|
Good satire Bob. Does anyone else here realize that your landover posts are
the epitome of liberalism? Scout "Bob Crantz" wrote in message ink.net... It's obvious that you, Capt Neal, reign supreme as a Master Mariner over this newsgroup. I took note of your quick detection of a sense of entitlement from Scout there. That is one of the essential traits of Liberalism. It is an attempt to thwart reality by assuming that something is owed you (obviously from someone else). If a liberal is alone in the woods and a tree falls and lands on his leg, pinning him to the ground, is he entitled to help? "Ask not what your country can force others to do for you". Amen! Bob Crantz "Capt. Neal®" wrote in message ... Being? "Scout" wrote in message ... that's just perversion of a more noble idea. Scout "Capt. Neal®" wrote Wrong! That is pure liberalism. You need to consider the fact that everyone who works hard, works hard. That's it. That's all of it. If he has something to show for his hard work or nothing to show for it that is his own choice and his own responsibility. |
.. . . that being comfortable with the few profiting from the hard work of
the many, while the many receive no profit, is to be comfortable with slavery, which doesn't surprise me a bit. "Capt. Neal®" wrote in message ... Being? "Scout" wrote in message ... that's just perversion of a more noble idea. Scout "Capt. Neal®" wrote Wrong! That is pure liberalism. You need to consider the fact that everyone who works hard, works hard. That's it. That's all of it. If he has something to show for his hard work or nothing to show for it that is his own choice and his own responsibility. |
Shhhhh.....Neal doesn't get it...
"Scout" wrote in message ... Good satire Bob. Does anyone else here realize that your landover posts are the epitome of liberalism? Scout "Bob Crantz" wrote in message ink.net... It's obvious that you, Capt Neal, reign supreme as a Master Mariner over this newsgroup. I took note of your quick detection of a sense of entitlement from Scout there. That is one of the essential traits of Liberalism. It is an attempt to thwart reality by assuming that something is owed you (obviously from someone else). If a liberal is alone in the woods and a tree falls and lands on his leg, pinning him to the ground, is he entitled to help? "Ask not what your country can force others to do for you". Amen! Bob Crantz "Capt. Neal®" wrote in message ... Being? "Scout" wrote in message ... that's just perversion of a more noble idea. Scout "Capt. Neal®" wrote Wrong! That is pure liberalism. You need to consider the fact that everyone who works hard, works hard. That's it. That's all of it. If he has something to show for his hard work or nothing to show for it that is his own choice and his own responsibility. |
I am assertive....not aggressive....
"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message news:hTpYd.20694$i6.18071@edtnps90... Aggression need not be physical.... CM "katysails" wrote in message ... I am not a physically aggressive person....except for the boots, chains, spurs, etc....but that's not the same thing... "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message news:xghYd.40369$fc4.33395@edtnps89... You may indeed suggest it...... but I'd sooner you take your own advise. CM "katysails" wrote in message Well, may I suggest you rise above your base animal instinct and start using the tools that were given you to negotiate and walk away from aggression? |
"Dave" wrote in message What foolish nonsense. You don't like your boss? Go to work for somebody who will appreciate your genius and diligence. Nah... You've got that all wrong... if you don't like your boss... you raise the bar on job performance and then request a lay-off. Unions have had their day..... if I had a preference I would suggest the staff establish a committee and hire a Legal Firm to negotiate wages and benefits. No strikes.. just costly litigation which would prove incentive to settlement. I would then as well have an accounting of where my monthly "union dues" were being spent and wouldn't have some dork calling me "Brother Mooron".... CM |
You require aggressiveness to be assertive.... the very act of asserting
yourself, places others as either your equal or your subordinate.... despite what they may have perceived. This situation is not attained by passive compliance, nor neutral indifference. CM "katysails" wrote in message ... I am assertive....not aggressive.... "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message news:hTpYd.20694$i6.18071@edtnps90... Aggression need not be physical.... CM "katysails" wrote in message ... I am not a physically aggressive person....except for the boots, chains, spurs, etc....but that's not the same thing... "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message news:xghYd.40369$fc4.33395@edtnps89... You may indeed suggest it...... but I'd sooner you take your own advise. CM "katysails" wrote in message Well, may I suggest you rise above your base animal instinct and start using the tools that were given you to negotiate and walk away from aggression? |
"Scout" wrote in message ... Good satire Bob. Does anyone else here realize that your landover posts are the epitome of liberalism? No, we're all just a bunch of dumb hicks. |
"Capt. Mooron" wrote Nah... You've got that all wrong... if you don't like your boss... you raise the bar on job performance and then request a lay-off. Unions have had their day..... if I had a preference I would suggest the staff establish a committee and hire a Legal Firm to negotiate wages and benefits. No strikes.. just costly litigation which would prove incentive to settlement. I would then as well have an accounting of where my monthly "union dues" were being spent and wouldn't have some dork calling me "Brother Mooron".... I prefer my method. I quote a price. They can take it or shove it. Scotty |
Why not? I do it all the time.
