LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Simple Simon
 
Posts: n/a
Default Navigator's lament

The Navigator's Lament

I had a kitten and I loved her so much
She was playful and gentle and so nice to touch.
But alas she went blind
And in my warped mind
A handicapped cat might never survive
And I fancied her better off dead than alive.
So I KILLED her . . .



S.Simon - loves animals


  #2   Report Post  
The Carrolls
 
Posts: n/a
Default Navigator's lament

Boyoh boy, you must have hated recess when you were a kid.
"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...
The Navigator's Lament

I had a kitten and I loved her so much
She was playful and gentle and so nice to touch.
But alas she went blind
And in my warped mind
A handicapped cat might never survive
And I fancied her better off dead than alive.
So I KILLED her . . .



S.Simon - loves animals




  #3   Report Post  
Simple Simon
 
Posts: n/a
Default Killing Pets

Negative!

What I cannot abide, however, is people who write things
that indicate they consider their pets as just another throwaway
toy. There is all too much of this crap going on these days. What's
worse these people expect support and sympathy for their
moral decriptitude.

People move into an apartment or house where pets are not
allowed in the lease so they dump their pets out of the car
along the road somewhere. Or, people meet another person
who is alergic to their pets so they get rid of the pet at the
pound. The pet gets sick and it will be expensive to treat
so they have the vet kill it and on and on. People have many
excuses but what it all boils down to is FAILURE to accept
obligations because it is inconvenient to do so.

This indicates a total lack of conscience, morals and respect
for life in general. This is true psychotic behavior but so many
people exhibit it that it has blurred the norm. But, still, people
will continue to attempt to justify it by claiming they killed their
pet for whatever reason when the ONLY valid reason to ever
kill a pet is if it is suffering greatly and has no chance to live.
Only then can it be considered humane to kill the animal.
A real man will do the killing himself - not take the animal
to the vet which is another failure to live up to obligations.

It is never humane to abandon a pet. It is never humane to
regeg on your obligations to your pet. You willingly take on
the obligation. It shows a lack of morals to change your mind.
Too many people these days have no morals. They do whatever
is most convenient at any given time but what disgusts me is
they lie to themselves and attempt to justify this lack of morals
with lame excuses that simply don't make any logical or moral sense.

If my words can sway one opinion and save one animal they are
worth it. I don't care what people think of me for writing these
words.

S.Simon - loves and respects animals


"The Carrolls" wrote in message ...
Boyoh boy, you must have hated recess when you were a kid.
"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...
The Navigator's Lament

I had a kitten and I loved her so much
She was playful and gentle and so nice to touch.
But alas she went blind
And in my warped mind
A handicapped cat might never survive
And I fancied her better off dead than alive.
So I KILLED her . . .



S.Simon - loves animals






  #4   Report Post  
Scott Vernon
 
Posts: n/a
Default Killing Pets


What's sad is that some people do that with babies & kids nowadays.

SV

"Simple Simon" wrote ...

What I cannot abide, however, is people who write things
that indicate they consider their pets as just another throwaway
toy. There is all too much of this crap going on these days. What's
worse these people expect support and sympathy for their
moral decriptitude.

People move into an apartment or house where pets are not
allowed in the lease so they dump their pets out of the car
along the road somewhere. Or, people meet another person
who is alergic to their pets so they get rid of the pet at the
pound. The pet gets sick and it will be expensive to treat
so they have the vet kill it and on and on. People have many
excuses but what it all boils down to is FAILURE to accept
obligations because it is inconvenient to do so.




  #5   Report Post  
Simple Simon
 
Posts: n/a
Default Killing Pets

You're right. That's why it needs to be explicitely pointed out that it
should not be done with pets because once people accept the aberration
with pets it's not all that difficult to migrate it to babies and kids.

S.Simon


"Scott Vernon" wrote in message ...

What's sad is that some people do that with babies & kids nowadays.

SV

"Simple Simon" wrote ...

What I cannot abide, however, is people who write things
that indicate they consider their pets as just another throwaway
toy. There is all too much of this crap going on these days. What's
worse these people expect support and sympathy for their
moral decriptitude.

People move into an apartment or house where pets are not
allowed in the lease so they dump their pets out of the car
along the road somewhere. Or, people meet another person
who is alergic to their pets so they get rid of the pet at the
pound. The pet gets sick and it will be expensive to treat
so they have the vet kill it and on and on. People have many
excuses but what it all boils down to is FAILURE to accept
obligations because it is inconvenient to do so.








  #6   Report Post  
Scott Vernon
 
Posts: n/a
Default Killing Pets

What about cows and pigs?


"Simple Simon" wrote in message
news
You're right. That's why it needs to be explicitely pointed out that it
should not be done with pets because once people accept the aberration
with pets it's not all that difficult to migrate it to babies and kids.

S.Simon


"Scott Vernon" wrote in message

...

What's sad is that some people do that with babies & kids nowadays.

SV

"Simple Simon" wrote ...

