Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tinkerntom" wrote in message oups.com... Hey Wilf, You never said that I can find, what sort of roof rack do you have? Is it a Commercial unit? If so, most of them have some sort of extender system already made. No point in reinventing the wheel. The problem with electrical conduit is two fold. First it is steel and would begin to get nasty fast when exposed to salt water. Secondly, it is designed to bend, which is great in some projects, but you would not want it to decide to bend when you have the kayak on it and lifting other end. It would result in a loud crash, and possibly a broken boat or twisted back as you try to keep the loud crash from happening. Any of these scenarios being bad. I think you will also find that the commercial extender systems do not extend as far as you are thinking like up to 28". So, though they use extruded, hardened Aluminum, which is amazingly strong, they only go out like maybe 15". Go out any further, and they don't bend, they break right of, and you end up with a similar scenario as above. So it may be time to go back to the drawing board! You might think in terms of Titanium, and then you begin talking real money, though with the aircraft industry up there, you may have a cheaper source! What you need is a material that can take the extended end loading, you might think of a fiber glass or Kevlar pole, which could be extended out beyond the side of vehicle, and supported in the middle folcrum on the roof gutter independent from the existing rack. This pole could extend across the top of the vehicle and be attached for loading to the other end of the rack. Think in terms of a teeter-totter, with one end held down, and the other end sticking out beyond the side of your car. The right material can carry a significant load. The right material could even be just a clear of knots, straight grained piece of Douglas Fir. A hand selected 2x4, from the local lumber yard. Trees are subject to end loading by the wind, and are incredibly strong. When you are done loading your boat, the system will not fold up all nice on top like a commercial unit would, but you could pull it and place inside vehicle, or lash along side the kayak on top. Now your car begins to look like a kayakers car should look. Check out the pictures on Wilko's website, and you will get a better idea of where this is headed. :-) My only other suggestion also, is that when you lift the front end up on the extension, that you tie a loop of rope around it to act as a safety to keep it from slipping off the extension as you lift the back end. this would be especially important if it is windy, or you are parked on a slope, which could result in the front end sliding off or deciding to take a lesson in "flying like a kite!" and you are holding on to the little end of the kite. I am sort of like a bull, when it comes to loading stuff as you know (:-), and I just lift my 70 lb boat onto the top of my Caravan. One time the wind caught the boat as I had it overhead and did a windvane number on my back. I am re-thinking my loading procedure even as I write this all to you. It is amazing how you get smarter each time you try to break something. TnT How about seeing if you can get a section of Schedule 40 pipe about 3ft long by 1 1/2 to 2 inches and attach it to the rack (no rust). Then get a good length of hardwood dowel that fits inside. It could be very loose fitting if you have 3 ft of it inside the pipe. I'm thinking 1 1/2 inch OD pipe should work great with a 1 inch or 1 1/4 inch dowel - like you buy to hang the cloths up in your closet. Toss the dowel inside the car when done (if the paddles fit, so will it). A dowel this size with 3 ft of support should hold for most boats. I would think it would hold 100 lbs distributed across the 2 ft or so you have sticking out. -- Stress test away from the car - I don't want to get blamed for a paint job after it breaks ; The beauty of using wood is you should hear it start to fail before it lets go. Unlike the conduit which may just fold-up without a sound. Ken |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() No Spam wrote: "Tinkerntom" wrote in message oups.com... Hey Wilf, You never said that I can find, what sort of roof rack do you have? Is it a Commercial unit? If so, most of them have some sort of extender system already made. No point in reinventing the wheel. The problem with electrical conduit is two fold. First it is steel and would begin to get nasty fast when exposed to salt water. Secondly, it is designed to bend, which is great in some projects, but you would not want it to decide to bend when you have the kayak on it and lifting other end. It would result in a loud crash, and possibly a broken boat or twisted back as you try to keep the loud crash from happening. Any of these scenarios being bad. I think you will also find that the commercial extender systems do not extend as far as you are thinking like up to 28". So, though they use extruded, hardened Aluminum, which is amazingly strong, they only go out like maybe 15". Go out any further, and they don't bend, they break right of, and you end up with a similar scenario as above. So it may be time to go back to the drawing board! You might think in terms of Titanium, and then you begin talking real money, though with the aircraft industry up there, you may have a cheaper source! What you need is a material that can take the extended end loading, you might think of a fiber glass or Kevlar pole, which could be extended out beyond the side of vehicle, and supported in the middle folcrum on the roof gutter independent from the existing rack. This pole could extend across the top of the vehicle and be attached for loading to the other end of the rack. Think in terms of a teeter-totter, with one end held down, and the other end