Scotty "katysails" wrote in message ... Not good to pee in your own backyard, Lonny... |
One of the joys of livin' in the country.
CM "Scott Vernon" wrote in message ... Why not? I do it all the time. Scotty "katysails" wrote in message ... Not good to pee in your own backyard, Lonny... |
An assertive person makes their point by showing you the hole in the ground;
an aggressive person puts you in the hole in the ground. "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message news:gXrYd.19227$ZO2.4609@edtnps84... You require aggressiveness to be assertive.... the very act of asserting yourself, places others as either your equal or your subordinate.... despite what they may have perceived. This situation is not attained by passive compliance, nor neutral indifference. CM "katysails" wrote in message ... I am assertive....not aggressive.... "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message news:hTpYd.20694$i6.18071@edtnps90... Aggression need not be physical.... CM "katysails" wrote in message ... I am not a physically aggressive person....except for the boots, chains, spurs, etc....but that's not the same thing... "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message news:xghYd.40369$fc4.33395@edtnps89... You may indeed suggest it...... but I'd sooner you take your own advise. CM "katysails" wrote in message Well, may I suggest you rise above your base animal instinct and start using the tools that were given you to negotiate and walk away from aggression? |
It wasn't meant to be literal, Scotty....
"Scott Vernon" wrote in message ... Why not? I do it all the time. Scotty "katysails" wrote in message ... Not good to pee in your own backyard, Lonny... |
We live on top of a hill and the woods only covers one side...the exposure
level from the other side is...very open....unfortunately, that's where the neighbors live... "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message news:2psYd.19538$ZO2.16990@edtnps84... One of the joys of livin' in the country. CM "Scott Vernon" wrote in message ... Why not? I do it all the time. Scotty "katysails" wrote in message ... Not good to pee in your own backyard, Lonny... |
NO! Kitty.... You are confusing aggressiveness and assertiveness.... which
is understandable. I will repeat myself despite the fact I know you are not capable of understanding the logic..... You cannot be assertive without being aggressive. Let's take the scenario you utilized.... you assume that aggression requires physical intervention. It does not! Aggression between males has a multi-tiered level.... none of which can be comprehended by females. The level of aggressive behaviour is dependant on the situation. This is comprehended by even the youngest of our gender. CM CM "katysails" wrote in message ... An assertive person makes their point by showing you the hole in the ground; an aggressive person puts you in the hole in the ground. "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message news:gXrYd.19227$ZO2.4609@edtnps84... You require aggressiveness to be assertive.... the very act of asserting yourself, places others as either your equal or your subordinate.... despite what they may have perceived. This situation is not attained by passive compliance, nor neutral indifference. CM "katysails" wrote in message ... I am assertive....not aggressive.... "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message news:hTpYd.20694$i6.18071@edtnps90... Aggression need not be physical.... CM "katysails" wrote in message ... I am not a physically aggressive person....except for the boots, chains, spurs, etc....but that's not the same thing... "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message news:xghYd.40369$fc4.33395@edtnps89... You may indeed suggest it...... but I'd sooner you take your own advise. CM "katysails" wrote in message Well, may I suggest you rise above your base animal instinct and start using the tools that were given you to negotiate and walk away from aggression? |
A man can turn his back to the world and relieve himself... a woman must
squat and bear herself to it. CM "katysails" wrote in message ... We live on top of a hill and the woods only covers one side...the exposure level from the other side is...very open....unfortunately, that's where the neighbors live... "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message news:2psYd.19538$ZO2.16990@edtnps84... One of the joys of livin' in the country. CM "Scott Vernon" wrote in message ... Why not? I do it all the time. Scotty "katysails" wrote in message ... Not good to pee in your own backyard, Lonny... |
