LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Bobsprit
 
Posts: n/a
Default Credit where it's Due

I'm not trying to amplify it. If that's what I did, it was unintentional.
He's an idiot for doing it. Just because his protection is good, doesn't
make it perfect.

By that logic he should never fly. If there was any reasonable risk he wouldn't
have gone. The very fact that he went proves that. The man does very few
positive things, but I'm not so biased that I can't see it when it happens.
Since nothing bad happened and the troops were cheered, it was a "positive"
event.

RB
  #2   Report Post  
Bobsprit
 
Posts: n/a
Default Credit where it's Due

Generous? Using taxpayer money in gargantuan amounts to stage a photo op for
future campaign commercials is generous?


Bill, consider this:
Even if Bush was there for a photo op, the RESULT is still the same. Some very
isolated and lonely American soldiers felt better on a Holiday far from home.

This one isn't about politics and Bush is busy wasting away our country in
other more useless ways.

RB
  #3   Report Post  
The Carrolls
 
Posts: n/a
Default Credit where it's Due

I too am not a Bush supporter, but I have to agree it was a grand gesture to
the troops, and deserves to be appaluded. Certianly a positive.
"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
I'm not trying to amplify it. If that's what I did, it was unintentional.
He's an idiot for doing it. Just because his protection is good, doesn't
make it perfect.

By that logic he should never fly. If there was any reasonable risk he

wouldn't
have gone. The very fact that he went proves that. The man does very few
positive things, but I'm not so biased that I can't see it when it

happens.
Since nothing bad happened and the troops were cheered, it was a

"positive"
event.

RB



  #4   Report Post  
Bobsprit
 
Posts: n/a
Default Credit where it's Due

We could have saved the taxpayers millions of dollars and made those guys a lot
happier by sending Halle Berry over


I've met her. She's quite an unhappy person and tends to let people know it.


RB
  #5   Report Post  
Bobsprit
 
Posts: n/a
Default Credit where it's Due

This was ALL about politics - nothing else.


I'm not disputing what it's about. I'm simply pointing out that it did have a
positive effect on the troops.


RB


  #6   Report Post  
Bobsprit
 
Posts: n/a
Default Credit where it's Due

Bush wouldn't have even made the
trip at all unless he heard first that Hillary was about to beat him there.

Hillary also went to Iraq?

RB
  #7   Report Post  
Jonathan Ganz
 
Posts: n/a
Default Credit where it's Due

True, but only in retrospect. The Pres has no business risking his life,
which is what he did. Same as the carrier landing... a stunt to get
re-elected.
Nothing more.

"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
I'm not trying to amplify it. If that's what I did, it was unintentional.
He's an idiot for doing it. Just because his protection is good, doesn't
make it perfect.

By that logic he should never fly. If there was any reasonable risk he

wouldn't
have gone. The very fact that he went proves that. The man does very few
positive things, but I'm not so biased that I can't see it when it

happens.
Since nothing bad happened and the troops were cheered, it was a

"positive"
event.

RB



  #8   Report Post  
Simple Simon
 
Posts: n/a
Default Credit where it's Due


Ganz, you are an idiot! As soon as ANY President takes
the oath of office he is risking his life. There are all
kinds of people out there who would like to kill any
president for any number of reasons.

S.Simon

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ...
True, but only in retrospect. The Pres has no business risking his life,
which is what he did. Same as the carrier landing... a stunt to get
re-elected.
Nothing more.

"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
I'm not trying to amplify it. If that's what I did, it was unintentional.
He's an idiot for doing it. Just because his protection is good, doesn't
make it perfect.

By that logic he should never fly. If there was any reasonable risk he

wouldn't
have gone. The very fact that he went proves that. The man does very few
positive things, but I'm not so biased that I can't see it when it

happens.
Since nothing bad happened and the troops were cheered, it was a

"positive"
event.

RB





  #9   Report Post  
Jonathan Ganz
 
Posts: n/a
Default Credit where it's Due

Neal, you are a fool! We all know there's a risk in everyday
life. The point is that he took an unnecessary risk... as much
as I hate him, he is the president.

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...

Ganz, you are an idiot! As soon as ANY President takes
the oath of office he is risking his life. There are all
kinds of people out there who would like to kill any
president for any number of reasons.

S.Simon

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message

...
True, but only in retrospect. The Pres has no business risking his life,
which is what he did. Same as the carrier landing... a stunt to get
re-elected.
Nothing more.

"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
I'm not trying to amplify it. If that's what I did, it was

unintentional.
He's an idiot for doing it. Just because his protection is good,

doesn't
make it perfect.

By that logic he should never fly. If there was any reasonable risk he

wouldn't
have gone. The very fact that he went proves that. The man does very

few
positive things, but I'm not so biased that I can't see it when it

happens.
Since nothing bad happened and the troops were cheered, it was a

"positive"
event.

RB







  #10   Report Post  
Simple Simon
 
Posts: n/a
Default Credit where it's Due

'Unnecessary' is a word subject to personal interpretation.
You are an overcautious weenie so it stands to reason that
what most people would label an acceptable risk you would
label an unnecessary risk.

Because you haven't risked moving out of Momma's house
doesn't means such a move is unacceptably risky.

S.Simon




"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ...
Neal, you are a fool! We all know there's a risk in everyday
life. The point is that he took an unnecessary risk... as much
as I hate him, he is the president.

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...

Ganz, you are an idiot! As soon as ANY President takes
the oath of office he is risking his life. There are all
kinds of people out there who would like to kill any
president for any number of reasons.

S.Simon

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message

...
True, but only in retrospect. The Pres has no business risking his life,
which is what he did. Same as the carrier landing... a stunt to get
re-elected.
Nothing more.

"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
I'm not trying to amplify it. If that's what I did, it was

unintentional.
He's an idiot for doing it. Just because his protection is good,

doesn't
make it perfect.

By that logic he should never fly. If there was any reasonable risk he
wouldn't
have gone. The very fact that he went proves that. The man does very

few
positive things, but I'm not so biased that I can't see it when it
happens.
Since nothing bad happened and the troops were cheered, it was a
"positive"
event.

RB










 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Credit card foreign currency fees Carl Cruising 1 July 6th 04 10:25 PM
Shady Billing Practices of IMIS Insurance Geoff Schultz Cruising 46 July 6th 04 04:44 PM
DESIGNING PORTAL CREATION DATABASE SHOPPING CART ANIMAT Ad-Aero General 0 May 19th 04 02:10 AM
Mail Handling and Cruising Phil Cruising 7 October 15th 03 12:57 AM
Boat Loans Tailgunner General 7 August 16th 03 03:51 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:59 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017