sticking out beyond the side of your car. The right material can carry a significant load. The right material could even be just a clear of knots, straight grained piece of Douglas Fir. A hand selected 2x4, from the local lumber yard. Trees are subject to end loading by the wind, and are incredibly strong. When you are done loading your boat, the system will not fold up all nice on top like a commercial unit would, but you could pull it and place inside vehicle, or lash along side the kayak on top. Now your car begins to look like a kayakers car should look. Check out the pictures on Wilko's website, and you will get a better idea of where this is headed. :-) My only other suggestion also, is that when you lift the front end up on the extension, that you tie a loop of rope around it to act as a safety to keep it from slipping off the extension as you lift the back end. this would be especially important if it is windy, or you are parked on a slope, which could result in the front end sliding off or deciding to take a lesson in "flying like a kite!" and you are holding on to the little end of the kite. I am sort of like a bull, when it comes to loading stuff as you know (:-), and I just lift my 70 lb boat onto the top of my Caravan. One time the wind caught the boat as I had it overhead and did a windvane number on my back. I am re-thinking my loading procedure even as I write this all to you. It is amazing how you get smarter each time you try to break something. TnT How about seeing if you can get a section of Schedule 40 pipe about 3ft long by 1 1/2 to 2 inches and attach it to the rack (no rust). Then get a good length of hardwood dowel that fits inside. It could be very loose fitting if you have 3 ft of it inside the pipe. I'm thinking 1 1/2 inch OD pipe should work great with a 1 inch or 1 1/4 inch dowel - like you buy to hang the cloths up in your closet. Toss the dowel inside the car when done (if the paddles fit, so will it). A dowel this size with 3 ft of support should hold for most boats. I would think it would hold 100 lbs distributed across the 2 ft or so you have sticking out. -- Stress test away from the car - I don't want to get blamed for a paint job after it breaks ; The beauty of using wood is you should hear it start to fail before it lets go. Unlike the conduit which may just fold-up without a sound. Ken Ken, the only thing I would question, is that where the dowel comes out of the pipe, would represent a sheer line. All the load on the extended dowel would be concentrated at the sheer line as a breaking force. You would not be able to take advantage really of the flex of the dowel inside the tube, to dissipate the energy as a flexing force, and it would tend to break at that sheer line. You are right on though about hearing the dowel break. Another function of the safety line that I recommended, is that if the extension collapses, the boat would not fall clear to the ground. Considering the car paint though, it might be equally important to use some cushions in strategic spots in case the boat fell. You could just hang a long noodle on the side of the car to take the bang. or like Cyli indicated, you just don't worry about the paint! ![]() |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tinkerntom" wrote in message oups.com... Snip Ken, the only thing I would question, is that where the dowel comes out of the pipe, would represent a sheer line. All the load on the extended dowel would be concentrated at the sheer line as a breaking force. You would not be able to take advantage really of the flex of the dowel inside the tube, to dissipate the energy as a flexing force, and it would tend to break at that sheer line. You are right on though about hearing the dowel break. Another function of the safety line that I recommended, is that if the extension collapses, the boat would not fall clear to the ground. Considering the car paint though, it might be equally important to use some cushions in strategic spots in case the boat fell. You could just hang a long noodle on the side of the car to take the bang. or like Cyli indicated, you just don't worry about the paint! ![]() You are correct about the shear at the point of entry but I think a hardwood dowel of this size will take this force without complaint. My uncle used to hang an old wood extension ladder on dowel pegs and it took 2 people to lift that thing down. The flex in the exposed dowel would take the force of the jolt of rough handling of the boat though. I did some google searching but cannot find the shear strength of a dowel but I would guess that a 1 inch hardwood dowel would take at least 500 pounds of pure shear force before it would break. I have a 1 1/2 inch dowel here and I just stood on the end of it with the other end wedged under my work bench -- yep lifted the bench right up - the dowel flexed a little but easily handled me 275 lbs out about a foot from the support. Ken |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() No Spam wrote: "Tinkerntom" wrote in message oups.com... Snip Ken, the only thing I would question, is that where the dowel comes out of the pipe, would represent a sheer line. All the load on the extended dowel would be concentrated at the sheer line as a breaking force. You would not be able to take advantage really of the flex of the dowel inside the tube, to dissipate the energy as a flexing force, and it would tend to break at that sheer line. You are right on though about hearing the dowel break. Another function of the safety line that I recommended, is that if the extension collapses, the boat would not fall clear to the ground. Considering the car paint though, it might be equally important to use some cushions in strategic spots in case the boat fell. You could just hang a long noodle on the side of the car to take the bang. or like Cyli indicated, you