In article ,
Scout wrote: Nothing wrong with profit Joe. But everyone who works hard should have something to show for it. Scout Unions... the people who gave us the 8 hour days and the 5 day work weeks. -- Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m) http://www.sailnow.com "If there's no wind, row." |
In article ,
katysails wrote: Do we need Ganz to post all your former indiscretions again? "Capt. Neal®" wrote in message ... So, Katysails shows her true colors. There are so many... do I have to?? -- Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m) http://www.sailnow.com "If there's no wind, row." |
In article 6c8Yd.19351$i6.1805@edtnps90,
Capt. Mooron wrote: "Capt. Neal®" wrote in message It has always been my belief that those who delight in beating up queers are little chicken-**** men. Real men don't beat up queers. Frightened little cowards do. Do you agree that real men protect their women from abuse? Or are one of those men who abuse their women? If a man attacks your woman.... sure.. kick the crap outta him. I won't tolerate a man attacking a woman... verbally or physically. I told Gaynzy to ease up on insulting LP or he'd get on my bad side in a hurry... he ignored the warning. Then he started in on Kitty... so as far as I'm concerned he's fair game for a beating. Gaynzy has no class... that's his problem..... are you coming to his defence? Bwahahahahaaa.... LIKE I GIVE A **** WHAT YOU THINK... MR. CHICKEN!! You're a wimp and a drunk. LP IS A LESBIAN AND PROBABLY A LOT WORSE, sinec there's nothing wrong with lesbians in general. -- Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m) http://www.sailnow.com "If there's no wind, row." |
In article ,
katysails wrote: Rationale of the irrational...hope Ganz posts your history...you need to be reminded what you have proclaimed yourself to be... "Capt. Neal®" wrote in message ... You mean the one about him preferring 13 year olds? -- Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m) http://www.sailnow.com "If there's no wind, row." |
In article %r9Yd.19381$i6.6679@edtnps90,
Capt. Mooron wrote: "Joe" wrote in message And when your beat someone you respect you feel you accomplish more. To fight someone who is not worthy of respect.. is like target pratice and not really doing much. Like when you start slappin' Gaynzy around? CM Like when you play with your chickens???? BWAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAA -- Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m) http://www.sailnow.com "If there's no wind, row." |
In article ,
katysails wrote: The sins of the past coming back to haunt you? Or more likely, kick you in the butt? "Capt. Neal®" wrote in message ... Maybe I'm in love and feel a need to protect a loved one from libel and slander? CN How sweet... Neal wants to "protect" the 13 year old. Must be similar to Mooron trying to be with his chickens. -- Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m) http://www.sailnow.com "If there's no wind, row." |
What you're all missing is the fact that the options you mention are all
possible thanks to the battle fought by unions. How blind can you be? Still, you folks can probably live the rest of your lives in ignorance, living off the inertia of union accomplishments; but mark my words, your children will pay the price for your lack of diligence. Of course, Neal wouldn't care about that nor would his many sock puppets. Scout "Scott Vernon" wrote in message ... "Capt. Mooron" wrote Nah... You've got that all wrong... if you don't like your boss... you raise the bar on job performance and then request a lay-off. Unions have had their day..... if I had a preference I would suggest the staff establish a committee and hire a Legal Firm to negotiate wages and benefits. No strikes.. just costly litigation which would prove incentive to settlement. I would then as well have an accounting of where my monthly "union dues" were being spent and wouldn't have some dork calling me "Brother Mooron".... I prefer my method. I quote a price. They can take it or shove it. Scotty |
Holy **** Dave, read the full article!
