| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
SW Tom - Take a gander
Eisboch wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message ... http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...0/29737c6c.jpg This was shot handheld, no "VR," at 56mm, f9 at 1/200th from a considerable distance, and cropped. See if you can read the words just below the center top row of windows... Relatively inexpensive lens, too. What windows? Eisboch *Those* windows... |
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
SW Tom - Take a gander
"Boater" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...0/29737c6c.jpg This was shot handheld, no "VR," at 56mm, f9 at 1/200th from a considerable distance, and cropped. See if you can read the words just below the center top row of windows... Relatively inexpensive lens, too. What windows? Eisboch *Those* windows... *Them* windows? |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
SW Tom - Take a gander
Eisboch wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...0/29737c6c.jpg This was shot handheld, no "VR," at 56mm, f9 at 1/200th from a considerable distance, and cropped. See if you can read the words just below the center top row of windows... Relatively inexpensive lens, too. What windows? Eisboch *Those* windows... *Them* windows? Them be the those. |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
SW Tom - Take a gander
"Boater" wrote in message ... http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...0/29737c6c.jpg This was shot handheld, no "VR," at 56mm, f9 at 1/200th from a considerable distance, and cropped. See if you can read the words just below the center top row of windows... Relatively inexpensive lens, too. Who gives a **** about your pictures? |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
SW Tom - Take a gander
"Calif Bill" wrote in message ... "Boater" wrote in message ... http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...0/29737c6c.jpg This was shot handheld, no "VR," at 56mm, f9 at 1/200th from a considerable distance, and cropped. See if you can read the words just below the center top row of windows... Relatively inexpensive lens, too. Who gives a **** about your pictures? Never mind that. I find it funny how he's sucking Tom again. You know, after Tom banned him permanently from Chuck's, and he came back here calling Tom all sorts of names. He even tried to make fun of Tom's low transom Ranger, which is also a low freeboard Ranger... WAFA doesn't get the difference between his boat and Tom's. WAFA is beyond pathetic. --Mike |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
SW Tom - Take a gander
On Nov 4, 8:35*pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message ... http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...0/29737c6c.jpg This was shot handheld, no "VR," at 56mm, f9 at 1/200th from a considerable distance, and cropped. See if you can read the words just below the center top row of windows... Relatively inexpensive lens, too. Who gives a **** about your pictures? The asshole whines like a friggin' baby if Scotty proudly posts a pic or movie of the Mouse MXing, JohnH posts pics of places he's visited etc. but then HE can do it. |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
SW Tom - Take a gander
On Tue, 04 Nov 2008 15:03:45 -0500, Boater wrote:
http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...0/29737c6c.jpg This was shot handheld, no "VR," at 56mm, f9 at 1/200th from a considerable distance, and cropped. See if you can read the words just below the center top row of windows... Relatively inexpensive lens, too. Tell whoever took the picture to invest in a level. Perhaps some work on depth of field would be appropriate. BTW, who took the picture? -- A Harry Krause truism: "It's not a *baby* kicking, beautiful bride, it's just a fetus!" [A Narcissistic Hypocrite] |
|
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
SW Tom - Take a gander
JohnH wrote:
On Tue, 04 Nov 2008 15:03:45 -0500, Boater wrote: http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...0/29737c6c.jpg This was shot handheld, no "VR," at 56mm, f9 at 1/200th from a considerable distance, and cropped. See if you can read the words just below the center top row of windows... Relatively inexpensive lens, too. Tell whoever took the picture to invest in a level. Perhaps some work on depth of field would be appropriate. BTW, who took the picture? D'oh. I took the photo. Yesterday. I was testing a lens, not looking for an art photo. The ground in the park area where I was is not even close to level. I have a new lens to try out, and I wanted to see what it could do on a building with some interesting units. I cropped out the bottom third of the photo...just more grass. |
|
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
SW Tom - Take a gander
On Tue, 04 Nov 2008 21:31:33 -0500, Boater wrote:
JohnH wrote: On Tue, 04 Nov 2008 15:03:45 -0500, Boater wrote: http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...0/29737c6c.jpg This was shot handheld, no "VR," at 56mm, f9 at 1/200th from a considerable distance, and cropped. See if you can read the words just below the center top row of windows... Relatively inexpensive lens, too. Tell whoever took the picture to invest in a level. Perhaps some work on depth of field would be appropriate. BTW, who took the picture? D'oh. I took the photo. Yesterday. I was testing a lens, not looking for an art photo. The ground in the park area where I was is not even close to level. I have a new lens to try out, and I wanted to see what it could do on a building with some interesting units. I cropped out the bottom third of the photo...just more grass. Oh. You're right. Sometimes the engineers will design a building to have the same slope as the ground beneath it. Do you *really* expect folks to believe you took a picture you're posting as your own? -- A Harry Krause truism: "It's not a *baby* kicking, beautiful bride, it's just a fetus!" [A Narcissistic Hypocrite] |
|
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
SW Tom - Take a gander
JohnH wrote:
On Tue, 04 Nov 2008 21:31:33 -0500, Boater wrote: JohnH wrote: On Tue, 04 Nov 2008 15:03:45 -0500, Boater wrote: http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...0/29737c6c.jpg This was shot handheld, no "VR," at 56mm, f9 at 1/200th from a considerable distance, and cropped. See if you can read the words just below the center top row of windows... Relatively inexpensive lens, too. Tell whoever took the picture to invest in a level. Perhaps some work on depth of field would be appropriate. BTW, who took the picture? D'oh. I took the photo. Yesterday. I was testing a lens, not looking for an art photo. The ground in the park area where I was is not even close to level. I have a new lens to try out, and I wanted to see what it could do on a building with some interesting units. I cropped out the bottom third of the photo...just more grass. Oh. You're right. Sometimes the engineers will design a building to have the same slope as the ground beneath it. Do you *really* expect folks to believe you took a picture you're posting as your own? D'oh. The building was on relatively flat ground. The park area where I was standing was hilly. Even a former "combat engineer" in the Army should be able to figure that out, eh? As I have stated here many times, what the right-wing turds like you think or believe matters not to me. You should do the world a favor and turn yourself in at the local Soylent Green Fish Food franchise. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| tom tom 1 at gander mountain $125 | General | |||
Hybrid Mode
