On Oct 6, 11:01 am, Boater wrote:
wrote:
On Oct 6, 9:31 am, "Canuck57" wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message

m...

MCCAIN: "Uh, I, I just have to rely on the good judgment of the voters not
to buy into these negative attack ads. Sooner or later, people are going
to figure out if all you run is negative attack ads you don't have much of
a vision for the future or you're not ready to articulate it."
[The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer, 2/21/2000]
This is boating.

Has Brunswick having a firesale on new boats yet due to the screwy USD
monetary policies of the Congress an Fed yet?

Too bad I can't short them.

Harry's constant cut and paste political posts are simply proof of a
Dems inability tothink for himself. If he could actually think, he'd
tell us what HE thought instead of simply cutting and pasting. OTOH,
maybe he belongs to the Obama collective and is not allowed to have
thoughts.

What I think about what, in particular?

I think McPalin would be worse for this country and its future than
Bush-Cheney.

Is that clear enough?

So, a man whose best friend hates the USA and whose other good friend
is a terrorist sounds good to you? A man who cultivates a Stalinesque
cult of personality sounds good to you? A man who attempts to
suppress free speech sounds good to you. Why am I not surprised.

wrote:
On Oct 6, 11:01 am, Boater wrote:

I think McPalin would be worse for this country and its future than
Bush-Cheney.

Is that clear enough?

So, a man whose best friend hates the USA and whose other good friend
is a terrorist sounds good to you? A man who cultivates a Stalinesque
cult of personality sounds good to you? A man who attempts to
suppress free speech sounds good to you. Why am I not surprised.


I'm sorry, but I don't buy into the latest McPalin attack nonsense, as
you obviously have. The Republicans are now running a campaign built
upon little more than desperation, fear, hate, and race-baiting. Screw
them and anyone who supports that sort of nonsense.

McCain is clueless and Palin knows nothing beyond the day's talking
points, and doesn't even handle those well.

Oh...did you say terrorist? Well, I don't condone Bill Ayers' violence
during the 1960s, but, as a terrorist, he was a piker compared to the
horrors perpetrated on innocents in Iraq and Afghanistan by the Bush
Administration, and by the Johnson and Nixon Administrations during the
late 1960s and early 1970s on Vietnam and Cambodia and Laos.

On Oct 6, 4:06 pm, Boater wrote:
wrote:
On Oct 6, 11:01 am, Boater wrote:
I think McPalin would be worse for this country and its future than
Bush-Cheney.

Is that clear enough?

So, a man whose best friend hates the USA and whose other good friend
is a terrorist sounds good to you? A man who cultivates a Stalinesque
cult of personality sounds good to you? A man who attempts to
suppress free speech sounds good to you. Why am I not surprised.

I'm sorry, but I don't buy into the latest McPalin attack nonsense, as
you obviously have. The Republicans are now running a campaign built
upon little more than desperation, fear, hate, and race-baiting. Screw
them and anyone who supports that sort of nonsense.

McCain is clueless and Palin knows nothing beyond the day's talking
points, and doesn't even handle those well.

Oh...did you say terrorist? Well, I don't condone Bill Ayers' violence
during the 1960s, but, as a terrorist, he was a piker compared to the
horrors perpetrated on innocents in Iraq and Afghanistan by the Bush
Administration, and by the Johnson and Nixon Administrations during the
late 1960s and early 1970s on Vietnam and Cambodia and Laos.

O yeah, well they were pikers compared to Stalin. How do you like
typical dem rreasoning.

wrote:
On Oct 6, 4:06 pm, Boater wrote:
wrote:
On Oct 6, 11:01 am, Boater wrote:
I think McPalin would be worse for this country and its future than
Bush-Cheney.
Is that clear enough?
So, a man whose best friend hates the USA and whose other good friend
is a terrorist sounds good to you? A man who cultivates a Stalinesque
cult of personality sounds good to you? A man who attempts to
suppress free speech sounds good to you. Why am I not surprised.
I'm sorry, but I don't buy into the latest McPalin attack nonsense, as
you obviously have. The Republicans are now running a campaign built
upon little more than desperation, fear, hate, and race-baiting. Screw
them and anyone who supports that sort of nonsense.

McCain is clueless and Palin knows nothing beyond the day's talking
points, and doesn't even handle those well.

Oh...did you say terrorist? Well, I don't condone Bill Ayers' violence
during the 1960s, but, as a terrorist, he was a piker compared to the
horrors perpetrated on innocents in Iraq and Afghanistan by the Bush
Administration, and by the Johnson and Nixon Administrations during the
late 1960s and early 1970s on Vietnam and Cambodia and Laos.