The current feeding frenzy happening in the real estate market does not mean Americans are wealthier than ever. The second half of your evidence is a sad ending for such a promising thesis. What it means is young people must wait for their parents to die to get their first home. What it means is that people who can scrape together two nickels to save will get 1.5% interest while credit card companies rape people for 20% (check out Citi-Bank's earnings and policies). What it means is that gasoline will soon be $3 / gallon. What it means is that apartments in the sticks are going for $2,000/month. That article is nothing more than red paint on a whore's lips. Don't **** down my back and tell me it's raining Dave. Scout "Dave" wrote in message ... On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 01:04:41 GMT, "Scout" said: I hardly call posting propaganda a debunking. The Federal Reserve and Reuters are big in the propaganda business, right? |
"Capt. Neal®" wrote
Wrong! That is pure liberalism. You need to consider the fact that everyone who works hard, works hard. That's it. That's all of it. If he has something to show for his hard work or nothing to show for it that is his own choice and his own responsibility. Yes folks, right there is the mentality that brought you the union! And by the way, I'm not excusing the corruption seen in many unions. That's just one more burden placed on the worker. It doesn't justify crushing the unions, however, so we can go back to the days of bidding for workers. I once worked as a manager for a large petroleum company who owned wells in Texas City. I sat in a management meeting and listened as they laid out their plan to keep the union out. "Let's pay the workers just slightly below union rate, so they won't vote union," they said. The non-union workers got a raise, I got a raise (managers salary was based on workers highest salary). We all got raises, without being union, but thanks to the union. "So, who will work for $100 per day? ~ Ok, who will work for $50?" Scout |
"Capt. Mooron" wrote
Unions have had their day..... if I had a preference I would suggest the staff establish a committee and hire a Legal Firm to negotiate wages and benefits. No strikes.. just costly litigation which would prove incentive to settlement. I would then as well have an accounting of where my monthly "union dues" were being spent and wouldn't have some dork calling me "Brother Mooron".... Very good. And because they had that day, hired goons no longer show up and split your head open with a baseball bat for wanting a fair share of the profits of a company's efforts. Had you seen that, you might be glad to have a brother close by. These heavy handed "negotiations" made bar room fights look like a day at the beach. It's all very well and good to espouse a philosophy that worked in the day of the agrarian citizen, but the sheer number of people in the modern workforce demands different rules. Hobbes would have agreed with me. People are inherently greedy; generally speaking they are pricks. ASA provides all the evidence one needs to believe that is true. Government and big business are one and the same, and together they are still the Leviathan. Mutually beneficial contracts are needed today more than ever. God bless a nation where a guy like Scotty can make the offer of "take it or shove it." He can do so only because others have paid the cost, and continue to pay the price, for that privilege. Scout |
It's not that we don't comprehend..it's that we reject that as anything
other than what it is....uncontrolled testosterone...it worked for cavemen because that's the physical reality they lived in but the idea of man (gender, not species) as hunter/gatherer in an enlightened society is an anachronism... "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message news:5huYd.20032$ZO2.7495@edtnps84... NO! Kitty.... You are confusing aggressiveness and assertiveness.... which is understandable. I will repeat myself despite the fact I know you are not capable of understanding the logic..... You cannot be assertive without being aggressive. Let's take the scenario you utilized.... you assume that aggression requires physical intervention. It does not! Aggression between males has a multi-tiered level.... none of which can be comprehended by females. The level of aggressive behaviour is dependant on the situation. This is comprehended by even the youngest of our gender. CM CM "katysails" wrote in message ... An assertive person makes their point by showing you the hole in the ground; an aggressive person puts you in the hole in the ground. "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message news:gXrYd.19227$ZO2.4609@edtnps84... You require aggressiveness to be assertive.... the very act of asserting yourself, places others as either your equal or your subordinate.... despite what they may have perceived. This situation is not attained by passive compliance, nor neutral indifference. CM "katysails" wrote in message ... I am assertive....not aggressive.... "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message news:hTpYd.20694$i6.18071@edtnps90... Aggression need not be physical.... CM "katysails" wrote in message ... I am not a physically aggressive person....except for the boots, chains, spurs, etc....but that's not the same thing... "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message news:xghYd.40369$fc4.33395@edtnps89... You may indeed suggest it...... but I'd sooner you take your own advise. CM "katysails" wrote in message Well, may I suggest you rise above your base animal instinct and start using the tools that were given you to negotiate and walk away from aggression? |
Nah....you just happen to know the swuatters...
