|
Our economy...
No. Gasoline has gone from 3.59 to 4.09 in the past two weeks here. Sounds like you think that your little corner of the world is the whole world. Just out of curiosity, just where is "here"? Gunner |
I'm voting republican because...
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 21:38:43 -0700, Curly Surmudgeon
wrote: On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 19:24:13 -0500, Jerry wrote: "John R. Carroll" wrote in message ... Cheney and Quayle weren't in line behind a guy that is likely to be undergoing chemo during the first few month's after an election. Palin is. Good, then we get to watch her on TV for the next eight years, instead of some liberal boner shrinker. Do you really look forward to putting the United States in the hands of a housewife without foreign exposure? Or someone that cannot find SPAIN? Sarah Palin who began her campaign with lies and misrepresentations, someone without a shred of strategic or tactical experience, speaks no other languages, no military experience, and wants to burn library books based upon her religion? Are you really postulating that Sarah Palin, who thinks God commanded the Iraq and Afghanistani wars, is qualified to run America in its current condition? Or are you a pacifist troll trying to tweak noses? -- Cliff |
I'm voting republican because...
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 09:14:45 -0700, Gunner Asch
wrote: he hasn't tortured prisoners...WHOOPS!! he did!! (guess why he never says mccain was tortured...because we're doing the same thing to our prisoners that the commie assholes did to mccain). I somehow cant see Bush with a 5 gallon bucket of water. I can't either. That would be work. -- Cliff |
I'm voting republican because...
|
I'm voting republican because...
|
I'm voting republican because...
|
I'm voting republican because...
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 21:45:51 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
We've recently had a hillbilly president in Bill Clinton. Rhodes Scholar. Why are the dumb ones repubs? -- Cliff |
I'm voting republican because...
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 21:45:51 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
after all, the US doesn't need a leader who can out think putin, or the chinese or the saudis. all she has to do is show 'em she can shoot and they'll roll right over. Obama couldn't think his way out of a wet cardboard box if he didn't have his earpiece in. You took some advanced law classes from him? Read his work? -- Cliff |
I'm voting republican because...
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 21:45:51 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
Was it called SALT 1 or SALT 2? START? IIRC The neocons broke ALL of those. -- Cliff |
I'm voting republican because...
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 22:54:20 -0700, "Hawke" wrote:
You seem to think that people born in Hawaii are not Americans. Bill O'Reilly said on his show today that Obama was born in Hawaii. So I guess that proves it, doesn't it? But you said that Obama is a foreigner. Logic says that means you think everyone born in Hawaii is a foreigner too. You are stupid, Dude. And Palin is from Alaska. -- Cliff |
I'm voting republican because...
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 23:31:43 -0400, "Ed Huntress"
wrote: Well, Virginia originally extended up to what is now Maine and into Canada, I don't recall that. -- Cliff |
I'm voting republican because...
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 19:06:28 -0500, "Jerry" wrote:
"Hawke" wrote in message .. . You seem to think that people born in Hawaii are not Americans. Bill O'Reilly said on his show today that Obama was born in Hawaii. So I guess that proves it, doesn't it? No, it just proves O'Reilly can make a mistake too. Obama was born in Kenya. That's Kenya Africa, not Kenya USA You lie. So does O'Reilly. http://www.misskenyanusa.org/2008contestants.html He's running for a LOT of offces in Brazil too IIRC. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/s...oryId=94795807 VERY popular. -- Cliff |
I'm voting republican because...
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 21:20:48 -0500, "Jerry" wrote:
Firstly, being born in Kenya and going to school in a Madrasah You were born lying? -- Cliff |
I'm voting republican because...
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 21:20:48 -0500, "Jerry" wrote:
Sarah Palin speaks English, better English than the ebonics that Obama speaks. The language from Harvard Law? -- Cliff |
I'm voting republican because...
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 21:20:48 -0500, "Jerry" wrote:
She doesn't "misspeak" or tell lies like Obama does. She just lies ALL the time. -- Cliff |
I'm voting republican because...
