"Lady Pilot" wrote in message
news:YG54e.16933$TZ.1636@okepread06...

So you would just sit there and go to jail for a katykook? I don't
know
whether to call you lazy or stupid.

call me 'gone'.

What a stylish plonking! The slag didn't deserve it.



Regards


Donal
--

Top-posted to annoy the flonkers.....

Yeah, I ignored most of it. I kf'ed Jon a while ago, the filter should
expire soon, we'll see if the content has improved. In hindsight I
coulda put in a filter to kill your 'HOMO' posts but what the hey,
that's marginally harder than I can generally be bothered with.

I had a nice break away from it all, saw some new icebergs, a couple
new (to me) whale species and a chinstrap penguin a long way from where
he should be. Managed to swipe a floe with a sleeping leopard seal on
it and ruin his day so badly there were stains on the ice as he left
:-) I can't really take asa at all seriously and I don't much care.
It's entertainment. When a thread gets boring - ignore. Ditto for
people who simply can't keep up.

Hope you get to splash Overproof soon. I've been sailing Patanela D
every second day or so since I got back.

PDW

In article OvV3e.166159$fc4.13772@edtnps89, Capt. Mooron
wrote:

"Peter Wiley" wrote in message
. ..

Ummm, Moron - the postings Thom was referring to were those repetitive,
boring, content-free ones lacking it life, wit, humour or any trace of
originality whereby you just called Jon a HOMO for post after boring
post after boring post after boring post after ......
ZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzz

Heh.. Look... Ganz had been at it for months. I fiqured it was time he was
subjected to the same bland repetative regieme. I admit... and stated as
much that it was like playing "Whack the Gopher" at a fair.... only
difference being the gopher was frothing more each time it popped up. I had
no problem with it since I was not employed at the time and had sufficent
time on my hands to persue this objective. I posted sailing related content
as well as some replies to off topic threads during that time. Look Peter...
when I am not interested in following a prolonged disscussion between Doug
and Dave of investments and social security ... I just select and delete the
thread.... or ignore their posts.

Thom could have employed a killfile as could everyone else. I suggested it
to anyone that had a concern. You have, as explained... several options at
your disposal... a kill file or the choice of ignoring the post and the
option of reply. I even assured that I would include a word in every reply
to Jon that could have been entered in a kill file message "if content
contains" for those of which cared to follow my other posts while avoiding
my trouncing of Ganz.

My primary objection is that this involved nobody but Ganz and myself. Thom
decided to involve himself of his own free will. Not only did he take the
liberty and attitude that his opinion was of merit to me or not... he
attacked me in the process. Now he seems surprised that I've taken this in a
negative manner????

Don't take it as an attempt to be your conscience. Take it as a
critique on style.

Critique on style ? I admitted no "style" was involved in those posts....
on many occasions. I consider advice but I question direction. I do not
consider mutual respect to be asking too much. Had I attacked Thom as Ganz
had on several occassions ... then I could have understood his actions. Thom
seems to have the mistaken belief that he is the adjudicator of disputes and
enforcer of posting content.
As it is... I have made it clear to Thom that his manner of appraoch has
clarified his opinion of me. I owe him no consideration nor compliance.
Respect is earned and age does not give carte blanche to such
considerations.

Think about it... if Thom had approached me as you have here... I would have
been much more receptive to his concerns....

CM