On Nov 12, 2:46*pm, Jim wrote:
There are some pretty serious allegations on this web site.

http://www.unionfacts.com/

Cat got your tongue Harry?

I take it you mean to ask why he won't shout negatively about the
unions?

It's because he's been sucking from their nipple for years, so no need
to bite the teat that feeds

wrote:
On Nov 12, 2:46 pm, Jim wrote:
There are some pretty serious allegations on this web site.

http://www.unionfacts.com/

Cat got your tongue Harry?

I take it you mean to ask why he won't shout negatively about the
unions?

It's because he's been sucking from their nipple for years, so no need
to bite the teat that feeds

I was hoping he would debunk the claims made on the web site. It's scary
to think that this kind of thuggery is still going on.

On Nov 12, 5:58*pm, Jim wrote:
wrote:
On Nov 12, 2:46 pm, Jim wrote:
There are some pretty serious allegations on this web site.

http://www.unionfacts.com/

Cat got your tongue Harry?

I take it you mean to ask why he won't shout negatively about the
unions?

It's because he's been sucking from their nipple for years, so no need
to bite the teat that feeds

I was hoping he would debunk the claims made on the web site. It's scary
to think that this kind of thuggery is still going on.

Why listen to Harry, you know he will only lie. Those of us who have
actually been on the working side of the union have seen this first
hand. The side of the Union Harry worked for, generally are in the
pocket of the management.. Deep in the pockets, and well paid for it.

On Nov 12, 5:35*pm, wrote:
On Nov 12, 2:46*pm, Jim wrote:

There are some pretty serious allegations on this web site.

http://www.unionfacts.com/

Cat got your tongue Harry?

I take it you mean to ask why he won't shout negatively about the
unions?

It's because he's been sucking from their nipple for years, so no need
to bite the teat that feeds

If it weren't for unions, lazy fat slobs like him would actually have
to work for a living, or go on welfare...