BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   ASA (https://www.boatbanter.com/asa/)
-   -   A final refoinder to the situation... (https://www.boatbanter.com/asa/28948-final-refoinder-situation.html)

Scott Vernon March 13th 05 12:46 AM


"JG" wrote in message
...
No they're not. They've been involved in situations beyond their

control.
Cheating implies some nefarious act.


Not necassarily. If someone files bankrupcy, even though they tried
their hardest and were honest, their creditors are still cheated out
of the money they're owed.

Scotty



--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Scott Vernon" wrote in message
...
Well, they're cheating somebody.


"JG" wrote in message
...
I agree, but a very large number are in that situation because of

family
problems, such as illness or death of a spouse or child/parent.

Most
are not
cheating the system.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Scout" wrote in message
...
No they don't. What they do is offer the card at a lower rate

and
then let
it crawl like ivy up a wall.
And by the way, I'm all for making bankruptcy more difficult

for
fools in
debt. Why should we all pay for their lack of discipline.

Wouldn't
Neal be
surprised.
Scout

"Scott Vernon" wrote in message
...

"Scout" wrote ...
What it means is that people who can scrape together two
nickels to save will get 1.5% interest while credit card

companies
rape
people for 20% (check out Citi-Bank's earnings and policies).

Rape? Anybody that uses a CC deserves what they get charged.

it's not
like they hide the int. rates.

Scotty















Scott Vernon March 13th 05 12:47 AM


"JG" wrote in message
...
What's the opposite of "persoanl bankruptcy"??? Corporate? Like

Enron? Seems
to me that the individual is more important than the corporation.


Well yeah, you don't own a corp. If you did you'd feel different.

SV



Scott Vernon March 13th 05 12:50 AM

Why didn't you send over a couple of union thugs to break his legs?

Scotty


"Scout" wrote in message
...
Yep, but notice that I carefully couched my reference to "fools in

debt."
There are always legitimate cases where honest people have fallen on

hard
times and it is in the best interest of the rest of us to help them

regain
their balance.
There are others, of course, like the big casino mahof, who hired my

company
to do his mechanical construction and then claimed (planned)

bankruptcy. He
offered us 10 cents on the dollar. As you can see, he is no where

near
bankrupt and planned to let the contractors pay for his casino. We

said no,
beat him in court, and got all of our money.
Scout


"JG" wrote in message
...
I agree, but a very large number are in that situation because of

family
problems, such as illness or death of a spouse or child/parent.

Most are
not cheating the system.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Scout" wrote in message
...
No they don't. What they do is offer the card at a lower rate and

then
let it crawl like ivy up a wall.
And by the way, I'm all for making bankruptcy more difficult for

fools in
debt. Why should we all pay for their lack of discipline.

Wouldn't Neal
be surprised.
Scout

"Scott Vernon" wrote in message
...

"Scout" wrote ...
What it means is that people who can scrape together two
nickels to save will get 1.5% interest while credit card

companies
rape
people for 20% (check out Citi-Bank's earnings and policies).

Rape? Anybody that uses a CC deserves what they get charged.

it's not
like they hide the int. rates.

Scotty













Scott Vernon March 13th 05 12:56 AM

I believe you are unable to comprehend this
because as a gay you are guided by emotion as opposed to logic.



"JG" wrote in message
...
I disagree completely. One doesn't have to be aggressive to assert

one's
rights. I believe you're unable to comprehend this because you are

just
plain stupid.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message
news:w6LYd.23554$ZO2.23116@edtnps84...
Again you fail to grasp the basic fact that without an aggressive
attitude... you cannot be assertive. Assertiveness is merely a

symptom of
an aggressive nature, as is being competitive. Aggression does not

have to
involve physical violence. I believe you are unable to comprehend

this
because as a female you are guided by emotion as opposed to logic.

CM

"katysails" wrote in message
...
Assertiveness works well in the competitive field of business

whereas
aggressiveness will usually land you on the unemployment
lines...aggressive people generally rise fast in their

professions and
then tank out early whereas the consistently assertive attain

their goals
in a non-threatening manner and hold their positions or continue

to
rise....

"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message
news:N_EYd.46434$fc4.26583@edtnps89...
I believe it is indeed that you do not comprehend.... or make

erroneous
assumptions regarding male aggression. In the average male...
aggressiveness is controlled. To submit that a competitive nature

is not
required in a modern society is illogical. Even the few women in

a
position of power show an extremely heightened sense of

aggressiveness
and a competitive nature. Enlightenment has nothing to do with

it.

CM

"katysails" wrote in message

...
It's not that we don't comprehend..it's that we reject that as

anything
other than what it is....uncontrolled testosterone...it worked

for
cavemen because that's the physical reality they lived in but

the idea
of man (gender, not species) as hunter/gatherer in an

enlightened
society is an anachronism...


