On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 07:32:51 -0400, DSK wrote:

Then what was all that stuff about how Kerry was really a coward and a
traitor and he really didn't earn those medals and he lied about it and
it was only scratch etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc
etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc...????


Dave wrote:
Had nothing to do with the procedures. The best of procedures will be
undermined if those providing the input are untruthful.

Let me get this straight- you are claiming that all the bull**** attacks
on Kerry's Viet Nam War record are all truthful & honest & totally
uncoordinated with the Bush-CHeney campaign.... *AND* they are in no way
reflective that Kerry's medals were awarded totally within the context
of a correct & honest procedure?

I'm sorry, my brain just cannot bend that far. Black is not white and
water runs downhill.

DSK

It is always a bit difficult to understand Dave's obscure little
questioning of the facts, but I believe he is dancing around the
absurd claim of the Swift Boat Liars for Bush that the initials "KJW"
on the after action reports *really* indicate that Kerry, with the
initials "JFK" wrote up all the after action reports. Now, of course,
35 years later and with the benefits of all this "new evidence"
provided by folks who weren't there, those "Kerry" reports need to be
re-written...preferably by the RNC, who, as we all know, were REALLY
not in the area at the time.

I hope that helps clear up your confusion