Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Thank You Ole Thom
GOALS GOALS GOALS -not means of achieving them!
God are you stupid. Cheers MC DSK wrote: The navigator© wrote: Still not raised your debating skill beyond the schoolyard? Or are you just as stupid as you appear to be? Let me repost your statement: "1- the terrorists are irrational and cannot agree on their own goals, so there is no hope of making 'peace' with them on any terms " And you then said: Some have very clear goals. It is usually their means of achieving it that they cannot agree on In other words, they cannot agree. As I said. Thank you and good night. Don't forget to take your medicine before beddie-byes. DSK |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Thank You Ole Thom
SHUT UP you foreigner! Americans are talking.
Scotty "The_nagitattor" wrote ... Some have very clear goals. It is usually their means of achieving it that they cannot agree on. While many would like to kill all Americans as vermin, other wish to scare you to an honest, open negotiation table. That you lump them together reveals your lack of diplomatic smarts. The US's second major problem is that you gain no respect on their eyes as you, yourself, carry out acts of terrorism and support terrorist countries/regimes -when it suits you. Cheers MC DSK wrote: "Thom Stewart" wrote... Thanks Joe, Doug , I return your Salute! You younger Vets deserve your share of real credit, In my war, we knew who the enemy was and where to find him. It was the Leaders of the Military's job to defeat him, It was a hard, costly war but it had a direction and a goal. TOTAL VICTORY!! That, I believe was the last war fought that way. I dunno about that, Thom. War is always a military means to a political solution for an economic problem. It's a loose term for any large group of people attempting to impose their collective will on another group by force. An old fashioned word for terrorism might be sabotage, and every country has tried it's hand at sending saboteurs into 'enemy' territory. The enemy we are currenty fighting (outside of those enemies of the Constitution that we have, Lord help us, elected over ourselves) uses terrorism or sabotage because that is the only way they have to fight. They are so poor & so desparate that they have no other means. Therefor they have no big, obvious, economically valuable targets for our military to go after. We have two huge strategic problems, and no leader of any industrialized country has AFAIK addressed either. 1- the terrorists are irrational and cannot agree on their own goals, so there is no hope of making 'peace' with them on any terms 2- the terrorists make very handy agents for behind-the-scenes economic groups who profit by the destruction of competitors assets I wish I had some answers myself, contemplating the whole situation makes me very sad. I do salute the Military of today. They have it tougher than we did. In some ways, it's not so bad. Cell phones & email make it easy for today's servicemen to keep in daily contact with their families. Equipment is much better & more reliable. Living conditions are also a lot better, although it seems to me (and I thought about this a lot back in my day) that the US always chooses to fight in most horrible climates & terrains we can find. Thanks Joe and everyone who serviced and services. To all OUR VETS---- GOD BLESS AMERICA; And "I'LL DRINK TO THAT!!" I'll drink to that, too, Thom! Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Thank You Ole Thom
But you are on MY planet.