"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message
news:5huYd.20032$ZO2.7495@edtnps84...
NO! Kitty.... You are confusing aggressiveness and

assertiveness....
which is understandable. I will repeat myself despite the fact

I know
you are not capable of understanding the logic..... You cannot

be
assertive without being aggressive.

Let's take the scenario you utilized.... you assume that

aggression
requires physical intervention. It does not! Aggression

between males
has a multi-tiered level.... none of which can be comprehended

by
females. The level of aggressive behaviour is dependant on the
situation. This is comprehended by even the youngest of our

gender.

CM



CM

"katysails" wrote in message

...
An assertive person makes their point by showing you the hole

in the
ground; an aggressive person puts you in the hole in the

ground.

"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message
news:gXrYd.19227$ZO2.4609@edtnps84...
You require aggressiveness to be assertive.... the very act

of
asserting yourself, places others as either your equal or

your
subordinate.... despite what they may have perceived. This

situation
is not attained by passive compliance, nor neutral

indifference.

CM


"katysails" wrote in message

...
I am assertive....not aggressive....

"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message
news:hTpYd.20694$i6.18071@edtnps90...
Aggression need not be physical....

CM

"katysails" wrote in message

...
I am not a physically aggressive person....except for the

boots,
chains, spurs, etc....but that's not the same thing...

"Capt. Mooron" wrote in

message
news:xghYd.40369$fc4.33395@edtnps89...
You may indeed suggest it...... but I'd sooner you take

your
own advise.

CM

"katysails" wrote in

message
Well, may I suggest you rise above your base animal

instinct
and start using the tools that were given you to

negotiate and
walk away from aggression?



























Capt. Mooron March 13th 05 01:05 AM

Nova Scotia????? Bwahahahahahahahaaaa!!

CM

"JG" wrote in message
...
Yeah, in the frozen tundra where no one wants to live. Might make a nice
vacation home. I think I'll stick to the warmer lats.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message
news:YyLYd.23822$ZO2.20783@edtnps84...

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 22:47:23 GMT, "Scout" said:

But I wouldn't want to be the 25 year old newly wed trying to scrape
together 20% of $500K for a down payment.

Happens all the time. And in the Manhattan market, if they have to
scrape
together 20% of $500K for the down payment they're not gonna get to
first
base. The coop board will turn them down.


Isn't that where Bob lives???? Do you think his apartment is worth
$500K??
Man.. $500K will buy you 60 acres of oceanside and a house up this way!
$50K will buy you a 15 acre farm, with house, barns and out
buildings......

CM






Capt. Mooron March 13th 05 01:17 AM


"JG" wrote in message
...
I disagree completely. One doesn't have to be aggressive to assert one's
rights. I believe you're unable to comprehend this because you are just
plain stupid.


Well now Gaynzy... you're neither aggressive nor assertive... you're just an
annoying, whining little homo! Your incapacity of emulating any masculine
traits is positive proof that you are a limp wristed, lisping queer! Your
tendency to effeminate behaviour has no doubt been the root cause of the
abuse you've suffered throughout life.

Now why don't you return to memorizing the Vagina Monologues and reapply
more Preparation H while awaiting your next caller....

CM



JG March 13th 05 01:23 AM

The creditors were not cheated! They lost money because due to risks
associated with doing business. This is basic business stuff.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Scott Vernon" wrote in message
...

"JG" wrote in message
...
No they're not. They've been involved in situations beyond their

control.
Cheating implies some nefarious act.


Not necassarily. If someone files bankrupcy, even though they tried
their hardest and were honest, their creditors are still cheated out
of the money they're owed.

Scotty



--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Scott Vernon" wrote in message
...
Well, they're cheating somebody.


"JG" wrote in message
...
I agree, but a very large number are in that situation because of
family
problems, such as illness or death of a spouse or child/parent.

Most
are not
cheating the system.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Scout" wrote in message
...
No they don't. What they do is offer the card at a lower rate

and
then let
it crawl like ivy up a wall.
And by the way, I'm all for making bankruptcy more difficult

for
fools in
debt. Why should we all pay for their lack of discipline.

Wouldn't
Neal be
surprised.
Scout

"Scott Vernon" wrote in message
...

"Scout" wrote ...
What it means is that people who can scrape together two
nickels to save will get 1.5% interest while credit card
companies
rape
people for 20% (check out Citi-Bank's earnings and policies).

Rape? Anybody that uses a CC deserves what they get charged.
it's not
like they hide the int. rates.

Scotty

















JG March 13th 05 01:23 AM

Really? I don't?? Wow. Ok.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Scott Vernon" wrote in message
...