"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message news:WiuYd.20034$ZO2.2028@edtnps84... A man can turn his back to the world and relieve himself... a woman must squat and bear herself to it. CM "katysails" wrote in message ... We live on top of a hill and the woods only covers one side...the exposure level from the other side is...very open....unfortunately, that's where the neighbors live... "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message news:2psYd.19538$ZO2.16990@edtnps84... One of the joys of livin' in the country. CM "Scott Vernon" wrote in message ... Why not? I do it all the time. Scotty "katysails" wrote in message ... Not good to pee in your own backyard, Lonny... |
1. No one owes you a job.
2. You get what you negotiate for. Amen! BC "Scout" wrote in message ... . . . that being comfortable with the few profiting from the hard work of the many, while the many receive no profit, is to be comfortable with slavery, which doesn't surprise me a bit. "Capt. Neal®" wrote in message ... Being? "Scout" wrote in message ... that's just perversion of a more noble idea. Scout "Capt. Neal®" wrote Wrong! That is pure liberalism. You need to consider the fact that everyone who works hard, works hard. That's it. That's all of it. If he has something to show for his hard work or nothing to show for it that is his own choice and his own responsibility. |
I thought they created a Confederation.
"Scout" wrote in message ... "Capt. Neal®" wrote in message ... "Scout" wrote in message ... So our founding fathers, who believed in strength through unity, were socialists? Bwaahahhahahahhah. You are definitely a product of the liberal public educational system. You learned a slanted view of what our founding fathers were all about. Our founding fathers believed in strength through individualism and hard work. Nope, Catholic school, then private college. And, our founding fathers United the colonies, they made a UNION. Care to guess why? You lose, once again. Scout |
So, basically, unions are all good?
What is the cost of the teachers union to the future productivity of this country? How many jobs in the last century were shipped overseas because of unions? How much environmental damage have unions caused in the steel and automotive industry clinging to old methods and factories? How many companies will default on their pension promises because of bloated union demands? How many people will wind up getting nothing or very little when they retire? How many union members have been ripped off or beaten up by their own unions? What is the overall cost of unions impeding the fluidity of capital? BC "Scout" wrote in message ... What you're all missing is the fact that the options you mention are all possible thanks to the battle fought by unions. How blind can you be? Still, you folks can probably live the rest of your lives in ignorance, living off the inertia of union accomplishments; but mark my words, your children will pay the price for your lack of diligence. Of course, Neal wouldn't care about that nor would his many sock puppets. Scout "Scott Vernon" wrote in message ... "Capt. Mooron" wrote Nah... You've got that all wrong... if you don't like your boss... you raise the bar on job performance and then request a lay-off. Unions have had their day..... if I had a preference I would suggest the staff establish a committee and hire a Legal Firm to negotiate wages and benefits. No strikes.. just costly litigation which would prove incentive to settlement. I would then as well have an accounting of where my monthly "union dues" were being spent and wouldn't have some dork calling me "Brother Mooron".... I prefer my method. I quote a price. They can take it or shove it. Scotty |
As bad as it is, it beats living in caves or during the Depression.