Cheers MC Scott Vernon wrote: SHUT UP you foreigner! Americans are talking. Scotty "The_nagitattor" wrote ... Some have very clear goals. It is usually their means of achieving it that they cannot agree on. While many would like to kill all Americans as vermin, other wish to scare you to an honest, open negotiation table. That you lump them together reveals your lack of diplomatic smarts. The US's second major problem is that you gain no respect on their eyes as you, yourself, carry out acts of terrorism and support terrorist countries/regimes -when it suits you. Cheers MC DSK wrote: "Thom Stewart" wrote... Thanks Joe, Doug , I return your Salute! You younger Vets deserve your share of real credit, In my war, we knew who the enemy was and where to find him. It was the Leaders of the Military's job to defeat him, It was a hard, costly war but it had a direction and a goal. TOTAL VICTORY!! That, I believe was the last war fought that way. I dunno about that, Thom. War is always a military means to a political solution for an economic problem. It's a loose term for any large group of people attempting to impose their collective will on another group by force. An old fashioned word for terrorism might be sabotage, and every country has tried it's hand at sending saboteurs into 'enemy' territory. The enemy we are currenty fighting (outside of those enemies of the Constitution that we have, Lord help us, elected over ourselves) uses terrorism or sabotage because that is the only way they have to fight. They are so poor & so desparate that they have no other means. Therefor they have no big, obvious, economically valuable targets for our military to go after. We have two huge strategic problems, and no leader of any industrialized country has AFAIK addressed either. 1- the terrorists are irrational and cannot agree on their own goals, so there is no hope of making 'peace' with them on any terms 2- the terrorists make very handy agents for behind-the-scenes economic groups who profit by the destruction of competitors assets I wish I had some answers myself, contemplating the whole situation makes me very sad. I do salute the Military of today. They have it tougher than we did. In some ways, it's not so bad. Cell phones & email make it easy for today's servicemen to keep in daily contact with their families. Equipment is much better & more reliable. Living conditions are also a lot better, although it seems to me (and I thought about this a lot back in my day) that the US always chooses to fight in most horrible climates & terrains we can find. Thanks Joe and everyone who serviced and services. To all OUR VETS---- GOD BLESS AMERICA; And "I'LL DRINK TO THAT!!" I'll drink to that, too, Thom! Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Thank You Ole Thom
WRONG, the world belongs to US.
"The_navigator©" wrote in message ... But you are on MY planet. Cheers MC Scott Vernon wrote: SHUT UP you foreigner! Americans are talking. Scotty "The_nagitattor" wrote ... Some have very clear goals. It is usually their means of achieving it that they cannot agree on. While many would like to kill all Americans as vermin, other wish to scare you to an honest, open negotiation table. That you lump them together reveals your lack of diplomatic smarts. The US's second major problem is that you gain no respect on their eyes as you, yourself, carry out acts of terrorism and support terrorist countries/regimes -when it suits you. Cheers MC DSK wrote: "Thom Stewart" wrote... Thanks Joe, Doug , I return your Salute! You younger Vets deserve your share of real credit, In my war, we knew who the enemy was and where to find him. It was the Leaders of the Military's job to defeat him, It was a hard, costly war but it had a direction and a goal. TOTAL VICTORY!! That, I believe was the last war fought that way. I dunno about that, Thom. War is always a military means to a political solution for an economic problem. It's a loose term for any large group of people attempting to impose their collective will on another group by force. An old fashioned word for terrorism might be sabotage, and every country has tried it's hand at sending saboteurs into 'enemy' territory. The enemy we are currenty fighting (outside of those enemies of the Constitution that we have, Lord help us, elected over ourselves) uses terrorism or sabotage because that is the only way they have to fight. They are so poor & so desparate that they have no other means. Therefor they have no big, obvious, economically valuable targets for our military to go after. We have two huge strategic problems, and no leader of any industrialized country has AFAIK addressed either. 1- the terrorists are irrational and cannot agree on their own goals, so there is no hope of making 'peace' with them on any terms 2- the terrorists make very handy agents for behind-the-scenes economic groups who profit by the destruction of competitors assets I wish I had some answers myself, contemplating the whole situation makes me very sad. I do salute the Military of today. They have it tougher than we did. In some ways, it's not so bad. Cell phones & email make it easy for today's servicemen to keep in daily contact with their families. Equipment is much better & more reliable. Living conditions are also a lot better, although it seems to me (and I thought about this a lot back in my day) that the US always chooses to fight in most horrible climates & terrains we can find. Thanks Joe and everyone who serviced and services. To all OUR VETS---- GOD BLESS AMERICA; And "I'LL DRINK TO THAT!!" I'll drink to that, too, Thom! Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Thank You Ole Thom
Not my part... and my part is bigger than your part!
