Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
posted to alt.machines.cnc,misc.survivalism,rec.crafts.metalworking,alt.impeach.bush,rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
I'm voting republican because...
On Sep 12, 5:58*pm, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 14:24:30 -0700, Roy Blankenship wrote: "greylock" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 14:16:05 -0500, "Rob Fraser" FraserRacing"AT"RobFraser.Net wrote: Well this is cruel but true- If the Republicans do win, She has a kid who is retarded so there will technically still be a retard in the White House. *Does the Vice-President live in the White House in your world? How interesting !!! And I wouldn't call it cruel - I'd call it - and you - *assinine. All the bull**** the neocons have thrown out? Give it a rest. McCain won't finish his term, and then she WILL be in the White House. Dan Quayle and Dick Cheney have proven the dangers of electing an administration with a terrible 2nd in command. *Palin is another bible-thumping crazymother****er (yeah, I know that's redundant) that risks our civli liberties. At least what is left of them. -- Regards, Curly Curly, Roy is saying Sarah Palin will be president and you give us Quayle and Cheney??? Do you ever read what it is you are replying to, or do you just unroll the dem talking points scroll and start posting? Neither Quayle nor Cheney have become president. And Hillary was more of a VP than Algore. |
#2
posted to alt.machines.cnc,misc.survivalism,rec.crafts.metalworking,alt.impeach.bush,rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
I'm voting republican because...
|
#3
posted to alt.machines.cnc,misc.survivalism,rec.crafts.metalworking,alt.impeach.bush,rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
I'm voting republican because...
On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 12:05:09 -0700, Gunner Asch wrote:
---Snipped distractions and probably some more lies--- Hey Weasel! Where's that offered proof there is no Flying Spaghetti Monster? Still spouting the bull**** that the U.S. Economy is just peachy, you lying piece of ****... -- Regards, Curly ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Bush, Plunderer In Chief ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ .................................................. ............... Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access at http://www.TitanNews.com -=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=- |
#4
posted to alt.machines.cnc,misc.survivalism,rec.crafts.metalworking,alt.impeach.bush,rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
I'm voting republican because...
On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 07:07:16 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote:
On Sep 12, 5:58*pm, Curly Surmudgeon wrote: On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 14:24:30 -0700, Roy Blankenship wrote: "greylock" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 14:16:05 -0500, "Rob Fraser" FraserRacing"AT"RobFraser.Net wrote: Well this is cruel but true- If the Republicans do win, She has a kid who is retarded so there will technically still be a retard in the White House. *Does the Vice-President live in the White House in your world? How interesting !!! And I wouldn't call it cruel - I'd call it - and you - *assinine. All the bull**** the neocons have thrown out? Give it a rest. McCain won't finish his term, and then she WILL be in the White House. Dan Quayle and Dick Cheney have proven the dangers of electing an administration with a terrible 2nd in command. *Palin is another bible-thumping crazymother****er (yeah, I know that's redundant) that risks our civli liberties. At least what is left of them. -- Regards, Curly Curly, Roy is saying Sarah Palin will be president and you give us Quayle and Cheney??? Where is your cognitive disconnect? Cheney and Quayle were Vice Presidents of the United States, no? Cheney and Quayle were one heartbeat away from the Presidency, no? Cheney and Quayle were horrid examples of what "might have been" if they had ascended the throne, no? How does that differ in kind, not detail, from Sarah Palin ascending to the Presidency when/if McCain is elected and dies? Do you ever read what it is you are replying to, or do you just unroll the dem talking points scroll and start posting? "Phoney Outrage" is the term, you make **** up to get your panties in a bunch. Follow the logic, even though that appears difficult in your case. Neither Quayle nor Cheney have become president. And Hillary was more of a VP than Algore. Nor has Sarah Palin "become" president. Perhaps parallel thinking is difficult for you but not the rest of us. -- Regards, Curly ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Bush, Plunderer In Chief ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ .................................................. ............... Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access at http://www.TitanNews.com -=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=- |
#5
posted to alt.machines.cnc,misc.survivalism,rec.crafts.metalworking,alt.impeach.bush,rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
I'm voting republican because...
