| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
SW Tom - Take a gander
http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...0/29737c6c.jpg This was shot handheld, no "VR," at 56mm, f9 at 1/200th from a considerable distance, and cropped. See if you can read the words just below the center top row of windows... Relatively inexpensive lens, too. |
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
SW Tom - Take a gander
"Boater" wrote in message ... http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...0/29737c6c.jpg This was shot handheld, no "VR," at 56mm, f9 at 1/200th from a considerable distance, and cropped. See if you can read the words just below the center top row of windows... Relatively inexpensive lens, too. PHILOSOPHY Only after 250X magnification in Paint Shop Pro. After knowing what is was I could make it out at 100X. |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
SW Tom - Take a gander
D.Duck wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message ... http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...0/29737c6c.jpg This was shot handheld, no "VR," at 56mm, f9 at 1/200th from a considerable distance, and cropped. See if you can read the words just below the center top row of windows... Relatively inexpensive lens, too. PHILOSOPHY Only after 250X magnification in Paint Shop Pro. After knowing what is was I could make it out at 100X. Hmmm. There actually are three words there, which I can see clearly at 80%. Most likely due to differences in software and perhaps video cards and monitors? Your guess? In any event, the lens seems pretty sharp to me. At 80%, even the mortar joints look pretty good. Here's some rooftiles on a different building but at the same distance (lens at 75mm, f/10): http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...0/9c7dc4d5.jpg |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
SW Tom - Take a gander
"Boater" wrote in message ... D.Duck wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...0/29737c6c.jpg This was shot handheld, no "VR," at 56mm, f9 at 1/200th from a considerable distance, and cropped. See if you can read the words just below the center top row of windows... Relatively inexpensive lens, too. PHILOSOPHY Only after 250X magnification in Paint Shop Pro. After knowing what is was I could make it out at 100X. Hmmm. There actually are three words there, which I can see clearly at 80%. Most likely due to differences in software and perhaps video cards and monitors? Your guess? In any event, the lens seems pretty sharp to me. At 80%, even the mortar joints look pretty good. Here's some rooftiles on a different building but at the same distance (lens at 75mm, f/10): http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...0/9c7dc4d5.jpg Did you do your building viewing before jpeg compression? What was the file size and what format? |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
SW Tom - Take a gander
D.Duck wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message ... D.Duck wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...0/29737c6c.jpg This was shot handheld, no "VR," at 56mm, f9 at 1/200th from a considerable distance, and cropped. See if you can read the words just below the center top row of windows... Relatively inexpensive lens, too. PHILOSOPHY Only after 250X magnification in Paint Shop Pro. After knowing what is was I could make it out at 100X. Hmmm. There actually are three words there, which I can see clearly at 80%. Most likely due to differences in software and perhaps video cards and monitors? Your guess? In any event, the lens seems pretty sharp to me. At 80%, even the mortar joints look pretty good. Here's some rooftiles on a different building but at the same distance (lens at 75mm, f/10): http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...0/9c7dc4d5.jpg Did you do your building viewing before jpeg compression? What was the file size and what format? No, I shot the photo and viewed it in jpeg. Before I cropped it, the file size was about 4200 x 2800 |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
SW Tom - Take a gander
"Boater" wrote in message ... D.Duck wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... D.Duck wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...0/29737c6c.jpg This was shot handheld, no "VR," at 56mm, f9 at 1/200th from a considerable distance, and cropped. See if you can read the words just below the center top row of windows... Relatively inexpensive lens, too. PHILOSOPHY Only after 250X magnification in Paint Shop Pro. After knowing what is was I could make it out at 100X. Hmmm. There actually are three words there, which I can see clearly at 80%. Most likely due to differences in software and perhaps video cards and monitors? Your guess? In any event, the lens seems pretty sharp to me. At 80%, even the mortar joints look pretty good. Here's some rooftiles on a different building but at the same distance (lens at 75mm, f/10): http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...0/9c7dc4d5.jpg Did you do your building viewing before jpeg compression? What was the file size and what format? No, I shot the photo and viewed it in jpeg. Before I cropped it, the file size was about 4200 x 2800 File size in kilobytes..The version on PhotoBucket is 900K |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