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 23:39:42 -0500, "Jerry" wrote:
"wf3h" wrote in message ... On Sep 15, 9:20 pm, "Jerry" wrote: Palin will be running for Vice President, but since you mention "running America", let's do some comparisons against someone who is trying to win the office of President. Firstly, being born in Kenya and going to school in a Madrasah is hardly the kind of foreign exposure I would like in a President. On the other hand, Sarah Palin has a foreign exposure out of her west facing window. obama grew up in hawaii and went to american schools and college Obama was BORN in Kenya. Liar. -- Cliff |
I'm voting republican because...
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 21:20:48 -0500, "Jerry" wrote:
Regarding Palin burning books, She just wanted to ban some from the library. Would they then be burned? -- Cliff |
I'm voting republican because...
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 21:20:48 -0500, "Jerry" wrote:
As for Palin and her belief in God, I find it refreshing that she is not afraid to express her faith. Nutty that it is. But do you want her expressing it on YOU? -- Cliff |
I'm voting republican because...
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 21:20:48 -0500, "Jerry" wrote:
Yes, I recall it was when his loving pastor, Rev. Wright said blacks should sing "God damn American" instead of "God bless America." "God damn America for treating its citizens as less than human" And YOU want to bring back slavery, right? -- Cliff |
I'm voting republican because...
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 20:28:00 -0700 (PDT), wf3h wrote:
and palin is a sportswriter. Who was never employed .... -- Cliff |
I'm voting republican because...
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 21:20:48 -0500, "Jerry" wrote:
Here I thought you were finally ready to discuss something real with me, Which of your endless supply of lies & winger hate? http://clickme.50webs.org/ HTH -- Cliff |
I'm voting republican because...
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 03:03:39 -0700, Gunner Asch
wrote: Odd..the librarian in question said it never happened. Liar. -- Cliff |
I'm voting republican because...
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 09:34:10 -0700, Gunner Asch
wrote: You think that raping women is qualification? Do they have to pay for their own tests & treatment? Alaska has the highest rates of rape & incest in the US. -- Cliff |
Our economy...
On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 02:55:23 -0700, Gunner
wrote: No. Gasoline has gone from 3.59 to 4.09 in the past two weeks here. Sounds like you think that your little corner of the world is the whole world. Just out of curiosity, just where is "here"? Gunner North Carolina. Now, just out of curiosity, how do you plan to read this since you claim to have permanently kill filed me three times now? |
I'm voting republican because...
On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 07:32:55 -0400, Cliff wrote:
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 23:39:42 -0500, "Jerry" wrote: "wf3h" wrote in message ... On Sep 15, 9:20 pm, "Jerry" wrote: Palin will be running for Vice President, but since you mention "running America", let's do some comparisons against someone who is trying to win the office of President. Firstly, being born in Kenya and going to school in a Madrasah is hardly the kind of foreign exposure I would like in a President. On the other hand, Sarah Palin has a foreign exposure out of her west facing window. obama grew up in hawaii and went to american schools and college Obama was BORN in Kenya. Liar. See? Gotta be a virus. The odds of both being hit in the head with the same 2x4 in the same place, destroying the same neurons is pretty remote. Either they are the same person or there's a really nasty virus running around. -- Regards, Curly ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Bush, a Disaster of Biblical Proportions ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ .................................................. ............... Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access at http://www.TitanNews.com -=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=- |
Our economy...
"Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message m... john wrote: Bob Brock wrote: On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 08:19:51 -0700, Gunner wrote: On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:40:14 -0400, john wrote: Gunner wrote: On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 20:34:55 -0400, john wrote: Gasoline is selling for three times what it was when Bush presumed office. Gasoline is going down, does he get credit for that too? Gummer apparently hasn't bought any gasoline in the past week or so. Odd...Last week it was $3.71, at the end of the week, it was $3.65, this morning I filled up at $3.59 Doesnt seem like much of a rise, least not on this planet You aint seen nuffing yet. Yet the claim was the price of fuel has skyrocketed in the last month, when its easily demonstrated its been falling. Sounds like the claiment is an outright liar, no? Gunner No. Gasoline has gone from 3.59 to 4.09 in the past two weeks here. Sounds like you think that your little corner of the world is the whole world. It went from $4.07 to $3.56 around here in North Central Florida. North Central Florida. That explains your other dumbass post. |
Our economy...
