On Sep 22, 11:52*pm, Curly Surmudgeon
wrote:
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 20:11:05 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote:
On Sep 21, 4:43*pm, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 13:29:07 -0400, Cliff wrote:
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 07:50:14 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Sep 20, 7:24*am, Cliff wrote:
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 19:58:38 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:
On Sep 15, 11:16*am, Curly Surmudgeon
wrote:
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 03:41:14 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote:
Do you really look forward to putting the United States in the
hands of a housewife without foreign exposure? *

Better than putting it in the hands of a foreigner.

Another lie, irrelevant, and the old "lesser of two evils"
argument that got us in this mess to begin with.

Clinton was not the lesser of two evils, he was the "I voted for an
independant and we got a liberal."

* Clinton was a moderate conservative. -- Cliff

Cliffie is nuts. *Stay away from squirrelly... he's nutless.

* Clinton was a moderate conservative. * Why did you think he got
elected? Twice? *http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Clinton[
His policies, on issues such as the North American Free Trade
Agreement and welfare reform, have been described as "centrist."
Clinton presided over the longest period of peace-time economic
expansion in American history, which included a balanced budget and a
reported federal surplus. Based on Congressional accounting rules, at
the end of his presidency Clinton reported a surplus of $559 billion..
]
[
Clinton left office with an approval rating at 65%, the highest end of
office rating of any President since World War II. ]

That's why the Wackos want to disparage him, he was an economic success
that violated some of their deeply held precepts. *To admit Slick
Willies success would undermine their delusions.

Sometimes we have to admit that our opinions were wrong. *I don't like
Clinton but he did a good job on the economy.

--
Regards, Curly

And sometimes we have to quit saying we are libertarian anarchists and
just accept that we are liberal democrats who will absolutely vote for
Barack Saddam Hussein Osama when the curtain closes.

Why would _you_ vote for Obama? *Now I know you're insane.

I can't think of a single reason to vote for Obama, but then, I'm not
going to vote for him.

You on the other hand offer up Obama at every turn all the while
saying you are a libertarian anarchist who is going to vote for either
a Republican from Texas or a Republican from Georgia. You should
hear yourself from the other side...you just don't make any sense at
all.

On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 05:01:00 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote:

On Sep 22, 11:52*pm, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 20:11:05 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote:
On Sep 21, 4:43*pm, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 13:29:07 -0400, Cliff wrote:
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 07:50:14 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Sep 20, 7:24*am, Cliff wrote:
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 19:58:38 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:
On Sep 15, 11:16*am, Curly Surmudgeon
wrote:
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 03:41:14 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote:
Do you really look forward to putting the United States in
the hands of a housewife without foreign exposure? *

Better than putting it in the hands of a foreigner.

Another lie, irrelevant, and the old "lesser of two evils"
argument that got us in this mess to begin with.

Clinton was not the lesser of two evils, he was the "I voted for
an independant and we got a liberal."

* Clinton was a moderate conservative. -- Cliff

Cliffie is nuts. *Stay away from squirrelly... he's nutless.

* Clinton was a moderate conservative. * Why did you think he got
elected? Twice? *http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Clinton[ His
policies, on issues such as the North American Free Trade Agreement
and welfare reform, have been described as "centrist." Clinton
presided over the longest period of peace-time economic expansion
in American history, which included a balanced budget and a
reported federal surplus. Based on Congressional accounting rules,
at the end of his presidency Clinton reported a surplus of $559
billion. ]
[
Clinton left office with an approval rating at 65%, the highest end
of office rating of any President since World War II. ]

That's why the Wackos want to disparage him, he was an economic
success that violated some of their deeply held precepts. *To admit
Slick Willies success would undermine their delusions.

Sometimes we have to admit that our opinions were wrong. *I don't
like Clinton but he did a good job on the economy.

--
Regards, Curly

And sometimes we have to quit saying we are libertarian anarchists and
just accept that we are liberal democrats who will absolutely vote for
Barack Saddam Hussein Osama when the curtain closes.

Why would _you_ vote for Obama? *Now I know you're insane.

I can't think of a single reason to vote for Obama, but then, I'm not
going to vote for him.

Then why the false paragraph above?

You on the other hand offer up Obama at every turn all the while saying
you are a libertarian anarchist who is going to vote for either a
Republican from Texas or a Republican from Georgia. You should hear
yourself from the other side...you just don't make any sense at all.

You threw Clinton into the conversation to distract, now Obama. The
thread is "I'm voting Republican because..." Lie by misdirection.

--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Bush Doctrine: Privatize Profits, Socialize Losses
------------------------------------------------------------------------------




.................................................. ...............
Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access
at http://www.TitanNews.com
-=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-