|
SW Tom - Take a gander
http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...0/29737c6c.jpg This was shot handheld, no "VR," at 56mm, f9 at 1/200th from a considerable distance, and cropped. See if you can read the words just below the center top row of windows... Relatively inexpensive lens, too. |
SW Tom - Take a gander
"Boater" wrote in message ... http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...0/29737c6c.jpg This was shot handheld, no "VR," at 56mm, f9 at 1/200th from a considerable distance, and cropped. See if you can read the words just below the center top row of windows... Relatively inexpensive lens, too. PHILOSOPHY Only after 250X magnification in Paint Shop Pro. After knowing what is was I could make it out at 100X. |
SW Tom - Take a gander
"Boater" wrote in message ... http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...0/29737c6c.jpg This was shot handheld, no "VR," at 56mm, f9 at 1/200th from a considerable distance, and cropped. See if you can read the words just below the center top row of windows... Relatively inexpensive lens, too. What windows? Eisboch |
SW Tom - Take a gander
D.Duck wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message ... http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...0/29737c6c.jpg This was shot handheld, no "VR," at 56mm, f9 at 1/200th from a considerable distance, and cropped. See if you can read the words just below the center top row of windows... Relatively inexpensive lens, too. PHILOSOPHY Only after 250X magnification in Paint Shop Pro. After knowing what is was I could make it out at 100X. Hmmm. There actually are three words there, which I can see clearly at 80%. Most likely due to differences in software and perhaps video cards and monitors? Your guess? In any event, the lens seems pretty sharp to me. At 80%, even the mortar joints look pretty good. Here's some rooftiles on a different building but at the same distance (lens at 75mm, f/10): http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...0/9c7dc4d5.jpg |
SW Tom - Take a gander
Eisboch wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message ... http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...0/29737c6c.jpg This was shot handheld, no "VR," at 56mm, f9 at 1/200th from a considerable distance, and cropped. See if you can read the words just below the center top row of windows... Relatively inexpensive lens, too. What windows? Eisboch *Those* windows... |
SW Tom - Take a gander
"Boater" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...0/29737c6c.jpg This was shot handheld, no "VR," at 56mm, f9 at 1/200th from a considerable distance, and cropped. See if you can read the words just below the center top row of windows... Relatively inexpensive lens, too. What windows? Eisboch *Those* windows... *Them* windows? |
SW Tom - Take a gander
Eisboch wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...0/29737c6c.jpg This was shot handheld, no "VR," at 56mm, f9 at 1/200th from a considerable distance, and cropped. See if you can read the words just below the center top row of windows... Relatively inexpensive lens, too. What windows? Eisboch *Those* windows... *Them* windows? Them be the those. |
SW Tom - Take a gander
"Boater" wrote in message ... D.Duck wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...0/29737c6c.jpg This was shot handheld, no "VR," at 56mm, f9 at 1/200th from a considerable distance, and cropped. See if you can read the words just below the center top row of windows... Relatively inexpensive lens, too. PHILOSOPHY Only after 250X magnification in Paint Shop Pro. After knowing what is was I could make it out at 100X. Hmmm. There actually are three words there, which I can see clearly at 80%. Most likely due to differences in software and perhaps video cards and monitors? Your guess? In any event, the lens seems pretty sharp to me. At 80%, even the mortar joints look pretty good. Here's some rooftiles on a different building but at the same distance (lens at 75mm, f/10): http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...0/9c7dc4d5.jpg Did you do your building viewing before jpeg compression? What was the file size and what format? |
SW Tom - Take a gander
D.Duck wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message ... D.Duck wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...0/29737c6c.jpg This was shot handheld, no "VR," at 56mm, f9 at 1/200th from a considerable distance, and cropped. See if you can read the words just below the center top row of windows... Relatively inexpensive lens, too. PHILOSOPHY Only after 250X magnification in Paint Shop Pro. After knowing what is was I could make it out at 100X. Hmmm. There actually are three words there, which I can see clearly at 80%. Most likely due to differences in software and perhaps video cards and monitors? Your guess? In any event, the lens seems pretty sharp to me. At 80%, even the mortar joints look pretty good. Here's some rooftiles on a different building but at the same distance (lens at 75mm, f/10): http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...0/9c7dc4d5.jpg Did you do your building viewing before jpeg compression? What was the file size and what format? No, I shot the photo and viewed it in jpeg. Before I cropped it, the file size was about 4200 x 2800 |
SW Tom - Take a gander
"Boater" wrote in message ... D.Duck wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... D.Duck wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...0/29737c6c.jpg This was shot handheld, no "VR," at 56mm, f9 at 1/200th from a considerable distance, and cropped. See if you can read the words just below the center top row of windows... Relatively inexpensive lens, too. PHILOSOPHY Only after 250X magnification in Paint Shop Pro. After knowing what is was I could make it out at 100X. Hmmm. There actually are three words there, which I can see clearly at 80%. Most likely due to differences in software and perhaps video cards and monitors? Your guess? In any event, the lens seems pretty sharp to me. At 80%, even the mortar joints look pretty good. Here's some rooftiles on a different building but at the same distance (lens at 75mm, f/10): http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...0/9c7dc4d5.jpg Did you do your building viewing before jpeg compression? What was the file size and what format? No, I shot the photo and viewed it in jpeg. Before I cropped it, the file size was about 4200 x 2800 File size in kilobytes..The version on PhotoBucket is 900K |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:06 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com