On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 15:48:47 -0700, "Roy Blankenship"
wrote: "Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message om... john wrote: Bob Brock wrote: On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 08:19:51 -0700, Gunner wrote: On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:40:14 -0400, john wrote: Gunner wrote: On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 20:34:55 -0400, john wrote: Gasoline is selling for three times what it was when Bush presumed office. Gasoline is going down, does he get credit for that too? Gummer apparently hasn't bought any gasoline in the past week or so. Odd...Last week it was $3.71, at the end of the week, it was $3.65, this morning I filled up at $3.59 Doesnt seem like much of a rise, least not on this planet You aint seen nuffing yet. Yet the claim was the price of fuel has skyrocketed in the last month, when its easily demonstrated its been falling. Sounds like the claiment is an outright liar, no? Gunner No. Gasoline has gone from 3.59 to 4.09 in the past two weeks here. Sounds like you think that your little corner of the world is the whole world. It went from $4.07 to $3.56 around here in North Central Florida. North Central Florida. That explains your other dumbass post. "Your little corner" exquisite..... |
Our economy...
On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 21:55:08 -0700, Gunner Asch
wrote: On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 15:48:47 -0700, "Roy Blankenship" wrote: "Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message news:csadnZztGfh6kknVnZ2dnUVZ_gWdnZ2d@earthlink. com... john wrote: Bob Brock wrote: On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 08:19:51 -0700, Gunner wrote: On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:40:14 -0400, john wrote: Gunner wrote: On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 20:34:55 -0400, john wrote: Gasoline is selling for three times what it was when Bush presumed office. Gasoline is going down, does he get credit for that too? Gummer apparently hasn't bought any gasoline in the past week or so. Odd...Last week it was $3.71, at the end of the week, it was $3.65, this morning I filled up at $3.59 Doesnt seem like much of a rise, least not on this planet You aint seen nuffing yet. Yet the claim was the price of fuel has skyrocketed in the last month, when its easily demonstrated its been falling. Sounds like the claiment is an outright liar, no? Gunner No. Gasoline has gone from 3.59 to 4.09 in the past two weeks here. Sounds like you think that your little corner of the world is the whole world. It went from $4.07 to $3.56 around here in North Central Florida. North Central Florida. That explains your other dumbass post. "Your little corner" exquisite..... You're the one who claims to live in a small desert town. |
Our economy...
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 01:16:20 -0400, Bob Brock wrote:
On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 21:55:08 -0700, Gunner Asch wrote: On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 15:48:47 -0700, "Roy Blankenship" wrote: "Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message news:csadnZztGfh6kknVnZ2dnUVZ_gWdnZ2d@earthlink .com... john wrote: Bob Brock wrote: On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 08:19:51 -0700, Gunner wrote: On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:40:14 -0400, john wrote: Gunner wrote: On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 20:34:55 -0400, john wrote: Gasoline is selling for three times what it was when Bush presumed office. Gasoline is going down, does he get credit for that too? Gummer apparently hasn't bought any gasoline in the past week or so. Odd...Last week it was $3.71, at the end of the week, it was $3.65, this morning I filled up at $3.59 Doesnt seem like much of a rise, least not on this planet You aint seen nuffing yet. Yet the claim was the price of fuel has skyrocketed in the last month, when its easily demonstrated its been falling. Sounds like the claiment is an outright liar, no? Gunner No. Gasoline has gone from 3.59 to 4.09 in the past two weeks here. Sounds like you think that your little corner of the world is the whole world. It went from $4.07 to $3.56 around here in North Central Florida. North Central Florida. That explains your other dumbass post. "Your little corner" exquisite..... You're the one who claims to live in a small desert town. Didn't he claim to have plonked you, too? -- Regards, Curly ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Bush Doctrine: Privatize Profits, Socialize Losses ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ .................................................. ............... Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access at http://www.TitanNews.com -=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=- |
Curly admits he doesn't or won't pay taxes... I'm votingrepublican because...
