Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Good Morning Simple,
Many of us SAILORS that sail among Whales use charts and depth finders to get a location of exactly where we are on the chart. This is an accepted practest in DED piloting. We finally got a nice cleaning rain last night and we have about 5mph wind at the house here. Waiting for my dog to wake up. We'll probabilly spend the day out on the water. The Pilothouse will come into play. Nice and dry and warm. OT |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
And, good morning to you, sir!
With the advent of GPS and its accurate nature, plotting your position on a chart is a more accurate method than using depth readings and dead reckoning. It's that simple. S.Simon "Thom Stewart" wrote in message ... Good Morning Simple, Many of us SAILORS that sail among Whales use charts and depth finders to get a location of exactly where we are on the chart. This is an accepted practest in DED piloting. We finally got a nice cleaning rain last night and we have about 5mph wind at the house here. Waiting for my dog to wake up. We'll probabilly spend the day out on the water. The Pilothouse will come into play. Nice and dry and warm. OT |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tell that to the crew of the Royal Majesty. They traveled most of the way from Bermuda to
Nantucket unaware that their GPS was not working. In the several hours before they grounded a glance at the depth sounder would have shown that they were dangerously off course. Frankly I was appalled by this incident, since I have never relied souly on GPS, but always verify position with soundings or bearings. http://www.ntsb.gov/publictn/1997/mar9701.pdf -- -jeff "Constant Vigilance!" - Frances W. Wright "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... And, good morning to you, sir! With the advent of GPS and its accurate nature, plotting your position on a chart is a more accurate method than using depth readings and dead reckoning. It's that simple. S.Simon "Thom Stewart" wrote in message ... Good Morning Simple, Many of us SAILORS that sail among Whales use charts and depth finders to get a location of exactly where we are on the chart. This is an accepted practest in DED piloting. We finally got a nice cleaning rain last night and we have about 5mph wind at the house here. Waiting for my dog to wake up. We'll probabilly spend the day out on the water. The Pilothouse will come into play. Nice and dry and warm. OT |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
You're point is not valid for sailors. Only professional motor
boaters carry on in such a stupid fashion. Only sloppy captains like Shen44 and Otnmbrd allow such a slovenly-run ship. Any cruising sailor worth his salt can look into and at the water and tell immediately if he is in shoal water by the color, wave action, shape, etc. Depth sounders are simply not a vital instrument of navigation. I'd be willing to bet more boats go aground while the operator is looking at the instrument than when using visual clues of sea state, color of water, etc. S.Simon "Jeff Morris" jeffmo@NoSpam-sv-lokiDOTcom wrote in message ... Tell that to the crew of the Royal Majesty. They traveled most of the way from Bermuda to Nantucket unaware that their GPS was not working. In the several hours before they grounded a glance at the depth sounder would have shown that they were dangerously off course. Frankly I was appalled by this incident, since I have never relied souly on GPS, but always verify position with soundings or bearings. http://www.ntsb.gov/publictn/1997/mar9701.pdf -- -jeff "Constant Vigilance!" - Frances W. Wright "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... And, good morning to you, sir! With the advent of GPS and its accurate nature, plotting your position on a chart is a more accurate method than using depth readings and dead reckoning. It's that simple. S.Simon "Thom Stewart" wrote in message ... Good Morning Simple, Many of us SAILORS that sail among Whales use charts and depth finders to get a location of exactly where we are on the chart. This is an accepted practest in DED piloting. We finally got a nice cleaning rain last night and we have about 5mph wind at the house here. Waiting for my dog to wake up. We'll probabilly spend the day out on the water. The Pilothouse will come into play. Nice and dry and warm. OT |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Once again, you demonstrate very limited experience.
