Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to alt.machines.cnc,misc.survivalism,rec.crafts.metalworking,alt.impeach.bush,rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Cheney and Quayle weren't in line behind a guy that is likely to be undergoing chemo during the first few month's after an election. Palin is. Good, then we get to watch her on TV for the next eight years, instead of some liberal boner shrinker. Do you really look forward to putting the United States in the hands of a housewife without foreign exposure? Sarah Palin who began her campaign with lies and misrepresentations, someone without a shred of strategic or tactical experience, speaks no other languages, no military experience, and wants to burn library books based upon her religion? Are you really postulating that Sarah Palin, who thinks God commanded the Iraq and Afghanistani wars, is qualified to run America in its current condition? Or are you a pacifist troll trying to tweak noses? -- Regards, Curly ------------------------------------------------------------------------- - ---- I Love Republicans, They Taste Just Like Chickenhawks ------------------------------------------------------------------------- - ---- .................................................. .............. Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access at http://www.TitanNews.com -=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=- She is the Veep. What foreign experience does Obama have? Not a lot from his few days he has showed up in the Senate. Being the most liberal legislator is enough to give the shivers to anybody who works for a living. How much of your wages are you going to contribute to his social programs? How much do you want to mortgage your children and grandchildrens earnings? You are repeating falsehoods when you accuse Obama of being the most liberal, and this puts your credibility in question. It is clear you have been sucking up the propaganda, so don't even give us this speculative crap that no one can predict. Explain who is more liberal. He may not really be the most liberal. Spent so little time in the Senate and never introduced any bills, he just voted the liberal line. So I may be wrong. But his background and choice of friends, is extremely leftist. He has proposed huge increase in Government and government spending. My kids and grandchildren can not afford more debt being passed on to them. Then you better not send any more republicans to Washington. They ran up the debt five trillion in the eight years Bush was president. That is more debt than anyone ever did. So if you want more debt elect republicans. But the other thing is that you say Obama is for a huge increase in government spending. Didn't the republicans say they are for decreasing government spending? You know they did. They point is do you hold anyone accountable? Obama MIGHT make the government bigger. Bush and McCain WILL make it bigger while claiming they will shrink it. So who do you believe? Every year of Bush's term he's said the budget was going to be balanced in X number of years. It never happens and now we have another whopper of debt this year. I say you're better off with someone like Obama who is telling the truth than someone who claims he will do things that you know he will never really do. Hawke |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
I'm voting republican because... | General | |||
I'm voting republican because... | General | |||
I'm voting republican because... | General | |||
I'm voting republican because... | General | |||
I'm voting republican because... | General |