On Sep 13, 4:01*pm, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 07:07:16 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote: On Sep 12, 5:58*pm, Curly Surmudgeon wrote: On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 14:24:30 -0700, Roy Blankenship wrote: "greylock" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 14:16:05 -0500, "Rob Fraser" FraserRacing"AT"RobFraser.Net wrote: Well this is cruel but true- If the Republicans do win, She has a kid who is retarded so there will technically still be a retard in the White House. *Does the Vice-President live in the White House in your world? How interesting !!! And I wouldn't call it cruel - I'd call it - and you - *assinine. All the bull**** the neocons have thrown out? Give it a rest. McCain won't finish his term, and then she WILL be in the White House. Palin is another bible-thumping crazymother****er (yeah, I know that's redundant) that risks our civli liberties. At least what is left of them. -- Regards, Curly Curly, Roy is saying Sarah Palin will be president and you give us Quayle and Cheney??? Where is your cognitive disconnect? * I have none, but thanks for asking. Cheney and Quayle were Vice Presidents of the United States, no? * Correct. Cheney and Quayle were one heartbeat away from the Presidency, no? * Correct. Cheney and Quayle were horrid examples of what "might have been" if they had ascended the throne, no? No/Yes. I'd have preferred Cheney as president. I don't think about Quayle much. And you have changed the parameters of the above dialog. Neither Quayle nor Cheney were president nor occupied the White House. How does that differ in kind, not detail, from Sarah Palin ascending to the Presidency when/if McCain is elected and dies? Perhaps you want her "creature" billeted at the White House kennel? Do you ever read what it is you are replying to, or do you just unroll the dem talking points scroll and start posting? "Phoney Outrage" is the term, you make **** up to get your panties in a bunch. *Follow the logic, even though that appears difficult in your case. My underwear are just fine. As a matter of fact I just got some of those new Hanes that are quite comfy. They're probably not available in Argentina yet. Neither Quayle nor Cheney have become president. *And Hillary was more of a VP than Algore. Nor has Sarah Palin "become" president. * Correct. Curly: "Dan Quayle and Dick Cheney have proven the dangers of electing an administration with a terrible 2nd in command." So how does Cheney and Quayle having NOT been president PROVEN your perceived danger? Perhaps parallel thinking is difficult for you but not the rest of us. I'm not the one saying that something that didn't happen is PROOF that Sarah Palin is unfit to be president. You are. -- Regards, Curly ---------------------------------------------------------------------------*--- * * * * * * * * * * * *Bush, Plunderer In Chief ---------------------------------------------------------------------------*--- |
#6
posted to alt.machines.cnc,misc.survivalism,rec.crafts.metalworking,alt.impeach.bush,rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
I'm voting republican because...
wrote:
On Sep 13, 4:01 pm, Curly Surmudgeon wrote: On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 07:07:16 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote: On Sep 12, 5:58 pm, Curly Surmudgeon wrote: On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 14:24:30 -0700, Roy Blankenship wrote: "greylock" wrote in message ... On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 14:16:05 -0500, "Rob Fraser" FraserRacing"AT"RobFraser.Net wrote: So how does Cheney and Quayle having NOT been president PROVEN your perceived danger? Cheney and Quayle weren't in line behind a guy that is likely to be undergoing chemo during the first few month's after an election. Palin is. -- John R. Carroll www.machiningsolution.com |
#7
posted to alt.machines.cnc,misc.survivalism,rec.crafts.metalworking,alt.impeach.bush,rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
I'm voting republican because...
"John R. Carroll" wrote in message ... Cheney and Quayle weren't in line behind a guy that is likely to be undergoing chemo during the first few month's after an election. Palin is. Good, then we get to watch her on TV for the next eight years, instead of some liberal boner shrinker. |
#8
posted to alt.machines.cnc,misc.survivalism,rec.crafts.metalworking,alt.impeach.bush,rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
I'm voting republican because...
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 19:24:13 -0500, Jerry wrote:
"John R. Carroll" wrote in message ... Cheney and Quayle weren't in line behind a guy that is likely to be undergoing chemo during the first few month's after an election. Palin is. Good, then we get to watch her on TV for the next eight years, instead of some liberal boner shrinker. Do you really look forward to putting the United States in the hands of a housewife without foreign exposure? Sarah Palin who began her campaign with lies and misrepresentations, someone without a shred of strategic or tactical experience, speaks no other languages, no military experience, and wants to burn library books based upon her religion? Are you really postulating that Sarah Palin, who thinks God commanded the Iraq and Afghanistani wars, is qualified to run America in its current condition? Or are you a pacifist troll trying to tweak noses? -- Regards, Curly ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I Love Republicans, They Taste Just Like Chickenhawks ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ .................................................. ............... Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access at http://www.TitanNews.com -=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=- |
#9
posted to alt.machines.cnc,misc.survivalism,rec.crafts.metalworking,alt.impeach.bush,rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Little Squirrel's failed logic... was: I'm voting republicanbecause...