SW Tom - Take a gander
On Tue, 04 Nov 2008 15:46:30 -0500, Boater wrote:
D.Duck wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...0/29737c6c.jpg This was shot handheld, no "VR," at 56mm, f9 at 1/200th from a considerable distance, and cropped. See if you can read the words just below the center top row of windows... Relatively inexpensive lens, too. PHILOSOPHY Only after 250X magnification in Paint Shop Pro. After knowing what is was I could make it out at 100X. Hmmm. There actually are three words there, which I can see clearly at 80%. Most likely due to differences in software and perhaps video cards and monitors? Your guess? In any event, the lens seems pretty sharp to me. At 80%, even the mortar joints look pretty good. Here's some rooftiles on a different building but at the same distance (lens at 75mm, f/10): http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...0/9c7dc4d5.jpg Harry, who took that one? -- A Harry Krause truism: "It's not a *baby* kicking, beautiful bride, it's just a fetus!" [A Narcissistic Hypocrite] |
|
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
SW Tom - Take a gander
JohnH wrote:
On Tue, 04 Nov 2008 15:46:30 -0500, Boater wrote: D.Duck wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...0/29737c6c.jpg This was shot handheld, no "VR," at 56mm, f9 at 1/200th from a considerable distance, and cropped. See if you can read the words just below the center top row of windows... Relatively inexpensive lens, too. PHILOSOPHY Only after 250X magnification in Paint Shop Pro. After knowing what is was I could make it out at 100X. Hmmm. There actually are three words there, which I can see clearly at 80%. Most likely due to differences in software and perhaps video cards and monitors? Your guess? In any event, the lens seems pretty sharp to me. At 80%, even the mortar joints look pretty good. Here's some rooftiles on a different building but at the same distance (lens at 75mm, f/10): http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...0/9c7dc4d5.jpg Harry, who took that one? I took that one, too...as I said, I've been testing a lens. So far, I'm pretty well pleased with it, especially considering its relatively low price point and speed. It is an f2.8 zoom, 28-75 mm. The portion of the roof tiles depicted here is a tiny portion of the entire photo. |
|
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
SW Tom - Take a gander
On Tue, 04 Nov 2008 21:33:50 -0500, Boater wrote:
JohnH wrote: On Tue, 04 Nov 2008 15:46:30 -0500, Boater wrote: D.Duck wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...0/29737c6c.jpg This was shot handheld, no "VR," at 56mm, f9 at 1/200th from a considerable distance, and cropped. See if you can read the words just below the center top row of windows... Relatively inexpensive lens, too. PHILOSOPHY Only after 250X magnification in Paint Shop Pro. After knowing what is was I could make it out at 100X. Hmmm. There actually are three words there, which I can see clearly at 80%. Most likely due to differences in software and perhaps video cards and monitors? Your guess? In any event, the lens seems pretty sharp to me. At 80%, even the mortar joints look pretty good. Here's some rooftiles on a different building but at the same distance (lens at 75mm, f/10): http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...0/9c7dc4d5.jpg Harry, who took that one? I took that one, too...as I said, I've been testing a lens. So far, I'm pretty well pleased with it, especially considering its relatively low price point and speed. It is an f2.8 zoom, 28-75 mm. The portion of the roof tiles depicted here is a tiny portion of the entire photo. Oh Harry. You know it's just a matter of time before someone finds the picture on the internet. Plagiarism is your style. -- A Harry Krause truism: "It's not a *baby* kicking, beautiful bride, it's just a fetus!" [A Narcissistic Hypocrite] |
|
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
SW Tom - Take a gander
"Boater" wrote in message ... http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...0/29737c6c.jpg This was shot handheld, no "VR," at 56mm, f9 at 1/200th from a considerable distance, and cropped. See if you can read the words just below the center top row of windows... Relatively inexpensive lens, too. What windows? Eisboch |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| tom tom 1 at gander mountain $125 | General | |||
Hybrid Mode