just don't worry about the paint! ![]() TnT You are correct about the shear at the point of entry but I think a hardwood dowel of this size will take this force without complaint. My uncle used to hang an old wood extension ladder on dowel pegs and it took 2 people to lift that thing down. The flex in the exposed dowel would take the force of the jolt of rough handling of the boat though. I did some google searching but cannot find the shear strength of a dowel but I would guess that a 1 inch hardwood dowel would take at least 500 pounds of pure shear force before it would break. I have a 1 1/2 inch dowel here and I just stood on the end of it with the other end wedged under my work bench -- yep lifted the bench right up - the dowel flexed a little but easily handled me 275 lbs out about a foot from the support. Ken Ken, Wilf, is talking about extending the dowel out 28", see what loading the dowel breaks under now. This will prevent Wilf from falling off his workbench, and you seemed more inclined to do this sort of stuff! ![]() |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tink says:
=========== Ken, Wilf, is talking about extending the dowel out 28", see what loading the dowel breaks under now. This will prevent Wilf from falling off his workbench, and you seemed more inclined to do this sort of stuff! ![]() ============== I'm with you on this Tink -- as far as a 275 pound guy is concerned. The question is, as you point out, what happens when the dowel is extended out 28" and approx 50 pounds is placed essentially at the 14" mark (although, what with twisting and turning, the full 50 pounds could, momentarily anyway, be way out there at the 28" mark)? Tink, you mentioned that you're an electrician: do you think 50 pounds could bend the larger diameter conduit? Cheers, Wilf |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() BCITORGB wrote: Tink says: =========== Ken, Wilf, is talking about extending the dowel out 28", see what loading the dowel breaks under now. This will prevent Wilf from falling off his workbench, and you seemed more inclined to do this sort of stuff! ![]() ============== I'm with you on this Tink -- as far as a 275 pound guy is concerned. The question is, as you point out, what happens when the dowel is extended out 28" and approx 50 pounds is placed essentially at the 14" mark (although, what with twisting and turning, the full 50 pounds could, momentarily anyway, be way out there at the 28" mark)? Tink, you mentioned that you're an electrician: do you think 50 pounds could bend the larger diameter conduit? Cheers, Wilf Wilf, you say you are with me on this, do mean the testing, or falling off the workbench? ![]() I am not sure what you mean by large diameter. We bend conduit all the time with bending tools up to 1". Beyond that we have hydralic benders. This is mainly to provide a standard radius that the wire can be pulled through inside. Otherwise if you were to take the conduit, and bend it over a sharp edge, as soon as the radius of the tube is broken, the tube will easily collapse. There is a certain structural strength to the tube, but once it is compromised, the tube material is pretty soft and malleable. One person that you might check with, is Michael Daly. Recently I saw him post, that he is a structural engineer. He could probably give some good suggestions on real data base. I mostly figure stuff off the seat of my pants, hence the Tinker. My name is a double or triple entendo (sp)! Given enough time, as a practical engineer, I can usually cobble something together! Though it is the sort of stuff you might see on the Red/Green Show. I guess one thing I might ask you though, is how did you come up with the 28" number? Also is your rack a commercial unit, or is it standard Ford issue on Aerostar? As you load the kayak, can you come in at a larger angle to get the bow more up on the vehicle to start. That way the extension would not need to be so long. You would then be standing further out from the vehicle as you lift the stern, lift it higher so that the front does not get pivoted off the front rack, and swing the stern up on the rear rack. Also did you understand about the safety line, which should help keep the bow in place. TnT |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Tinkerntom wrote: BCITORGB wrote: Tink says: =========== Ken, Wilf, is talking about extending the dowel out 28", see what loading the dowel breaks under now. This will prevent Wilf from falling off his workbench, and you seemed more inclined to do this sort of stuff! ![]() ============== I'm with you on this Tink -- as far as a 275 pound guy is concerned. The question is, as you point out, what happens when the dowel is extended out 28" and approx 50 pounds is placed essentially at the 14" mark (although, what with twisting and turning, the full 50 pounds could, momentarily anyway, be way out there at the 28" mark)? Tink, you mentioned that you're an electrician: do you think 50 pounds could bend the larger diameter conduit? Cheers, Wilf Wilf, you say you are with me on this, do mean the testing, or falling off the workbench? ![]() I am not sure what you mean by large diameter. We bend conduit all the time with bending tools up to 1". Beyond that we have hydralic benders. This is mainly to provide a standard radius that the wire can be pulled through inside. Otherwise if you were to take the conduit, and bend it over a sharp edge, as soon as the radius of the tube is broken, the tube will easily collapse. There is a certain structural strength to the tube, but once it is compromised, the tube material is pretty soft and malleable. One person that you might check with, is Michael Daly. Recently I saw him post, that he is a structural engineer. He could probably give some good suggestions on real data base. I mostly figure stuff off the seat of my