![]() |
The issue isn't whether Bush and his people have questioned the documents. The
most telling point is that they haven't disputed most of what the documents SAID. RB |
Barnes in a 1999 article said he called Guard on Bush's behalf - no
debunking by daughter then? Barnes says he called Guard on Bush's behalf By Michael Holmes Associated Press Writer Story last updated at 12:10 p.m. on Tuesday, September 28, 1999 AUSTIN, Texas -- The former speaker of the Texas House of Representatives acknowledged Monday that he called the head of the Texas Air National Guard in 1968 to recommend George W. Bush for a pilot slot during the Vietnam War. But Ben Barnes, who later was lieutenant governor, said the request for his help came from a Bush family friend -- not Bush or his father, who then was a congressman. The Texas governor and Republican presidential front-runner, meanwhile, insisted again that neither he nor his father sought such assistance when he joined the Guard. ''I can tell you what happened. Nothing happened. My Guard unit was looking for pilots and I flew for the Guard,'' Bush said at a campaign appearance south of Houston. ''I'm proud of my service and any allegation that my dad asked for special favors is simply not true. ... I didn't ask anybody to help get me to the Guard either,'' Bush said. Barnes, a Democrat, has been at the center of questions about Bush's Vietnam-era service for several weeks. His name surfaced in a lawsuit filed in federal court in Dallas by the former executive director of the Texas Lottery. Lawrence Littwin has sued GTECH Corp., the lottery operator, alleging that the company is to blame for his firing in 1997, after four months on the job. According to court records, Littwin's lawyers wanted to question Barnes, who used to lobby for GTECH, about whether GTECH was allowed to keep its lucrative state contract in exchange for Barnes' silence about the Guard matter. That theory has been dismissed as unfounded by GTECH, Barnes and Bush. Barnes testified for several hours Monday in a deposition in the case. Afterwards, his lawyer issued a written statement saying Barnes had been contacted by the now-deceased Sidney Adger, a Houston oilman and friend of the elder Bush. ''Mr. Barnes was contacted by Sid Adger and asked to recommend George W. Bush for a pilot position with the Air National Guard. Barnes called Gen. (James) Rose (Texas Air Guard commander) and did so,'' the statement said. ''Neither Congressman Bush nor any other member of the Bush family asked Barnes' help. Barnes has no knowledge that Governor Bush or President Bush knew of Barnes' recommendation,'' the statement said. Barnes also said he met in September 1998 with Donald L. Evans, a longtime friend and chief fund-raiser for Governor Bush. Barnes told Evans about Adger's request, and ''Governor Bush wrote Barnes a note thanking him for his candor in acknowledging that Barnes received no call from any member of the Bush family.'' In an interview with The Associated Press, Evans said he met with Barnes on his own initiative, without informing the governor in advance. At the time, he was Bush's gubernatorial campaign chairman and was concerned only about that contest, Evans said. Bush joined the National Guard in 1968, at the height of the Vietnam War, serving until late 1973. The Republican governor has said for several years that he received no special treatment. Both he and his father, the former president, have said they didn't ask for help in finding the Guard opening. ''I don't know if Ben Barnes did or not -- but he was not asked by me or my dad,'' Bush said Monday. ''People are relying on whether a man who is deceased (Adger) tried to help. I can just tell you, from my perspective, I never asked for, I don't believe I received any special treatment,'' Bush said. Bush indicated that he wasn't concerned about Barnes' deposition. ''I think everybody ought to tell the truth when they're being deposed. I'm confident he will,'' Bush said. ''I'm not sure what Ben Barnes is going to say. But I know what the facts are.'' Asked if he considered questions about his National Guard service a personal attack, Bush replied, ''I think it's just politics.'' http://www.ardmoreite.com/stories/09...w_barnes.shtml OBVIOUSLY, SINCE THIS ARTICLE WAS WRITTEN IN 1999, IT HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH JOHN KERRY'S CAMPAIGN. Walt wrote in message ... John Deere wrote: ridiculous paranoid freetard crap snipped You'll believe *anything*, won't you? Wanna buy a sailboat from Granada? Only a teesy-weensy bit of storm danmage. |
|
On 10 Sep 2004 10:07:05 -0500, Dave wrote:
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 14:02:48 GMT, felton said: That is one thing, but to be excused from meeting his minimal obligations to the Guard is another, particularly when the alternative would have been to actually serve in Vietnam. That makes a nice sophomoric argument, but has very little to do with reality. I got out about the same time as Bush, and remember the times well. Fact is that with the war winding down the military had more junior officers than they needed by quite a margin, and really had very little interest in making sure those who had finished their active duty obligations kept up their reserve training. Certainly not in calling up anybody who didn't go to reserve meetings. Except that GWB got his "get out of Vietnam free" card in 1968. I don't necessarily disagree that the chances