O yeah, well they were pikers compared to Stalin. How do you like
typical dem rreasoning.


I have no idea what you are talking about now.

On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 14:36:33 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Oct 6, 4:06 pm, Boater wrote:
wrote:
On Oct 6, 11:01 am, Boater wrote:
I think McPalin would be worse for this country and its future than
Bush-Cheney.

Is that clear enough?

So, a man whose best friend hates the USA and whose other good friend
is a terrorist sounds good to you? A man who cultivates a Stalinesque
cult of personality sounds good to you? A man who attempts to
suppress free speech sounds good to you. Why am I not surprised.

I'm sorry, but I don't buy into the latest McPalin attack nonsense, as
you obviously have. The Republicans are now running a campaign built
upon little more than desperation, fear, hate, and race-baiting. Screw
them and anyone who supports that sort of nonsense.

McCain is clueless and Palin knows nothing beyond the day's talking
points, and doesn't even handle those well.

Oh...did you say terrorist? Well, I don't condone Bill Ayers' violence
during the 1960s, but, as a terrorist, he was a piker compared to the
horrors perpetrated on innocents in Iraq and Afghanistan by the Bush
Administration, and by the Johnson and Nixon Administrations during the
late 1960s and early 1970s on Vietnam and Cambodia and Laos.

O yeah, well they were pikers compared to Palin. How do you like
typical dem rreasoning.

I have to agree!

On Mon, 06 Oct 2008 19:50:27 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 14:36:33 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Oct 6, 4:06 pm, Boater wrote:
wrote:
On Oct 6, 11:01 am, Boater wrote:
I think McPalin would be worse for this country and its future than
Bush-Cheney.

Is that clear enough?

So, a man whose best friend hates the USA and whose other good friend
is a terrorist sounds good to you? A man who cultivates a Stalinesque
cult of personality sounds good to you? A man who attempts to
suppress free speech sounds good to you. Why am I not surprised.

I'm sorry, but I don't buy into the latest McPalin attack nonsense, as
you obviously have. The Republicans are now running a campaign built
upon little more than desperation, fear, hate, and race-baiting. Screw
them and anyone who supports that sort of nonsense.

McCain is clueless and Palin knows nothing beyond the day's talking
points, and doesn't even handle those well.

Oh...did you say terrorist? Well, I don't condone Bill Ayers' violence
during the 1960s, but, as a terrorist, he was a piker compared to the
horrors perpetrated on innocents in Iraq and Afghanistan by the Bush
Administration, and by the Johnson and Nixon Administrations during the
late 1960s and early 1970s on Vietnam and Cambodia and Laos.

O yeah, well they were pikers compared to Palin. How do you like
typical dem rreasoning.

I have to agree!

There's another here who changes the words in the posts of others. You fit
right in with him.
--
John H.

On Mon, 06 Oct 2008 22:42:49 -0400, John H.
wrote:

On Mon, 06 Oct 2008 19:50:27 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 14:36:33 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Oct 6, 4:06 pm, Boater wrote:
wrote:
On Oct 6, 11:01 am, Boater wrote:
I think McPalin would be worse for this country and its future than
Bush-Cheney.

Is that clear enough?

So, a man whose best friend hates the USA and whose other good friend
is a terrorist sounds good to you? A man who cultivates a Stalinesque
cult of personality sounds good to you? A man who attempts to
suppress free speech sounds good to you. Why am I not surprised.

I'm sorry, but I don't buy into the latest McPalin attack nonsense, as
you obviously have. The Republicans are now running a campaign built
upon little more than desperation, fear, hate, and race-baiting. Screw
them and anyone who supports that sort of nonsense.

McCain is clueless and Palin knows nothing beyond the day's talking
points, and doesn't even handle those well.

Oh...did you say terrorist? Well, I don't condone Bill Ayers' violence
during the 1960s, but, as a terrorist, he was a piker compared to the
horrors perpetrated on innocents in Iraq and Afghanistan by the Bush
Administration, and by the Johnson and Nixon Administrations during the
late 1960s and early 1970s on Vietnam and Cambodia and Laos.

O yeah, well they were pikers compared to Palin. How do you like
typical dem rreasoning.

I have to agree!

There's another here who changes the words in the posts of others. You fit
right in with him.

There is seagull crap on my dock. You'd be able to hide ther easily.