CM "Scott Vernon" wrote in message ... | WRONG, the world belongs to US. | | | "The_navigator©" wrote in message | ... | But you are on MY planet. | | Cheers MC | | Scott Vernon wrote: | | SHUT UP you foreigner! Americans are talking. | | Scotty | | | "The_nagitattor" wrote ... | | Some have very clear goals. It is usually their means of achieving it | that they cannot agree on. While many would like to kill all Americans | as vermin, other wish to scare you to an honest, open negotiation table. | That you lump them together reveals your lack of diplomatic smarts. The | US's second major problem is that you gain no respect on their eyes as | you, yourself, carry out acts of terrorism and support terrorist | countries/regimes -when it suits you. | | Cheers MC | | DSK wrote: | | | "Thom Stewart" wrote... | | | Thanks Joe, | | Doug , I return your Salute! You younger Vets deserve your share of | | real | | credit, | | In my war, we knew who the enemy was and where to find him. It was | the | Leaders of the Military's job to defeat him, It was a hard, costly | war | but it had a direction and a goal. TOTAL VICTORY!! | | That, I believe was the last war fought that way. | | | I dunno about that, Thom. War is always a military means to a political | | solution for an economic problem. It's a loose | | term for any large group of people attempting to impose their | collective | | will on another group by force. An old fashioned | | word for terrorism might be sabotage, and every country has tried it's | | hand at sending saboteurs into 'enemy' territory. | | The enemy we are currenty fighting (outside of those enemies of the | | Constitution that we have, Lord help us, elected over | | ourselves) uses terrorism or sabotage because that is the only way they | | have to fight. They are so poor & so desparate | | that they have no other means. Therefor they have no big, obvious, | | economically valuable targets for our military to go | | after. | | We have two huge strategic problems, and no leader of any | industrialized | | country has AFAIK addressed either. | | 1- the terrorists are irrational and cannot agree on their own goals, | so | | there is no hope of making 'peace' with them on | | any terms | | 2- the terrorists make very handy agents for behind-the-scenes economic | | groups who profit by the destruction of | | competitors assets | | I wish I had some answers myself, contemplating the whole situation | | makes me very sad. | | | | I do salute the Military of today. They have it tougher than we did. | | | In some ways, it's not so bad. Cell phones & email make it easy for | | today's servicemen to keep in daily contact with | | their families. Equipment is much better & more reliable. Living | | conditions are also a lot better, although it seems to | | me (and I thought about this a lot back in my day) that the US always | | chooses to fight in most horrible climates & | | terrains we can find. | | | | | Thanks Joe and everyone who serviced and services. To all OUR | VETS---- | | GOD BLESS AMERICA; And "I'LL DRINK TO THAT!!" | | | I'll drink to that, too, Thom! | | Fresh Breezes- Doug King | | | | | |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Thank You Ole Thom
We don't want THAT part of the world.
SV "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message ... Not my part... and my part is bigger than your part! CM "Scott Vernon" wrote in message ... | WRONG, the world belongs to US. | | | "The_navigator©" wrote in message | ... | But you are on MY planet. | | Cheers MC | | Scott Vernon wrote: | | SHUT UP you foreigner! Americans are talking. | | Scotty | | | "The_nagitattor" wrote ... | | Some have very clear goals. It is usually their means of achieving it | that they cannot agree on. While many would like to kill all Americans | as vermin, other wish to scare you to an honest, open negotiation table. | That you lump them together reveals your lack of diplomatic smarts. The | US's second major problem is that you gain no respect on their eyes as | you, yourself, carry out acts of terrorism and support terrorist | countries/regimes -when it suits you. | | Cheers MC | | DSK wrote: | | | "Thom Stewart" wrote... | | | Thanks Joe, | | Doug , I return your Salute! You younger Vets deserve your share of | | real | | credit, | | In my war, we knew who the enemy was and where to find him. It was | the | Leaders of the Military's job to defeat him, It was a hard, costly | war | but it had a direction and a goal. TOTAL VICTORY!! | | That, I believe was the last war fought that way. | | | I