"JG" wrote in message
...
What's the opposite of "persoanl bankruptcy"??? Corporate? Like

Enron? Seems
to me that the individual is more important than the corporation.


Well yeah, you don't own a corp. If you did you'd feel different.

SV





JG March 13th 05 01:24 AM

Bwahahahaaa... I'm amazed your chickens don't freeze to death. Oh wait... I
forgot, they live in your house.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message
news:tlMYd.23932$ZO2.5515@edtnps84...
Nova Scotia????? Bwahahahahahahahaaaa!!

CM

"JG" wrote in message
...
Yeah, in the frozen tundra where no one wants to live. Might make a nice
vacation home. I think I'll stick to the warmer lats.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message
news:YyLYd.23822$ZO2.20783@edtnps84...

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 22:47:23 GMT, "Scout"
said:

But I wouldn't want to be the 25 year old newly wed trying to scrape
together 20% of $500K for a down payment.

Happens all the time. And in the Manhattan market, if they have to
scrape
together 20% of $500K for the down payment they're not gonna get to
first
base. The coop board will turn them down.

Isn't that where Bob lives???? Do you think his apartment is worth
$500K??
Man.. $500K will buy you 60 acres of oceanside and a house up this way!
$50K will buy you a 15 acre farm, with house, barns and out
buildings......

CM








JG March 13th 05 01:25 AM

This is how Scotti Potti shows his level of intelligence....

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Scott Vernon" wrote in message
...
I believe you are unable to comprehend this
because as a gay you are guided by emotion as opposed to logic.



"JG" wrote in message
...
I disagree completely. One doesn't have to be aggressive to assert

one's
rights. I believe you're unable to comprehend this because you are

just
plain stupid.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message
news:w6LYd.23554$ZO2.23116@edtnps84...
Again you fail to grasp the basic fact that without an aggressive
attitude... you cannot be assertive. Assertiveness is merely a

symptom of
an aggressive nature, as is being competitive. Aggression does not

have to
involve physical violence. I believe you are unable to comprehend

this
because as a female you are guided by emotion as opposed to logic.

CM

"katysails" wrote in message
...
Assertiveness works well in the competitive field of business

whereas
aggressiveness will usually land you on the unemployment
lines...aggressive people generally rise fast in their

professions and
then tank out early whereas the consistently assertive attain

their goals
in a non-threatening manner and hold their positions or continue

to
rise....

"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message
news:N_EYd.46434$fc4.26583@edtnps89...
I believe it is indeed that you do not comprehend.... or make

erroneous
assumptions regarding male aggression. In the average male...
aggressiveness is controlled. To submit that a competitive nature

is not
required in a modern society is illogical. Even the few women in

a
position of power show an extremely heightened sense of

aggressiveness
and a competitive nature. Enlightenment has nothing to do with

it.

CM

"katysails" wrote in message

...
It's not that we don't comprehend..it's that we reject that as

anything
other than what it is....uncontrolled testosterone...it worked

for
cavemen because that's the physical reality they lived in but

the idea
of man (gender, not species) as hunter/gatherer in an

enlightened
society is an anachronism...


"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message
news:5huYd.20032$ZO2.7495@edtnps84...
NO! Kitty.... You are confusing aggressiveness and

assertiveness....
which is understandable. I will repeat myself despite the fact

I know
you are not capable of understanding the logic..... You cannot

be
assertive without being aggressive.

Let's take the scenario you utilized.... you assume that

aggression
requires physical intervention. It does not! Aggression

between males
has a multi-tiered level.... none of which can be comprehended

by
females. The level of aggressive behaviour is dependant on the
situation. This is comprehended by even the youngest of our

gender.

CM



CM

"katysails" wrote in message

...
An assertive person makes their point by showing you the hole

in the
ground; an aggressive person puts you in the hole in the

ground.

"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message
news:gXrYd.19227$ZO2.4609@edtnps84...
You require aggressiveness to be assertive.... the very act

of
asserting yourself, places others as either your equal or

your
subordinate.... despite what they may have perceived. This

situation
is not attained by passive compliance, nor neutral

indifference.

CM


"katysails" wrote in message

...
I am assertive....not aggressive....

"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message
news:hTpYd.20694$i6.18071@edtnps90...
Aggression need not be physical....

CM

"katysails" wrote in message

...
I am not a physically aggressive person....except for the

boots,
chains, spurs, etc....but that's not the same thing...

"Capt. Mooron" wrote in

message
news:xghYd.40369$fc4.33395@edtnps89...
You may indeed suggest it...... but I'd sooner you take

your
own advise.

CM

"katysails" wrote in

message
Well, may I suggest you rise above your base animal

instinct
and start using the tools that were given you to

negotiate and
walk away from aggression?






























All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:14 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com