|
"katysails" wrote in message snort...like heck compliance comes naturally....BTW, the snort was not assertive but aggressive...and certainly noncompliant... I'll bet it was derisive. And perhaps even a bit denigrating. An aggressively denigratingly derisive, noncompliant, nonassertive snort. Max |
"Maxprop" wrote in message ink.net... "katysails" wrote in message snort...like heck compliance comes naturally....BTW, the snort was not assertive but aggressive...and certainly noncompliant... I'll bet it was derisive. And perhaps even a bit denigrating. An aggressively denigratingly derisive, noncompliant, nonassertive snort. I'm not quite certain Max... but it seems that "snort" sounded awfully assertive ..... Kitty was being totally noncompliant in this instance. I believe it stems from her aggressive personality which apparently has been piqued! She carefully weighed the substance of the point of contention and decided to take a stand. It seems I can take comfort in the fact that her assertiveness was based on aggression which would validate my argument... proving once again that females are guided by emotion and not logic! Excuse me while I take time to engage in my "I win! I Win!! River Dance" ...... Hoo Yeah! Who Da Man?... I Da Man! CM |
I believe in the free market.
If a man wants to work, then he should be allowed to work. If a man wants to strike, then he should be allowed to be replaced, provided someone else wants to do the work. The days of strong arm tactics should be over. They don't help anyone anymore. Collective bargaining should be allowed. It is more effecient for management, and it assures all workers of getting a somewhat equal and fair shake. But if you choose not to work (strike), then you can be replaced. Perhaps the management will decide it will function better with the striking workers as they are more experienced, then that is the free market at work. I believe in the free market. L -- Enjoy my new sailing web site http://sail247.com "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message news:ygiZd.57167$fc4.43701@edtnps89... "Lonny Bruce" wrote in message news:r2gZd.2223$uw6.564@trnddc06... "Scout" wrote in message ... CM, . Perhaps things are different in Canada, or in Philadelphia. Or in the real world. Lonny..... try this link on the Giant Mine Strike in Yellowknife... http://tinylink.com/?aVHXwkC6Ed I lived through it and had good friends on both sides. It destroyed life-long friendships and families to nobody's benefit. The fault lay squarely in the laps of both Employer and Union. This is why I am leaning towards Legal Firms to engage in Employment Contracts. CM |
Katy! you're babbling.
"katysails" wrote in message ... snort...like heck compliance comes naturally....BTW, the snort was not assertive but aggressive...and certainly noncompliant... "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message news:bTpZd.31168$i6.26124@edtnps90... "Maxprop" wrote in message Aggressively assertive compliance. She's female... compliance comes naturally! Assertive, Aggressive or otherwise... :-) CM... I know... I know... I'll burn in the Lava Lakes! |
"Dave" wrote in message ... On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 13:31:46 GMT, "Lonny Bruce" said: Collective bargaining should be allowed. It is more effecient for management, and it assures all workers of getting a somewhat equal and fair shake. As to efficiency, I find that a fairly weak argument. Seems to me it would be more efficient for management to be able to pay its harder working and more productive workers more than the guy who starts putting on his coat at 4:45. Which is why a legal firm would be a much better option than a union in today's workforce. Most of the union bosses are poorly educated, unmotivated, under-achievers who rely on seniority and the "good ole' boys" club mentality to secure a cushy position within the union hierarchy. If union dues were used to employ a legal firm to negotiate pay rates and benefits, the threat of a strike would be a non-issue and the cost of lengthy litigation would provide incentive for both sides to reach an agreement. As it is the collective bargaining and union demands are generally fuelled by the personal agenda of the union bosses..... not the requirements of the rank & file membership. CM |
You know me so well....
