Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#831
|
|||
|
|||
MacGregor 26M - Valiant 40
"Jim Cate" wrote in message
... If you consider that the Mac is much lighter, with much smaller sails, it's likely that it may ride over some waves that your boat may try to "bore through." Not in great comfort, admittedly. You're missing the point, Jim. My boat is extremely light for its size - lighter than the mac in some ways (50% more length, more than twice the beam, but a weight of only 8800 lbs). Diving through waves is more a function of the wave shape - in strong current against strong wind situations the wave length gets compressed, the heights grow, and the wave face appears "vertical." Inevitably, you surf down one and slam into the base of the next faster than you can rise up over them. There is also risk to going over the top, since at best, you will pound hard on the other side, but at worst, you can get twisted sideways and roll over. |
#832
|
|||
|
|||
MacGregor 26M - Valiant 40
OzOne wrote in message ...
On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 17:34:02 -0500, Jim Cate scribbled thusly: And it can be extended partially or fully, as desired for the particular point of sail. There is a reason why centreboard yachts are required to have the centreboard locked fully down when racing..... Is that true? I though it only applied if it was a weighted board. It certainly doesn't apply to dinks. |
#833
|
|||
|
|||
MacGregor 26M - Valiant 40
OzOne wrote in message ... On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 19:00:37 -0400, "Jeff Morris" scribbled thusly: There is a reason why centreboard yachts are required to have the centreboard locked fully down when racing..... Is that true? I though it only applied if it was a weighted board. It certainly doesn't apply to dinks. Yep, true. Never applied to dinghys though a couple of classes here insist to their downwind performance detriment and same in up wind planing conditions. Not that it matters much to me, but here's the PHRF rules: http://www.rmsail.org/PHRF%20Guidelines.pdf PHRF Rules While Racing: All PHRF members shall abide by the following rules while racing unless specifically exempted in the PHRF rating certificate. .. Yachts must race as configured and documented on their rating certificate while racing. .. No part of the torso of skipper or crew shall be outboard of a vertical plane extending upward from the rail while racing. The torso shall be defined as the trunk of the human body not including the arms, legs, or head. .. Water ballast boats shall be filled and sealed during racing. Any PHRF member may request that water ballast boats be inspected before and after racing to verify compliance. .. Boats with moveable keels, ballasted centerboards, swing keels and similar types, keep said keel/centerboard locked in the full down position at all times when racing. .. Centerboard boats where the centerboard/keel provides no righting ballast may raise centerboard while racing. .. An outboard motor may be removed from the transom while racing only if it is not removed from the yacht. .. All interior equipment delivered standard from the manufacturer such as berth cushions, latrines, cabinetry, and holding tanks must remain onboard while racing. Optional equipment does not apply. |
#834
|
|||
|
|||
MacGregor 26M - Valiant 40
Jim Cate wrote:
.... However,I think I've made it clear that I intend to be very conservative when going off-shore, to reef early, and substantially, if there is any question of threatening weather. Unfortunately, neither "being conservative" nor reefing will help if conditions are such that you're going to get solid water over the deck. Just last week I was talking to a nice man who was bringing in a heavy traditional cutter. He had been out in fairly common conditions, a spring cold front, which kicked up waves big enough to roll over his foredeck. One peeled open his fore hatch, which was a big surprise to his fiancee sleeping in the V-berth. A Mac 26M (having pretty much the same hull as the 26X) has enough reserve bouyancy to survive such an incident... as long as the water coming in didn't compromise the stability (water ballast and all that)... Fresh Breezes- Doug King Ultimately, however, if an emergency arose despite all of the above, I would rather have some water in the V-berth than wallow around without a sea anchor. Jim Jim |
#835
|
|||
|
|||
MacGregor 26M - Valiant 40