There are many locations where its not possible to avoid hazards just by looking at the water. This may be possible in the Keys or Bahamas (up to a point) but not in New England or the Chesapeake. Most of the hard groundings I've witnessed could have been avoided if more attention had be paid to the depth sounder. For example, Boston Harbor has only one non-obvious hazard near the main channel, Lower Middle. You can't get close to it without going through 100 yards of shallow water, yet someone whacks it every week. The Irwin 30 I sailed for a season hit it the next year at 6.5 knots in a GPS assisted incident. The rudder was broken and the engine was knocked off its mounts. Neal, if you want to call yourself a "real sailor" you'll have to come up to New England to complete your education. "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... You're point is not valid for sailors. Only professional motor boaters carry on in such a stupid fashion. Only sloppy captains like Shen44 and Otnmbrd allow such a slovenly-run ship. Any cruising sailor worth his salt can look into and at the water and tell immediately if he is in shoal water by the color, wave action, shape, etc. Depth sounders are simply not a vital instrument of navigation. I'd be willing to bet more boats go aground while the operator is looking at the instrument than when using visual clues of sea state, color of water, etc. S.Simon "Jeff Morris" jeffmo@NoSpam-sv-lokiDOTcom wrote in message ... Tell that to the crew of the Royal Majesty. They traveled most of the way from Bermuda to Nantucket unaware that their GPS was not working. In the several hours before they grounded a glance at the depth sounder would have shown that they were dangerously off course. Frankly I was appalled by this incident, since I have never relied souly on GPS, but always verify position with soundings or bearings. http://www.ntsb.gov/publictn/1997/mar9701.pdf -- -jeff "Constant Vigilance!" - Frances W. Wright "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... And, good morning to you, sir! With the advent of GPS and its accurate nature, plotting your position on a chart is a more accurate method than using depth readings and dead reckoning. It's that simple. S.Simon "Thom Stewart" wrote in message ... Good Morning Simple, Many of us SAILORS that sail among Whales use charts and depth finders to get a location of exactly where we are on the chart. This is an accepted practest in DED piloting. We finally got a nice cleaning rain last night and we have about 5mph wind at the house here. Waiting for my dog to wake up. We'll probabilly spend the day out on the water. The Pilothouse will come into play. Nice and dry and warm. OT |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was born in Somerville, Mass. I lived there until I was ten years
old - old enough to realize I never want to go back there again. ANY water shallow enough to ground my boat will be evident without a depth sounder. If nothing else all I have to do is watch for wading birds. S.Simon "Jeff Morris" jeffmo@NoSpam-sv-lokiDOTcom wrote in message ... Once again, you demonstrate very limited experience. There are many locations where its not possible to avoid hazards just by looking at the water. This may be possible in the Keys or Bahamas (up to a point) but not in New England or the Chesapeake. Most of the hard groundings I've witnessed could have been avoided if more attention had be paid to the depth sounder. For example, Boston Harbor has only one non-obvious hazard near the main channel, Lower Middle. You can't get close to it without going through 100 yards of shallow water, yet someone whacks it every week. The Irwin 30 I sailed for a season hit it the next year at 6.5 knots in a GPS assisted incident. The rudder was broken and the engine was knocked off its mounts. Neal, if you want to call yourself a "real sailor" you'll have to come up to New England to complete your education. "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... You're point is not valid for sailors. Only professional motor boaters carry on in such a stupid fashion. Only sloppy captains like Shen44 and Otnmbrd allow such a slovenly-run ship. Any cruising sailor worth his salt can look into and at the water and tell immediately if he is in shoal water by the color, wave action, shape, etc. Depth sounders are simply not a vital instrument of navigation. I'd be willing to bet more boats go aground while the operator is looking at the instrument than when using visual clues of sea state, color of water, etc. S.Simon "Jeff Morris" jeffmo@NoSpam-sv-lokiDOTcom wrote in message ... Tell that to the crew of the Royal Majesty. They traveled most of the way from Bermuda to Nantucket unaware that their GPS was not working. In the several hours before they grounded a glance at the depth sounder would have shown that they were dangerously off course. Frankly I was appalled by this incident, since I have never relied souly on GPS, but always verify position with soundings or bearings. http://www.ntsb.gov/publictn/1997/mar9701.pdf -- -jeff "Constant Vigilance!" - Frances W. Wright "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... And, good morning to you, sir! With the advent of GPS and its accurate nature, plotting your position on a chart is a more accurate method than using depth readings and dead reckoning. It's that simple. S.Simon "Thom Stewart" wrote in message ... Good Morning Simple, Many of us SAILORS that sail among Whales use charts and depth finders to get a location of exactly where we are on the chart. This is an accepted practest in DED piloting. We finally got a nice cleaning rain last night and we have about 5mph wind at the house here. Waiting for my dog to wake up. We'll probabilly spend the day out on the water. The Pilothouse will come into play. Nice and dry and warm. OT |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wow! Neal grew up in Slummerville! That explains a lot.