What I cannot abide, however, is people who write things
that indicate they consider their pets as just another throwaway
toy. There is all too much of this crap going on these days. What's
worse these people expect support and sympathy for their
moral decriptitude.

People move into an apartment or house where pets are not
allowed in the lease so they dump their pets out of the car
along the road somewhere. Or, people meet another person
who is alergic to their pets so they get rid of the pet at the
pound. The pet gets sick and it will be expensive to treat
so they have the vet kill it and on and on. People have many
excuses but what it all boils down to is FAILURE to accept
obligations because it is inconvenient to do so.








  #7   Report Post  
Simple Simon
 
Posts: n/a
Default Killing Pets


Depends upon whether they're pets or farm animals.
Intended use is a big factor. To be considered
reneging one must breach a promise - one makes
no promise of sanctuary to farm animals raised for food.
That's not to say these animals shouldn't be treated as
humanely as possible while being raised and dispatched
as humanely as possible when their time comes.

S.Simon

"Scott Vernon" wrote in message ...
What about cows and pigs?


"Simple Simon" wrote in message
news
You're right. That's why it needs to be explicitely pointed out that it
should not be done with pets because once people accept the aberration
with pets it's not all that difficult to migrate it to babies and kids.

S.Simon


"Scott Vernon" wrote in message

...

What's sad is that some people do that with babies & kids nowadays.

SV

"Simple Simon" wrote ...

What I cannot abide, however, is people who write things
that indicate they consider their pets as just another throwaway
toy. There is all too much of this crap going on these days. What's
worse these people expect support and sympathy for their
moral decriptitude.

People move into an apartment or house where pets are not
allowed in the lease so they dump their pets out of the car
along the road somewhere. Or, people meet another person
who is alergic to their pets so they get rid of the pet at the
pound. The pet gets sick and it will be expensive to treat
so they have the vet kill it and on and on. People have many
excuses but what it all boils down to is FAILURE to accept
obligations because it is inconvenient to do so.









  #8   Report Post  
Scott Vernon
 
Posts: n/a
Default Killing Pets

Who decided that dogs & cats get treated better than other animals?.

SV

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...

Depends upon whether they're pets or farm animals.
Intended use is a big factor. To be considered
reneging one must breach a promise - one makes
no promise of sanctuary to farm animals raised for food.
That's not to say these animals shouldn't be treated as
humanely as possible while being raised and dispatched
as humanely as possible when their time comes.

S.Simon

"Scott Vernon" wrote in message

...
What about cows and pigs?


"Simple Simon" wrote in message
news
You're right. That's why it needs to be explicitely pointed out that

it
should not be done with pets because once people accept the aberration
with pets it's not all that difficult to migrate it to babies and

kids.

S.Simon


"Scott Vernon" wrote in message

...

What's sad is that some people do that with babies & kids nowadays.

SV

"Simple Simon" wrote ...

What I cannot abide, however, is people who write things
that indicate they consider their pets as just another throwaway
toy. There is all too much of this crap going on these days.

What's
worse these people expect support and sympathy for their
moral decriptitude.

People move into an apartment or house where pets are not
allowed in the lease so they dump their pets out of the car
along the road somewhere. Or, people meet another person
who is alergic to their pets so they get rid of the pet at the
pound. The pet gets sick and it will be expensive to treat
so they have the vet kill it and on and on. People have many
excuses but what it all boils down to is FAILURE to accept
obligations because it is inconvenient to do so.











  #9   Report Post  
Pony Express
 
Posts: n/a
Default Killing Pets

and old people, and sick people , and people that
are different then us . . .
--
----
Steve
S/V Pony Express

"Simple Simon" wrote in
message
news : You're right. That's why it needs to be
explicitely pointed out that it
: should not be done with pets because once people
accept the aberration
: with pets it's not all that difficult to migrate
it to babies and kids.
:
: S.Simon
:
:
: "Scott Vernon" wrote in
message
...
:
: What's sad is that some people do that with
babies & kids nowadays.
:
: SV
:
: "Simple Simon" wrote
....
:
: What I cannot abide, however, is people who
write things
: that indicate they consider their pets as
just another throwaway
: toy. There is all too much of this crap
going on these days. What's
: worse these people expect support and
sympathy for their
: moral decriptitude.
:
: People move into an apartment or house where
pets are not
: allowed in the lease so they dump their pets
out of the car
: along the road somewhere. Or, people meet
another person
: who is alergic to their pets so they get rid
of the pet at the
: pound. The pet gets sick and it will be
expensive to treat
: so they have the vet kill it and on and on.
People have many
: excuses but what it all boils down to is
FAILURE to accept
: obligations because it is inconvenient to do
so.
:
:
:
:
:

  #10   Report Post  
Donal
 
Posts: n/a
Default Killing Pets


"Pony Express" wrote in message
ink.net...
and old people, and sick people , and people that
are different then us . . .


Iraqis are different! Simple already thinks that it is ok to kill Iraqis.




Regards


Donal
--


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Lurker's Lament The Carrolls ASA 0 June 25th 03 08:51 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:15 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017