Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#161
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Horvath wrote: On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 14:36:55 GMT, "Maxprop" wrote this crap: And before you get your panties in a wad, Kerry also requested an early discharge for the same reason. It also was granted. Don't forget that I'm stupid. Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now! -- Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m) http://www.sailnow.com "If there's no wind, row." |
#162
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Horvath wrote: On 22 Sep 2004 12:07:28 -0700, (Jonathan Ganz) wrote this crap: And before you get your panties in a wad, Kerry also requested an early discharge for the same reason. It also was granted. After he was wounded three times, which is why it was granted. Bzzzzt! Wrong answer! He was sent stateside after leaving Vietnam. Then he pulled strings to get an early out. Check the records. Check your butt. You'll find your boyfriend buried up to his shoulders. -- Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m) http://www.sailnow.com "If there's no wind, row." |
#163
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message You're right. He left VN under the auspices of his three PHs. He then made a request to leave the military, I believe as you claim. So, he was upfront about his request, and according to the military fullfilled his duties. He didn't fail to show up for a physical against the orders of his commander like someone else. Right. But both men received honorable discharges, and early ones at that. Max |
#164
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message So, I think we really need to hear why he didn't show up, don't you??? I think we can take a good guess, which means that there is a lot of negative speculation going on for no reason other than he's being stupid by not saying (stupid or smart I guess). Tonight Bill O'Reilly talked about his interview with Bush that occurred today. It will be shown on The Factor on Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday. O'Reilly said he asked Bush about this very thing, among other things. Maybe the answer is forthcoming, eh? Max |
#165
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message Well, you can't be all bad if someone in your family can think rationally. :-) My brother would probably disagree. :-) Max |
#166
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message Powerful friends who helped him shirk his duties, helped him overcome any bad press he was going to get from his commander. In the several years prior to this supposed failure to report, he accumulated ten to twenty times the number of points required to remain in good stead in each year. He flew often. Isn't it just possible that he was beginning to concentrate on his political career during that last year? Max |
#167
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 04:01:28 GMT, "Maxprop"
wrote: "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message Powerful friends who helped him shirk his duties, helped him overcome any bad press he was going to get from his commander. In the several years prior to this supposed failure to report, he accumulated ten to twenty times the number of points required to remain in good stead in each year. He flew often. Isn't it just possible that he was beginning to concentrate on his political career during that last year? Max I don't believe anyone disputes the fact that he met the requirements of a weekend warrior for the first four years of his six year obligation. Why his father shipped him off to Alabama in 1972 is a mystery, but by the accounts of the folks working on that campaign in Alabama, it certainly wasn't because Bush was serious about "his political career." http://www.salon.com/news/feature/20.../index_np.html In the spring of 1972, George H.W. Bush phoned his friend and asked a favor: Could Allison find a place on the Senate campaign he was managing in Alabama for his troublesome eldest son, the 25-year-old George W. Bush? "The impression I had was that Georgie was raising a lot of hell in Houston, getting in trouble and embarrassing the family, and they just really wanted to get him out of Houston and under Jimmy's wing," Allison's widow, Linda, told me. "And Jimmy said, 'Sure.' He was so loyal." Linda Allison's story, never before published, contradicts the Bush campaign's assertion that George W. Bush transferred from the Texas Air National Guard to the Alabama National Guard in 1972 because he received an irresistible offer to gain high-level experience on the campaign of Bush family friend Winton "Red" Blount. In fact, according to what Allison says her late husband told her, the younger Bush had become a political liability for his father, who was then the United States ambassador to the United Nations, and the family wanted him out of Texas. "I think they wanted someone they trusted to keep an eye on him." ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ When Bush returned to Houston, but not to his unit, he spent several months doing volunteer work with inner city youth in Operation PULL, work that sounds suspiciously like community service "volunteer" work by someone who may well have gotten in trouble with his father, or, more likely, the law. The rumored 1972 cocaine arrest and the subsequent changing of his driver's license number connects the dots, but is not, as yet, provable. |
#168
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .net,
Maxprop wrote: "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message You're right. He left VN under the auspices of his three PHs. He then made a request to leave the military, I believe as you claim. So, he was upfront about his request, and according to the military fullfilled his duties. He didn't fail to show up for a physical against the orders of his commander like someone else. Right. But both men received honorable discharges, and early ones at that. But, both me did not serve honorably. Kerry did, according to Bush. Bush didn't according to several people, including his own commander. -- Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m) http://www.sailnow.com "If there's no wind, row." |
#169
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article k.net,
Maxprop wrote: "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message Powerful friends who helped him shirk his duties, helped him overcome any bad press he was going to get from his commander. In the several years prior to this supposed failure to report, he accumulated ten to twenty times the number of points required to remain in good stead in each year. He flew often. Isn't it just possible that he was beginning to concentrate on his political career during that last year? Who knows. The point is that he refuses to say. And, he disobeyed direct orders. -- Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m) http://www.sailnow.com "If there's no wind, row." |
#170
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Dave wrote: On 22 Sep 2004 12:08:30 -0700, (Jonathan Ganz) said: The facts in the documents are not in dispute, only the documents themselves. That's the kind of sloppy thinking the proponents of the Dems' party line hope voters will accept. For a more careful reading see Actually, it's very precise thinking. Just because something is written down doesn't make it factual or the truth. Of course, the same goes the other way. Just because something is written down, doesn't mean it's not the truth or factual, even if MS Word was used instead of a typewriter. -- Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m) http://www.sailnow.com "If there's no wind, row." |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT Claims Vs. Facts from BushCo. | General | |||
OT--Democrats On Record Concerning WMD | General |