On Sep 15, 1:13*am, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 21:46:24 -0700, Calif Bill wrote: "Curly Surmudgeon" wrote in message ... On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 19:24:13 -0500, Jerry wrote: "John R. Carroll" wrote in message ... Cheney and Quayle weren't in line behind a guy that is likely to be undergoing chemo during the first few month's after an election. Palin is. Good, then we get to watch her on TV for the next eight years, instead of some liberal boner shrinker. Do you really look forward to putting the United States in the hands of a housewife without foreign exposure? *Sarah Palin who began her campaign with lies and misrepresentations, someone without a shred of strategic or tactical experience, speaks no other languages, no military experience, and wants to burn library books based upon her religion? Are you really postulating that Sarah Palin, who thinks God commanded the Iraq and Afghanistani wars, is qualified to run America in its current condition? Or are you a pacifist troll trying to tweak noses? -- Regards, Curly ---------------------------------------------------------------------------*--- * * * * * *I Love Republicans, They Taste Just Like Chickenhawks ---------------------------------------------------------------------------*--- .................................................. .............. * * * Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access * * * * * * athttp://www.TitanNews.com -=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=- She is the Veep. No, she's not. What foreign experience does Obama have? Irrelevant in the Sara Palin context. *Of all the highly qualified people McCain could have had for the position he chose a right-wing wacko who thinks God commanded these wars, that library material must be censored, and that the earth was created 4,000 years ago. That is a very bad choice for John McCain and unacceptable for America. Not a lot from his few days he has showed up in the Senate. *Being the most liberal legislator is enough to give the shivers to anybody who works for a living. Do not expect me to defend Barak Obama, ask someone who will vote for him.. How much of your wages are you going to contribute to his social programs? None, but that, too, is irrelevant to the qualifications, or lack of, of Sarah Palin. You asked for a cite, little squirrel, and here it is. How much do you want to mortgage your children and grandchildrens earnings? That implies that Obama/Biden are worse than McCain/Palin. *I will get into that useless, futile, arguement. *Instead I will vote for a good candidate not a pawn of others. -- Regards, Curly ---------------------------------------------------------------------------*--- * * * * * * I Love Republicans, They Taste Just Like Chickenhawks ---------------------------------------------------------------------------*--- .................................................. .............. * * * *Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access * * * * * * * athttp://www.TitanNews.com -=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
I'm voting republican because...
On Sep 20, 7:24*am, Cliff wrote:
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 19:58:38 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Sep 15, 11:16*am, Curly Surmudgeon wrote: On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 03:41:14 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote: Do you really look forward to putting the United States in the hands of a housewife without foreign exposure? * Better than putting it in the hands of a foreigner. Another lie, irrelevant, and the old "lesser of two evils" argument that got us in this mess to begin with. Clinton was not the lesser of two evils, he was the "I voted for an independant and we got a liberal." * Clinton was a moderate conservative. -- Cliff Cliffie is nuts. Stay away from squirrelly... he's nutless. |
Little Squirrel's failed logic... was: I'm voting republicanbecause...