Somerville is the ultimate working class 'burb. In Neal's day it was one of the most densely populated cities in the country. It was 98% Catholic and covered entirely by tightly packed three-deckers. Its become a bit gentrified of late, as it became an inexpensive alternative to Cambridge. I lived for many years on the Cambridge side of the line, and still visit often. "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... I was born in Somerville, Mass. I lived there until I was ten years old - old enough to realize I never want to go back there again. ANY water shallow enough to ground my boat will be evident without a depth sounder. If nothing else all I have to do is watch for wading birds. S.Simon "Jeff Morris" jeffmo@NoSpam-sv-lokiDOTcom wrote in message ... Once again, you demonstrate very limited experience. There are many locations where its not possible to avoid hazards just by looking at the water. This may be possible in the Keys or Bahamas (up to a point) but not in New England or the Chesapeake. Most of the hard groundings I've witnessed could have been avoided if more attention had be paid to the depth sounder. For example, Boston Harbor has only one non-obvious hazard near the main channel, Lower Middle. You can't get close to it without going through 100 yards of shallow water, yet someone whacks it every week. The Irwin 30 I sailed for a season hit it the next year at 6.5 knots in a GPS assisted incident. The rudder was broken and the engine was knocked off its mounts. Neal, if you want to call yourself a "real sailor" you'll have to come up to New England to complete your education. "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... You're point is not valid for sailors. Only professional motor boaters carry on in such a stupid fashion. Only sloppy captains like Shen44 and Otnmbrd allow such a slovenly-run ship. Any cruising sailor worth his salt can look into and at the water and tell immediately if he is in shoal water by the color, wave action, shape, etc. Depth sounders are simply not a vital instrument of navigation. I'd be willing to bet more boats go aground while the operator is looking at the instrument than when using visual clues of sea state, color of water, etc. S.Simon "Jeff Morris" jeffmo@NoSpam-sv-lokiDOTcom wrote in message ... Tell that to the crew of the Royal Majesty. They traveled most of the way from Bermuda to Nantucket unaware that their GPS was not working. In the several hours before they grounded a glance at the depth sounder would have shown that they were dangerously off course. Frankly I was appalled by this incident, since I have never relied souly on GPS, but always verify position with soundings or bearings. http://www.ntsb.gov/publictn/1997/mar9701.pdf -- -jeff "Constant Vigilance!" - Frances W. Wright "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... And, good morning to you, sir! With the advent of GPS and its accurate nature, plotting your position on a chart is a more accurate method than using depth readings and dead reckoning. It's that simple. S.Simon "Thom Stewart" wrote in message ... Good Morning Simple, Many of us SAILORS that sail among Whales use charts and depth finders to get a location of exactly where we are on the chart. This is an accepted practest in DED piloting. We finally got a nice cleaning rain last night and we have about 5mph wind at the house here. Waiting for my dog to wake up. We'll probabilly spend the day out on the water. The Pilothouse will come into play. Nice and dry and warm. OT |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Saturday my depth guage started acting up, just as I was entering Still
Pond anchorage (the entrance is narrow, between 2 sand spits) , however, I looked around, saw NO wading birds and proceeded to blast full speed ahead . SV "Simple Simon" wrote ANY water shallow enough to ground my boat will be evident without a depth sounder. If nothing else all I have to do is watch for wading birds. S.Simon |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Or in the SF bay... mostly mud, some rocks, and a few crapola