pants, hence the Tinker. My name is a double or triple entendo (sp)! Given enough time, as a practical engineer, I can usually cobble something together! Though it is the sort of stuff you might see on the Red/Green Show. I guess one thing I might ask you though, is how did you come up with the 28" number? Also is your rack a commercial unit, or is it standard Ford issue on Aerostar? As you load the kayak, can you come in at a larger angle to get the bow more up on the vehicle to start. That way the extension would not need to be so long. You would then be standing further out from the vehicle as you lift the stern, lift it higher so that the front does not get pivoted off the front rack, and swing the stern up on the rear rack. Also did you understand about the safety line, which should help keep the bow in place. TnT Sorry Wilf, I answered your second post before I saw the first, will reread and get back to you later, TnT |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tink says:
============= I am not sure what you mean by large diameter. We bend conduit all the time with bending tools up to 1". ================= Right, but even to bend 1" pipe, surely you use a "bending device" (my family would disown me for that... both father and brother are electricians and I spent a few summers as an electrician's helper, but am a complete nerd about practical matters... so, I don't recall what that fulcrum thingy is called). Anyway, I'm guessing that the larger diameter pipes cannot be bent, readily, without mechanical assistance. Hence my thought that, if a human can't readily bend it, a 100 pound kayak is not likely to bend it either (even at 50 pounds times, let's say, 30 inches). But, as I say, I'm not the electrician, I'm the geek. Tink says: ================ My name is a double or triple entendo (sp)! Given enough time, as a practical engineer, I can usually cobble something together! Though it is the sort of stuff you might see on the Red/Green Show. =========== And you likely thought ALL Canadians were like Red Green, eh? GRIN Cheers, Wilf |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tinkerntom" wrote in message oups.com... No Spam wrote: "Tinkerntom" wrote in message oups.com... Snip Ken, the only thing I would question, is that where the dowel comes out of the pipe, would represent a sheer line. All the load on the extended dowel would be concentrated at the sheer line as a breaking force. You would not be able to take advantage really of the flex of the dowel inside the tube, to dissipate the energy as a flexing force, and it would tend to break at that sheer line. You are right on though about hearing the dowel break. Another function of the safety line that I recommended, is that if the extension collapses, the boat would not fall clear to the ground. Considering the car paint though, it might be equally important to use some cushions in strategic spots in case the boat fell. You could just hang a long noodle on the side of the car to take the bang. or like Cyli indicated, you just don't worry about the paint! ![]() TnT You are correct about the shear at the point of entry but I think a hardwood dowel of this size will take this force without complaint. My uncle used to hang an old wood extension ladder on dowel pegs and it took 2 people to lift that thing down. The flex in the exposed dowel would take the force of the jolt of rough handling of the boat though. I did some google searching but cannot find the shear strength of a dowel but I would guess that a 1 inch hardwood dowel would take at least 500 pounds of pure shear force before it would break. I have a 1 1/2 inch dowel here and I just stood on the end of it with the other end wedged under my work bench -- yep lifted the bench right up - the dowel flexed a little but easily handled me 275 lbs out about a foot from the support. Ken Ken, Wilf, is talking about extending the dowel out 28", see what loading the dowel breaks under now. This will prevent Wilf from falling off his workbench, and you seemed more inclined to do this sort of stuff! ![]() Unfortunately I don't have enough dowel to anchor it and have 28 inches left over or I would gladly give it a try - I've ended up on my backside in the name of learning before. I think it would break if I were to put my full weight at 28 inches out, but that is not what we are talking about when we are loading a boat. You will have much less than half my weight and it will be more distributed. At any rate I think the schedule 40 pipe on the car is the ticket because it will not rust and it should hold just fine. The only thing to do now is find something that fits inside it that will take the weight. Get some conduit and some dowel and anything else that is lying around and see what happens. Good luck. Ken |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Again, thanks to everyone for all your input.
While in the shower this morning, I had a flash of brilliance as my father's words came back to me: "avoid moving parts whenever possible and shun automation!". While this little project hardly concerns automation, and not much in the way of moving parts, the general gist of his admonition was KISS. So, along those lines, I started thinking simple (and crude). Here's what I'm going to try. Take a 8'-2X4 and place it across the front of the van roof, by the front roofrack crossbar. Now lash it into place along the crossbar. Now I should have about 3.5' of 2X4 jutting out past the side of the van. While I know I'm an idiot in terms of things practical and mechanical, but I can't see a 2X4 not holding up this kayak. What do you guys think? Then, when I'm done, the 2X4 stays up on the rack next to the kayak. Are there any flaws in this crude version of an extension bar? Cheers, Wilf ================== |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General |