On Sep 15, 6:32*am, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 07:19:28 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:
Rigid or non-rigid?

Non-rigid by definition. rigid by application.

The fun part of the whole exercise were the spherical harmonic maps
which once they were plotted, were quite beautiful and almost three
dimensional - which, oddly, would have taken them out of two space and
into three space which was not a result I expected, but it happened.

Three and a half years, 25 hours a week, tons of calculations, graphs,
formings and misformings, draft graphics, proofing, printing and
presentations.

Was it worth it? *Yes because it was interesting and frankly, my one
and only single talent that I don't honestly have to work at -
nonsense came naturally to me - idiot savant like if you will (yes, I
said it). *:)

What's even funnier is the fact that I haven't a clue what you are talking
about ...

Which part - the spherical harmonic maps or the fact that I'm an
idiot? *:)

If you are the latter, yo can understand the former...