Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Looks like..
"Eisboch" wrote in message ... "Vic Smith" wrote in message ... You might be too young to remember Everett Dirksen's voice. Cool. Hey, check this out. Spiro Agnew rapping. Found it looking for an example of Dirksen. Here's a link to a c-span site that has some old interviews with the likes of Everett Dirksen, Hubert Humphrey, Barry Goldwater, etc. It took a minute or so for the page to begin loading, but then did so quickly. There's a couple of 45 minute interviews with Dirksen. Fun to listen to that distinctive voice and personality behind it again. http://www.c-span.org/apa/cong_lead....t_events,lcng; or: http://tinyurl.com/6lz5f2 Eisboch I lived in Illinois while Dirksen was senator. I always remember his famous line, "a billion here, a billion there and pretty soon we're talking real money". Of course back in his day a billion bought a lot more than today. |
#22
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Looks like..
|
#24
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Looks like..
BAR wrote:
HK wrote: wrote: On Nov 7, 9:07 am, "D.Duck" wrote: "Jim" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "jamesgangnc" wrote in message m... It's over. You lost big time. Get over it. Heh. I had to laugh. I remember someone saying that to Harry. Took him eight years. Eisboch Now he can gloat and, **** & moan, simultaneously. It's like he died and went to heaven, or wherever he would go. Now we can look to the future and remember there will always be *someone* here to defend/rationalize every *O* and democrat mis-step along the way. Oh, and find a way to blame it on Bush and those nasty evangelicals. The only difference is us "wingers" (moderate republicans) won't spend the next 4 years making up stories,namecalling, and running interference for our worst criminals, in an attempt to subvert our elected government... We will probably buck up, pay more taxes, and hope for the future. Time will tell. You don't pay federal income taxes. The problem is I haven't been paying Social Security taxes for the last 1/3 of the year. But, once The Obama gets sworn in I'll be paying them for the full year. Do you know how many jobs are going to be lost because of that increase in taxes? If you think 6.5% unemployment is high you haven't seen anything yet. Slightly higher taxes on the wealthy aren't going to raise the unemployment rate. I was in a new condo yesterday, still under construction, on which the owner spent $10 million. He and his buddies aren't going to miss a few tens of thousands of dollars a year for fairer taxes. |
#25
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Looks like..
HK wrote:
BAR wrote: HK wrote: wrote: On Nov 7, 9:07 am, "D.Duck" wrote: "Jim" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "jamesgangnc" wrote in message m... It's over. You lost big time. Get over it. Heh. I had to laugh. I remember someone saying that to Harry. Took him eight years. Eisboch Now he can gloat and, **** & moan, simultaneously. It's like he died and went to heaven, or wherever he would go. Now we can look to the future and remember there will always be *someone* here to defend/rationalize every *O* and democrat mis-step along the way. Oh, and find a way to blame it on Bush and those nasty evangelicals. The only difference is us "wingers" (moderate republicans) won't spend the next 4 years making up stories,namecalling, and running interference for our worst criminals, in an attempt to subvert our elected government... We will probably buck up, pay more taxes, and hope for the future. Time will tell. You don't pay federal income taxes. The problem is I haven't been paying Social Security taxes for the last 1/3 of the year. But, once The Obama gets sworn in I'll be paying them for the full year. Do you know how many jobs are going to be lost because of that increase in taxes? If you think 6.5% unemployment is high you haven't seen anything yet. Slightly higher taxes on the wealthy aren't going to raise the unemployment rate. I was in a new condo yesterday, still under construction, on which the owner spent $10 million. He and his buddies aren't going to miss a few tens of thousands of dollars a year for fairer taxes. Don't rely too heavily on monkey ears'promises. You will be disappointed. Guaranteed |
#26
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Looks like..