Scott Vernon wrote: "Jim Cate" wrote The plan is to leave the boat in a gated boat storage area that has access to the water. The mast would be left up. what's the cost for that? $65 per month. No insurance on your Mac? About $400 per year. (What I meant was that I wouldn't be paying insurance on the larger, charter boats. I pay $215 for my ins., but then my boat is safer than yours. No bottom paint? Nope. Not needed if the boat is sitting on the trailor 98% of the time. Oh. That 50 hp WILL need maitnance. Right. About $200 per year? what do you think I spend on a Yanmar diesel per year? Hint: it's less than $200. You really didn't research this very much, did you? No rigging, electronics, or sails on your macM????? Yes, I'll have to keep up the sails, rigging, electronics, etc. so you admit you were bull ****ting. "IF ONLY I had bought a Mac 26M....then I could be the laughing stock of the sailing world." Jim |
#836
|
|||
|
|||
MacGregor 26M - Valiant 40
Scott Vernon wrote: "Jim Cate" wrote The plan is to leave the boat in a gated boat storage area that has access to the water. The mast would be left up. what's the cost for that? $65 per month No insurance on your Mac? About $400 per year. (What I meant was that I wouldn't be paying insurance on the larger, charter boats. Actually, the quote I had was $300. I was including some padding. I pay $215 for my ins., but then my boat is safer than yours. No bottom paint? Nope. Not needed if the boat is sitting on the trailor 98% of the time. Oh. That 50 hp WILL need maitnance. Right. About $200 per year? what do you think I spend on a Yanmar diesel per year? Hint: it's less than $200. You really didn't research this very much, did you? Actually, my comment mentioning $200 was a question, not a statement. I actually think it will be much less than that. Your diesel may not have cost you much in the past few years, but sooner or later, you will ahve to have an overhaul. You need to prorate the bigger costs into your annual estimate. No rigging, electronics, or sails on your macM????? Yes, I'll have to keep up the sails, rigging, electronics, etc. so you admit you were bull ****ting. Nope. I never claimed that I wouldn't have maintenance costs, did I Scot? The point is that I won't have to pay many of the costs paid by my freinds with large boats kept in the marinas in this area. thdon't ex[ect texongi "IF ONLY I had bought a Mac 26M....then I could be the laughing stock of the sailing world." Jim He who laughs last....... Jim |
#837
|
|||
|
|||
MacGregor 26M - Valiant 40
Scott Vernon wrote: "Jim Cate" wrote The Mac permits you to spend less time getting to a variety of sailing or recreational areas, and more time in the good sailing areas or good recreational areas. you don't understand 'sailing'. For example, you can trailer the boat down to Florida but that would take a lot of time! In our area, the boat could be trailered to the Gulf coast in less than an hour, or to various ports up and down the coast in two or three hours. It means the difference between being essentially locked into one sailing area for most of the year (It can get pretty monotonous) and being able to go whereever we want to go, in one weekend. Despite your pontification and sarcasm, the boat does substantially minimize the "lack of time" factor. Jim Jim |
#838
|
|||
|
|||
MacGregor 26M - Valiant 40
Jonathan Ganz wrote: You are so stupid that it's beyond belief. How can you possibly believe that, or post such a remark on this ng? What, in particular, have I posted that would suggest that I'm stupid beyond believe. BE SPECIFIC FOR A CHANGE, ASSHOLE. Jim |
#839
|
|||
|
|||
MacGregor 26M - Valiant 40
Jeff Morris wrote: "Jim Cate" wrote in message ... If you consider that the Mac is much lighter, with much smaller sails, it's likely that it may ride over some waves that your boat may try to "bore through." Not in great comfort, admittedly. You're missing the point, Jim. My boat is extremely light for its size - lighter than the mac in some ways (50% more length, more than twice the beam, but a weight of only 8800 lbs). Diving through waves is more a function of the wave shape - in strong current against strong wind situations the wave length gets compressed, the heights grow, and the wave face appears "vertical." Inevitably, you surf down one and slam into the base of the next faster than you can rise up over them. There is also risk to going over the top, since at best, you will pound hard on the other side, but at worst, you can get twisted sideways and roll over. OK. I didn't know what boat you had. Obviously, I'll want to respect the limiations of the 26-foot boat. Jim |
#840
|
|||
|
|||
MacGregor 26M - Valiant 40
ha ha, it's gonna take jimbo a long time before he realizes the mistake he
made. And then even longer for him to admit it to himself. He'll NEVER admit it to us. SV wrote Scott, I happen to have a Mac26M for sale that you might be interested in buying. Jim |