dunno about that, Thom. War is always a military means to a political | | solution for an economic problem. It's a loose | | term for any large group of people attempting to impose their | collective | | will on another group by force. An old fashioned | | word for terrorism might be sabotage, and every country has tried it's | | hand at sending saboteurs into 'enemy' territory. | | The enemy we are currenty fighting (outside of those enemies of the | | Constitution that we have, Lord help us, elected over | | ourselves) uses terrorism or sabotage because that is the only way they | | have to fight. They are so poor & so desparate | | that they have no other means. Therefor they have no big, obvious, | | economically valuable targets for our military to go | | after. | | We have two huge strategic problems, and no leader of any | industrialized | | country has AFAIK addressed either. | | 1- the terrorists are irrational and cannot agree on their own goals, | so | | there is no hope of making 'peace' with them on | | any terms | | 2- the terrorists make very handy agents for behind-the-scenes economic | | groups who profit by the destruction of | | competitors assets | | I wish I had some answers myself, contemplating the whole situation | | makes me very sad. | | | | I do salute the Military of today. They have it tougher than we did. | | | In some ways, it's not so bad. Cell phones & email make it easy for | | today's servicemen to keep in daily contact with | | their families. Equipment is much better & more reliable. Living | | conditions are also a lot better, although it seems to | | me (and I thought about this a lot back in my day) that the US always | | chooses to fight in most horrible climates & | | terrains we can find. | | | | | Thanks Joe and everyone who serviced and services. To all OUR | VETS---- | | GOD BLESS AMERICA; And "I'LL DRINK TO THAT!!" | | | I'll drink to that, too, Thom! | | Fresh Breezes- Doug King | | | | | |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Thank You Ole Thom
Well goody for you cause you Can't Have It! So There!
CM "Scott Vernon" wrote in message ... | We don't want THAT part of the world. | | SV | | "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message | ... | Not my part... and my part is bigger than your part! | | CM | | "Scott Vernon" wrote in message | ... | | WRONG, the world belongs to US. | | | | | | "The_navigator©" wrote in message | | ... | | But you are on MY planet. | | | | Cheers MC | | | | Scott Vernon wrote: | | | | SHUT UP you foreigner! Americans are talking. | | | | Scotty | | | | | | "The_nagitattor" wrote ... | | | | Some have very clear goals. It is usually their means of achieving | it | | that they cannot agree on. While many would like to kill all | Americans | | as vermin, other wish to scare you to an honest, open negotiation | table. | | That you lump them together reveals your lack of diplomatic smarts. | The | | US's second major problem is that you gain no respect on their eyes | as | | you, yourself, carry out acts of terrorism and support terrorist | | countries/regimes -when it suits you. | | | | Cheers MC | | | | DSK wrote: | | | | | | "Thom Stewart" wrote... | | | | | | Thanks Joe, | | | | Doug , I return your Salute! You younger Vets deserve your share | of | | | | real | | | | credit, | | | | In my war, we knew who the enemy was and where to find him. It | was | | the | | Leaders of the Military's job to defeat him, It was a hard, | costly | | war | | but it had a direction and a goal. TOTAL VICTORY!! | | | | That, I believe was the last war fought that way. | | | | | | I dunno about that, Thom. War is always a military means to a | political | | | | solution for an economic problem. It's a loose | | | | term for any large group of people attempting to impose their | | collective | | | | will on another group by force. An old fashioned | | | | word for terrorism might be sabotage, and every country has tried | it's | | | | hand at sending saboteurs into 'enemy' territory. | | | | The enemy we are currenty fighting (outside of those enemies of the | | | | Constitution that we have, Lord help us, elected over | | | | ourselves) uses terrorism or sabotage because that is the only way | they | | | | have to fight. They are so poor & so desparate | | | | that they have no other means. Therefor they have no big, obvious, | | | | economically valuable targets for our military to go | | | | after. | | | | We have two huge strategic problems, and no leader of any | | industrialized | | | | country has AFAIK addressed