On Sep 16, 9:37*pm, wrote:
On Sep 14, 1:54*pm, wrote: On Sep 13, 4:01*pm, Curly Surmudgeon wrote: On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 07:07:16 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote: On Sep 12, 5:58*pm, Curly Surmudgeon wrote: On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 14:24:30 -0700, Roy Blankenship wrote: "greylock" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 14:16:05 -0500, "Rob Fraser" FraserRacing"AT"RobFraser.Net wrote: Well this is cruel but true- If the Republicans do win, She has a kid who is retarded so there will technically still be a retard in the White House. *Does the Vice-President live in the White House in your world? How interesting !!! And I wouldn't call it cruel - I'd call it - and you - *assinine. All the bull**** the neocons have thrown out? Give it a rest. McCain won't finish his term, and then she WILL be in the White House. Palin is another bible-thumping crazymother****er (yeah, I know that's redundant) that risks our civli liberties. At least what is left of them. -- Regards, Curly Curly, Roy is saying Sarah Palin will be president and you give us Quayle and Cheney??? Where is your cognitive disconnect? * I have none, but thanks for asking. Cheney and Quayle were Vice Presidents of the United States, no? * Correct. Cheney and Quayle were one heartbeat away from the Presidency, no? * Correct. Cheney and Quayle were horrid examples of what "might have been" if they had ascended the throne, no? No/Yes. *I'd have preferred Cheney as president. *I don't think about Quayle much. And you have changed the parameters of the above dialog. *Neither Quayle nor Cheney were president nor occupied the White House. Why doesn't the little squirrel reply? How does that differ in kind, not detail, from Sarah Palin ascending to the Presidency when/if McCain is elected and dies? Perhaps you want her "creature" billeted at the White House kennel? Do you ever read what it is you are replying to, or do you just unroll the dem talking points scroll and start posting? "Phoney Outrage" is the term, you make **** up to get your panties in a bunch. *Follow the logic, even though that appears difficult in your case. My underwear are just fine. *As a matter of fact I just got some of those new Hanes that are quite comfy. *They're probably not available in Argentina yet. Neither Quayle nor Cheney have become president. *And Hillary was more of a VP than Algore. Nor has Sarah Palin "become" president. * Correct. *Curly: *"Dan Quayle and Dick Cheney have proven the dangers of electing an administration with a terrible 2nd in command." So how does Cheney and Quayle having NOT been president PROVEN your perceived danger? Why doesn't the little squirrel reply? Perhaps parallel thinking is difficult for you but not the rest of us. I'm not the one saying that something that didn't happen is PROOF that Sarah Palin is unfit to be president. *You are. So why doesn't the little squirrel address his failed logic? Everyone knows he is so much smarter than me so it should be a simple matter for him to use "honest dialog" to dispatch me. Where are you, little squirrel??? Where Oh where has my little squirrel gone, Oh where oh where can he be? |
Our economy...
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 00:13:48 -0700, Curly Surmudgeon
wrote: On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 01:16:20 -0400, Bob Brock wrote: On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 21:55:08 -0700, Gunner Asch wrote: On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 15:48:47 -0700, "Roy Blankenship" wrote: "Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message news:csadnZztGfh6kknVnZ2dnUVZ_gWdnZ2d@earthlin k.com... john wrote: Bob Brock wrote: On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 08:19:51 -0700, Gunner wrote: On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:40:14 -0400, john wrote: Gunner wrote: On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 20:34:55 -0400, john wrote: Gasoline is selling for three times what it was when Bush presumed office. Gasoline is going down, does he get credit for that too? Gummer apparently hasn't bought any gasoline in the past week or so. Odd...Last week it was $3.71, at the end of the week, it was $3.65, this morning I filled up at $3.59 Doesnt seem like much of a rise, least not on this planet You aint seen nuffing yet. Yet the claim was the price of fuel has skyrocketed in the last month, when its easily demonstrated its been falling. Sounds like the claiment is an outright liar, no? Gunner No. Gasoline has gone from 3.59 to 4.09 in the past two weeks here. Sounds like you think that your little corner of the world is the whole world. It went from $4.07 to $3.56 around here in North Central Florida. North Central Florida. That explains your other dumbass post. "Your little corner" exquisite..... You're the one who claims to live in a small desert town. Didn't he claim to have plonked you, too? Several times. Here lately, he's been piggybacking on replies to my posts claiming not to be able to see the answers. |
I'm voting republican because...