HK wrote:
BAR wrote: HK wrote: wrote: On Nov 7, 9:07 am, "D.Duck" wrote: "Jim" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "jamesgangnc" wrote in message m... It's over. You lost big time. Get over it. Heh. I had to laugh. I remember someone saying that to Harry. Took him eight years. Eisboch Now he can gloat and, **** & moan, simultaneously. It's like he died and went to heaven, or wherever he would go. Now we can look to the future and remember there will always be *someone* here to defend/rationalize every *O* and democrat mis-step along the way. Oh, and find a way to blame it on Bush and those nasty evangelicals. The only difference is us "wingers" (moderate republicans) won't spend the next 4 years making up stories,namecalling, and running interference for our worst criminals, in an attempt to subvert our elected government... We will probably buck up, pay more taxes, and hope for the future. Time will tell. You don't pay federal income taxes. The problem is I haven't been paying Social Security taxes for the last 1/3 of the year. But, once The Obama gets sworn in I'll be paying them for the full year. Do you know how many jobs are going to be lost because of that increase in taxes? If you think 6.5% unemployment is high you haven't seen anything yet. Slightly higher taxes on the wealthy aren't going to raise the unemployment rate. You miss or ignore the point again. The companies that have to pay the increased Social Security taxes will cause the unemployment rate to increase. I was in a new condo yesterday, still under construction, on which the owner spent $10 million. He and his buddies aren't going to miss a few tens of thousands of dollars a year for fairer taxes. Again you are looking at it from the individual's perspective. You need to look at it from the companies perspective. If the company's labor costs increase by 10% due to increased federal state and local tax costs that money is going to come on the backs of the current labor force in by layoffs. Capital improvements will be delayed do to the reduced availability of labor to implement those improvements. Since the company will not be buying new equipment and services for those improvements it spirals throughout the entire economy. The best thing for The Obama to do to get the economy moving again is to cut all federal taxes by 50%, captial gains, income, ... If you want to see money start moving through the economy that's the way to do it. |
#27
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Looks like..
BAR wrote:
HK wrote: BAR wrote: HK wrote: wrote: On Nov 7, 9:07 am, "D.Duck" wrote: "Jim" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "jamesgangnc" wrote in message m... It's over. You lost big time. Get over it. Heh. I had to laugh. I remember someone saying that to Harry. Took him eight years. Eisboch Now he can gloat and, **** & moan, simultaneously. It's like he died and went to heaven, or wherever he would go. Now we can look to the future and remember there will always be *someone* here to defend/rationalize every *O* and democrat mis-step along the way. Oh, and find a way to blame it on Bush and those nasty evangelicals. The only difference is us "wingers" (moderate republicans) won't spend the next 4 years making up stories,namecalling, and running interference for our worst criminals, in an attempt to subvert our elected government... We will probably buck up, pay more taxes, and hope for the future. Time will tell. You don't pay federal income taxes. The problem is I haven't been paying Social Security taxes for the last 1/3 of the year. But, once The Obama gets sworn in I'll be paying them for the full year. Do you know how many jobs are going to be lost because of that increase in taxes? If you think 6.5% unemployment is high you haven't seen anything yet. Slightly higher taxes on the wealthy aren't going to raise the unemployment rate. You miss or ignore the point again. The companies that have to pay the increased Social Security taxes will cause the unemployment rate to increase. I was in a new condo yesterday, still under construction, on which the owner spent $10 million. He and his buddies aren't going to miss a few tens of thousands of dollars a year for fairer taxes. Again you are looking at it from the individual's perspective. You need to look at it from the companies perspective. If the company's labor costs increase by 10% due to increased federal state and local tax costs that money is going to come on the backs of the current labor force in by layoffs. Capital improvements will be delayed do to the reduced availability of labor to implement those improvements. Since the company will not be buying new equipment and services for those improvements it spirals throughout the entire economy. The best thing for The Obama to do to get the economy moving again is to cut all federal taxes by 50%, captial gains, income, ... If you want to see money start moving through the economy that's the way to do it. Sorry, I have NO trust in corporations to do the right thing. |
#28
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Looks like..
