Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 17:14:43 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message ... "Calif Bill" wrote in message m... Just because you have a Phd does not mean you get lifetime employment. Well except at a University. Most PhD's that I know should have never left the University. (whoops .... hope ShortWave isn't lurking) Eisboch Isn't PhD, Piled Higher and Deeper? There is a little secret which I will share with you and only you. It's called "quote early and quote often". First, you look through the papers of the review committee's, and the chairman's, papers, books, dissertations and monographs for anything that even remotely touches on the subject matter for your thesis. And by remotely, I mean even if you have to make it up remotely. Then, in your introduction, you make sure you thank, with foot notes to papers, books, dissertations and monographs (including the chairman of your department if he isn't serving on the committee) for clarifying, elucidating and in general assisting you in the preparation of your thesis and dissertation. In the body of the dissertation, footnote the hell out of it only make sure you quote one of the review committee members - the rest must be real books, papers, dissertations and monographs but if doesn't matter as long as you use something from everybody on the committee. Make one page entirely for footnotes for the preceding page and do that every ten or so pages following the above procedure. Use graphs, obscure types of data sets and lots and lots of color - distracts from the fact that most of what you are writing is pure page filler. If it's not a hard science paper, then use flow charts and pictographs. In concluding, make it really short and simple with plenty of praise for the pioneering back ground work, blah, blah, blah. And that's how you write a successful dissertation. :) Why, you might ask, does it work? Pretty simple actually - the morons on the committee will only look for their due credit and will look through the bibliography and footnote annotation for references to their work. They can't very well discredit their own achievement can they? :) And before you ask, no - I did not. Hmmmm, my MSEE was muuuuch easier. 80 |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Are you a Democrat, Republican or Southern Republican? | General | |||
Done voting | General | |||
OT More Republican voting tactics | General | |||
Democrat, Republican or Southern Republican? | ASA |