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 07:37:56 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote:
On Sep 15, 1:13Â*am, Curly Surmudgeon wrote: On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 21:46:24 -0700, Calif Bill wrote: "Curly Surmudgeon" wrote in message ... On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 19:24:13 -0500, Jerry wrote: "John R. Carroll" wrote in message ... Cheney and Quayle weren't in line behind a guy that is likely to be undergoing chemo during the first few month's after an election. Palin is. Good, then we get to watch her on TV for the next eight years, instead of some liberal boner shrinker. Do you really look forward to putting the United States in the hands of a housewife without foreign exposure? Â*Sarah Palin who began her campaign with lies and misrepresentations, someone without a shred of strategic or tactical experience, speaks no other languages, no military experience, and wants to burn library books based upon her religion? You evaded this question. Are you really postulating that Sarah Palin, who thinks God commanded the Iraq and Afghanistani wars, is qualified to run America in its current condition? You evaded this question. Or are you a pacifist troll trying to tweak noses? You evaded this question. -- Regards, Curly ---------------------------------------------------------------------------Â*--- Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â*I Love Republicans, They Taste Just Like Chickenhawks ---------------------------------------------------------------------------Â*--- .................................................. .............. Â* Â* * Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* athttp://www.TitanNews.com -=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=- She is the Veep. No, she's not. Why do you say Sarah Palin is the Vice President of the United States? What foreign experience does Obama have? Irrelevant in the Sara Palin context. Â*Of all the highly qualified people McCain could have had for the position he chose a right-wing wacko who thinks God commanded these wars, that library material must be censored, and that the earth was created 4,000 years ago. That is a very bad choice for John McCain and unacceptable for America. Not a lot from his few days he has showed up in the Senate. Â*Being the most liberal legislator is enough to give the shivers to anybody who works for a living. Do not expect me to defend Barak Obama, ask someone who will vote for him. Instead of trying to detour the thread, why not stay on topic? How much of your wages are you going to contribute to his social programs? None, but that, too, is irrelevant to the qualifications, or lack of, of Sarah Palin. You asked for a cite, little squirrel, and here it is. What are you babbling about now? I "asked for a cite"? Where do you see a request in this thread? You've evaded the rebuttal to your mistruths and now fabricate nonsense to what end? Man, you're raising insanity to a new level... How much do you want to mortgage your children and grandchildrens earnings? That implies that Obama/Biden are worse than McCain/Palin. Â*I will get into that useless, futile, arguement. Â*Instead I will vote for a good candidate not a pawn of others. Any other gymnastics to avoid substantive discourse on the thread? -- Regards, Curly ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Bush Doctrine: Privatize Profits, Socialize Losses ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ .................................................. ............... Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access at http://www.TitanNews.com -=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=- |
Our economy...
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 11:09:42 -0400, Bob Brock wrote:
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 00:13:48 -0700, Curly Surmudgeon wrote: On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 01:16:20 -0400, Bob Brock wrote: On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 21:55:08 -0700, Gunner Asch wrote: On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 15:48:47 -0700, "Roy Blankenship" wrote: "Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message news:csadnZztGfh6kknVnZ2dnUVZ_gWdnZ2d@earthli nk.com... john wrote: Bob Brock wrote: On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 08:19:51 -0700, Gunner wrote: On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:40:14 -0400, john wrote: Gunner wrote: On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 20:34:55 -0400, john wrote: Gasoline is selling for three times what it was when Bush presumed office. Gasoline is going down, does he get credit for that too? Gummer apparently hasn't bought any gasoline in the past week or so. Odd...Last week it was $3.71, at the end of the week, it was $3.65, this morning I filled up at $3.59 Doesnt seem like much of a rise, least not on this planet You aint seen nuffing yet. Yet the claim was the price of fuel has skyrocketed in the last month, when its easily demonstrated its been falling. Sounds like the claiment is an outright liar, no? Gunner No. Gasoline has gone from 3.59 to 4.09 in the past two weeks here. Sounds like you think that your little corner of the world is the whole world. It went from $4.07 to $3.56 around here in North Central Florida. North Central Florida. That explains your other dumbass post. "Your little corner" exquisite..... You're the one who claims to live in a small desert town. Didn't he claim to have plonked you, too? Several times. Here lately, he's been piggybacking on replies to my posts claiming not to be able to see the answers. Yeah, I noticed that he did that to me also until a couple of days ago and he slipped responding directly. Bizarre that we have so many pathologoical liars here for many of their lies are completely unnecessary. It's gotten to the point that after visiting misc.survivalism I have to wash my hands... -- Regards, Curly ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Bush Doctrine: Privatize Profits, Socialize Losses ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ .................................................. ............... Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access at http://www.TitanNews.com -=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=- |
Curly admits he doesn't or won't apy taxes... I'm votingrepublican because...
