On Fri, 5 Sep 2008 21:45:30 -0700, "CalifBill"
wrote:


"D.Duck" wrote in message
m...

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 5 Sep 2008 15:37:30 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

Sarah Palin's husband recently offered up these quips during his first
exposure to the national media.

He has a sense of humor himself .....

"Is it me, or do things move very quickly around here?"

and,

"If I had a crystal ball a couple of years ago, I might have asked a few
more questions when Sarah decided to join the PTA."


and,

"When my wife starts talking about reform, corruption and making the
government work for the people ..... it's just best to get out of the
way."


Pretty cool dude, and no pansy, that's for sure.

http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/up/play...26716&src=news

I like the whole family - seems like the quintessential American
experience with all it's warts and flaws.

Real life lived by real people.

Sure, but they were did a lousy job of parenting by letting their daughter
get pregnant. Shame on them. NOT.


Do we blame Harry's parents for him?


The party of "Family Values" sure had a field day a few months ago,
when 17 year old Jamie Lynn Spears got pregnant. It was absolutely
blamed on the parents doing a very poor job. They got called all sorts
of nasty names. Jamie Lynn Spears is keeping her baby, too.

Now all of a sudden, the parents of Bristol the slut are being praised
for standing by their tramp, and being such wonderful parents. Can't
have it both ways, folks. You already said that 17 year olds having
babies out of wedlock was a sign of moral decay. Not something to
applaud. Most of the advice from the right was that the Spears should
stay out of the lime light, guard their daughters privacy, and tend to
being better parents. Where is that advice for the Palins? What's
different?

And then there was Dan Quayles famous speech casitgating the fictional
character "Murphy Brown" for being pregnant out of wedlock. If he had
ever realized that Mickey and Minnie were "shacking up" there would
have been hell to pay.

wrote:
On Fri, 5 Sep 2008 21:45:30 -0700, "CalifBill"
wrote:

"D.Duck" wrote in message
...
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...


The party of "Family Values" sure had a field day a few months ago,
when 17 year old Jamie Lynn Spears got pregnant. It was absolutely
blamed on the parents doing a very poor job. They got called all sorts
of nasty names. Jamie Lynn Spears is keeping her baby, too.

Now all of a sudden, the parents of Bristol the slut are being praised
for standing by their tramp, and being such wonderful parents. Can't
have it both ways, folks. You already said that 17 year olds having
babies out of wedlock was a sign of moral decay. Not something to
applaud. Most of the advice from the right was that the Spears should
stay out of the lime light, guard their daughters privacy, and tend to
being better parents. Where is that advice for the Palins? What's
different?

And then there was Dan Quayles famous speech casitgating the fictional
character "Murphy Brown" for being pregnant out of wedlock. If he had
ever realized that Mickey and Minnie were "shacking up" there would
have been hell to pay.



There's nothing impressive about pumping out babies one right after
another, as in the case of Sarah Palin, or starting too early, as in the
case of Bristol Palin or Jamie Lynn Spears.

I wonder whether the next eldest Palin daughter will ask her girlfriends
about contraceptives or just decide it is "cool" to get pregnant.

hk wrote:


There's nothing impressive about pumping out babies one right after
another, as in the case of Sarah Palin, or starting too early, as in the
case of Bristol Palin or Jamie Lynn Spears.

I wonder whether the next eldest Palin daughter will ask her girlfriends
about contraceptives or just decide it is "cool" to get pregnant.

Harry,
How many children is an acceptable number for you? Maybe we should
insist that no one can have more than X (we'll allow you to fill in the
number) and than anymore than X we can abort.

Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P.
Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. wrote:
hk wrote:


There's nothing impressive about pumping out babies one right after
another, as in the case of Sarah Palin, or starting too early, as in
the case of Bristol Palin or Jamie Lynn Spears.

I wonder whether the next eldest Palin daughter will ask her
girlfriends about contraceptives or just decide it is "cool" to get
pregnant.

Harry,
How many children is an acceptable number for you? Maybe we should
insist that no one can have more than X (we'll allow you to fill in the
number) and than anymore than X we can abort.

I guess the couple that lives next door to me should have asked Harry if
it was okay to have 8 kids.

BAR wrote:
Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P.
Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. wrote:
hk wrote:


There's nothing impressive about pumping out babies one right after
another, as in the case of Sarah Palin, or starting too early, as in
the case of Bristol Palin or Jamie Lynn Spears.

I wonder whether the next eldest Palin daughter will ask her
girlfriends about contraceptives or just decide it is "cool" to get
pregnant.

Harry,
How many children is an acceptable number for you? Maybe we should
insist that no one can have more than X (we'll allow you to fill in
the number) and than anymore than X we can abort.

I guess the couple that lives next door to me should have asked Harry if
it was okay to have 8 kids.

They should have and it is not OK. Tell them to pick out their favorite
2, and a truck will be by tomorrow to pick up the rest.

On Sat, 06 Sep 2008 16:22:11 -0400, BAR wrote:

Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P.
Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. wrote:
hk wrote:


There's nothing impressive about pumping out babies one right after
another, as in the case of Sarah Palin, or starting too early, as in
the case of Bristol Palin or Jamie Lynn Spears.

I wonder whether the next eldest Palin daughter will ask her
girlfriends about contraceptives or just decide it is "cool" to get
pregnant.

Harry,
How many children is an acceptable number for you? Maybe we should
insist that no one can have more than X (we'll allow you to fill in the
number) and than anymore than X we can abort.

I guess the couple that lives next door to me should have asked Harry if
it was okay to have 8 kids.

Well, they certainly share Harry's narcissistic tendencies.

wrote:
On Sat, 06 Sep 2008 16:22:11 -0400, BAR wrote:

Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P.
Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. wrote:
hk wrote:

There's nothing impressive about pumping out babies one right after
another, as in the case of Sarah Palin, or starting too early, as in
the case of Bristol Palin or Jamie Lynn Spears.

I wonder whether the next eldest Palin daughter will ask her
girlfriends about contraceptives or just decide it is "cool" to get
pregnant.
Harry,
How many children is an acceptable number for you? Maybe we should
insist that no one can have more than X (we'll allow you to fill in the
number) and than anymore than X we can abort.
I guess the couple that lives next door to me should have asked Harry if
it was okay to have 8 kids.

Well, they certainly share Harry's narcissistic tendencies.


"Tendencies"? No, it's pure narcissism.

On Sep 6, 3:22*pm, BAR wrote:
Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P.
Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. wrote:

hk wrote:

There's nothing impressive about pumping out babies one right after
another, as in the case of Sarah Palin, or starting too early, as in
the case of Bristol Palin or Jamie Lynn Spears.

I wonder whether the next eldest Palin daughter will ask her
girlfriends about contraceptives or just decide it is "cool" to get
pregnant.

Harry,
How many children is an acceptable number for you? *Maybe we should
insist that no one can have more than X (we'll allow you to fill in the
number) and than anymore than X we can abort.

I guess the couple that lives next door to me should have asked Harry if
it was okay to have 8 kids.

I'm not sure, but I think that 8 is the maximum that IL Welfare pays
for.