The political "debate" here is so funny!

Should one crack the egg on the large end or the small end?

Paper or plastic?

Communism or socialism?

You can bet that no matter who wins the end result will be less freedom and
bigger government. In fact not one of you can name a single President that
has ever reduced the scope of government or extended freedom. But yet you
argue so loudly for your slightly different forms of enslavement!

I'm for any candidate who promises:

" I have no interest in streamlining government or in making it more
efficient, for I mean to reduce its size. I do not undertake to promote
welfare, for I propose to extend freedom. My aim is not to pass laws, but to
cancel old ones that do violence to the Constitution, or that have failed in
their purpose, or that impose on the people an unwarranted financial burden.
I will not attempt to discover whether legislation is needed before I have
first determined whether it is constitutionally permissible. And if I should
later be attacked for neglecting my constituents interests, I shall reply
that I was informed their main interest is liberty and that in that cause I
am doing the very best I can."

Vote Libertarian! Leave the big party-franchise politics to those who are
too cowardly to live or think for themselves.

Gilligan