of him having to go in 1972 were all that great, which is probably why he stopped bothering to "serve his country" at that time. I got a 4 months early out without even requesting it, and most of the non-career officers serving at the time had the same experience. I recall calling up the local reserve unit after I got out and being told that yea, if I wanted to earn retirement credit I could come to meetings, but they weren't really very interested one way or the other. In short, that whole line of argument is a desperate effort to make hay out of a straw man. Well, we already know how objective and impartial your views on the subjects of Vietnam service are. I will agree that this probably won't have all that much traction as most folks who support GWB don't seem to hold him to very high standards, then or now, and the rest of us are already voting against him for what he has done the past 4 years, not for what he did in the 60s. |
I'd like to take this oppurtunity to say that in 1944 during WW2 , in
Pearl Harbor while serving in the US Navy our office used IBM proportional-spaced font electric typewriters. Not thirty years ago, 60 YEARS AGO. Nice try RNC but I'm not impressed by your experts. Ole Thom |
On 10 Sep 2004 11:00:45 -0500, Dave wrote:
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 15:26:20 GMT, felton said: Except that GWB got his "get out of Vietnam free" card in 1968. I don't necessarily disagree that the chances of him having to go in 1972 were all that great, which is probably why he stopped bothering to "serve his country" at that time. I agree that his getting into the guard in 1968 is highly suspect, and probably deserving of criticism. Those slots were hard to come by. My OCS class had a helluva lot of lawyers in it, many from schools like Duke and the Ivys, who would rather have been in JAG if they had to serve, but couldn't get in, and so ended up as line officers on tin cans. It all depends on who you know:) "The 147th, Col. Staudt’s Texas unit, was infamous as a way out of Vietnam combat for the politically well connected and celebrity draft avoiders: Both of Sid Adger’s sons, Democratic Senator Lloyd Bentsen’s son, Republican Senator John Tower’s son, and at least seven players for the Dallas Cowboys had been signed into the unit." The waiting list in Texas was a year and a half. It took GWB one day, and he jumped to the head of the line ahead of 500 others in Texas, alone. It is no great secret that there were double standards in those days. It is just insulting to claim that GWB got no special treatment, when clearly he got nothing but special treatment. |
But Kerry certainly deserves criticism for being a decorated war hero.
Of course, McCain and Cleland do also. Talk about hypocracy! -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Dave" wrote in message ... On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 15:26:20 GMT, felton said: Except that GWB got his "get out of Vietnam free" card in 1968. I don't necessarily disagree that the chances of him having to go in 1972 were all that great, which is probably why he stopped bothering to "serve his country" at that time. I agree that his getting into the guard in 1968 is highly suspect, and probably deserving of criticism. Those slots were hard to come by. My OCS class had a helluva lot of lawyers in it, many from schools like Duke and the Ivys, who would rather have been in JAG if they had to serve, but couldn't get in, and so ended up as line officers on tin cans. |
On 10 Sep 2004 11:47:13 -0500, Dave wrote:
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 08:45:50 -0700, (Thom Stewart) said: I'd like to take this oppurtunity to say that in 1944 during WW2 , in Pearl Harbor while serving in the US Navy our office used IBM proportional-spaced font electric typewriters. Nice try, but the IBM Model A Executive typewriter, first produced in the early 1940s, was not proportional spaced, but did have had four different spacings for letters. I don't believe it produced superscripts. Fact is that proportional spacing was uncommon until after the 1970s. I am not the typewriter expert that you claim to be, but my link to the IBM site seems to contradict you http://www-1.ibm.com/ibm/history/history/year_1941.html "IBM announces the Electromatic Model 04 electric typewriter, featuring the revolutionary concept of proportional spacing. By assigning varied rather than uniform spacing to different sized characters, the Type 4 recreated the appearance of a printed page, an effect that was further enhanced by a typewriter ribbon innovation that produced clearer, sharper words on the page. The proportional spacing feature became a staple of the IBM Executive series typewriters." That was in 1941. |
In article ,
Dave wrote: On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 09:57:40 -0700, "Jonathan Ganz" said: But Kerry certainly deserves criticism for being a decorated war hero. Of course he's not being criticized for getting medals. He's being criticized for perhaps being a bit economical with the truth in getting some of them and then using them to get out of the combat zone. As opposed to Bush who gets a free pass for telling a few whoppers... a flip flopping whopper. Hahahahhaa -- Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m) http://www.sailnow.com "If there's no wind, row." |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:51 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com