"Horvath" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 00:13:00 +0100, "Donal"
wrote this crap:


I believe I know.


You know about his AWOL?

Everybody knows that Bush went AWOL. Why do you ask?

Despite all the screaming from the left, nobody can prove that George
W. Bush was AWOL.

Your logic seems a bit confused.

Everybody can prove that Kerry served in Vietnam.

Everybody can prove that Bush evaded service in Vietnam.

Nobody can doubt Kerry's patriotism.
Nobody can doubt Bush's cowardice.


It's all on the record.

Regards

Donal
-- ]

"Horvath" wrote in message
...
On 27 Sep 2004 12:52:14 -0500, Dave wrote this
crap:

Face it, the Kerry campaign is sinking like a torpedoed Swift Boat. In
their
latest effort they're trying desperately to raise expectations of Bush in
the forthcoming debates, saying "George Bush is a very good debater. In
fact, he has never lost a debate in his political career."

We'll see.

Kerry is only 5 points ahead in California. Face it, Kerry is going
downhill fast.

Horass is an ignornant asshole. So, what else is new.

Nobody can doubt Kerry's patriotism.

LOL.............. A bunch of Vietnam vets can after he said everybody
committed atrocities.
Also if he's such a patriot why did he bail out of Nam after 4 months?
S/V Express 30 "Ringmaster"
"Trains are a winter sport"

Tell you what... start demanding that Maxprop and Dave prove their
assertions for a couple of days... see where you get.

Still no answer.
S/V Express 30 "Ringmaster"
"Trains are a winter sport"

On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:34:08 -0700, "Jonathan Ganz"
wrote this crap:


Kerry is only 5 points ahead in California. Face it, Kerry is going
downhill fast.

Horass is an ignornant asshole. So, what else is new.


You hate the truth, don't you?





Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now!

On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 00:48:51 +0100, "Donal"
wrote this crap:


Despite all the screaming from the left, nobody can prove that George
W. Bush was AWOL.

Nobody can doubt Kerry's patriotism.

It's all on the record.


What's on the record is that the French-looking John Kerry left active
duty in 1970, and doesn't show a discharge until 1978.

When leaving active duty, you get a DD-214, separation from active
duty form. John Kerrry doesn't show one from 1970. It's fairly
obvious that he got a less than honorable discharge that he is hiding.
He had this changed in 1978.

That's the facts, jack.





Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now!

In article ,
SAIL LOCO wrote:
Nobody can doubt Kerry's patriotism.

LOL.............. A bunch of Vietnam vets can after he said everybody
committed atrocities.
Also if he's such a patriot why did he bail out of Nam after 4 months?

I guess Bush and Cheney lied then, since they said he was a patriot
also.


--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."

In article ,
Horvath wrote:
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 00:48:51 +0100, "Donal"
wrote this crap:


Despite all the screaming from the left, nobody can prove that George
W. Bush was AWOL.

Nobody can doubt Kerry's patriotism.

It's all on the record.


What's on the record is that the French-looking John Kerry left active
duty in 1970, and doesn't show a discharge until 1978.

Horass is obsessed with Frenchmen, and that's a fact.

--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."

On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 12:52:14 -0500, Dave wrote:

On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 09:57:59 -0400, thunder said:

Yet, O'Neill *did* claim he was in Cambodia.

http://www.washingtondispatch.com/sp...es/000553.html

The Kerry folks are really grasping at straws when they try to dredge that
one up.

The man said it was "impossible" for Kerry to have taken a Swift Boat into
Cambodia, yet he claimed that he had done it. Go figure.



Face it, the Kerry campaign is sinking like a torpedoed Swift Boat.

LOL, keep telling yourself that. This is a horse race. On 9/20/2000,
Gore had a larger lead over Bush, than Bush has over Kerry today. We know
who won that race.

http://www.zogby.com/features/featuredtables.dbm?ID=8

You can hang your hat on Gallup's polls, but I wouldn't. I think a 40%
Republican weighting is excessive. Zogby has Bush 3% ahead. Rasmussen has
Bush 2% ahead. The Electoral College vote shows Bush with a considerable
lead *today*, but that changes almost daily, as new polls come out.

http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=868

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/


A look at Electoral Votes:

http://www.dcpoliticalreport.com/CurrentPolls.htm

http://www.electoral-vote.com/

http://www.electionprojection.com/elections2004.html

In article ,
Horvath wrote:
On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:34:08 -0700, "Jonathan Ganz"
wrote this crap:


Kerry is only 5 points ahead in California. Face it, Kerry is going
downhill fast.

Horass is an ignornant asshole. So, what else is new.


You hate the truth, don't you?

No. I just dislike you, mainly because you think you're hunter is a
"good boat."

--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."