Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Lonny Bruce" wrote Who is next, people that are 20 pounds overweight? Why not? The same arguements can be made that peeps that are overweight take too much time off, and add to the overall cost of health care, therefore no one should hire them. Then who will be next, peeps who are genetically disposed to certain diseases? Yes, it would take genetic profiling, but why not? I mean the same arguements could be made that no one should hire women who's mother has contracted breast cancer, for instance, as there is a risk that they may contract it too, causing an employers health insurance claims to go up. Those are some great ideas Lonny, I'll bring them up at the next board meeting. SV |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Which anti freeze in Massachusetts? | General | |||
Smoking Diesel | General | |||
Mike B, Your smoking some good stuf | Power Boat Racing |