On Sep 14, 1:54*pm, wrote:
On Sep 13, 4:01*pm, Curly Surmudgeon wrote: On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 07:07:16 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote: On Sep 12, 5:58*pm, Curly Surmudgeon wrote: On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 14:24:30 -0700, Roy Blankenship wrote: "greylock" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 14:16:05 -0500, "Rob Fraser" FraserRacing"AT"RobFraser.Net wrote: Well this is cruel but true- If the Republicans do win, She has a kid who is retarded so there will technically still be a retard in the White House. *Does the Vice-President live in the White House in your world? How interesting !!! And I wouldn't call it cruel - I'd call it - and you - *assinine. All the bull**** the neocons have thrown out? Give it a rest. McCain won't finish his term, and then she WILL be in the White House. Palin is another bible-thumping crazymother****er (yeah, I know that's redundant) that risks our civli liberties. At least what is left of them. -- Regards, Curly Curly, Roy is saying Sarah Palin will be president and you give us Quayle and Cheney??? Where is your cognitive disconnect? * I have none, but thanks for asking. Cheney and Quayle were Vice Presidents of the United States, no? * Correct. Cheney and Quayle were one heartbeat away from the Presidency, no? * Correct. Cheney and Quayle were horrid examples of what "might have been" if they had ascended the throne, no? No/Yes. *I'd have preferred Cheney as president. *I don't think about Quayle much. And you have changed the parameters of the above dialog. *Neither Quayle nor Cheney were president nor occupied the White House. Why doesn't the little squirrel reply? How does that differ in kind, not detail, from Sarah Palin ascending to the Presidency when/if McCain is elected and dies? Perhaps you want her "creature" billeted at the White House kennel? Do you ever read what it is you are replying to, or do you just unroll the dem talking points scroll and start posting? "Phoney Outrage" is the term, you make **** up to get your panties in a bunch. *Follow the logic, even though that appears difficult in your case. My underwear are just fine. *As a matter of fact I just got some of those new Hanes that are quite comfy. *They're probably not available in Argentina yet. Neither Quayle nor Cheney have become president. *And Hillary was more of a VP than Algore. Nor has Sarah Palin "become" president. * Correct. *Curly: *"Dan Quayle and Dick Cheney have proven the dangers of electing an administration with a terrible 2nd in command." So how does Cheney and Quayle having NOT been president PROVEN your perceived danger? Why doesn't the little squirrel reply? Perhaps parallel thinking is difficult for you but not the rest of us. I'm not the one saying that something that didn't happen is PROOF that Sarah Palin is unfit to be president. *You are. So why doesn't the little squirrel address his failed logic? Everyone knows he is so much smarter than me so it should be a simple matter for him to use "honest dialog" to dispatch me. Where are you, little squirrel??? |
#10
posted to alt.machines.cnc,misc.survivalism,rec.crafts.metalworking,alt.impeach.bush,rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Little Squirrel's failed logic... was: I'm voting republicanbecause...
On Sep 16, 9:37*pm, wrote:
On Sep 14, 1:54*pm, wrote: On Sep 13, 4:01*pm, Curly Surmudgeon wrote: On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 07:07:16 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote: On Sep 12, 5:58*pm, Curly Surmudgeon wrote: On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 14:24:30 -0700, Roy Blankenship wrote: "greylock" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 14:16:05 -0500, "Rob Fraser" FraserRacing"AT"RobFraser.Net wrote: Well this is cruel but true- If the Republicans do win, She has a kid who is retarded so there will technically still be a retard in the White House. *Does the Vice-President live in the White House in your world? How interesting !!! And I wouldn't call it cruel - I'd call it - and you - *assinine. All the bull**** the neocons have thrown out? Give it a rest. McCain won't finish his term, and then she WILL be in the White House. Palin is another bible-thumping crazymother****er (yeah, I know that's redundant) that risks our civli liberties. At least what is left of them. -- Regards, Curly Curly, Roy is saying Sarah Palin will be president and you give us Quayle and Cheney??? Where is your cognitive disconnect? * I have none, but thanks for asking. Cheney and Quayle were Vice Presidents of the United States, no? * Correct. Cheney and Quayle were one heartbeat away from the Presidency, no? * Correct. Cheney and Quayle were horrid examples of what "might have been" if they had ascended the throne, no? No/Yes. *I'd have preferred Cheney as president. *I don't think about Quayle much. And you have changed the parameters of the above dialog. *Neither Quayle nor Cheney were president nor occupied the White House. Why doesn't the little squirrel reply? How does that differ in kind, not detail, from Sarah Palin ascending to the Presidency when/if McCain is elected and dies? Perhaps you want her "creature" billeted at the White House kennel? Do you ever read what it is you are replying to, or do you just unroll the dem talking points scroll and start posting? "Phoney Outrage" is the term, you make **** up to get your panties in a bunch. *Follow the logic, even though that appears difficult in your case. My underwear are just fine. *As a matter of fact I just got some of those new Hanes that are quite comfy. *They're probably not available in Argentina yet. Neither Quayle nor Cheney have become president. *And Hillary was more of a VP than Algore. Nor has Sarah Palin "become" president. * Correct. *Curly: *"Dan Quayle and Dick Cheney have proven the dangers of electing an administration with a terrible 2nd in command." So how does Cheney and Quayle having NOT been president PROVEN your perceived danger? Why doesn't the little squirrel reply? Perhaps parallel thinking is difficult for you but not the rest of us. I'm not the one saying that something that didn't happen is PROOF that Sarah Palin is unfit to be president. *You are. So why doesn't the little squirrel address his failed logic? Everyone knows he is so much smarter than me so it should be a simple matter for him to use "honest dialog" to dispatch me. Where are you, little squirrel??? Where Oh where has my little squirrel gone, Oh where oh where can he be? |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
I'm voting republican because... | General | |||
I'm voting republican because... | General | |||
I'm voting republican because... | General | |||
I'm voting republican because... | General | |||
I'm voting republican because... | General |