Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Horvath" wrote in message On 28 Jun 2004 18:46:36 GMT, (Bobsprit) wrote this crap: And here's why... Start with his record: Twenty-two million jobs, longest postwar boom, a shift from record deficits to record surpluses, There never was a surplus. Here's the figures for the National Debt: 09/30/2002 $6,228,235,965,597.16 09/28/2001 $5,807,463,412,200.06 09/29/2000 $5,674,178,209,886.86 09/30/1999 $5,656,270,901,615.43 09/30/1998 $5,526,193,008,897.62 09/30/1997 $5,413,146,011,397.34 09/30/1996 $5,224,810,939,135.73 09/29/1995 $4,973,982,900,709.39 09/30/1994 $4,692,749,910,013.32 09/30/1993 $4,411,488,883,139.38 09/30/1992 $4,064,620,655,521.66 09/30/1991 $3,665,303,351,697.03 09/28/1990 $3,233,313,451,777.25 09/29/1989 $2,857,430,960,187.32 09/30/1988 $2,602,337,712,041.16 09/30/1987 $2,350,276,890,953.00 SOURCE: BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT As anyone can see, the debt increased every year. There never was a surplus. It was another Clinton lie. Most folks have difficulty discerning the federal deficit (above) from an annual budget deficit. Clinton balanced the budget, but never made a dent in the federal deficit. Of course neither has any other president in modern times. And this current one seems bent on raising it to unprecedented levels. Max |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 02:12:03 GMT, "Maxprop"
wrote this crap: "Horvath" wrote in message On 28 Jun 2004 18:46:36 GMT, (Bobsprit) wrote this crap: And here's why... Start with his record: Twenty-two million jobs, longest postwar boom, a shift from record deficits to record surpluses, There never was a surplus. Here's the figures for the National Debt: 09/30/2002 $6,228,235,965,597.16 09/28/2001 $5,807,463,412,200.06 09/29/2000 $5,674,178,209,886.86 09/30/1999 $5,656,270,901,615.43 09/30/1998 $5,526,193,008,897.62 09/30/1997 $5,413,146,011,397.34 09/30/1996 $5,224,810,939,135.73 09/29/1995 $4,973,982,900,709.39 09/30/1994 $4,692,749,910,013.32 09/30/1993 $4,411,488,883,139.38 09/30/1992 $4,064,620,655,521.66 09/30/1991 $3,665,303,351,697.03 09/28/1990 $3,233,313,451,777.25 09/29/1989 $2,857,430,960,187.32 09/30/1988 $2,602,337,712,041.16 09/30/1987 $2,350,276,890,953.00 SOURCE: BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT As anyone can see, the debt increased every year. There never was a surplus. It was another Clinton lie. Most folks have difficulty discerning the federal deficit (above) from an annual budget deficit. Clinton balanced the budget, but never made a dent in the federal deficit. Oh, I understand the difference. The budget HAS to be balanced every year. If there's not enough, we increase the debt. Clinton borrowed more money than he needed, balanced the budget, and called the left over money a "surplus." Just another lie from the crookedest administration in history. Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now! |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Borrowed it? From your boyfriend?
-- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Horvath" wrote in message ... On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 02:12:03 GMT, "Maxprop" wrote this crap: "Horvath" wrote in message On 28 Jun 2004 18:46:36 GMT, (Bobsprit) wrote this crap: And here's why... Start with his record: Twenty-two million jobs, longest postwar boom, a shift from record deficits to record surpluses, There never was a surplus. Here's the figures for the National Debt: 09/30/2002 $6,228,235,965,597.16 09/28/2001 $5,807,463,412,200.06 09/29/2000 $5,674,178,209,886.86 09/30/1999 $5,656,270,901,615.43 09/30/1998 $5,526,193,008,897.62 09/30/1997 $5,413,146,011,397.34 09/30/1996 $5,224,810,939,135.73 09/29/1995 $4,973,982,900,709.39 09/30/1994 $4,692,749,910,013.32 09/30/1993 $4,411,488,883,139.38 09/30/1992 $4,064,620,655,521.66 09/30/1991 $3,665,303,351,697.03 09/28/1990 $3,233,313,451,777.25 09/29/1989 $2,857,430,960,187.32 09/30/1988 $2,602,337,712,041.16 09/30/1987 $2,350,276,890,953.00 SOURCE: BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT As anyone can see, the debt increased every year. There never was a surplus. It was another Clinton lie. Most folks have difficulty discerning the federal deficit (above) from an annual budget deficit. Clinton balanced the budget, but never made a dent in the federal deficit. Oh, I understand the difference. The budget HAS to be balanced every year. If there's not enough, we increase the debt. Clinton borrowed more money than he needed, balanced the budget, and called the left over money a "surplus." Just another lie from the crookedest administration in history. Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now! |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Clinton borrowed more money than he needed, balanced the budget, and
called the left over money a "surplus." Just another lie from the crookedest administration in history. Bush also called what Clinton did a "surplus" and debated with Gore about what to do with it. So Bush is also a liar then! RB |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Horvath wrote:
The budget HAS to be balanced every year. If there's not enough, we increase the debt. Right. Clinton borrowed more money than he needed, balanced the budget, and called the left over money a "surplus." That's just nonsense. Clinton's last few budgets collected more in taxes than the federal government spent, cutting the publicly held portion of the federal debt. Meanwhile Social Security (to name one) were buying federal securities because they were collecting more money than they were spending as well, adding to the overall debt by adding to the intergovernmental holdings. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:02:21 GMT, "Wolfie" wrote
this crap: Horvath wrote: The budget HAS to be balanced every year. If there's not enough, we increase the debt. Right. Clinton borrowed more money than he needed, balanced the budget, and called the left over money a "surplus." That's just nonsense. Clinton's last few budgets collected more in taxes than the federal government spent, cutting the publicly held portion of the federal debt. Meanwhile Social Security (to name one) were buying federal securities because they were collecting more money than they were spending as well, adding to the overall debt by adding to the intergovernmental holdings. That's your story. I just showed the facts. Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now! |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
You just did.
-- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Horvath" wrote in message ... On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:02:21 GMT, "Wolfie" wrote this crap: Horvath wrote: The budget HAS to be balanced every year. If there's not enough, we increase the debt. Right. Clinton borrowed more money than he needed, balanced the budget, and called the left over money a "surplus." That's just nonsense. Clinton's last few budgets collected more in taxes than the federal government spent, cutting the publicly held portion of the federal debt. Meanwhile Social Security (to name one) were buying federal securities because they were collecting more money than they were spending as well, adding to the overall debt by adding to the intergovernmental holdings. That's your story. I just showed the fags. Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now! |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Horvath wrote:
That's your story. I just showed the facts. You showed a subset of the facts without understanding them, yes. Any idea that Clinton could borrow money to show a running surplus when only the Republican-led Congress could appropriate money isn't factual in any non-delusional reality... |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 03:42:45 GMT, "Wolfie" wrote
this crap: Horvath wrote: That's your story. I just showed the facts. You showed a subset of the facts without understanding them, yes. Any idea that Clinton could borrow money to show a running surplus when only the Republican-led Congress could appropriate money isn't factual in any non-delusional reality... That's your story. I'm just pointing out the facts. Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now! |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT--Not again! More Chinese money buying our politicians. | General | |||
Bush Resume | ASA |