Doesn't it? BC "Scout" wrote in message ... Holy **** Dave, read the full article! The current feeding frenzy happening in the real estate market does not mean Americans are wealthier than ever. The second half of your evidence is a sad ending for such a promising thesis. What it means is young people must wait for their parents to die to get their first home. What it means is that people who can scrape together two nickels to save will get 1.5% interest while credit card companies rape people for 20% (check out Citi-Bank's earnings and policies). What it means is that gasoline will soon be $3 / gallon. What it means is that apartments in the sticks are going for $2,000/month. That article is nothing more than red paint on a whore's lips. Don't **** down my back and tell me it's raining Dave. Scout "Dave" wrote in message ... On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 01:04:41 GMT, "Scout" said: I hardly call posting propaganda a debunking. The Federal Reserve and Reuters are big in the propaganda business, right? |
Brilliant Capt consider that most women are just a vat of volatile
chemicals. It'a all alchemistry, there's no logic or reason. Mooron is right, just stand back, close your eyes and hold your nose! Amen! Bob Crantz "Capt. Neal®" wrote in message ... "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message news:6c8Yd.19351$i6.1805@edtnps90... "Capt. Neal®" wrote in message It has always been my belief that those who delight in beating up queers are little chicken-**** men. Real men don't beat up queers. Frightened little cowards do. Do you agree that real men protect their women from abuse? Or are one of those men who abuse their women? If a man attacks your woman.... sure.. kick the crap outta him. I won't tolerate a man attacking a woman... verbally or physically. I told Gaynzy to ease up on insulting LP or he'd get on my bad side in a hurry... he ignored the warning. Then he started in on Kitty... so as far as I'm concerned he's fair game for a beating. Gaynzy has no class... that's his problem..... are you coming to his defence? Now if a woman gets into a fight with your woman.... that's between the hens! A catfight fight involves a lot of hissin' spittin' clawin' & scratchin'... it's fun to watch, but it's neither sensible nor required to get involved. Unlike Men.... Women fight dirty.... nothing is sacred nor is there any honour. To lower yourself to become involved is nothing less than foolish. You and I may have arguments and disagreements.... but can readily be insulting each other in one thread and complimenting each other in an alternate thread. Men understand the battle and generally respect their opponents... women do not. Notice how all the dirty laundry was suddenly 'exposed' during their fight..... most of which I had no interest in and should have been kept offline. It showed neither of them have any common sense and both need to be placed over the knee and spanked! CM It seems to me it is a man's responsibility to inject a modicum of reason and common sense in any argument no matter the gender of the individuals involved. This I have tried to do but unsuccessfully because some women definitely cannot listen to reason and some are incapable of self-examination. To sit back and listen to a person of any gender making serious false accusations about another person of any gender is to send the wrong message. Men are supposed to lead by virtue of their superior logic and reason. To not exercise that reason and logic at every appropriate opportunity is to renege on being a man. CN |
You are right to a point brilliant one.
There are some things you can control. There are others you can't. Wisdom is to know the difference... On this subject we pray you be dumb-- Dumb--dumb. We think you had better succumb-- Cumb--cumb! There are lots of good fish in the sea! You'll find there are many Who'll wed for a penny-- Who'll wed for a penny! There are lots of good fish in the sea! There are lots of good fish in the sea! There's lots of good fish, good fish in the sea! There's lots of good fish, good fish in the sea, in the sea, in the sea, in the sea, in the sea! BC "Capt. Neal®" wrote in message ... Ah, but you are wrong. It is ILLOGICAL to not support a loved one. Does a father ignore protecting his daughter from boy or girl because she is female. Does a husband not protect his wife from a vicious gang of females out to harm her as adamantly as he would protect her from a male rapist. I find it hard to believe that if you had a daughter you would let her be hounded and abused physically and mentally by other girls at school. Gender has nothing to do with sticking up for what is right. It is not right to accuse any person of child neglect when there is no evidence of it, especially while there IS tragic evidence that a child in one's very own family might be a victim of child neglect even if it's accidental and unintentional. You are the one sounding female with your illogical arguments, sir. CN "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message news:AW8Yd.19373$i6.12631@edtnps90... "Capt. Neal®" wrote in message It seems to me it is a man's responsibility to inject a modicum of reason and common sense in any argument no matter the gender of the individuals involved. This I have tried to do but unsuccessfully because some women definitely cannot listen to reason and some are incapable of self-examination. No.... that's called interference... biased interference. Since you favour one over the other you cannot allude to a having a logical approach. This is why you have met with abject failure in your endeavours. A man may elect to be guided by emotion... but a woman can not elect to be guided by logic. To sit back and listen to a person of any gender making serious false accusations about another person of any gender is to send the wrong message. Men are supposed to lead by virtue of their superior logic and reason. To not exercise that reason and logic at every appropriate opportunity is to renege on being a man. It's the lack of logic in your approach that I'm questioning. CM |
You are quite comical!