On Sep 21, 1:32*pm, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 07:37:56 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote: On Sep 15, 1:13Â*am, Curly Surmudgeon wrote: How much of your wages are you going to contribute to his social programs? None, but that, too, is irrelevant to the qualifications, or lack of, of Sarah Palin. You asked for a cite, little squirrel, and here it is. What are you babbling about now? *I "asked for a cite"? *Where do you see a request in this thread? This is the cite you've asked for. If you don't remember when or where you asked for such a cite, that's your problem. Anyway, good luck with your tax evasion program. |
Another lie from HH&C
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 11:15:36 -0700, almostcutmyhairtoday wrote:
On Sep 21, 1:32*pm, Curly Surmudgeon wrote: On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 07:37:56 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote: On Sep 15, 1:13Â*am, Curly Surmudgeon wrote: How much of your wages are you going to contribute to his social programs? None, but that, too, is irrelevant to the qualifications, or lack of, of Sarah Palin. You asked for a cite, little squirrel, and here it is. What are you babbling about now? *I "asked for a cite"? *Where do you see a request in this thread? This is the cite you've asked for. If you don't remember when or where you asked for such a cite, that's your problem. You're making **** up again, just like your twisted subject line. Anyway, good luck with your tax evasion program. You are a pathological liar: "From Andrea Broadbent "The Truth about Truman": To begin, the definition of pathological actually means abnormal or grossly atypical. Therefore, a pathological liar prevaricates more frequently than the average person or tells more abnormal lies. In most cases, pathological liars tell lies that are "unplanned and impulsive" (Hausman). These lies are usually very emotional stories that tend to serve no purpose except to impress people (Ford 133). As of now, psychiatrists are unsure whether or not pathological liars are fully capable of realizing if and when they are lying, so detecting whether or not a person is a pathological liar is a very difficult task (Hausman). By looking at the list of conditions commonly connected with people considered to be pathological liars, psychiatrists are better able to determine whether or not a person might actually have the disorder. Some main qualities linked with pathological liars include dysfunctional family origin, family lying patterns, anomalies of sexual life, frequent substance abuse, and a great capacity for language." -- Regards, Curly ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Bush Doctrine: Privatize Profits, Socialize Losses ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ .................................................. ............... Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access at http://www.TitanNews.com -=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=- |
I'm voting republican because...
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 13:29:07 -0400, Cliff wrote:
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 07:50:14 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Sep 20, 7:24*am, Cliff wrote: On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 19:58:38 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Sep 15, 11:16*am, Curly Surmudgeon wrote: On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 03:41:14 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote: Do you really look forward to putting the United States in the hands of a housewife without foreign exposure? * Better than putting it in the hands of a foreigner. Another lie, irrelevant, and the old "lesser of two evils" argument that got us in this mess to begin with. Clinton was not the lesser of two evils, he was the "I voted for an independant and we got a liberal." * Clinton was a moderate conservative. -- Cliff Cliffie is nuts. Stay away from squirrelly... he's nutless. Clinton was a moderate conservative. Why did you think he got elected? Twice? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Clinton [ His policies, on issues such as the North American Free Trade Agreement and welfare reform, have been described as "centrist." Clinton presided over the longest period of peace-time economic expansion in American history, which included a balanced budget and a reported federal surplus. Based on Congressional accounting rules, at the end of his presidency Clinton reported a surplus of $559 billion. ] [ Clinton left office with an approval rating at 65%, the highest end of office rating of any President since World War II. ] That's why the Wackos want to disparage him, he was an economic success that violated some of their deeply held precepts. To admit Slick Willies success would undermine their delusions. Sometimes we have to admit that our opinions were wrong. I don't like Clinton but he did a good job on the economy. -- Regards, Curly ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Bush Doctrine: Privatize Profits, Socialize Losses ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ .................................................. ............... Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access at http://www.TitanNews.com -=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=- |
Another lie from HH&C
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 13:37:42 -0700, Curly Surmudgeon
wrote: "From Andrea Broadbent "The Truth about Truman": Some main qualities linked with pathological liars include dysfunctional family origin, family lying patterns, anomalies of sexual life, frequent substance abuse, and a great capacity for language." Wow. -- John H. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:24 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com