What about women? Intended use could mean anything.

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...

Depends upon whether they're pets or farm animals.
Intended use is a big factor. To be considered
reneging one must breach a promise - one makes
no promise of sanctuary to farm animals raised for food.
That's not to say these animals shouldn't be treated as
humanely as possible while being raised and dispatched
as humanely as possible when their time comes.

S.Simon

"Scott Vernon" wrote in message
...
What about cows and pigs?


"Simple Simon" wrote in message
news
You're right. That's why it needs to be explicitely pointed out that
it
should not be done with pets because once people accept the aberration
with pets it's not all that difficult to migrate it to babies and
kids.

S.Simon


"Scott Vernon" wrote in message
...

What's sad is that some people do that with babies & kids nowadays.

SV

"Simple Simon" wrote ...

What I cannot abide, however, is people who write things
that indicate they consider their pets as just another throwaway
toy. There is all too much of this crap going on these days.
What's
worse these people expect support and sympathy for their
moral decriptitude.

People move into an apartment or house where pets are not
allowed in the lease so they dump their pets out of the car
along the road somewhere. Or, people meet another person
who is alergic to their pets so they get rid of the pet at the
pound. The pet gets sick and it will be expensive to treat
so they have the vet kill it and on and on. People have many
excuses but what it all boils down to is FAILURE to accept
obligations because it is inconvenient to do so.