"Gilligan" wrote

You can bet that no matter who wins the end result will be less freedom
and
bigger government. In fact not one of you can name a single President that
has ever reduced the scope of government or extended freedom......

Tom Jefferson - He disestablished the national bank.

Geo. Washington limited term of office, Truman put it into Law

Ole Thom

Great job on rising to the challenge.
Is your name really Vito?

Gilligan

"Vito" wrote in message
...
"Gilligan" wrote

You can bet that no matter who wins the end result will be less freedom
and
bigger government. In fact not one of you can name a single President
that
has ever reduced the scope of government or extended freedom......

Tom Jefferson - He disestablished the national bank.

Welcome back Gilly,

Your comment are welcome and needed.Add to them; Career politicians, two
party system that limits choice to their approval and representatives
that don't represent but rule

Ole Thom

Thanks Thom. We don't have to accept the lesser of two evils.

Gilligan

"Thom Stewart" wrote in message
...
Welcome back Gilly,

Your comment are welcome and needed.Add to them; Career politicians, two
party system that limits choice to their approval and representatives
that don't represent but rule

Ole Thom

In article .net,
Gilligan wrote:
Vote Libertarian! Leave the big party-franchise politics to those who are
too cowardly to live or think for themselves.

If you vote libertarian, you get Bush. Definitely the worse of the
two.
--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."

But Jonathan, the Republicans claim if I vote Libertarian then Kerry will
win.
So I look at it this way, according to either side, if I vote Libertarian
their candidate will lose. Is that bad?

How's your Cal 20 doing? I bet you have it fixed up real nice.

Gilligan


"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
In article .net,
Gilligan wrote:
Vote Libertarian! Leave the big party-franchise politics to those who are
too cowardly to live or think for themselves.

If you vote libertarian, you get Bush. Definitely the worse of the
two.
--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."

In article et,
Gilligan wrote:
But Jonathan, the Republicans claim if I vote Libertarian then Kerry will
win.
So I look at it this way, according to either side, if I vote Libertarian
their candidate will lose. Is that bad?

How's your Cal 20 doing? I bet you have it fixed up real nice.

You're right. I was thinking Nader, even though you were typing
Libertarian. Go for it. :-)

Cal is doing fine. I'm doing a lot of sailing when I'm not workin. :-)
--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."

"Gilligan" wrote in message
link.net...
I'm for any candidate who promises:

" I have no interest in streamlining government or in making it more
efficient, for I mean to reduce its size. I do not undertake to promote
welfare, for I propose to extend freedom. My aim is not to pass laws, but
to
cancel old ones that do violence to the Constitution, or that have failed
in
their purpose, or that impose on the people an unwarranted financial
burden.
I will not attempt to discover whether legislation is needed before I have
first determined whether it is constitutionally permissible. And if I
should
later be attacked for neglecting my constituents interests, I shall reply
that I was informed their main interest is liberty and that in that cause
I
am doing the very best I can."

Vote Libertarian! Leave the big party-franchise politics to those who are
too cowardly to live or think for themselves.

Gilligan, have you considered moving to the UK?

You could be our Prime Minister! ... Unlike the US, some of us still
believe in personal freedom. However, we don't have any politicians who
will represent our views.

Pack your bags immediately. I shall arrange tickets and some temporary
accommodation.

Come quick! We need you!



Regards


Donal
--

Donal,

It's terrible that personal freedom, a natural right that government can't
grant, is so easily taken away.

We must fight tyranny wherever it is.

I must respectfully turn down the prime minister offer, but if you guys need
a King, I'm your man. I think Benny Hill would be a fine Prime Minister.

Gilligan

"Donal" wrote in message
...

"Gilligan" wrote in message
link.net...
I'm for any candidate who promises:

" I have no interest in streamlining government or in making it more
efficient, for I mean to reduce its size. I do not undertake to promote
welfare, for I propose to extend freedom. My aim is not to pass laws,
but
to
cancel old ones that do violence to the Constitution, or that have
failed
in
their purpose, or that impose on the people an unwarranted financial
burden.
I will not attempt to discover whether legislation is needed before I
have
first determined whether it is constitutionally permissible. And if I
should
later be attacked for neglecting my constituents interests, I shall
reply
that I was informed their main interest is liberty and that in that
cause
I
am doing the very best I can."

Vote Libertarian! Leave the big party-franchise politics to those who
are
too cowardly to live or think for themselves.

Gilligan, have you considered moving to the UK?

You could be our Prime Minister! ... Unlike the US, some of us still
believe in personal freedom. However, we don't have any politicians who
will represent our views.

Pack your bags immediately. I shall arrange tickets and some temporary
accommodation.

Come quick! We need you!



Regards


Donal
--