hunters sitting on the bottom. "Jeff Morris" jeffmo@NoSpam-sv-lokiDOTcom wrote in message ... Once again, you demonstrate very limited experience. There are many locations where its not possible to avoid hazards just by looking at the water. This may be possible in the Keys or Bahamas (up to a point) but not in New England or the Chesapeake. Most of the hard groundings I've witnessed could have been avoided if more attention had be paid to the depth sounder. For example, Boston Harbor has only one non-obvious hazard near the main channel, Lower Middle. You can't get close to it without going through 100 yards of shallow water, yet someone whacks it every week. The Irwin 30 I sailed for a season hit it the next year at 6.5 knots in a GPS assisted incident. The rudder was broken and the engine was knocked off its mounts. Neal, if you want to call yourself a "real sailor" you'll have to come up to New England to complete your education. "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... You're point is not valid for sailors. Only professional motor boaters carry on in such a stupid fashion. Only sloppy captains like Shen44 and Otnmbrd allow such a slovenly-run ship. Any cruising sailor worth his salt can look into and at the water and tell immediately if he is in shoal water by the color, wave action, shape, etc. Depth sounders are simply not a vital instrument of navigation. I'd be willing to bet more boats go aground while the operator is looking at the instrument than when using visual clues of sea state, color of water, etc. S.Simon "Jeff Morris" jeffmo@NoSpam-sv-lokiDOTcom wrote in message ... Tell that to the crew of the Royal Majesty. They traveled most of the way from Bermuda to Nantucket unaware that their GPS was not working. In the several hours before they grounded a glance at the depth sounder would have shown that they were dangerously off course. Frankly I was appalled by this incident, since I have never relied souly on GPS, but always verify position with soundings or bearings. http://www.ntsb.gov/publictn/1997/mar9701.pdf -- -jeff "Constant Vigilance!" - Frances W. Wright "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... And, good morning to you, sir! With the advent of GPS and its accurate nature, plotting your position on a chart is a more accurate method than using depth readings and dead reckoning. It's that simple. S.Simon "Thom Stewart" wrote in message ... Good Morning Simple, Many of us SAILORS that sail among Whales use charts and depth finders to get a location of exactly where we are on the chart. This is an accepted practest in DED piloting. We finally got a nice cleaning rain last night and we have about 5mph wind at the house here. Waiting for my dog to wake up. We'll probabilly spend the day out on the water. The Pilothouse will come into play. Nice and dry and warm. OT |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Simple Simon" wrote in message | Any cruising sailor worth his salt can look into and at the water | and tell immediately if he is in shoal water by the color, wave | action, shape, etc. This type of ridiculous comment can only be attributed to a tropical backwater daysailor with severely limited experience and absolutely no clue as to sea states North or South of the tropics. Depth sounders are simply not a vital instrument | of navigation. I'd be willing to bet more boats go aground while | the operator is looking at the instrument than when using visual | clues of sea state, color of water, etc. I never ran aground while operating without a sounder because I carried a lead line and exercised extreme caution knowing the my limitations and those of my vessel. Unknown harbour ... verify chart soundings, enter dead slow, split the entries 50/50 or favour the steep topography by 60/40. Once you've been in... you can sail back in under full press in a gale and really wow the rubber neckers moored inside. CM |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
depth finder "Inside" alum hull | General | |||
depth finder "Inside" alum hull | General | |||
depth finder transducer frequency question | Electronics | |||
Humminbird 300TX fish finder, depth finder Opinion survey please. | Electronics | |||
Replacing Lowrance depth finder | General |