"Maxprop" wrote in message ink.net... "katysails" wrote in message snort...like heck compliance comes naturally....BTW, the snort was not assertive but aggressive...and certainly noncompliant... I'll bet it was derisive. And perhaps even a bit denigrating. An aggressively denigratingly derisive, noncompliant, nonassertive snort. Max |
Did you ever consider the fact that I had a stuffy nose and needed to clear
it at that time? But I refrained from aggressively clearing it your way and averted an aggressive reply from you in return...making it an assertive act but the remark was most obviously derisive...but not aggressive, since no force was applied in any way, shape, or form...and only aggressors care if they win or lose...I am sanctimonious no matter which way it turns... "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message news:5CtZd.31486$i6.16248@edtnps90... "Maxprop" wrote in message ink.net... "katysails" wrote in message snort...like heck compliance comes naturally....BTW, the snort was not assertive but aggressive...and certainly noncompliant... I'll bet it was derisive. And perhaps even a bit denigrating. An aggressively denigratingly derisive, noncompliant, nonassertive snort. I'm not quite certain Max... but it seems that "snort" sounded awfully assertive ..... Kitty was being totally noncompliant in this instance. I believe it stems from her aggressive personality which apparently has been piqued! She carefully weighed the substance of the point of contention and decided to take a stand. It seems I can take comfort in the fact that her assertiveness was based on aggression which would validate my argument... proving once again that females are guided by emotion and not logic! Excuse me while I take time to engage in my "I win! I Win!! River Dance" ..... Hoo Yeah! Who Da Man?... I Da Man! CM |
If you followed the thread you would know what's going on...get with the
program.... "Scott Vernon" wrote in message ... Katy! you're babbling. "katysails" wrote in message ... snort...like heck compliance comes naturally....BTW, the snort was not assertive but aggressive...and certainly noncompliant... "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message news:bTpZd.31168$i6.26124@edtnps90... "Maxprop" wrote in message Aggressively assertive compliance. She's female... compliance comes naturally! Assertive, Aggressive or otherwise... :-) CM... I know... I know... I'll burn in the Lava Lakes! |
Yeah Whatever... Okay!... but I still win right!!!
Woooooooooooo Ye-e-e-a-a-a-a-a-h-h-h-h-h-h!!!! CM Who Da Man!?.... I da Man!!!! "katysails" wrote in message ... Did you ever consider the fact that I had a stuffy nose and needed to clear it at that time? But I refrained from aggressively clearing it your way and averted an aggressive reply from you in return...making it an assertive act but the remark was most obviously derisive...but not aggressive, since no force was applied in any way, shape, or form...and only aggressors care if they win or lose...I am sanctimonious no matter which way it turns... "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message news:5CtZd.31486$i6.16248@edtnps90... "Maxprop" wrote in message ink.net... "katysails" wrote in message snort...like heck compliance comes naturally....BTW, the snort was not assertive but aggressive...and certainly noncompliant... I'll bet it was derisive. And perhaps even a bit denigrating. An aggressively denigratingly derisive, noncompliant, nonassertive snort. I'm not quite certain Max... but it seems that "snort" sounded awfully assertive ..... Kitty was being totally noncompliant in this instance. I believe it stems from her aggressive personality which apparently has been piqued! She carefully weighed the substance of the point of contention and decided to take a stand. It seems I can take comfort in the fact that her assertiveness was based on aggression which would validate my argument... proving once again that females are guided by emotion and not logic! Excuse me while I take time to engage in my "I win! I Win!! River Dance" ..... Hoo Yeah! Who Da Man?... I Da Man! CM |
Whoa!... that assertion sounded awfully aggressive to me Kitty!!
CM "katysails" wrote in message ... If you followed the thread you would know what's going on...get with the program.... "Scott Vernon" wrote in message ... Katy! you're babbling. "katysails" wrote in message ... snort...like heck compliance comes naturally....BTW, the snort was not assertive but aggressive...and certainly noncompliant... "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message news:bTpZd.31168$i6.26124@edtnps90... "Maxprop" wrote in message Aggressively assertive compliance. She's female... compliance comes naturally! Assertive, Aggressive or otherwise... :-) CM... I know... I know... I'll burn in the Lava Lakes! |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:23 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com