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote: HK wrote: BAR wrote: HK wrote: wrote: On Nov 7, 9:07 am, "D.Duck" wrote: "Jim" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "jamesgangnc" wrote in message m... It's over. You lost big time. Get over it. Heh. I had to laugh. I remember someone saying that to Harry. Took him eight years. Eisboch Now he can gloat and, **** & moan, simultaneously. It's like he died and went to heaven, or wherever he would go. Now we can look to the future and remember there will always be *someone* here to defend/rationalize every *O* and democrat mis-step along the way. Oh, and find a way to blame it on Bush and those nasty evangelicals. The only difference is us "wingers" (moderate republicans) won't spend the next 4 years making up stories,namecalling, and running interference for our worst criminals, in an attempt to subvert our elected government... We will probably buck up, pay more taxes, and hope for the future. Time will tell. You don't pay federal income taxes. The problem is I haven't been paying Social Security taxes for the last 1/3 of the year. But, once The Obama gets sworn in I'll be paying them for the full year. Do you know how many jobs are going to be lost because of that increase in taxes? If you think 6.5% unemployment is high you haven't seen anything yet. Slightly higher taxes on the wealthy aren't going to raise the unemployment rate. You miss or ignore the point again. The companies that have to pay the increased Social Security taxes will cause the unemployment rate to increase. I was in a new condo yesterday, still under construction, on which the owner spent $10 million. He and his buddies aren't going to miss a few tens of thousands of dollars a year for fairer taxes. Again you are looking at it from the individual's perspective. You need to look at it from the companies perspective. If the company's labor costs increase by 10% due to increased federal state and local tax costs that money is going to come on the backs of the current labor force in by layoffs. Capital improvements will be delayed do to the reduced availability of labor to implement those improvements. Since the company will not be buying new equipment and services for those improvements it spirals throughout the entire economy. The best thing for The Obama to do to get the economy moving again is to cut all federal taxes by 50%, captial gains, income, ... If you want to see money start moving through the economy that's the way to do it. Sorry, I have NO trust in corporations to do the right thing. Yet you rely upon those corporations to provide you with your daily needs. |
#29
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Looks like..
HK wrote: BAR wrote: The best thing for The Obama to do to get the economy moving again is to cut all federal taxes by 50%, captial gains, income, ... If you want to see money start moving through the economy that's the way to do it. Sorry, I have NO trust in corporations to do the right thing. You belong on an island then. Virtually all economists and politicians, Democrat and Republican alike are focused on invigorating business to curb unemployment, provide resources for health care and other benefits plus recover lost values in 401k plans for retirements. The economy won't recover until business, meaning corporations, have a reason to grow and expand rather than downsize and shrink. Corporations don't exist to provide social welfare. They exist to make a profit. The current problems are not going to be solved by extending unemployment benefits or providing free, taxpayer funded health care for all. It may temporarily ease the pain somewhat for some, but it's a band-aid, not a fix. Even your man Obama is in favor of a bailout for GM, Ford and possibly Chrysler. Mistake IMO. Eisboch |
#30
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Looks like..
On Fri, 7 Nov 2008 17:49:15 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:
"Vic Smith" wrote in message .. . You might be too young to remember Everett Dirksen's voice. Cool. Hey, check this out. Spiro Agnew rapping. Found it looking for an example of Dirksen. Here's a link to a c-span site that has some old interviews with the likes of Everett Dirksen, Hubert Humphrey, Barry Goldwater, etc. It took a minute or so for the page to begin loading, but then did so quickly. There's a couple of 45 minute interviews with Dirksen. Fun to listen to that distinctive voice and personality behind it again. http://www.c-span.org/apa/cong_lead....t_events,lcng; or: http://tinyurl.com/6lz5f2 Eisboch Thanks. For some reason I always get a "page can't be displayed" error. Maybe tomorrow it'll work. --Vic |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|