either. | | | | 1- the terrorists are irrational and cannot agree on their own | goals, | | so | | | | there is no hope of making 'peace' with them on | | | | any terms | | | | 2- the terrorists make very handy agents for behind-the-scenes | economic | | | | groups who profit by the destruction of | | | | competitors assets | | | | I wish I had some answers myself, contemplating the whole situation | | | | makes me very sad. | | | | | | | | I do salute the Military of today. They have it tougher than we | did. | | | | | | In some ways, it's not so bad. Cell phones & email make it easy for | | | | today's servicemen to keep in daily contact with | | | | their families. Equipment is much better & more reliable. Living | | | | conditions are also a lot better, although it seems to | | | | me (and I thought about this a lot back in my day) that the US | always | | | | chooses to fight in most horrible climates & | | | | terrains we can find. | | | | | | | | | | Thanks Joe and everyone who serviced and services. To all OUR | | VETS---- | | | | GOD BLESS AMERICA; And "I'LL DRINK TO THAT!!" | | | | | | I'll drink to that, too, Thom! | | | | Fresh Breezes- Doug King | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Thank You Ole Thom
"Scott Vernon" wrote in message ... WRONG, the world belongs to the US. No, it doesn't! Regards Touche. -- |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Thank You Ol Thom
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Thank You Ole Thom
No wonder you are having trouble! You don't even know who will inherit
the earth! Cheers MC Scott Vernon wrote: WRONG, the world belongs to US. "The_navigator©" wrote in message ... But you are on MY planet. Cheers MC Scott Vernon wrote: SHUT UP you foreigner! Americans are talking. Scotty "The_nagitattor" wrote ... Some have very clear goals. It is usually their means of achieving it that they cannot agree on. While many would like to kill all Americans as vermin, other wish to scare you to an honest, open negotiation table. That you lump them together reveals your lack of diplomatic smarts. The US's second major problem is that you gain no respect on their eyes as you, yourself, carry out acts of terrorism and support terrorist countries/regimes -when it suits you. Cheers MC DSK wrote: "Thom Stewart" wrote... Thanks Joe, Doug , I return your Salute! You younger Vets deserve your share of real credit, In my war, we knew who the enemy was and where to find him. It was the Leaders of the Military's job to defeat him, It was a hard, costly war but it had a direction and a goal. TOTAL VICTORY!! That, I believe was the last war fought that way. I dunno about that, Thom. War is always a military means to a political solution for an economic problem. It's a loose term for any large group of people attempting to impose their collective will on another group by force. An old fashioned word for terrorism might be sabotage, and every country has tried it's hand at sending saboteurs into 'enemy' territory. The enemy we are currenty fighting (outside of those enemies of the Constitution that we have, Lord help us, elected over ourselves) uses terrorism or sabotage because that is the only way they have to fight. They are so poor & so desparate that they have no other means. Therefor they have no big, obvious, economically valuable targets for our military to go after. We have two huge strategic problems, and no leader of any industrialized country has AFAIK addressed either. 1- the terrorists are irrational and cannot agree on their own goals, so there is no hope of making 'peace' with them on any terms 2- the terrorists make very handy agents for behind-the-scenes economic groups who profit by the destruction of competitors assets I wish I had some answers myself, contemplating the whole situation makes me very sad. I do salute the Military of today. They have it tougher than we did. In some ways, it's not so bad. Cell phones & email make it easy for today's servicemen to keep in daily contact with their families. Equipment is much better & more reliable. Living conditions are also a lot better, although it seems to me (and I thought about this a lot back in my day) that the US always chooses to fight in most horrible climates & terrains we can find. Thanks Joe and everyone who serviced and services. To all OUR VETS---- GOD BLESS AMERICA; And "I'LL DRINK TO THAT!!" I'll drink to that, too, Thom! Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Thank you Old Thom! | ASA | |||
Inexpensive sails - Ole Thom. | ASA | |||
Pneuma's New Main | ASA |