Good job! The all powerful Lord needs a jester! Heaven for you! Amen! BC "Lonny Bruce" wrote in message news:IqiYd.16$Z07.12@trnddc02... KATY IS AFRAID, KATY IS AFRAID! L -- Enjoy my new sailing web site http://sail247.com "Capt. Neal®" wrote in message ... Katy, Prior to respect comes understanding. You will never respect somebody you don't understand. Rational human beings attempt to understand and they work at it harder than they do dis- respecting somebody. Irrational human beings use not respecting somebody as an excuse to abuse them. With that abuse comes more disrespect. Then it ends up in a fight because some find it easier to fight than to understand. Not very Christian of you, Katy. I am trying hard to understand you and you are throwing up roadblocks at every intersection. What are you afraid of? CN "katysails" wrote in message ... The only reason to "fight" with anyone is because you don't respect them....why would you want to fight someone you respect? What's honorable about that? "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message news:6c8Yd.19351$i6.1805@edtnps90... "Capt. Neal®" wrote in message It has always been my belief that those who delight in beating up queers are little chicken-**** men. Real men don't beat up queers. Frightened little cowards do. Do you agree that real men protect their women from abuse? Or are one of those men who abuse their women? If a man attacks your woman.... sure.. kick the crap outta him. I won't tolerate a man attacking a woman... verbally or physically. I told Gaynzy to ease up on insulting LP or he'd get on my bad side in a hurry... he ignored the warning. Then he started in on Kitty... so as far as I'm concerned he's fair game for a beating. Gaynzy has no class... that's his problem..... are you coming to his defence? Now if a woman gets into a fight with your woman.... that's between the hens! A catfight fight involves a lot of hissin' spittin' clawin' & scratchin'... it's fun to watch, but it's neither sensible nor required to get involved. Unlike Men.... Women fight dirty.... nothing is sacred nor is there any honour. To lower yourself to become involved is nothing less than foolish. You and I may have arguments and disagreements.... but can readily be insulting each other in one thread and complimenting each other in an alternate thread. Men understand the battle and generally respect their opponents... women do not. Notice how all the dirty laundry was suddenly 'exposed' during their fight..... most of which I had no interest in and should have been kept offline. It showed neither of them have any common sense and both need to be placed over the knee and spanked! CM |
generally, I turn my back to the wind.
Scotty "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message news:WiuYd.20034$ZO2.2028@edtnps84... A man can turn his back to the world and relieve himself... a woman must squat and bear herself to it. CM "katysails" wrote in message ... We live on top of a hill and the woods only covers one side...the exposure level from the other side is...very open....unfortunately, that's where the neighbors live... "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message news:2psYd.19538$ZO2.16990@edtnps84... One of the joys of livin' in the country. CM "Scott Vernon" wrote in message ... Why not? I do it all the time. Scotty "katysails" wrote in message ... Not good to pee in your own backyard, Lonny... |
"katysails" wrote ... An assertive person makes their point by showing you the hole in the ground; an aggressive person puts you in the hole in the ground. and a smart fellow would stick his outhouse over the hole. SV |
"katysails" wrote in message ... It wasn't meant to beliteral Scotty.... yeah, don't belittle me! SV |
"Jonathan Ganz" wrote I like when you play with your chicken! BWAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAA |
"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ... In article , Scout wrote: Nothing wrong with profit Joe. But everyone who works hard should have something to show for it. Scout Unions... the people who gave us the 8 hour days and the 5 day work weeks. Yes, unions were a good thing in their day. SV |
"Jonathan Ganz" wrote So, Katysails shows her true colors. There are so many... in your Rainbow Flag? do I have to?? Please don't. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:52 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com